Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 67 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 31 | 41 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 53 | 69 | 91 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 77 | 101 | 133 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Thief, with the data showing a clear transition from CPU-bound territory at 1080p to a firmly GPU-limited state at 4K. The measured frame rates reveal that this combo is best suited for 1440p gaming, where it maintains solid performance across all settings presets.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across every settings preset, indicating that the Intel Arc B570 becomes the primary bottleneck as pixel count rises. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 133 FPS at 1920x1080 to 91 FPS at 2560x1440, then plummets to 54 FPS at 3840x2160. That represents a 59% reduction from 1080p to 4K, a dramatic scaling curve that points to the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute resources being overwhelmed at higher resolutions.
The Medium preset tells a similar story, with averages of 101 FPS at 1080p, 69 FPS at 1440p, and 41 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1440p and 4K here is 28 FPS, while the gap between 1080p and 1440p is 32 FPS — fairly even scaling that suggests the GPU is the limiting factor across the board once settings are raised. At High settings, the pattern repeats: 77 FPS at 1080p, 53 FPS at 1440p, and 31 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset delivers 73 FPS, 50 FPS, and 29 FPS respectively, showing that the most demanding settings compress the resolution scaling somewhat because the GPU is already saturated even at 1080p.
The data indicates that the Ryzen 7 7700 has ample headroom at 1080p. The jump from 73 FPS at Ultra to 133 FPS at Low — an 82% increase — suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor even at the highest preset. However, at 4K, the spread narrows dramatically: from 29 FPS at Ultra to 54 FPS at Low, a mere 86% improvement compared to the 1080p spread. This compression confirms that the Arc B570 is the dominant constraint at 4K, and that the CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads are more than sufficient for this 2014 title.
Notably, the 4K Medium preset is the only row in the entire dataset with min/max FPS values recorded (35 to 47). This suggests that the combination of 4K resolution and medium settings produces the most variable frame pacing, likely due to the GPU working near its limits while the CPU still has headroom to feed frames.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570’s specifications directly explain the observed scaling behavior. With 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the card has enough memory capacity for Thief at any resolution, but the bandwidth becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases. The 2500 MHz base and boost clocks are identical, indicating a fixed clock profile that doesn’t offer dynamic headroom to compensate for increased load.
The GPU’s 2304 shading units and 80 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s. These figures explain why the card handles 1080p and 1440p well but struggles at 4K — the fill rate is adequate for lower pixel counts but insufficient for the 8.3 million pixels of 3840x2160. The 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is respectable for a mid-range card, but Thief’s lighting and shadow effects appear to be heavily dependent on raw pixel throughput rather than compute shaders.
The Arc B570’s 18 ray tracing cores are present, but Thief from 2014 does not use ray-traced effects, so those cores sit idle. The memory configuration is more relevant: 10 GB at 19 Gbps effective speed is generous for this game, and the fact that 4K Ultra still delivers 29 FPS suggests the card isn’t hitting a capacity wall but rather a bandwidth wall. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth to the CPU, and given that the Ryzen 7 7700 supports PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, the link is not a bottleneck.
The GPU’s benchmark profile places it in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750, scores 20582 (a deltaPct of -0.1%), indicating that the B570 is essentially a performance twin of its predecessor. This context suggests that the 4K performance observed here is typical for this class of GPU, and users expecting higher frame rates at 4K would need to look at significantly more powerful cards.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this pairing of the Ryzen 7 7700 and Arc B570 ranks 2296 out of 2851 combos for Thief. That places it in the bottom 20% of all tested systems, which is a surprisingly low ranking given the individual components’ mid-range to high-end positioning. The Ryzen 7 7700 itself sits in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile among GPUs, yet their combination in this specific game underperforms relative to other pairings.
The low combo rank likely reflects the fact that Thief is an older title that responds poorly to this particular hardware combination. The game’s release in 2014 predates the Arc architecture by over a decade, and driver optimization for legacy DirectX 11 titles has historically been a challenge for Intel’s discrete GPUs. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 118 for the Arc B570, compared to 164 for DirectX 9 and 72 for DirectX 12, suggests that the card’s DX11 performance is middling, which directly impacts Thief since it relies on that API.
The CPU’s nearest rivals — the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Intel Core 5 221E, AMD Ryzen 9 270, and Intel Core i9-13905H — all have average benchmark scores within 0.6% of the Ryzen 7 7700, confirming that the CPU is not the weak link in this combo. The GPU’s nearest rivals, including the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750, have virtually identical average scores (within 0.5%), meaning the GPU is also performing as expected in general benchmarks. The poor combo ranking must therefore stem from game-specific driver or architecture interactions rather than raw component capability.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers strong performance across all presets. The Low preset averages 133 FPS, providing a buttery-smooth experience well beyond the 60 FPS threshold. Medium averages 101 FPS with a min of 86 and max of 116, showing tight frame pacing. High averages 77 FPS, and Ultra averages 73 FPS, both comfortably playable. The 4 FPS difference between High and Ultra at 1080p suggests diminishing returns from the highest preset.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains respectable. Low averages 91 FPS, Medium averages 69 FPS with a min of 59 and max of 79, High averages 53 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The 1440p Medium results are particularly interesting — the 59 FPS minimum stays just above the 60 FPS target, but the average of 69 FPS indicates occasional dips below that threshold. At High and Ultra, the averages of 53 and 50 FPS respectively are playable but not ideal for competitive play.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles. Low averages 54 FPS, Medium averages 41 FPS with a min of 35 and max of 47, High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. Only the Low preset achieves above 50 FPS, and even that is borderline. The 12 FPS difference between Low and Medium at 4K, compared to the 32 FPS difference at 1080p, highlights how the GPU becomes the sole bottleneck at higher resolutions. The Ultra preset’s 29 FPS is technically playable for a stealth game but far from ideal.
The data shows that the 1440p Medium setting is the sweet spot for this combo: 69 FPS average with a 59 FPS minimum. This provides the best balance of visual quality and smoothness, as the 4K Medium preset’s 41 FPS average is too low for consistent gameplay, and the 1080p Ultra preset, while faster at 73 FPS, doesn’t offer enough visual improvement over 1440p Medium to justify the resolution downgrade.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?*
A: The data shows 2560x1440 is the optimal resolution. At Medium settings, the combo achieves 69 FPS average with a 59 FPS minimum, which is the highest resolution that maintains a consistent 60 FPS floor. The 1920x1080 results are faster, but the visual downgrade is unnecessary when 1440p is this playable.
*Q: Can this combo handle 4K in Thief?*
A: Only at Low settings, where it averages 54 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 41 FPS, and High and Ultra fall to 31 and 29 FPS respectively. For a stealth game where frame rate consistency matters, only the Low preset at 4K is viable.
Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K?
A: At Low settings, 1080p averages 133 FPS versus 54 FPS at 4K — a 79 FPS difference. At Ultra settings, the gap narrows to 44 FPS (73 vs 29), showing that the GPU is saturated at 4K regardless of preset.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700 or the Arc B570 the bottleneck?
A: The GPU is clearly the bottleneck at 1440p and 4K. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample power, as evidenced by the 82% FPS increase from Ultra to Low at 1080p. At 4K, this spread compresses to just 86%, confirming the GPU limits performance.
Q: How does this combo compare to the Arc A750?
A: The Arc B570 and Arc A750 have nearly identical average benchmark scores (20556 vs 20582, a deltaPct of -0.1%). In Thief, the B570’s performance is representative of this class of GPU, with 4K performance below 60 FPS at all presets.
Q: What are the minimum FPS values for this combo?
A: Only the Medium preset has min/max data recorded. At 1080p, the min is 86 FPS and max is 116 FPS. At 1440p, the min is 59 FPS and max is 79 FPS. At 4K, the min is 35 FPS and max is 47 FPS.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data supports a clear hierarchy of settings for this combo. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 69 FPS average with a 59 FPS minimum, making it the best overall choice for a smooth experience without sacrificing too much visual fidelity. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 16 FPS (69 to 53), which is a significant drop for marginal visual gains in a 2014 title.
For users prioritizing maximum visual quality, the 1080p Ultra preset at 73 FPS is the best option. It performs only 4 FPS slower than 1080p High (77 FPS), so the extra quality is essentially free. However, the 1080p Medium preset at 101 FPS is the best choice for high refresh rate displays, as it stays well above 100 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS.
The 4K resolution is only viable at Low settings, where the combo averages 54 FPS. This is playable for a stealth game but not ideal. The 4K Medium preset’s 41 FPS average and 35 FPS minimum will feel stuttery, and the High and Ultra presets at 31 and 29 FPS respectively are best avoided.
For the optimal balance of resolution, settings, and frame rate, the 1440p Medium preset is the recommended configuration. It provides a 69 FPS average, a 59 FPS minimum, and the visual benefits of 1440p over 1080p. Users with 60 Hz displays will find this perfectly smooth, while those with 144 Hz monitors can drop to 1080p Medium for 101 FPS or 1080p Low for 133 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700 + Intel Arc B570 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 31.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 53.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 133.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 101.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 73.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 7 7700 + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700 + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.