Road 96
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 35 | 44 | 60 |
| 1440p QHD | 53 | 67 | 83 | 114 |
| 1080p Full HD | 82 | 105 | 131 | 178 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Road 96 with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050, In-Depth Analysis
Road 96 is an adventure title that leans more on narrative and atmosphere than on raw hardware demands, but the measured data for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 still reveals a clear performance profile. This combo delivers playable frame rates across most settings, with the CPU providing a solid foundation for the GPU to stretch its legs. The Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture and fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock is 3.30 GHz, boosting up to 4.90 GHz, and it carries 20 MB of shared L3 cache alongside per-core L2 and L1 caches of 3 MB and 192 KB, respectively. This is paired with a 65 W TDP and support for DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, which yields a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 25891 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 3655 in single-core, and a Passmark multi-thread score of 30459, placing it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs tested. Its average benchmark score of 36938 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (36945), with a deltaPct of 0, meaning the two are effectively tied in overall CPU performance. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D by 0.2% (37018) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 by 0.4% (37093), while the Intel Core i9-12900T trails by 0.5% (37112). For Road 96, the CPU’s single-thread strength is more relevant than its multi-core count, since adventure games typically rely on a few primary threads for game logic and scene management. The 4.90 GHz boost clock ensures that those threads run with ample headroom, preventing CPU bottlenecks at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed.
How This Combo Ranks
Looking at the broader picture, this specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 ranks 1760 out of 2903 tested combos in Road 96. That places it in the lower-middle tier of the database, which makes sense given the GPU’s modest position in the overall hierarchy. The RTX 5050 sits in the 66th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21035, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, -0.6%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, -1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, +1.6%). The RTX 5050 is actually slightly ahead of the RX 5600 XT in raw GPU benchmarks, but it lags behind the Vega M GL and HD 8970M by less than 1%. This ranking suggests that the combo is not a top-tier performer for Road 96, but it is far from the bottom. The data shows that the combo can handle the game at 1080p and 1440p with high frame rates, but it struggles to maintain smooth performance at 4K on higher settings. The 1760th rank out of 2903 means that roughly 60% of tested combos perform better, which is consistent with a mid-range GPU paired with a capable but not exceptional CPU. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU’s 66th percentile, indicating that the processor is not the limiting factor in this pairing. Instead, the RTX 5050’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus width, delivering 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth, are more likely to constrain performance in demanding scenarios. For a narrative-driven game like Road 96, this rank is still perfectly serviceable, as the game’s pacing does not demand consistently high frame rates to be enjoyable.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how this combo scales across resolutions, and the pattern clearly shows where the bottleneck lies. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 178 FPS average, which drops to 131 FPS at Medium, 105 FPS at High, and 82 FPS at Ultra. Moving to 1440p, the averages are 114 FPS at Low, 83 FPS at Medium, 67 FPS at High, and 53 FPS at Ultra. At 4K (3840x2160), the numbers fall further: 60 FPS at Low, 44 FPS at Medium, 35 FPS at High, and 28 FPS at Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a drop from 105 FPS to 67 FPS, which is a reduction of about 36%. From 1440p to 4K at High, the drop is from 67 FPS to 35 FPS, a further decline of about 48%. This steepening decline at higher resolutions is a classic sign of GPU limitation. The CPU’s performance remains constant regardless of resolution, but the GPU’s workload increases dramatically with pixel count. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom, allowing the GPU to push higher frame rates, but at 4K, the RTX 5050’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth become stretched, leading to the observed FPS drops. The fact that 4K Low (60 FPS) is nearly double 4K High (35 FPS) further confirms that the GPU is the limiting component, as lowering settings reduces the GPU’s workload more than it affects the CPU. The 4K Medium result (44 FPS) with a min of 37 and max of 51 shows some variance, but the trend is consistent. For gamers targeting 4K, this combo will require Low or Medium settings to maintain acceptable frame rates, while 1080p and 1440p are more comfortable territories.
Measured FPS Breakdown
Breaking down the exact measurements, the data provides a full picture of what to expect at each resolution and settings preset. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 178 FPS on Low, 131 FPS on Medium, 105 FPS on High, and 82 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset also includes a min FPS of 111 and a max of 150, showing that frame times are relatively stable even with some variance. This means that at 1080p, the combo is more than capable of driving high refresh rate monitors, even at Ultra settings where 82 FPS is well above the 60 FPS threshold. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages are 114 FPS on Low, 83 FPS on Medium, 67 FPS on High, and 53 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset again provides min and max values of 71 and 96 FPS, respectively, indicating that the experience remains smooth. At 1440p, the combo can handle High settings comfortably, but Ultra dips below 60 FPS, which might be noticeable for some players. At 3840x2160, the results are more modest: 60 FPS on Low, 44 FPS on Medium, 35 FPS on High, and 28 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a min of 37 and a max of 51, suggesting some frame pacing issues at this resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 32 FPS, which is substantial and highlights the GPU’s struggle with the higher pixel count. For a game like Road 96, which is not a fast-paced shooter, 4K at Low or Medium is playable, but 4K at High or Ultra will result in noticeable stutter. The 1080p numbers are the standout, with even Ultra delivering 82 FPS, making this an excellent 1080p setup for the game. The 1440p numbers are also solid, with High being the sweet spot for a balance of visual quality and performance.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 is the key component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS patterns. The GPU is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB207 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores. The base clock is 2317 MHz, with a boost clock of 2572 MHz, and the memory runs at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) across a 128-bit bus, providing 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance is rated at 13.17 TFLOPS, with a texture rate of 205.8 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 82.30 GPixel/s. The TDP is 130 W, and it requires a 300 W power supply, using a single 8-pin connector. In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5050 scores 2502 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 90334 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 89381 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its Passmark G3D score is 17326, with a GPU compute score of 9184. The GPU’s 66th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it is a mid-range part, and its 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a limiting factor at 4K, especially with higher texture settings. The 128-bit memory bus is also a constraint, as it reduces memory bandwidth compared to wider-bus GPUs. In Road 96, the GPU’s role is to render the game’s stylized visuals, which include procedurally generated road trips and character interactions. The data shows that the GPU can handle the game at 1080p with ease, but at 4K, the combination of lower bandwidth and limited VRAM leads to the observed FPS drops. The RTX 5050’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153, -0.6%), the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (21237, -1%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (20713, +1.6%), with the RTX 5050 slightly outperforming the RX 5600 XT in average benchmark score. This places the GPU in a competitive but not dominant position, and for Road 96, it is sufficient for smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires compromises.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings for this combo in Road 96?
A: Based on the measured FPS, 1080p at Ultra delivers an average of 82 FPS, which is smooth for most players. At 1440p, High settings yield 67 FPS, which is also playable. For 4K, Low settings are the only option to stay above 60 FPS, with an average of 60 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combo?
A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking and high boost clock of 4.90 GHz ensure it can keep up, but the RTX 5050’s 8 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth cause FPS to drop significantly at 4K, particularly at higher settings.
Q: How does this combo compare to other CPU and GPU pairings?
A: The combo ranks 1760 out of 2903 tested combos in Road 96. The CPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F with a deltaPct of 0, meaning they perform identically in CPU benchmarks. The GPU’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which the RTX 5050 outperforms by 1.6%.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Road 96?
A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it averages 60 FPS. At Medium, the average drops to 44 FPS, and at High it falls to 35 FPS, which may be too low for comfortable play. Ultra at 4K is not recommended, as it averages only 28 FPS.
Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The data includes min and max FPS only for the Medium preset at each resolution. At 1080p, the min is 111 and max is 150. At 1440p, min is 71 and max is 96. At 4K, min is 37 and max is 51. No min/max data is provided for Low, High, or Ultra presets.
Q: Does the CPU’s single-thread performance matter for Road 96?
A: Yes, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655 and its 4.90 GHz boost clock are important for maintaining high frame rates, especially at 1080p where the GPU is less stressed. The data shows that the combo achieves 178 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in this title.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 225
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 in Road 96
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 60.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 44.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 114.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 83.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 67.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 53.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 178.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 131.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 105.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 82.0 |
Road 96 with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Road 96 with RTX 5050 + Other CPUs
See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + RTX 5050
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.