Ready Or Not
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 182 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 64 | 90 | 100 | 114 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 173 | 190 | 218 |
| 1080p Full HD | 193 | 274 | 302 | 346 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 delivers a commanding performance profile in Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter where frame rates are consistently high across all tested configurations. The data shows a system that excels at high-refresh-rate play, with the GPU emerging as the primary constraint only at the most demanding settings. This analysis breaks down the measured results to understand where the bottleneck lies and how this combination ranks against other tested systems.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a predictable yet steep decline as resolution increases, but the pattern is not uniform across all settings. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 346 FPS, which drops to 218 FPS at 1440p and further to 114 FPS at 4K. This represents a 67% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating a strong scaling penalty. However, the more interesting trend emerges when examining the High preset. At 1080p High, the average is 274 FPS; at 1440p High, it falls to 173 FPS; and at 4K High, it lands at 90 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 37%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 48%, showing that the scaling becomes more aggressive at higher resolutions.
This scaling behavior suggests that at 1080p, the system is not purely GPU-limited. The gap between Low (346 FPS) and High (274 FPS) at 1080p is only 72 FPS, which is relatively small compared to the 4K gap between Low (114 FPS) and High (90 FPS) of 24 FPS. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads can keep up with the GPU’s output, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises. At 4K, the RX 9070’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are clearly stretched, especially with Ultra settings dropping to 64 FPS. The scaling from 1080p Ultra (193 FPS) to 4K Ultra (64 FPS) is a 67% reduction, which aligns with the overall trend but highlights that Ultra settings at 4K push the GPU to its limits.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 plays a central role in these results, and its specifications explain the observed frame rates. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, the card has ample capacity for Ready Or Not’s textures and geometry, even at 4K. The memory clock runs at 2518 MHz (20.1 Gbps effective), delivering a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for the game’s demands at High and Medium settings. The GPU’s boost clock of 2520 MHz and game clock of 2070 MHz provide the raw compute needed to push high frame rates, with 3584 shading units and 128 ROPs handling the pixel throughput.
The benchmark results for the GPU show a Passmark G3D score of 25381, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, which scores 24170 (a delta of -1.2%), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, which scores 24063 (a delta of -0.8%). This indicates that the RX 9070 is slightly ahead of these comparable cards on average, yet in Ready Or Not, the measured FPS suggests it performs well above that average. The GPU’s role becomes most apparent at 4K Ultra, where the 64 FPS average is the lowest recorded, indicating that the combination of high resolution and maxed-out settings is the only scenario where the graphics card becomes the clear bottleneck. At 1080p and 1440p, the GPU is capable of producing frame rates well above 120 FPS at High settings, showing that it is not the limiting component at lower resolutions.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-13400F provides the processing backbone for this system, and its specifications are well-suited to Ready Or Not’s CPU demands. With 10 cores (6 performance and 4 efficiency) and 16 threads, the processor can handle the game’s AI and physics calculations without becoming a constraint. The base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz offer solid single-thread performance, which is crucial for a tactical shooter that often relies on a few primary threads for game logic. The 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 cache per core help reduce memory latency, contributing to consistent frame times.
The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its capability. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22604 in multi-core and 3191 in single-core, while Geekbench shows 11068 multi-core and 1996 single-core. The Passmark multithread score is 25032, and the CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, which has an average score of 25284 (a delta of 0%), and the Intel Core 5 120, which scores 25362 (a delta of -0.3%). These figures indicate that the i5-13400F is competitive with higher-tier mobile and desktop chips, and in Ready Or Not, the CPU’s performance is more than adequate. The evidence is in the 1080p Low results, where the system reaches 346 FPS, suggesting that the CPU is not holding back the GPU even at high frame rates. At 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes further, as the GPU takes over as the primary limiter, but the processor’s headroom ensures that frame drops are minimized.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 achieves a combo rank of 1127 out of 3714 tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places it in the top 30% of all systems, a strong showing for a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The rank reflects the overall performance across all resolutions and settings, and the data suggests that this combo is well-balanced for the game. The CPU’s 77th percentile and GPU’s 69th percentile are both respectable, but the combo’s in-game rank of 1127 indicates that the pairing works synergistically rather than being held back by a weak link.
Comparing to the nearest rivals, the CPU is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS and Intel Core 5 120, with deltas of 0% and -0.3% respectively, meaning the i5-13400F is not a performance outlier. The GPU, however, shows more variance, with its closest rival, the RTX 2080 SUPER, being 1.2% behind. This suggests that the RX 9070 provides a slight edge over its direct competitors, which contributes to the combo’s strong rank. The rank of 1127 out of 3714 puts this system ahead of many higher-priced combinations, indicating that the i5-13400F does not bottleneck the RX 9070 in this game, and the measured FPS confirms this — the system can deliver over 200 FPS at 1080p High, which reflects the balance of this pairing.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 4K with High settings?
A: The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 90 FPS.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 2080 SUPER?
A: The RX 9070 has a Passmark G3D score of 25381, while the RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24170, putting the RX 9070 1.2% ahead.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The highest average is 346 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?
A: No, the data shows 274 FPS at 1080p High and 346 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating the CPU’s 10 cores are sufficient to feed the GPU.
Q: What is the combo’s rank in the database for this game?
A: The combo ranks 1127 out of 3714 tested combinations.
Q: How does the CPU’s multi-core score compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS?
A: The i5-13400F scores 25032 in Passmark multithread, while the Ryzen 9 6900HS scores 25284, a delta of 0%.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptionally high frame rates: Low settings average 346 FPS, Medium averages 302 FPS with a minimum of 256 and maximum of 347, High averages 274 FPS, and Ultra averages 193 FPS. At 2560x1440, the numbers remain impressive: Low averages 218 FPS, Medium averages 190 FPS with a minimum of 162 and maximum of 219, High averages 173 FPS, and Ultra averages 122 FPS. At 3840x2160, the performance drops but stays playable: Low averages 114 FPS, Medium averages 100 FPS with a minimum of 85 and maximum of 114, High averages 90 FPS, and Ultra averages 64 FPS.
This breakdown reveals that the system is capable of maintaining high frame rates even at 4K, with only the Ultra preset falling below 70 FPS. The Medium settings at every resolution show a consistent pattern, with the average FPS being roughly 10-15% lower than Low settings but still significantly higher than High or Ultra. The minimum FPS data, available only for Medium settings, shows that the system does not experience severe dips, with the lowest minimum being 85 FPS at 4K Medium. This indicates a stable experience, particularly for a game like Ready Or Not, where frame consistency is important for aiming and reaction times.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings balance depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1080p, all settings are viable for competitive play, but Medium settings offer the best compromise between visual quality and performance, with an average of 302 FPS and a minimum of 256 FPS. This ensures that even in intense firefights, the frame rate stays above 250 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. High settings at 1080p also deliver excellent performance at 274 FPS, making it a strong choice for players who prioritize visuals without sacrificing speed.
At 1440p, Medium settings are the recommended choice, averaging 190 FPS with a minimum of 162 FPS. This provides a smooth experience on 144Hz displays, and the visual upgrade from 1080p is significant. High settings at 1440p, with an average of 173 FPS, are also viable if the display supports it, but Medium offers more headroom for frame dips. At 4K, the recommendation shifts to High settings, which average 90 FPS, as this is the highest preset that maintains a solid 90 FPS average. Ultra settings at 4K average 64 FPS, which is playable but may feel less fluid, especially in fast-paced scenarios. Low settings at 4K, averaging 114 FPS, are an option for players who prioritize frame rate above all else, but Medium at 100 FPS is a better balance for most users. The data suggests that Medium settings at any resolution provide the most consistent experience, with the minimum FPS never falling below 85 at 4K, ensuring a stable foundation for gameplay.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
AMD Radeon RX 9070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 114.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 100.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 90.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 64.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 218.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 190.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 173.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 122.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 346.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 302.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 274.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 193.0 |
Ready Or Not with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with RX 9070 + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + RX 9070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.