Ready Or Not

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700KF compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The data shows the i7-14700KF holds a narrow lead over its nearest competitors. It scores 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, and 0.9% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1%, making the performance gap between these four processors effectively negligible.

Q: What is the performance ranking of the Core i7-14700KF among all CPUs?

A: The Core i7-14700KF sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors. Its average benchmark score is 70,163, which places it just above the Ryzen 9 7950X and just below the Core Ultra 7 265K in the overall hierarchy.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D's synthetic benchmark score compare to other GPUs?

A: The RTX 5090 D achieves an average benchmark score of 77,712, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. It is 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT but 1.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. It also trails the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB and 16 GB by 2.1% and 2.4%, respectively.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the CPU, and what does this mean for gaming?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. For a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not, this high core count provides substantial headroom for background tasks and streaming, while the strong single-core performance (a boost clock of 5.60 GHz) ensures the main game logic runs smoothly. This combination helps prevent CPU bottlenecks, especially at lower resolutions.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 5090 D?

A: The RTX 5090 D is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a massive 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This is far more memory than is needed for current games, ensuring that texture streaming and high-resolution assets will not be constrained by VRAM capacity in Ready Or Not.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and GPU in this combo?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has a launch MSRP of $384, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D has a launch MSRP of 2,299 USD.

---

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is the engine driving this combination, and its specifications are well-suited to avoid becoming the limiting factor in Ready Or Not. With 20 cores and 28 threads, the processor offers a level of parallelism that, while not fully utilized by most games, ensures that the operating system, game anti-cheat, voice chat, and any background recording software do not compete with the game for CPU resources. The architecture is Raptor Lake-R, a refinement of the Raptor Lake design, built on Intel's 10 nm process node.

The clock speeds are the more critical aspect for gaming. The processor's base clock is 3.40 GHz, but it can boost up to 5.60 GHz when thermals and power allow. This high boost clock is directly responsible for maintaining high frame rates in the game's AI-driven and physics-heavy scenes. In Ready Or Not, where NPCs and environmental interactions are numerous, the single-threaded performance of the CPU is often the deciding factor for minimum frame rates. The data supports this; the CPU scores 6,235 points in the Cinebench R23 single-core test and 2,578 in Geekbench single-core. These scores are indicative of top-tier single-thread performance.

Synthetic benchmarks further underscore the CPU's capability. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44,167 and Geekbench multicore score of 21,462 show that even when all cores are engaged, the processor maintains a commanding lead over most rivals. The Passmark multithread score of 52,425 and the 94th percentile ranking confirm its position as a high-end desktop part. When compared to its nearest rivals, the performance is remarkably tight. The i7-14700KF is only 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.9% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X in average benchmark score. This indicates that in a game like Ready Or Not, the choice between these CPUs would not be the primary driver of performance differences; the GPU would be the dominant factor.

The processor's large 33 MB of shared L3 cache is also a boon for gaming. It allows for more data to be stored closer to the cores, reducing latency when the game needs to fetch instructions and assets. This can improve frame pacing and reduce stutters, which is critical for a tactical shooter where precision and reaction time are paramount. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. The 125W TDP and compatibility with Intel Socket 1700 make it a standard, if power-hungry, desktop part. In summary, the i7-14700KF provides a robust and balanced foundation that will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, including Ready Or Not.

---

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the undisputed performance king in this pairing. Its role is to render the complex environments of Ready Or Not at high resolutions with maximum detail. The GPU is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and uses the GB202 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It is a massive chip, containing 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. This hardware foundation allows for an extraordinary level of graphical processing power.

The RTX 5090 D's memory subsystem is its most defining feature. It comes with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory, which is more than double the amount found on most high-end cards. The 512-bit memory bus and 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth are staggering figures. In Ready Or Not, this means that even at 4K resolution with Ultra settings, the GPU will have an overwhelming surplus of VRAM and bandwidth. There will be no texture pop-in or stuttering due to memory limitations, as the GPU can effortlessly stream in high-resolution assets.

The core configuration is equally impressive. With 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs, the GPU has a massive amount of raw compute power. This is reflected in its FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The GPU also features 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores, which, while not specifically benchmarked for this game, provide the hardware acceleration for ray tracing and DLSS features that many modern titles support. The boost clock of 2407 MHz ensures that all these units are fed with data at a rapid pace.

In synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5090 D scores 44,065 in Passmark G3D and 310,674 in Geekbench OpenCL. It achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326. These scores place it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, though interestingly, its average benchmark score of 77,712 is only marginally ahead of some mobile and datacenter parts. It is 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT and 1.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. This is a peculiar situation where the synthetic benchmarks do not fully capture the 5090 D's potential in gaming workloads, likely because those specific rival GPUs have different driver optimizations or benchmark conditions. However, the measured FPS in Ready Or Not tells the true story of its gaming performance, which is exceptional. The GPU's 575W TDP and requirement for a 950W PSU indicate it is a power-hungry component, but the performance it delivers justifies the power draw. Ultimately, the RTX 5090 D is built to eliminate any GPU-related performance ceiling, leaving the CPU as the only potential bottleneck.

---

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination in Ready Or Not is exceptional across all resolutions and settings. The numbers reveal that this system is not just capable of running the game; it is capable of obliterating it.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system is entirely GPU-bound, and the frame rates are astronomical. On Low settings, the average FPS is 567. Moving up to Medium settings, the average drops to 494 FPS, with a minimum of 420 FPS and a maximum of 568 FPS. The High preset still delivers an incredibly smooth 449 FPS on average. Even the most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p produces an average of 316 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the refresh rate of any consumer monitor, making the CPU the bottleneck at this resolution, but a bottleneck that results in over 300 FPS on the highest settings.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the load shifts more toward the GPU, but the performance remains stellar. The Low preset yields an average of 358 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 312 FPS, with a minimum of 265 FPS and a maximum of 359 FPS. The High preset still achieves a very high average of 284 FPS. On Ultra settings, the average FPS is 199. This is a significant drop from 1080p Ultra, but it still exceeds the refresh rate of most high-end 1440p monitors, which typically top out at 240Hz or 360Hz.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU is finally pushed to its limits, but it still delivers outstanding playability. The Low preset averages 187 FPS. Medium settings average 163 FPS, with a minimum of 139 FPS and a maximum of 187 FPS. The High preset averages 148 FPS. The most demanding setting, Ultra, brings the average down to 104 FPS. This is the only scenario where the frame rate dips into triple digits, but it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS standard for a smooth experience. The data shows a clear and consistent performance hierarchy, with Ultra being the most demanding and Low being the least, across all resolutions. The minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium (139 FPS) is still higher than the average FPS of many other systems at 1080p, highlighting the sheer power of this build.

---

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic pattern of a high-end CPU paired with an even more powerful GPU. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high that the CPU is the limiting factor. For example, moving from 1080p High (449 FPS) to 1440p High (284 FPS) results in a 36.7% drop in average FPS. This significant drop indicates that the GPU is starting to become more relevant, as the pixel count increases by 78%. However, the CPU is still able to feed the GPU enough data to keep frame rates high.

The transition from 1440p to 4K shows an even more pronounced scaling. At High settings, the FPS drops from 284 at 1440p to 148 at 4K, a 47.9% reduction. This is a more substantial drop than the pixel count increase from 1440p to 4K (a 2.25x increase in pixels). This suggests that the GPU is now the primary bottleneck, and the rendering load is becoming too heavy for even the RTX 5090 D to maintain the same frame rate scaling. The same pattern holds for the Ultra preset. The average FPS drops from 199 at 1440p to 104 at 4K, a 47.7% decrease.

Interestingly, the Low preset shows a different trend. The FPS drops from 567 at 1080p to 358 at 1440p (a 36.9% drop), and then to 187 at 4K (a 47.8% drop from 1440p). This shows that even with minimal graphical settings, the GPU's workload still scales heavily with resolution. However, the absolute frame rates remain so high that it is a non-issue for gameplay.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the system is heavily CPU-limited. The i7-14700KF's single-thread performance is the ceiling, and the GPU is held back. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the scaling becomes more aggressive. The 4K data, particularly on Ultra settings, shows the only scenario where the combo is truly balanced. The fact that the system can maintain over 100 FPS at 4K Ultra reflects the strength of both components, but the scaling analysis confirms that the 5090 D is the star of the show at higher resolutions.

---

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend entirely on the user's display and performance targets. The hardware is so powerful that there is no "wrong" choice, but there are presets that offer a better balance for specific scenarios.

For players using a 1080p 240Hz or 360Hz monitor, the Ultra preset is the only one that challenges the system, averaging 316 FPS. This is still exceptionally high and will fully saturate a 240Hz display and nearly saturate a 360Hz display. However, for those with a 360Hz monitor looking to maximize their refresh rate, the High preset at 449 FPS is the better choice. It provides a massive frame rate boost that will easily saturate any display, and the visual differences between High and Ultra in a fast-paced tactical shooter are often minimal. The Medium preset at 494 FPS offers even more headroom for frame time consistency, which can be beneficial for competitive play.

For 1440p 144Hz or 165Hz displays, the High preset is the sweet spot. Averaging 284 FPS, it provides a massive buffer above the monitor's refresh rate, ensuring no screen tearing or input lag. Even the Ultra preset, at 199 FPS, will comfortably saturate a 144Hz display. The extra visual fidelity of Ultra is worth it on a larger 1440p monitor. The Medium preset at 312 FPS is overkill for these refresh rates and offers no tangible benefit.

For 4K 120Hz or 144Hz displays, the High preset is the best recommendation. Averaging 148 FPS, it will almost perfectly saturate a 144Hz display, providing a smooth and responsive experience. The Medium preset, averaging 163 FPS, is also an excellent choice, offering a higher frame rate for a small hit to visual quality. The Ultra preset, at 104 FPS, is the only one that struggles to hit high refresh rates, but it is still perfectly playable on a 120Hz display. It offers the maximum visual fidelity, and the frame rate is high enough for a game like Ready Or Not, which is not a fast-paced esports title.

Ultimately, High settings are the recommended default for this combo, as they offer the best mix of high frame rates and visual quality across all resolutions. Medium is a good fallback for those who prioritize frame rate above all else. Ultra is viable but only recommended for players with 1440p 144Hz displays or 4K 120Hz displays who want the absolute best visuals. Low settings are unnecessary, as even the most demanding preset provides a playable frame rate. The data shows that this system is so powerful that the user can prioritize their personal preference for visual fidelity or frame rate without making any significant sacrifices.