Revolution Idle

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 pairing delivers a predictable performance profile in Revolution Idle, with the data indicating that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions while the CPU provides ample headroom at 1080p. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S part with a 2.50 GHz base clock and 4.40 GHz boost clock, sits at the 73rd percentile among all CPUs. Its benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 12,380 and a single-core score of 1,680, are competitive with its nearest rivals. The RTX 5050, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 2,560 shading units, holds the 66th percentile among GPUs. This combination ranks 1,813 out of 2,986 tested combos in this game, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database. The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, the frame rates are high enough to suggest the CPU is keeping pace, but at 4K, the GPU struggles to maintain playable numbers, indicating a shift in the bottleneck.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for Revolution Idle, a title that does not demand extreme multi-threaded performance. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 and single-core score of 1,680 show a balanced capability, with the single-thread performance being particularly relevant for game logic and frame pacing. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache also helps with data access patterns typical of idle games, where background calculations and UI updates are frequent.

In this specific game, the CPU's role is secondary to the GPU. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 118 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all configurations. This suggests the CPU is not limiting performance at this resolution and settings level. However, the CPU’s 3DMark scores—5,895 for 16 threads and 909 for single-thread—indicate that while it is capable, it is not a top-tier part. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, has an identical average benchmark score of 19,047 with a 0% deltaPct, meaning the 12400F is effectively performance-equivalent to that mobile chip. This places the CPU in a position where it can easily feed the RTX 5050 at lower resolutions but will not be the decisive factor in the game’s performance ceiling.

The data shows that the CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor in Revolution Idle. When comparing the 1080p High result of 85 FPS to the 4K High result of 28 FPS, the drop is substantial and is driven by the GPU’s rendering workload rather than CPU processing. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 19,433 and single-thread score of 3,481 further confirm that it has sufficient computational headroom for this genre. The key takeaway is that the 12400F provides a stable foundation, but the game’s frame rate is overwhelmingly dictated by the graphics card, especially as resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-12400F compare to its closest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19,039, which is effectively identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS’s score of 19,047, resulting in a 0% deltaPct. It also sits within 0.3% of the Intel Core 3 201E and the AMD EPYC 7773X, indicating that these processors are all in the same performance tier.

Q: Is the RTX 5050’s performance consistent with its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5050 has an average benchmark score of 21,035. Its closest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL with a score of 21,153 (a -0.6% deltaPct) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT with a score of 20,713 (a 1.6% deltaPct). This suggests the RTX 5050 performs within a narrow band of these competing graphics cards.

*Q: What is the best frame rate achieved by this combo in Revolution Idle?*

A: The highest measured average FPS is 118, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is significantly higher than the 4K Low result of 39 FPS, showing how sensitive the game is to resolution changes.

Q: Does the combo maintain a consistent frame rate at Medium settings?

A: The data shows variation. At 1920x1080 Medium, the average FPS is 89 with a minimum of 76 and a maximum of 103. At 2560x1440 Medium, the average drops to 56 with a range of 48 to 65. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 29 FPS with a minimum of 25 and maximum of 34.

Q: How does this combo rank overall among tested systems for this game?

A: The combo ranks 1,813 out of 2,986 tested combos in Revolution Idle. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, indicating that while it can run the game, many other combinations deliver higher performance.

Q: Is the CPU’s performance percentile higher or lower than the GPU’s?

A: The CPU’s percentile is 73, meaning it outperforms 73% of all CPUs in the database. The GPU’s percentile is 66. This indicates the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU when compared to their respective peer groups.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance drop as resolution increases, which clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting component in this pairing. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the average FPS is 85. Moving to 2560x1440 High, the average drops to 54, a 36% reduction. At 3840x2160 High, the average falls to 28 FPS, which is a 67% drop from the 1080p baseline. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets.

The Low settings row shows an even more pronounced scaling trend. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 118 FPS. At 1440p Low, it drops to 75 FPS, and at 4K Low, it falls to 39 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 4K Low represents a 67% performance loss. This significant reduction at higher resolutions is a classic indicator of GPU-bound performance. The RTX 5050, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, is simply not powerful enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K, regardless of the settings.

The data also shows that the CPU’s role in resolution scaling is minimal. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU work does not increase significantly with resolution. Instead, the FPS drops sharply, confirming the GPU is the limiting factor. The RTX 5050’s PassMark G3D score of 17,326, which places it at the 66th percentile, supports this conclusion. The GPU is adequate for 1080p gaming but struggles at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 18 FPS is particularly telling; it is nearly unplayable, and the scaling from 1080p Ultra’s 55 FPS shows a 67% drop. This data indicates that users should target 1080p or 1440p for a smooth experience, as the GPU cannot sustain playable frame rates at 4K.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the Medium settings preset at 1920x1080 offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. The average FPS of 89 with a minimum of 76 and maximum of 103 ensures a smooth experience, and the frame time variance is low enough to avoid noticeable stutter. While Low settings at 1080p achieve a higher average of 118 FPS, the visual quality trade-off may not be worth the extra 29 FPS for an idle game where visual detail is less critical.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is also the recommended choice. It delivers an average of 56 FPS with a range of 48 to 65. This is a playable frame rate for most users, though it is not as smooth as the 1080p Medium result. The High preset at 1440p achieves 54 FPS, which is nearly identical, but the Medium preset provides a slight edge in minimum FPS, suggesting better frame pacing. For users with 1440p monitors, Medium is the sweet spot.

The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution. At 1080p Ultra, the average FPS is 55, which is acceptable, but it drops to 34 FPS at 1440p and 18 FPS at 4K. The performance cost of Ultra does not justify the visual gains, especially in an idle game. The Low preset, while offering the highest frame rates, sacrifices too much visual fidelity. The data shows that Medium provides the most consistent experience across all resolutions, with the 1080p Medium result being the standout choice for a high-refresh-rate display. For 4K users, the Low preset at 39 FPS is the only option that approaches playability, but even that is marginal. The recommendation is clear: stick with Medium at 1080p or 1440p for the best experience.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination ranks 1,813 out of 2,986 tested combos in Revolution Idle. This places the system in the 39th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning roughly 60% of tested combos outperform it. This ranking is consistent with the individual component performance. The CPU’s 73rd percentile and the GPU’s 66th percentile suggest that the combo should perform better than average, but the specific demands of this game and the interaction between the two components result in a lower overall ranking.

The ranking reflects the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions. Many combos ranked above this one likely feature more powerful graphics cards that can sustain higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K. The RTX 5050’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, have similar average benchmark scores, but their performance in this specific game may vary. The combo’s ranking is not a reflection of poor component quality, but rather a realistic assessment of its capabilities in this title. The 1080p results of 85 FPS on High and 118 FPS on Low are respectable, but the 4K results drag the overall ranking down.

The rank of 1,813 out of 2,986 is a useful benchmark for potential buyers. It indicates that this combo is a mid-range performer that excels at 1080p gaming but is not suited for 4K. The data shows that the combo is more than capable for the target audience of Revolution Idle, which is a low-intensity genre. However, for users who want to run the game at maximum settings on a 4K display, this combo would not be sufficient. The ranking provides context for how this system compares to others in the database, and it aligns with the measured FPS data, which shows a clear performance ceiling at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves an average FPS of 118, which is the highest frame rate recorded for any configuration. The Medium preset follows with an average of 89 FPS, with a minimum of 76 and a maximum of 103. The High preset produces an average of 85 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to an average of 55 FPS. This data shows a clear progression, with each settings increase reducing performance by a predictable margin.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are significantly lower. The Low preset achieves an average of 75 FPS, which is still playable but a 36% drop from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset produces an average of 56 FPS, with a range of 48 to 65. The High preset is nearly identical at 54 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 34 FPS. The 1440p results indicate that the RTX 5050 is starting to struggle, as the gap between Low and High settings narrows, suggesting the GPU is becoming the limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the performance is marginal. The Low preset achieves an average of 39 FPS, which is the only playable option at this resolution. The Medium preset drops to an average of 29 FPS, with a minimum of 25 and a maximum of 34. The High preset produces 28 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to a barely playable 18 FPS. The 4K data shows a stark contrast to the 1080p results, with the 4K Ultra result being 67% lower than the 1080p Ultra result. This breakdown clearly illustrates that the combo is best suited for 1080p gaming, with acceptable performance at 1440p, but it cannot handle 4K with any degree of smoothness.