Doom

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination delivers a high-refresh-rate experience in Doom across all tested resolutions, with the data showing a clear scaling pattern from 1080p to 4K. The CPU’s six Zen 3 cores and twelve threads, running at a 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.00 GHz boost clock, provide ample processing headroom for a 2016-era id Tech engine title, while the RX 9070’s RDNA 4.0 architecture and 16 GB of GDDR6 memory ensure the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck only at higher settings and resolutions.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) for the AMD Socket AM4 platform. Its 7 nm process node and 65 W TDP make it a power-efficient choice, but the benchmark results in Doom show that its compute capabilities are more than sufficient for this game’s demands. With a PassMark single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236, the CPU ranks in the 85th percentile among all tested processors, indicating strong performance for both lightly-threaded and fully-threaded workloads.

In Doom, which is a fast-paced FPS that relies heavily on frame pacing and responsiveness, the CPU’s clock speeds are the most relevant factor. The 3.00 GHz base clock and 4.00 GHz boost clock allow the processor to maintain high instruction throughput during intense combat sequences, where the game’s AI and physics calculations can otherwise create bottlenecks. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is also beneficial here, as it reduces memory latency when the CPU needs to quickly access game state data, particularly when the GPU is feeding frames at rates exceeding 200 FPS.

The data shows that the CPU’s performance is not a limiting factor at any tested resolution. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 293 FPS average, which is a workload that would expose CPU limitations if the processor were weak. The fact that the GPU is still able to deliver such high frame rates indicates that the 5600F’s single-thread performance, as reflected in its PassMark singlethread score of 2872, is adequate for this engine. The nearest rivals for the 5600F, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D, have nearly identical average benchmark scores (36938 and 37018 respectively), with delta percentages within 0.2%, meaning the 5600F is positioned in a highly competitive mid-range segment.

However, the CPU does have theoretical limits that could surface in other scenarios. Its PassMark physics score of 1043 and integer math score of 59339 show moderate computational throughput, but Doom’s id Tech 6 engine is known for its efficient multi-threading, which means the 12 threads are likely being utilized effectively. The benchmark results confirm this, as there is no evidence of CPU-induced frame drops even at the highest frame rates measured, such as the 293 FPS average at 1080p Low. For a game released in 2016, the 5600F’s architecture provides more than enough headroom, and the data suggests that users can expect consistent performance without worrying about CPU bottlenecks in this title.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS numbers. Built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 48 chip on a 4 nm process, the GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. This memory configuration is crucial for Doom at high resolutions, as the game’s texture-heavy environments and particle effects can quickly consume VRAM, though the data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the card never runs out of memory headroom.

The GPU’s clock speeds are also telling. The base clock is 1330 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 2520 MHz, with a game clock of 2070 MHz that represents the typical sustained frequency during gameplay. This boost behavior is what allows the RX 9070 to scale from 62 FPS at 4K Ultra to 293 FPS at 1080p Low, a range that demonstrates the card’s ability to dynamically adjust its performance based on the workload. The 56 ray tracing cores and 3584 shading units provide the raw compute power, with an FP32 throughput of 36.13 TFLOPS, which is more than sufficient for a game that does not rely heavily on ray tracing.

The benchmark results place the RX 9070 in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23877. Its nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark database include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, with delta percentages of 0.6% and -0.8% respectively. This indicates that the RX 9070 is performing in line with expectations for its class, though the measured FPS in Doom suggest that the card is particularly well-suited to this specific engine, likely due to its high memory bandwidth and efficient rasterization pipeline.

The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is a key advantage in Doom, as the game’s Ultra preset can consume over 8 GB of memory at 4K resolution in other titles, but the data here shows that the RX 9070 never dips below 62 FPS average at 4K Ultra. This suggests that the memory subsystem is not a limiting factor, and the card’s 644.6 GB/s bandwidth allows it to stream textures efficiently. At 1080p, the GPU is clearly not the bottleneck, as the frame rates exceed 200 FPS across all settings, but at 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 62, which is still playable but shows that the GPU is being pushed to its limits. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface also ensures that data transfer between the CPU and GPU does not introduce latency, further enhancing performance in this fast-paced shooter.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance, and how does it affect Doom?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F has a PassMark single-thread score of 2872, which ranks it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs. In Doom, this single-thread performance is sufficient to drive frame rates up to 293 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in this game.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 9070 have, and is it enough for 4K gaming?

A: The RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. At 4K Ultra settings, the measured average FPS is 62, which demonstrates that the VRAM capacity is adequate for Doom’s highest preset, as the card maintains playable frame rates without memory-related stutters.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of performance and visual quality?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 High settings achieve 141 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay while still offering improved visual fidelity over 1080p. This represents a sweet spot for this combo, as 1080p Ultra hits 178 FPS but 1440p Ultra drops to 115 FPS.

Q: How does the RX 9070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23877, which is 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 1.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile. It is 0.8% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, showing that it sits in a competitive mid-range GPU segment.

Q: Is the CPU’s boost clock of 4.00 GHz sufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: Yes, the 4.00 GHz boost clock, combined with 12 threads, allows the CPU to keep up with the GPU’s frame output. At 1080p Medium, the combo achieves 258 FPS average, and at 1440p High it reaches 141 FPS, confirming that the CPU can sustain high instruction throughput without becoming a bottleneck.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking among all tested system configurations?

A: This CPU-GPU combination ranks 858th out of 2930 tested combos in Doom, placing it in the top 30% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the balanced performance of the 5600F and RX 9070, which together deliver high frame rates across all tested resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The Ryzen 5 5600F and RX 9070 combination achieves a rank of 858 out of 2930 tested combos in Doom, placing it in the upper 29.3% of all configurations in the database. This ranking is notable because it shows that this mid-range CPU paired with an upper-mid-range GPU can outperform many higher-end combos that may be less balanced. The data indicates that the combo’s performance is heavily influenced by the GPU, as the RX 9070’s 16 GB of VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth provide the necessary resources for high-resolution gaming, while the CPU’s 85th percentile ranking ensures it does not drag down the overall score.

When compared to other combos in the database, this configuration’s rank of 858 suggests that it is well-suited for 1440p high-refresh-rate gaming, which is confirmed by the measured FPS numbers. The combo’s performance at 1440p High (141 FPS) and 1440p Ultra (115 FPS) places it in a sweet spot for competitive and immersive play, respectively. The fact that it ranks below the top 100 combos is expected, as those typically feature flagship CPUs and GPUs, but the 858th rank out of 2930 shows that this pairing offers a strong balance of CPU and GPU capabilities without a clear single-component bottleneck.

The ranking also benefits from the CPU’s competitive positioning among its rivals. The 5600F’s average benchmark score of 36945 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938) and AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018), meaning that the CPU is not a differentiator in this combo’s ranking. Instead, the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking among all GPUs is what boosts the combo’s overall position, as the RX 9070 is clearly the more powerful component in this pairing. This is reflected in the measured FPS, where the GPU’s performance scales predictably with resolution and settings, while the CPU maintains consistent support across all configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high, with the Low preset delivering an average of 293 FPS, Medium at 258 FPS, High at 218 FPS, and Ultra at 178 FPS. The Medium preset also shows a minimum FPS of 219 and a maximum of 296, indicating that the frame time variance is low and the experience is consistently smooth. These numbers suggest that 1080p gaming is well beyond the capabilities of this combo, as even the Ultra preset exceeds 144 Hz refresh rates, making it ideal for competitive play on high-refresh monitors.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s workload increasing. The Low preset achieves 192 FPS average, Medium drops to 167 FPS, High to 141 FPS, and Ultra to 115 FPS. The Medium preset again shows a minimum of 142 FPS and a maximum of 192, which means that even in the most demanding scenes, the frame rate stays well above the 100 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The 1440p Ultra setting is particularly noteworthy, as 115 FPS average is still extremely playable and provides a significant visual upgrade over 1080p, making this resolution the best choice for users who prioritize image quality without sacrificing responsiveness.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, but the results are still respectable for a 4K experience. The Low preset delivers 104 FPS average, Medium drops to 90 FPS, High to 76 FPS, and Ultra to 62 FPS. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104, indicating that the frame rate can dip below 60 FPS in the most intense moments, but the average remains playable. The Ultra preset at 62 FPS average is on the edge of the 60 FPS threshold, but it is still a viable option for users with 4K displays who prioritize maximum visual fidelity over frame rate. The data shows a clear linear scaling from 1080p to 4K, with each resolution step reducing the average FPS by approximately 40-50%, which is consistent with the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth capabilities.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user’s display resolution and performance priorities. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear recommendation, as it delivers 178 FPS average, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate commonly found on high-end gaming monitors. The Ultra preset’s visual enhancements, including higher texture quality and more detailed lighting effects, come at no practical cost to gameplay smoothness, and the 178 FPS average ensures that even the most demanding scenes remain fluid. For users with 240 Hz monitors, the High preset at 218 FPS average is also a strong choice, providing a 40 FPS improvement over Ultra while still maintaining excellent visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 141 FPS average is the best balance of performance and visual fidelity. This setting provides a 26 FPS improvement over Ultra (115 FPS) while still delivering a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (167 FPS). The 141 FPS average is sufficient for 144 Hz displays, and the High preset’s image quality is nearly indistinguishable from Ultra in most gameplay scenarios. For users who prioritize maximum frame rates, the Medium preset at 167 FPS is also viable, but the visual difference between Medium and High is noticeable, particularly in texture detail and shadow quality. The Ultra preset at 115 FPS is only recommended for users with 60-120 Hz displays who want the absolute best image quality, as the frame rate remains playable but leaves less headroom for frame time spikes.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset at 90 FPS average is the recommended starting point, as it provides a smooth experience with a minimum FPS of 77, which stays above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset at 76 FPS is also playable, but the lower average frame rate leaves less margin for demanding scenes, and the Ultra preset at 62 FPS is only suitable for users with 60 Hz displays who are willing to accept occasional frame rate dips. The Low preset at 104 FPS is the best choice for competitive 4K gaming, but it sacrifices significant visual quality, making Medium the best overall recommendation for 4K users who want a balance of performance and fidelity. The data shows that the combo is capable of handling 4K gaming, but users should be prepared to adjust settings to maintain consistent frame rates above 60 FPS.