Ready Or Not

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the Intel Arc B570 presents a compelling mid-range configuration for Ready Or Not. The measured data reveals a system that is highly capable at mainstream resolutions, though it faces predictable limitations at 4K Ultra. This analysis breaks down the performance characteristics, scaling behavior, and optimal settings based strictly on the provided benchmark results.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a clear and consistent progression as resolution increases, highlighting where this combo's balance of CPU and GPU performance lies. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional fluidity across all settings, with average frame rates ranging from 107 FPS at Ultra to 192 FPS at Low. This indicates that at 1080p, the combination has ample headroom, likely constrained more by the CPU's single-thread performance in certain scenes than by the GPU's raw output.

Stepping up to 2560x1440 introduces a noticeable but manageable performance cost. The average FPS at High settings drops from 152 at 1080p to 96 at 1440p, a reduction of approximately 37%. This scaling is typical for a GPU-bound scenario, confirming that the Arc B570's rendering load is increasing as expected with pixel count. The Medium preset at 1440p still holds a strong 105 FPS average, with a minimum of 90 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience on high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors.

The transition to 3840x2160 (4K) is where the system's limits become apparent. The average FPS at High settings falls to 50, and at Ultra, it drops to a demanding 35 FPS. This significant performance cliff from 1440p to 4K indicates that the GPU is now the primary limiting component. The 4K results suggest that while the configuration can technically run the game, it cannot maintain the high refresh rates seen at lower resolutions. The delta between Low (63 FPS) and Ultra (35 FPS) at 4K is a stark 28 FPS, showing that the highest settings are too demanding for this resolution on this hardware.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is the central figure in this system's performance profile. With 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, the GPU provides a substantial 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for Ready Or Not's textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the data suggests it becomes a bottleneck at 4K, where the frame rate drops significantly even on Low settings compared to 1440p High.

The GPU's clock behavior is fixed in this data set, with a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz. This constant clock speed means performance scaling is directly tied to the workload and memory subsystem. The Arc B570's architecture, Xe2-HPG, and its 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are put to the test most heavily at 4K. The measured results show a clear GPU-bound scenario at this resolution, as the frame rate is much more sensitive to settings changes (50 FPS High vs. 35 FPS Ultra) than at 1080p, where the differences are narrower (152 FPS High vs. 107 FPS Ultra).

When compared to its direct rivals, the Arc B570's position is clear. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it nearly identically to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct of 0.1) and the Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct of -0.1). This indicates that in raw compute potential, it is a peer of these cards, but the Ready Or Not data suggests its real-world performance in this specific title is well-optimized, delivering playable frame rates at 1440p where many mid-range cards begin to struggle.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides the processing foundation for this combination. With 10 cores (a mix of performance and efficiency cores) and 16 threads, it offers substantial multi-threaded capability, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22604. This headroom is crucial for Ready Or Not, which often involves complex AI and physics simulations that can scale across multiple cores.

The CPU's clock speeds, with a 2.50 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost, are more than adequate for gaming. The single-thread performance, measured at 3191 in Cinebench R23, is solid and ensures that the game's primary logic thread does not become a bottleneck at lower resolutions. This is confirmed by the 1080p results, where the FPS is high, and the scaling between Low (192 FPS) and Ultra (107 FPS) is significant, showing that the GPU is still the primary variable even at this resolution.

The i5-13400F's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide a robust platform. Its average benchmark score of 25292 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS and AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, with deltas of 0% and -0.3% respectively. This indicates that the CPU is not a weak link in this system; its performance is on par with other strong mid-range processors, allowing the Arc B570 to operate near its full potential.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested hardware configurations, this specific pairing holds a rank of 2361 out of 2947 total combos. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which may seem surprising given the strong individual component scores. However, this rank is a composite measure that likely includes many high-end systems with top-tier CPUs and GPUs, making the i5-13400F + Arc B570 a mid-pack performer overall.

The data suggests that while this combo excels at 1080p and performs well at 1440p, its overall ranking is dragged down by the 4K performance. Many combos above it in the rankings are likely equipped with more powerful GPUs that can handle 4K with higher frame rates. The rank of 2361 is not a condemnation of the system's value; rather, it accurately reflects that this is a configuration aimed at the 1080p and 1440p sweet spot, not a 4K powerhouse.

Within its own class, however, the performance is robust. The i5-13400F's ranking (77th percentile) and the Arc B570's ranking (65th percentile) are both respectable, and their combined performance in Ready Or Not exceeds what the GPU's percentile alone might suggest, indicating a well-balanced pairing that avoids severe bottlenecks in this title.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend entirely on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a 1080p display, the Ultra preset is the clear choice. Even at its most demanding, it delivers an average of 107 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth, responsive gameplay. The High preset at 1080p offers an even higher 152 FPS average, but the Ultra preset's performance is still excellent, allowing players to max out the visual fidelity without sacrificing playability.

For 1440p, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It provides an average of 96 FPS, which is excellent for most monitors. The Medium preset (105 FPS) is a viable alternative for players who prefer a higher frame rate buffer, but the High preset balances visual quality and performance effectively. The Ultra preset at 1440p (67 FPS average) is playable but may not be ideal for fast-paced action, so High is the more balanced choice.

At 4K, the situation is more constrained. The Medium preset is the only viable option for a consistently playable experience, offering an average of 55 FPS with a minimum of 47 FPS. The High preset (50 FPS) is borderline, and the Ultra preset (35 FPS) is too demanding for a smooth experience. The Low preset (63 FPS) is also an option, but the Medium preset provides a much better visual experience for only a slight FPS reduction, making it the recommended choice for 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve over 144 FPS?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 192 FPS, the Medium preset achieves 167 FPS, and the High preset achieves 152 FPS. All of these are capable of exceeding 144 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset provides an average of 55 FPS, and the Low preset provides 63 FPS. The High and Ultra presets (50 and 35 FPS respectively) are not ideal for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Arc A750?

A: The benchmark data shows the Arc B570 has an average score of 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, a delta of -0.1%. This indicates they perform nearly identically in general benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance like?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F scores 22604 in Cinebench R23 multicore, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. This indicates strong multi-threaded capability for tasks like game logic and AI.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The 1080p data shows a large difference between Low (192 FPS) and Ultra (107 FPS), indicating the GPU is still the primary factor. However, the CPU's single-thread performance (3191 in Cinebench R23) is sufficient to avoid being a major bottleneck at this resolution.

Q: What is the system's overall rank among all tested combos?

A: This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and the Intel Arc B570 is ranked 2361 out of 2947 total tested combos in Ready Or Not.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS measurements for each resolution and settings preset combination.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS | Minimum FPS | Maximum FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :---------- | :---------- | :---------- |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | High | 50 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 55 | 47 | 63 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 63 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 67 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 96 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 105 | 90 | 121 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 121 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 107 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | High | 152 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 167 | 142 | 192 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 192 | - | - |

The data indicates a well-rounded system for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K performance reserved for Medium or Low settings. The balance between the i5-13400F and Arc B570 is effective, ensuring that neither component dramatically hinders the other in this specific title.