Road 96

Road 96

AVERAGE FPS
122
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 122 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 54 68 92
1440p QHD 78 102 126 170
1080p Full HD 122 155 193 264

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 92
3840x2160 Medium 68
3840x2160 High 54
3840x2160 Ultra 41
2560x1440 Low 170
2560x1440 Medium 126
2560x1440 High 102
2560x1440 Ultra 78
1920x1080 Low 264
1920x1080 Medium 193
1920x1080 High 155
1920x1080 Ultra 122

Road 96 with Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis

Road 96 is not a demanding title, and the data for the Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination confirms that this pairing is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but transitions to a CPU-bound state at 1080p. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy where the RTX 3080's memory bandwidth and shading power become the limiting factors as pixel count rises, while the i7-14700F's 20 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock provide more than enough headroom to push frame rates past 250 FPS at lower settings. This combo ranks in the 69th percentile of all tested configurations (528 out of 1684), indicating strong but not elite performance in this specific adventure title.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a textbook GPU-bound curve, with the most dramatic drop occurring between 1440p and 4K. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 264.3 at 1920x1080 to 169.5 at 2560x1440 (a 36% reduction), and then further to 91.8 at 3840x2160 (another 46% reduction). This steep decline at 4K is characteristic of the RTX 3080's 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth being saturated by the higher pixel count, rather than any CPU limitation.

The scaling pattern becomes even more telling at Ultra settings. The transition from 1080p (121.6 FPS) to 1440p (78.2 FPS) represents a 36% performance loss, while moving from 1440p to 4K (41.2 FPS) costs another 47%. This consistent ~36-47% drop across each resolution step indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck throughout, as the i7-14700F's compute capabilities are far beyond what Road 96 requires at any resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases: at 1080p, Ultra is 54% slower than Low (121.6 vs 264.3 FPS), but at 4K, Ultra is 55% slower (41.2 vs 91.8 FPS). This stability in the relative performance gap suggests the game's graphical features scale uniformly with pixel load.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average at 3840x2160 Ultra is 41.2 FPS, which falls well below the 60 FPS threshold. However, dropping to High settings at 4K yields 54.3 FPS, still short of 60 FPS, while Medium settings reach 67.6 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate monitors?

A: At 1920x1080, all settings except Ultra exceed 155 FPS, with Low hitting 264.3 FPS. For 1440p, High and Medium settings deliver 102.3 and 125.5 FPS respectively, making 1440p High a solid choice for 100 Hz+ displays.

Q: Does the CPU ever limit performance in this game?

A: The data suggests the i7-14700F is rarely the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the 264.3 FPS average indicates the GPU is still keeping pace, but the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 28 threads provide ample headroom. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35443 places it in the 94th percentile, far exceeding Road 96's likely requirements.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 3080's average benchmark score of 35787 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860, -0.2%) and the AMD Radeon 880M (35646, +0.4%). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (36101) by 0.9% and beats the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35435) by 1%.

Q: Is 4K playable at any setting with this combo?

A: Yes, but only at Medium (67.6 FPS) or Low (91.8 FPS) settings. High (54.3 FPS) and Ultra (41.2 FPS) fall below 60 FPS, making them less ideal for smooth gameplay.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p, High averages 155.2 FPS while Ultra averages 121.6 FPS, a 22% reduction. At 4K, the gap widens to 24% (54.3 vs 41.2 FPS), showing that Ultra's additional effects have a proportionally larger impact at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. In this game, the CPU's role is largely preparatory: it feeds the GPU with draw calls and game logic, and its 33 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 264.3 FPS, which is likely near the engine's frame rate ceiling given the game's adventure genre nature. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35443 and single-core score of 5003 place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outpaces the vast majority of processors tested.

The nearest rivals for the i7-14700F highlight its positioning: the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X scores 54450 (0.6% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 54681 (1.1% higher), while the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469 (1.2% lower) and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206 (1.7% lower). These deltas are minimal, indicating that the i7-14700F sits at the top of the performance tier for this workload. In Road 96 specifically, the CPU's 28 threads are likely underutilized, as the game's adventure genre typically scales with single-thread performance. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is the key asset here, allowing the CPU to quickly process the game's scripted events and dialogue sequences without introducing frame pacing issues.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers consistently high frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce 264.3 FPS average, Medium drops to 193.3 FPS, High achieves 155.2 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 121.6 FPS. These numbers show a smooth degradation curve with each preset tier costing roughly 20-30% performance, which is typical for a GPU that is not fully stressed at this resolution. The 264.3 FPS at Low suggests the CPU is capable of driving the game well past 250 FPS, and the RTX 3080 is still able to keep up with the rendering demands.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain highly playable. Low settings deliver 169.5 FPS, Medium drops to 125.5 FPS, High comes in at 102.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 78.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 54% (169.5 vs 78.2 FPS), which is consistent with the 1080p scaling. The key insight is that even at 1440p Ultra, the system maintains above 75 FPS, making this resolution a sweet spot for high refresh rate gaming with maxed settings.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings still achieve 91.8 FPS, which is playable, but Medium falls to 67.6 FPS, High to 54.3 FPS, and Ultra to 41.2 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the highest quality preset at this resolution. The data shows a clear pattern: the system is comfortable at 1080p and 1440p, but 4K requires lowering settings to Medium or below for smooth gameplay.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ranks 528th out of 1684 tested combos in Road 96, placing it in the 69th percentile of all configurations. This is a strong result, but not top-tier, which reflects the fact that many higher-end GPUs (such as the RTX 3090 or RTX 4080) would achieve higher frame rates at 4K Ultra. The rank is driven primarily by the GPU's performance ceiling, as the i7-14700F's 94th percentile CPU ranking is far above the combo's overall percentile. This suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this pairing; rather, the RTX 3080's mid-range position among modern GPUs (80th percentile) holds the combo back from elite status.

Compared to the RTX 3080's nearest rivals, the combo's rank makes sense. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, which scores 0.9% higher in synthetic benchmarks, would likely achieve slightly better frame rates in Road 96, while the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (0.2% lower) would perform nearly identically. The 528th rank indicates that there are roughly 1,156 combos that perform worse, meaning this setup is above average for the game but not exceptional. For an adventure title like Road 96, where the visuals are stylized rather than photorealistic, this rank is more than adequate for a smooth experience at 1440p.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the recommended choice. The data shows 125.5 FPS average at this setting, which provides a 60% performance buffer over the 60 FPS threshold while still delivering improved visuals over Low. This combination allows for smooth gameplay with headroom for frame rate dips during busy scenes. If the user prioritizes maximum visual fidelity, High at 1440p (102.3 FPS) is the best option, as it remains well above 100 FPS while offering better shadows and textures than Medium.

At 4K, the recommended setting is Medium, which achieves 67.6 FPS. This is the only 4K preset that exceeds 60 FPS without sacrificing too much visual quality. High at 4K (54.3 FPS) is playable but may exhibit stutter on 60 Hz displays, while Ultra (41.2 FPS) should be avoided unless the user has a variable refresh rate monitor and can tolerate lower frame rates. For 1080p, Ultra (121.6 FPS) is recommended since it provides a substantial visual upgrade over High (155.2 FPS) while still maintaining triple-digit frame rates. The data clearly shows that the sweet spot for this combo is 1440p Medium or High, offering the best balance of frame rate and image quality.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA102 chip, featuring 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. Its 10 GB of GDDR6X memory operates at 19 Gbps effective across a 320-bit bus, yielding 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's boost clock of 1710 MHz and FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS are directly relevant to Road 96's rendering workload, which relies on traditional rasterization rather than ray tracing. The GPU's 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores are present but likely underutilized in this adventure title, as the game does not emphasize real-time ray tracing effects.

The RTX 3080's percentile ranking of 80th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35787, places it in the upper echelon of graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Duo, scores 35860 (0.2% higher), while the AMD Radeon 880M scores 35646 (0.4% lower). These close margins indicate that the RTX 3080 is positioned at the edge of a performance cluster, where small architectural differences can tip the balance. In Road 96, the GPU's role becomes dominant at 4K, where its 10 GB VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth are stressed by the higher resolution textures. The 41.2 FPS at 4K Ultra reflects the GPU's inability to process the full visual load, whereas at 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, allowing the CPU to drive frame rates to 264.3 FPS at Low settings.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-14700F

Cores / Threads 20 / 28
Base Clock 2100 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

VRAM 10 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1710 MHz MHz
TDP 320 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Road 96

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 91.8
3840x2160 Medium 67.6
3840x2160 High 54.3
3840x2160 Ultra 41.2
2560x1440 Low 169.5
2560x1440 Medium 125.5
2560x1440 High 102.3
2560x1440 Ultra 78.2
1920x1080 Low 264.3
1920x1080 Medium 193.3
1920x1080 High 155.2
1920x1080 Ultra 121.6

Road 96 with ii7-14700F + Other GPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Road 96 with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs

See how Road 96 performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-14700F + RTX 3080

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.