The Technomancer
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 143 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 70 | 82 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 100 | 128 | 149 | 195 |
| 1080p Full HD | 152 | 195 | 229 | 254 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 delivers a remarkably consistent experience in The Technomancer, with the data showing that the Ultra preset is the only setting tier that drops below the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. For users seeking the most visually demanding experience without compromise, the High preset at 2560x1440 is the clear sweet spot, producing 128 FPS average while maintaining a substantial performance buffer. The measured rows indicate that Medium settings at 4K provide 82 FPS, which is a more stable option than Ultra for 4K displays, but the scaling pattern across resolutions suggests that High at 1440p offers the best balance of fidelity and frame rate in the dataset. The data implies that the High preset is the intended experience for this combination, as it yields 195 FPS at 1080p, 128 FPS at 1440p, and 70 FPS at 4K, creating a predictable degradation curve that keeps gameplay fluid at all three resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows show a clear hierarchy where the Low preset delivers the highest frame rates but sacrifices the visual fidelity that this Action RPG benefits from. At 1920x1080, Low produces 254 FPS, Medium produces 229 FPS, and High produces 195 FPS, indicating that the step from Low to High costs roughly 59 FPS while the step from High to Ultra costs 43 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1080p still achieves 152 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any display, but the performance gap between High and Ultra at 4K is where the data becomes decisive. At 3840x2160, High averages 70 FPS, Medium averages 82 FPS, and Ultra drops to 55 FPS, which falls below the smoothness threshold that most users expect. This suggests that the Ultra preset is poorly optimized for this title's rendering pipeline, as it consumes over 21% of the frame rate compared to High at 4K while presumably adding marginal visual improvements.
The recommendation from the data is to select the High preset for the best overall experience, as it maintains 70 FPS at 4K and scales to 195 FPS at 1080p without any measured minimum frame rate below 60. For users with 1440p panels, the Medium preset at 149 FPS with a minimum of 127 FPS offers a more conservative choice, but the High preset at 128 FPS provides nearly identical fluidity with better image quality. The Ultra preset should be avoided at 4K due to its 55 FPS average, but at 1080p it still delivers 152 FPS, making it a viable option for those who prioritize maximum settings over frame rate headroom. The data shows that the Low preset at 4K produces 107 FPS, which is surprisingly close to the High preset at 1440p, suggesting that resolution has a more significant impact on performance than settings at this hardware tier.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT brings 8 cores and 16 threads to this pairing, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, built on the Zen 3 architecture codenamed Vermeer. The 32 MB shared L3 cache is substantial for a 2016-era game like The Technomancer, which was released before the CPU's 2024 launch date, meaning the processor has far more compute headroom than the title requires. The CPU's benchmark scores reinforce this interpretation: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 23794 and single-core score of 3359 place it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, yet the game's frame rates scale almost entirely with resolution and settings rather than CPU load. At 1080p Low, the system produces 254 FPS, which likely approaches the engine's simulation limit, but the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7683 and max-thread score of 7680 show nearly identical performance, indicating that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this configuration.
The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5800XT is overqualified for The Technomancer's threading model, as the game predates modern multi-core scaling and likely relies on fewer threads. The passmark single-thread score of 3535 and 3DMark single-thread score of 959 indicate strong single-core performance, which is more relevant for a 2016 Action RPG than the multicore scores. The CPU's nearest rivals in the synthetic benchmarks include the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H with a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS with a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X with a delta of 0.6%, showing that the 5800XT sits in a competitive position within its performance class. However, the measured game FPS data shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's 3.80 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for the game's logic and physics calculations.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the dominant component in this pairing, with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus providing 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for high-resolution textures in The Technomancer. The GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture with 9728 shading units and 76 RT cores delivers substantial compute power, reflected in its 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 54247. The memory clock of 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective) and boost clock of 2505 MHz allow the card to handle the game's demands at all tested settings, but the scaling pattern reveals where the GPU's limits begin to show. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 102 FPS (from 254 to 152), while at 4K the same settings difference is 52 FPS (from 107 to 55), indicating that the GPU becomes more constrained as pixel count increases.
The VRAM capacity of 16 GB is more than sufficient for a 2016 title, as The Technomancer's textures were designed for the hardware of that era, but the data shows that the GPU's raw compute is the primary driver of performance differences. The passmark G3D score of 34457 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 demonstrate the GPU's capability, yet the game's frame rates at Ultra 4K (55 FPS) suggest that the title's rendering features, possibly including unoptimized shadows or post-processing, create an unrealistic performance cost. The RTX 4080's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the RTX 4080 SUPER with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with a delta of -1.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with a delta of -2.6%, showing that this GPU is marginally ahead of its closest competitor but behind some AMD variants in aggregate scores.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves a rank of 296 out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 8% of all configurations in the database. This ranking is notable because the CPU is not the newest or most powerful in its class, yet the GPU's strength compensates for any potential CPU limitations in this title. The percentileVsAllCpus score of 81 and percentileVsAllGpus score of 86 indicate that both components are above average individually, but the game's performance ranking suggests that the GPU carries more weight in determining the final frame rates. The data shows that this combo outperforms many combinations with newer CPUs but weaker GPUs, as the game's rendering demands are heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions.
The ranking position of 296 out of 3696 implies that there are 295 combos that produce higher average frame rates in this specific game, likely featuring top-tier GPUs like the RTX 4090 or newer AMD flagships. However, the measured FPS data at 1080p shows that this combo reaches 254 FPS on Low settings, which is near the practical limit for 240Hz displays, meaning the ranking is influenced by diminishing returns at extreme frame rates. The combo's performance at 1440p High (128 FPS) and 4K High (70 FPS) demonstrates that it can handle the game at high refresh rates for most monitor configurations, making the rank of 296 more of evidence of the GPU's capabilities than a criticism of the pairing. The deltaPct values from the CPU's nearest rivals show minimal differences in synthetic scores, but the game-specific data reveals that the RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and high bandwidth are the differentiators.
Resolution Scaling
The performance degradation from 1080p to 4K in the measured data provides insight into which component is the limiting factor at each resolution. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 195 at 1920x1080 to 128 at 2560x1440 (a 34.4% reduction) and then to 70 at 3840x2160 (a 45.3% reduction from 1440p). This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario, where pixel count increases by 78% from 1080p to 1440p and by 125% from 1440p to 4K, but the frame rate drops are less than proportional, suggesting that the RTX 4080 has sufficient bandwidth to handle the additional load without collapsing. The Low settings show a similar trend: 254 FPS at 1080p, 195 FPS at 1440p, and 107 FPS at 4K, with the 4K figure being 42.1% of the 1080p result, indicating that even at minimal settings, the GPU is still the primary constraint.
The Medium settings provide the most detailed data with minimum and maximum FPS values, showing that at 1080p the frame time variance is from 194 to 263 FPS, while at 1440p it is from 127 to 172 FPS, and at 4K it is from 70 to 94 FPS. This narrowing of the frame rate range at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is working closer to its full capacity, reducing the headroom for variance. The Ultra settings show the steepest scaling curve, dropping from 152 FPS at 1080p to 100 FPS at 1440p and then to 55 FPS at 4K, which represents a 63.8% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This aggressive scaling suggests that Ultra settings introduce effects that are disproportionately expensive at high pixel counts, possibly including high-resolution shadows or ambient occlusion that scale non-linearly with resolution.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured rows show a complete dataset across all four settings presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 254 FPS, the Medium preset averages 229 FPS with a minimum of 194 and maximum of 263, the High preset averages 195 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 152 FPS. The step from Medium to High costs 34 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs 43 FPS, indicating that each settings tier has a meaningful performance impact at this resolution. The minimum FPS value of 194 at Medium settings is higher than the average FPS of the High preset, suggesting that the Medium preset provides more stable frame pacing, which could be beneficial for users sensitive to frame time spikes.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset produces 195 FPS, which is identical to the High preset at 1080p, demonstrating that the resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p at Low settings is equivalent to the settings increase from Low to High at 1080p. The Medium preset at 1440p averages 149 FPS with a minimum of 127 and maximum of 172, the High preset averages 128 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 100 FPS. The gap between Medium and High at 1440p is 21 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 28 FPS, showing that the settings scaling becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 107 FPS, the Medium preset averages 82 FPS with a minimum of 70 and maximum of 94, the High preset averages 70 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 55 FPS. The data shows that the step from High to Ultra at 4K costs 15 FPS, which is a significant reduction for what may be marginal visual improvements in a game from 2016.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K gaming with this combo?
A: The High preset provides the best experience at 3840x2160, averaging 70 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 55 FPS and the Medium preset averages 82 FPS. High offers a balance between visual quality and frame rate, with Medium being a viable alternative for higher performance.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination ranks 296 out of 3696 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 8% of all configurations in the database.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as frame rates scale with resolution and settings. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 254 FPS, but at 4K Low it drops to 107 FPS, showing GPU-bound behavior. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for this 2016 title.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 195 FPS while the Ultra preset averages 100 FPS, representing a 95 FPS difference. The High preset at 128 FPS and Medium at 149 FPS fill out the range.
Q: Does this GPU have enough VRAM for The Technomancer?
A: The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory is more than sufficient for this game, as it was released in 2016 and its textures are designed for hardware of that era. The memory bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s ensures no VRAM-related bottlenecks at any resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4080's average benchmark score is 54247, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 with a delta of -1.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 with a delta of -2.6%.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 107.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 82.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 195.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 149.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 128.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 100.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 254.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 229.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 195.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 152.0 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 5800XT + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5800XT + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.