Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
99
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 99 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 53 56 73 97
1440p QHD 91 95 110 121
1080p Full HD 111 113 124 138

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 97
3840x2160 Medium 73
3840x2160 High 56
3840x2160 Ultra 53
2560x1440 Low 121
2560x1440 Medium 110
2560x1440 High 95
2560x1440 Ultra 91
1920x1080 Low 138
1920x1080 Medium 124
1920x1080 High 113
1920x1080 Ultra 111

Thief with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination delivers a robust performance profile in Thief, a 2014 stealth title. The data shows a pairing that scales predictably across resolutions and settings, with the CPU providing a stable foundation and the GPU driving frame rates that range from highly playable at 4K to exceptionally smooth at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes the hardware's role, and provides actionable settings guidance based solely on the provided benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, and its 65 W TDP classifies it as a mainstream desktop part. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth are typical for this segment. In the context of Thief, a title from 2014, the CPU's role is primarily to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic without becoming a bottleneck.

Benchmark results for the CPU place its average score at 36945, with a percentile ranking of 85 compared to all CPUs. This indicates the 5600F sits comfortably in the upper tier of processors. Its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark score include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (avg score 36938, delta 0%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (avg score 37018, delta -0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (avg score 37093, delta -0.4%). The 5600F's performance is essentially tied with these parts, with a delta of 0.2% or less separating them. In a game like Thief, which is not known for extreme multi-core demands, the 6-core/12-thread configuration is more than sufficient. The single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 in Passmark tests suggest strong per-core performance, which is often more critical for frame pacing in older titles.

The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. The measured FPS at 1080p with Low settings reaches 138 FPS, which is a high frame rate that a less capable CPU might struggle to sustain. The fact that the frame rates scale down as resolution increases (from 138 FPS at 1080p Low to 97 FPS at 4K Low) points to the GPU becoming the primary constraint as pixel count rises. The 5600F's 4.00 GHz boost clock provides the headroom needed to keep up with the GPU's output, and its 85th percentile ranking confirms it is a capable partner for the Radeon RX 9070 in this specific workload.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this pairing, built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip on a 4 nm process. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. The GPU's clocks are listed as a base of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. With 3584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 128 ROPs, the RX 9070 is a high-end graphics card. Its 220 W TDP and dual-slot design are typical for this performance class.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23877, with a percentile ranking of 69 against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in aggregate score are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (avg score 23736, delta 0.6%), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (avg score 24063, delta -0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile (avg score 23628, delta 1.1%). The RX 9070's performance is closely clustered with these parts, with deltas of just over 1% in either direction. In Thief, the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is more than ample for the game's textures and geometry, even at 4K Ultra settings. The high memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming is not an issue.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU's strength. At 4K High, the combo produces 56 FPS, which is playable, but dropping to Low settings at the same resolution yields 97 FPS, a substantial 73% performance increase. This suggests that the GPU is heavily utilized and that adjusting settings has a significant impact on frame rate. The GPU's boost clock of 2520 MHz is high, but the data indicates that the card is not always running at its maximum potential, as frame rates scale so dramatically with settings changes. The RX 9070 is the clear driver of performance in this system, with the CPU providing ample support.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

Within the database of tested combinations for Thief, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 achieves a rank of 1134 out of 2851 total combos. This placement in the 40th percentile of all tested systems indicates that while this is a strong performer, there are many other combinations that deliver higher frame rates. The rank is a composite measure, likely weighing performance across all tested resolutions and settings.

The fact that this combo ranks near the middle of the pack is interesting given the individual components' strong benchmark scores. The CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 69th percentile might suggest a higher overall rank, but the game's age and the high frame rates achieved by many other combos in the database likely compress the ranking. For example, a combo with a more powerful CPU or GPU would naturally score higher. The rank of 1134 specifically indicates that this system is capable of running Thief very well, but it is not at the absolute top end of the database. The data shows that the combo is well-balanced, with neither component dragging the other down, but the overall score is limited by the fact that many other systems in the database have more powerful hardware. The 2851 total combos provide a broad field, and this pairing's position suggests it offers a solid, mid-to-high-tier experience for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance scaling. At 1080p, the combo achieves its highest frame rates. With Low settings, the average FPS is 138. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 124 FPS, with a minimum of 106 FPS and a maximum of 143 FPS. High settings yield 113 FPS on average, while Ultra settings produce 111 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is minimal, just 2 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset does not add a significant load at this resolution.

At 1440p, the frame rates remain high but show a more pronounced drop as settings increase. Low settings produce an average of 121 FPS. Medium settings average 110 FPS, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS. High settings average 95 FPS, and Ultra settings average 91 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 30 FPS, indicating that the GPU is starting to feel the pressure of higher pixel counts and more demanding settings.

At 4K, the performance decreases further, but the combo remains playable. Low settings average 97 FPS. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 FPS and a maximum of 84 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS, and Ultra settings average 53 FPS. The 4K results show a clear distinction between settings, with a 44 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. The minimum FPS of 62 at 4K Medium indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays above the generally accepted playability threshold of 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a high refresh rate experience?

A: At 1080p, the combo easily exceeds 100 FPS on all settings, with Low settings reaching 138 FPS and Ultra hitting 111 FPS. For a 144Hz monitor, 1080p is the target resolution, as even 1440p Low settings only reach 121 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Thief?

A: Yes, it is playable. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 56, and at 4K Ultra, it drops to 53. For a smoother experience, 4K Medium provides an average of 73 FPS, which is a better balance.

Q: How much performance is gained by dropping from Ultra to Low settings?

A: The gain is significant, especially at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference is 27 FPS (from 111 to 138). At 1440p, the difference is 30 FPS (from 91 to 121). At 4K, the difference is 44 FPS (from 53 to 97), showing that settings have a larger impact at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combination?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiter. The frame rates drop consistently as resolution increases (e.g., from 138 FPS at 1080p Low to 97 FPS at 4K Low), which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's strong benchmark scores and the high frame rates at 1080p indicate it is not bottlenecking.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its nearest rival in aggregate benchmark score?

A: The RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, has a score of 23736, making the RX 9070 0.6% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6800S has a score of 24063, which is 0.8% faster than the RX 9070.

Q: What is the frame rate consistency like at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The data shows an average FPS of 110, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS. The minimum frame rate is well above 60 FPS, indicating smooth performance with no major stutters or drops.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal balance of performance and visual quality is achieved with the Medium preset at 4K resolutions. At 4K Medium, the combo produces an average of 73 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the minimum FPS of 62 confirms that the experience remains fluid even in demanding scenes. The jump from Medium to High at 4K results in a 17 FPS drop to 56 FPS, which is a significant loss for a marginal visual improvement in a game from 2014. For users with 4K displays, Medium is the recommended starting point.

For 1440p displays, the High preset is a better choice. It delivers an average of 95 FPS, which is a comfortable margin above 60 FPS and allows for a smooth experience with enhanced visual details. The Ultra preset at 1440p only drops to 91 FPS, so it is also a viable option for those who prioritize maximum visual fidelity. At 1080p, the Ultra preset is recommended, as it provides 111 FPS on average, which is high enough for most displays, and the 2 FPS difference between High and Ultra is negligible, meaning you can enable all settings without a meaningful performance penalty.

The data shows that the Low preset is unnecessary for this combo at any resolution except perhaps for competitive play at 1080p, where the 138 FPS average could be beneficial. However, the visual downgrade is significant, and the Medium or High presets offer a vastly better experience for the small frame rate cost. The Medium preset is the best all-around choice for 4K, while High or Ultra is preferred for lower resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the GPU-bound nature of this system. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 138 at 1080p to 121 at 1440p (a 12.3% decrease) and then to 97 at 4K (a 29.7% decrease from 1440p). This pattern is consistent across all settings. At Ultra settings, the average FPS drops from 111 at 1080p to 91 at 1440p (an 18% decrease) and then to 53 at 4K (a 41.8% decrease from 1440p). The larger percentage drop at 4K, especially on higher settings, indicates that the GPU's pixel throughput is the limiting factor.

The data shows that the scaling is not linear. The jump from 1440p to 4K (a 2.25x increase in pixel count) results in a more than proportional decrease in frame rate at higher settings. For example, at Ultra settings, the 20 FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, but the 38 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K is nearly double. This suggests that the RX 9070's compute and memory subsystems are being saturated at 4K with higher settings. The CPU's role in this scaling is minimal; the frame rate drops are almost entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load. The 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient, as there are no signs of texture swapping or memory-related stutters in the minimum FPS data. The conclusion from the scaling data is that the RX 9070 is a strong 1440p card that can handle 4K with adjustments, but the CPU provides more than enough headroom to support the GPU at all resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 97.0
3840x2160 Medium 73.0
3840x2160 High 56.0
3840x2160 Ultra 53.0
2560x1440 Low 121.0
2560x1440 Medium 110.0
2560x1440 High 95.0
2560x1440 Ultra 91.0
1920x1080 Low 138.0
1920x1080 Medium 124.0
1920x1080 High 113.0
1920x1080 Ultra 111.0

Thief with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RX 9070 + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + RX 9070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.