Rust

Rust

AVERAGE FPS
64
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 64 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 24 32 38 56
1440p QHD 41 54 64 95
1080p Full HD 59 78 92 138

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 38
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Ultra 24
2560x1440 Low 95
2560x1440 Medium 64
2560x1440 High 54
2560x1440 Ultra 41
1920x1080 Low 138
1920x1080 Medium 92
1920x1080 High 78
1920x1080 Ultra 59

Rust with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers a playable but constrained experience in Rust, with the GPU acting as the clear performance ceiling. Benchmark results show that this combination ranks 2071st out of 2953 tested combos for this title, placing it in the lower half of the database. The RTX 2060 SUPER, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides adequate throughput for Rust’s demanding survival environments, but the data indicates that only the Low preset at 1080p approaches high-refresh territory. This analysis relies exclusively on the measured FPS rows and component specifications provided.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Rust?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 138, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the only measured result that exceeds 120 FPS, indicating that the combination is capable of high refresh rates only when graphical demands are minimized.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS ranges from 24 on Ultra settings to 56 on Low settings. The Medium preset at 4K yields an average of 38 FPS with a minimum of 32 and maximum of 43, showing that 4K gaming is only viable at the lowest quality presets.

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER sits in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18093. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, scores 18159, which is a 0.4% difference, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Q: How many cores does the CPU have and what is its boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its 128 MB of L3 cache is a defining feature for this processor, which belongs to the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: Does the measured FPS data include minimum or maximum values for all settings?

A: No, only the Medium preset at each resolution includes both minimum and maximum FPS values. For example, at 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 54 FPS and the maximum is 73 FPS. High, Low, and Ultra presets only have average FPS figures in the data.

Q: What is the combo’s rank out of all tested combinations for Rust?

A: The combination of AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2071st out of 2953 tested combos for Rust. This places it in the 70th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly 70% of tested configurations deliver higher frame rates in this game.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is the primary determinant of frame rates in this Rust configuration. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a card of this era. However, the benchmark data reveals clear limits: at 3840x2160, even the Low preset only reaches 56 average FPS, while Ultra drops to 24 average FPS. This pattern demonstrates that the GPU’s memory capacity and compute throughput are insufficient for high-resolution, high-detail rendering in Rust’s large open-world environments.

The GPU’s clock speeds are 1470 MHz base and 1650 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These figures are modest by modern standards, and the 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 performance reflects a mid-range part from the Turing generation. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 2060 SUPER scores 16462 in Passmark G3D, which is 1.5% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18373) and 1.6% lower than the Intel Arc A770M (18383). This places the GPU in the 62nd percentile overall, confirming that it is a solid but not exceptional performer.

The measured FPS data at 1920x1080 shows the GPU’s capability more clearly. At Low settings, the average FPS is 138, which is nearly 2.5 times the 4K Low result. At High settings, 1080p yields 78 average FPS, while Medium produces 92. These results indicate that the RTX 2060 SUPER can handle Rust at 1080p with acceptable smoothness, but the gap between Low and Ultra (138 vs 59 FPS) highlights how heavily the GPU is taxed by higher quality settings.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor. Rust’s asset streaming and large map sizes require significant memory, and the data suggests that at 4K Ultra, the combination falls to 24 average FPS, likely due to memory pressure and bandwidth limitations. Even at 2560x1440, Ultra only achieves 41 average FPS, while Low reaches 95. The GPU’s 64 ROPs and 136 TMUs are reasonable for 1080p gaming, but they are insufficient for 4K at high detail levels.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ranks 2071st out of 2953 tested combos for Rust. This position, in the bottom 30% of tested systems, reflects the imbalance between the high-end CPU and mid-range GPU. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and 128 MB of L3 cache, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 54762 is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55093, -0.6% delta) and slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053, 1.3% delta).

The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. The RTX 2060 SUPER’s 16462 Passmark G3D score puts it in the 62nd percentile, and its nearest rivals include the RTX 3060 Mobile (18159, -0.4% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18189, -0.5% delta). This means the GPU is roughly 30% slower than what would be needed to push the combo into the top half of Rust results. The rank of 2071 suggests that many other tested systems, likely with more balanced CPU-GPU pairings, achieve higher frame rates in this game.

The rank is further contextualized by the measured FPS data. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 138 average FPS, which is competitive for esports-style play. However, at 1440p High, the average drops to 54 FPS, and at 4K High, it falls to 32 FPS. These figures indicate that the combo’s performance is heavily resolution-dependent, and the rank reflects this variability. The data shows that for Rust, the GPU is responsible for the majority of performance variance, while the CPU’s high core count and cache provide no benefit when the GPU is saturated.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured FPS values are consistently low. The Low preset achieves an average of 56 FPS, which is the only 4K result above 40 FPS. Medium averages 38 FPS with a minimum of 32 and maximum of 43, showing significant frame pacing issues. High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra drops to 24 FPS. These numbers demonstrate that 4K gaming is not viable for this combo in Rust, as even the lowest settings fail to maintain 60 FPS.

The 2560x1440 results show a substantial improvement but still fall short of high-refresh targets. Low settings produce an average of 95 FPS, which is smooth for most players. Medium averages 64 FPS with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 73, indicating playable but variable performance. High averages 54 FPS, and Ultra averages 41 FPS. The data suggests that 1440p is only recommended for Low or Medium settings, as High and Ultra result in sub-60 averages.

At 1920x1080, the combo performs best. Low settings deliver an average of 138 FPS, which is excellent for competitive play. Medium averages 92 FPS with a minimum of 79 and maximum of 106, showing a stable experience. High averages 78 FPS, which is still smooth for most users. Ultra averages 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold. The 1080p data reveals that the RTX 2060 SUPER is well-suited for this resolution, particularly at Low and Medium settings.

The progression across resolutions is consistent: each step down in resolution yields roughly a 1.5x to 2x increase in average FPS. For instance, 1440p Low (95 FPS) is 1.7 times faster than 4K Low (56 FPS), and 1080p Low (138 FPS) is 1.45 times faster than 1440p Low. This scaling is typical for a GPU-bound scenario, confirming that the RTX 2060 SUPER is the limiting component.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, the Low preset at 138 average FPS is ideal for players with 120Hz or 144Hz monitors, as it provides a significant headroom above 60 FPS. Medium at 92 average FPS is also excellent, offering a balance between visual quality and performance. High at 78 average FPS is acceptable for 60Hz displays, but Ultra at 59 average FPS is borderline and may result in occasional dips below 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset at 95 average FPS is the best choice for maintaining smooth gameplay. Medium at 64 average FPS is playable but may show stutters in busy areas, given the minimum of 54 FPS. High at 54 average FPS and Ultra at 41 average FPS are not recommended, as they fall below the 60 FPS threshold and will feel less responsive. Players with 1440p monitors should prioritize Low or Medium settings to ensure a consistent experience.

For 3840x2160, none of the presets achieve 60 average FPS. Low at 56 average FPS is the only viable option, but even this may feel inconsistent. Medium at 38 average FPS and High at 32 average FPS are not suitable for serious gaming. Ultra at 24 average FPS is effectively unplayable. The data strongly suggests that 4K should be avoided with this GPU, and users should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p or 1080p for better performance.

Overall, the best experience per the measured rows is 1920x1080 with Medium settings, which provides 92 average FPS with a minimum of 79 FPS. This combination offers a smooth framerate with decent visual fidelity. For players who prioritize frame rate over visuals, 1080p Low at 138 average FPS is superior. The Medium preset at 1080p is the recommended sweet spot, as it keeps the minimum FPS above 75, ensuring minimal stuttering.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D provides a massive amount of processing power, but the data indicates that its role in this Rust configuration is largely secondary to the GPU. The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its 128 MB of L3 cache is a standout feature, designed to improve gaming performance by reducing memory latency. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and a single-core score of 6739, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

Despite this strength, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU is the bottleneck in most scenarios. For example, at 1080p Low, the combo hits 138 average FPS, which is high but not exceptionally so for a CPU with this level of performance. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 24 FPS, a figure that is clearly GPU-limited. The CPU’s high core count (12) and thread count (24) are unlikely to be fully utilized by Rust, which is known to be more dependent on single-thread performance and memory subsystem efficiency.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093 on average (a -0.6% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54053 (1.3% delta). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D’s average benchmark score is 54762, indicating that it is competitive with these mid-range Intel parts. However, the data does not show any scenario where the CPU’s superiority translates into higher FPS in Rust, as the GPU’s limitations dominate.

The CPU’s 128 MB of L3 cache could theoretically help with Rust’s procedural map generation and entity updates, but the measured FPS at 1440p and 4K suggests that any CPU advantage is masked by the RTX 2060 SUPER’s performance ceiling. Even at 1080p Low, the 138 FPS result is modest compared to what a faster GPU could achieve with the same CPU. The data indicates that pairing this high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU results in a system where the GPU is the primary constraint, and the CPU’s capabilities are underutilized in this specific game.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1650 MHz MHz
TDP 175 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Rust

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.0
3840x2160 Medium 38.0
3840x2160 High 32.0
3840x2160 Ultra 24.0
2560x1440 Low 95.0
2560x1440 Medium 64.0
2560x1440 High 54.0
2560x1440 Ultra 41.0
1920x1080 Low 138.0
1920x1080 Medium 92.0
1920x1080 High 78.0
1920x1080 Ultra 59.0

Rust with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + Other GPUs

See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Rust with RTX 2060 SUPER + Other CPUs

See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X3D + RTX 2060 SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.