The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 35 | 41 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 64 | 75 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 77 | 98 | 115 | 150 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for modern hardware. The data measured for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination reveals a system that is consistently bound by the GPU across all tested resolutions. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy of performance, with the RTX 5050's capabilities being the primary determinant of frame rates, while the Ryzen 7 9700F provides ample headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate data shows a significant and predictable impact as resolution increases, confirming the GPU as the limiting component. At 1080p, the combination achieves 150 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 98 FPS at 1440p and further to 54 FPS at 4K. This progression represents a 35% reduction in performance from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K. The scaling is consistent with the increased pixel count demanding more from the graphics processor.
This pattern is even more pronounced at the High settings preset. The system delivers 98 FPS at 1920x1080, which falls to 64 FPS at 2560x1440, and finally to 35 FPS at 3840x2160. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is a 35% decrease, and the subsequent drop from 1440p to 4K is a 45% decrease. The near-identical percentage drops between the Low and High presets across resolutions strongly indicate that the GPU's rendering throughput is the sole limiting factor, as the CPU's workload does not scale with resolution in the same way.
The 4K results are the most telling. At Ultra settings, the average frame rate plummets to 28 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth, playable performance in an action-oriented game. Even at Low settings, 4K only yields 54 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. The data shows that this combination is not well-suited for 4K gaming in The Technomancer, as it struggles to maintain high frame rates even on the lowest quality presets. The 1440p results, however, tell a more balanced story. The jump from 1080p to 1440p halves the frame rate at the Ultra preset, from 77 FPS to 50 FPS, but the Low preset remains fluid at 98 FPS.
The frame rate data also reveals the diminishing returns of higher settings as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (150 FPS) and Ultra (77 FPS) is a substantial 73 FPS. However, at 4K, the difference between Low (54 FPS) and Ultra (28 FPS) narrows to just 26 FPS. This compression of the frame rate range at higher resolutions is a classic sign of a GPU-limited scenario, where the cost of each frame is so high that the relative impact of quality settings is reduced.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the central component defining this system's gaming performance. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the GPU has a memory bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. Its boost clock is rated at 2572 MHz. These specifications are the primary drivers for the frame rates observed in The Technomancer. The GPU's compute capabilities, including a FP32 performance of 13.17 TFLOPS, directly translate to the pixel and texture fill rates needed to render the game's environments.
The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor, especially at higher resolutions. The measured data shows a steep performance cliff when moving from 1440p to 4K. While the GPU's raw compute power is insufficient for 4K Ultra, the memory capacity may also be a limiting factor, as the game's texture and geometry data at 3840x2160 could be exceeding the available frame buffer. This would cause the system to rely on slower memory paging, contributing to the significant frame rate drops seen at that resolution. The 4K Medium preset, for instance, averages 41 FPS with a minimum of 35 FPS, suggesting the system is under significant memory pressure.
The RTX 5050's position in the market is clarified by its benchmark percentiles. It holds the 66th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is better than a majority of the field. Its nearest rivals in the database, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, with deltaPct values of -0.6 and -1 respectively. This means the RTX 5050 performs on par with these older, mobile-oriented chips in synthetic benchmarks, which is a notable data point for its expected longevity and raw performance tier.
The GPU's clock speeds, while not directly variable in the measured FPS data, are the mechanism through which its performance is delivered. The 2572 MHz boost clock, combined with the 2560 shading units, determines how quickly the GPU can process the geometry and shader work required by The Technomancer. The data shows that this combination is well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the gap between the RTX 5050's capabilities and the demands of 4K is too large to overcome with settings adjustments alone.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured frame rates, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and the desired performance. For a smooth 60+ FPS experience, the data points to specific presets at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 98 FPS, making it the best choice for a high-refresh-rate experience. The Ultra preset, at 77 FPS, is also playable and offers the highest visual quality, but the 21 FPS penalty over High may not be worth the marginal visual gains for competitive play.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the sweet spot for a consistently smooth experience. It averages 75 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 64 FPS, ensuring that the frame rate stays above the 60 FPS threshold even during intense scenes. The High preset, at 64 FPS, is also acceptable but offers less headroom and could dip below 60 FPS in the most demanding moments. The Ultra preset at 1440p is not recommended for a 60 FPS target, as its 50 FPS average will be noticeably less smooth.
At 3840x2160, achieving 60 FPS is not possible with any of the measured presets. The Low preset, at 54 FPS, is the only one that approaches playable territory, but it still falls short of the 60 FPS standard. The Medium preset averages 41 FPS, which is a significant compromise on visual quality for a sub-optimal frame rate. Consequently, the recommendation for 4K is to use the Low preset if the user insists on this resolution, but the data suggests that 1440p is the practical ceiling for this hardware combination to deliver a satisfying experience.
The measured results for the Medium preset show its stability across resolutions. At 1080p, it averages 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS. At 1440p, it averages 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS. This preset offers a balanced compromise between visual fidelity and performance, consistently maintaining a frame rate that is just at or above the 60 FPS threshold at 1440p, and far exceeding it at 1080p.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table and analysis detail the exact average frames per second (FPS) measured for each resolution and settings preset. The data is presented without modification and reflects the system's performance in The Technomancer.
1920x1080:
- Low: 150 FPS average.
- Medium: 115 FPS average, with a minimum of 98 FPS and a maximum of 132 FPS.
- High: 98 FPS average.
- Ultra: 77 FPS average.
2560x1440:
- Low: 98 FPS average.
- Medium: 75 FPS average, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS.
- High: 64 FPS average.
- Ultra: 50 FPS average.
3840x2160:
- Low: 54 FPS average.
- Medium: 41 FPS average, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS.
- High: 35 FPS average.
- Ultra: 28 FPS average.
At 1080p, the system demonstrates excellent performance, with all presets exceeding 75 FPS. The Low preset's 150 FPS shows the raw rendering potential of the RTX 5050 when unburdened by high-quality effects. The step from Medium to High is a 17 FPS drop, while the step from High to Ultra is a 21 FPS drop. This indicates that the Ultra preset's additional effects, such as advanced shadows and post-processing, are particularly taxing on the GPU.
At 1440p, the performance is still strong. The Low preset maintains a high 98 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. The Medium preset's 75 FPS average is very good, and its minimum of 64 FPS shows it can maintain a stable experience. The High and Ultra presets, at 64 and 50 FPS respectively, represent a more traditional trade-off between quality and speed.
At 4K, the system is clearly overburdened. The frame rates range from 54 FPS on Low to 28 FPS on Ultra. The 4K Medium preset's minimum of 35 FPS is a clear indicator of stutter and inconsistent frame times. The data shows a consistent and predictable decline in performance as both resolution and settings increase, with the 4K Ultra combination being the absolute worst-case scenario at 28 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
In the comprehensive database of tested hardware combinations for The Technomancer, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 holds a rank of 1721 out of 2825 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the performance spectrum, which is consistent with the measured frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions. The combo rank is a holistic metric that considers performance across all tested scenarios.
The CPU component of this combo, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, is a high-end processor. It holds the 94th percentile among all CPUs and has an average benchmark score of 69996. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-14700KF, which is 0.2% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, which is 0.7% slower. This CPU provides powerful 8-core, 16-thread Zen 5 architecture, ensuring it is not the bottleneck in this system.
The GPU, however, anchors the overall rank. The RTX 5050's 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its performance parity with older mobile GPUs like the Radeon RX Vega M GL and HD 8970M place a practical limit on the system's gaming capabilities. The combination's rank of 1721 out of 2825 implies that nearly 40% of tested configurations deliver better performance in this specific game. This is a direct result of the GPU's mid-range standing, as the CPU is clearly capable of supporting much higher frame rates if paired with a more powerful graphics card.
The discrepancy between the CPU's high percentile (94th) and the combo's lower rank (61st percentile) is a clear indication of GPU limitation. The Ryzen 7 9700F has significant untapped potential in this configuration. The data strongly suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield a substantial improvement in the combo's rank and overall gaming performance in The Technomancer, while the current CPU would not need to be replaced to facilitate such an upgrade.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run The Technomancer smoothly at 4K resolution?
A: No. The measured data shows that at 3840x2160, even the Low preset only achieves an average of 54 FPS. The Medium preset averages 41 FPS, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. None of these presets provide a consistently smooth 60 FPS experience at 4K.
Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this hardware?
A: The Medium preset is the recommended choice for 2560x1440. It delivers an average of 75 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS, ensuring a stable experience above the 60 FPS target. The High preset also averages 64 FPS, but its lack of a reported minimum frame rate suggests it may be less stable.
Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 the limiting factor in this system?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The data shows that the CPU holds the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU holds only the 66th percentile. The consistent frame rate drops as resolution increases, without a corresponding change in CPU workload, confirm the RTX 5050 is the performance bottleneck.
Q: How does the RTX 5050 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: According to average benchmark scores, the RTX 5050 is directly comparable to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL, with a deltaPct of -0.6, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M, with a deltaPct of -1. This indicates it performs within 1% of these other GPUs.
Q: What is the best-case scenario for frame rate at 1080p?
A: The highest average frame rate measured is 150 FPS at the 1920x1080 Low preset. For a more visually demanding experience, the High preset still delivers a very high 98 FPS average, and the Ultra preset averages 77 FPS.
Q: What does the combo's rank of 1721 out of 2825 indicate?
A: It means that this specific CPU and GPU combination performs better than approximately 39% of all other tested configurations in The Technomancer. This rank is primarily dragged down by the GPU's mid-range standing, as the CPU is a high-end part with a 94th percentile ranking.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 98.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 64.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 150.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77.0 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RTX 5050
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.