Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not is a tactical shooter that scales dramatically across resolutions and settings, and the data for the Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 reveals a system with massive headroom. The measured frames per second (FPS) range from a blistering 531 at 1080p Low down to a still-smooth 98 at 4K Ultra, indicating that this combination is rarely the limiting factor. The benchmark results show a clear trend: as resolution increases, the performance gap between settings narrows, suggesting a shift in bottleneck from the CPU to the GPU. This analysis will break down the measured data, compare the combo’s standing against 3,713 other tested combinations, and explore what the numbers imply for gameplay.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep but predictable, and the pattern tells a compelling story about which component is doing the heavy lifting. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo produces 531 FPS, which is an extraordinarily high figure that indicates the CPU is feeding frames faster than most displays can even refresh. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 335 FPS, a 37% reduction, and then at 4K Low it falls to 175 FPS, another 48% cut from the 1440p figure. These sharp declines at lower settings are classic signs of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, where the RTX 5090’s raw processing power becomes the primary constraint.

However, the scaling behavior changes when settings are increased. At Ultra settings, the FPS goes from 296 at 1080p, to 187 at 1440p, and then to 98 at 4K—a more linear and less drastic percentage drop. The 1080p-to-1440p Ultra drop is 37%, while the 1440p-to-4K Ultra drop is 48%, which mirrors the Low setting percentages. This consistency suggests that even at Ultra, the RTX 5090 is still the limiting factor, but the CPU is doing more work to manage the increased draw calls and physics, and it is keeping up admirably.

The most telling data point is the difference between Low and Ultra at each resolution. At 1080p, Ultra is 44% slower than Low (531 vs 296 FPS), while at 4K, Ultra is 44% slower than Low (175 vs 98 FPS). This proportional scaling implies that the game’s settings are uniformly taxing the GPU, and the i7-14700KF is not introducing a variable bottleneck that would skew the results. In other words, the 20-core processor is strong enough to keep up with the RTX 5090 even at the lowest resolutions, where CPU overhead is typically highest. The data suggests that for this game, the RTX 5090 is the dominant factor in determining final FPS across all tested configurations.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor from the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,167 and a single-core score of 6,235. In the database, it sits at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70,163. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, which is only 0.2% slower, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, which is 0.9% slower, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 1% fastermen.

In Ready Or Not, the CPU’s role is evident in the high FPS ceilings at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 531 FPS figure is far beyond what most GPUs could sustain, and it points to the i7-14700KF’s strong single-thread performance. The boost clock of 5.60 GHz is critical for a tactical shooter where frame pacing and responsiveness matter. The data shows that the CPU is not the bottleneck even at 1080p, as the FPS is still limited by the GPU’s ability to render frames, not the CPU’s ability to issue draw commands.

However, the CPU’s multi-core strength, reflected in its 44,167 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, likely helps with the game’s AI and simulation elements. Ready Or Not is known for its complex AI behaviors and destructible environments, and the 28 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks. The 33 MB of shared L3 cache also helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency. While the benchmark data does not directly isolate CPU utilization, the fact that the FPS scales linearly with resolution and settings suggests that the i7-14700KF is fully capable of feeding the RTX 5090 without introducing stutters or frame drops.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination holds a rank of 82 out of 3,714 total tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the top 2.2% of all configurations, a strong showing but not the absolute pinnacle. The data indicates that there are 81 other combos that achieve higher average FPS in this game, which is surprising given the RTX 5090’s position as the flagship GPU. This suggests that either the CPU is slightly holding back the GPU in certain scenarios, or that other combinations with different CPUs and the same GPU edge it out.

Looking at the GPU’s nearest rivals, the RTX 5090 is 0.3% faster than the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 0.6% faster than the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, but 1.4% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X in average benchmark scores. However, these are workstation-class cards, and in gaming, the RTX 5090’s 32 GB of GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are far ahead. The combo’s rank of 82 suggests that while the RTX 5090 is a powerhouse, it is not always the best pairing for this specific game, and the i7-14700KF’s 94th percentile CPU score is not the sole determinant of gaming performance.

The fact that this combo ranks 82nd, rather than 1st, implies that some other processors, perhaps those with even higher single-core boost clocks or newer architectures, can extract more FPS from the RTX 5090 in Ready Or Not. The deltaPct values for the CPU rivals show that the i7-14700KF is within 1% of its nearest competitors, so the differences are small, but in a game like this, every frame can matter for competitive play or high-refresh-rate monitors. The data suggests that the combo is exceptionally fast overall, but not the absolute fastest.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across three resolutions and four settings levels. At 1080p, the results are staggeringly high: Low settings produce an average of 531 FPS, Medium produces 463 FPS with a minimum of 394 and a maximum of 533, High produces 421 FPS, and Ultra drops to 296 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound, as the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can render. The minimum FPS of 394 at Medium is still above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors, suggesting a smooth experience.

Moving to 1440p, the FPS remains very high but starts to show more variance. Low settings average 335 FPS, Medium averages 292 FPS with a minimum of 248 and a maximum of 336, High averages 266 FPS, and Ultra averages 187 FPS. The 1440p High result of 266 FPS is still excellent for a tactical shooter, and the Ultra setting at 187 FPS is well above the 144Hz threshold. The minimum FPS of 248 at Medium indicates that even in the most demanding scenes, the system does not drop below a playable level.

At 4K, the results are more moderate but still impressive. Low settings average 175 FPS, Medium averages 153 FPS with a minimum of 130 and a maximum of 176, High averages 139 FPS, and Ultra averages 98 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 98 FPS is just below the 100 FPS mark, but it is still smooth for a game of this type. The minimum of 130 FPS at Medium shows that even at 4K, the system rarely dips below 130 FPS, which is a strong performance for the highest resolution tested. The data shows a clear trend: the combo is overkill for 1080p, excellent for 1440p, and very capable for 4K, with the Ultra setting at 4K being the only configuration that drops below 100 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Ready Or Not?

A: The highest average FPS is 531, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the peak measured performance across all tested configurations.

Q: At which settings and resolution does the combo drop below 100 FPS?

A: The only configuration that falls below 100 FPS is 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings, which produces an average of 98 FPS. All other tested settings and resolutions remain above 100 FPS.

Q: How does the combo's rank in Ready Or Not compare to other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 82nd out of 3,714 total tested combos, placing it in the top 2.2% of all configurations. This indicates it is a top-tier performer, though not the absolute best.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution, Low settings average 335 FPS, while Ultra settings average 187 FPS. This represents a 44% reduction in FPS when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU act as the primary bottleneck at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 1080p, as the FPS scales significantly with settings changes. The CPU's strong single-core performance allows it to keep up with the RTX 5090, and the FPS is limited by the GPU's rendering speed.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 resolution with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 130, with an average of 153 FPS and a maximum of 176 FPS. This indicates that even in the most demanding scenes, the system remains highly playable.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. For players with a 1080p monitor, the Ultra setting at 296 FPS is the obvious choice, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while still delivering more than enough FPS for any display. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p is a 30% reduction in FPS (421 to 296), but the visual improvements in a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not can be significant for spotting enemies and reading environments.

At 1440p, the High setting at 266 FPS is the sweet spot, as it offers a substantial improvement over Medium (292 FPS) in visual quality while still maintaining a very high frame rate. Ultra at 187 FPS is also viable, but the 30% drop from High might not be worth the additional graphical fidelity for competitive players. The Medium setting at 292 FPS is the best choice for those with 240Hz monitors who prioritize raw responsiveness over visual detail, as the minimum FPS of 248 ensures a consistently smooth experience.

For 4K displays, the Medium setting at 153 FPS is the recommended choice, as it provides a good balance between visual quality and performance. The High setting at 139 FPS is also acceptable, but the drop to 98 FPS at Ultra is significant and may result in noticeable stutters on some displays. The Low setting at 175 FPS is the best option for players who want to maximize frame rate, but it sacrifices too much visual detail for most players. Overall, the data suggests that Medium at 4K is the safest recommendation, while 1440p High and 1080p Ultra offer the best experiences for their respective resolutions.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a massive GPU, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process node and 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. Its clock speeds are listed at 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost, and it delivers 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. In the database, the RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79,842. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which is 0.3% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, which is 1.4% faster.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU’s role is dominant, as evidenced by the FPS scaling with settings and resolution. The 32 GB of VRAM is far more than the game requires, which means there is no risk of running out of memory even at 4K Ultra with high-resolution textures. The high bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s ensures that the GPU can quickly access textures and geometry, which is critical for a game with detailed environments. The 170 ray tracing cores and 680 tensor cores suggest that the GPU is well-equipped for any future updates or mods that might add ray-traced effects.

The data shows that the RTX 5090 is the primary limiting factor in this combo, especially at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the 98 FPS result is likely due to the GPU’s raw rasterization limits, not any CPU constraint. The PassMark G3D score of 39,650 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 highlight the GPU’s immense compute power, but Ready Or Not’s engine may not be fully optimized to take advantage of all its features. The GPU’s role is clear: it provides the raw horsepower needed for high FPS at 4K, and the i7-14700KF is more than capable of keeping it fed.