Ready Or Not
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 101 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 50 | 55 | 63 |
| 1440p QHD | 67 | 96 | 105 | 121 |
| 1080p Full HD | 107 | 152 | 167 | 192 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
FAQ
Q: What is the overall performance ranking of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570 combo in Ready Or Not?
A: This combo ranks 2361 out of 2947 tested combinations in the database for this game. That puts it in the bottom 20% of all tested system pairings, indicating that while it can run the game, it does not deliver top-tier frame rates compared to the broader field.
Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches an average of 192 FPS. The Medium preset yields 167 FPS, High yields 152 FPS, and Ultra drops to 107 FPS. The data shows a clear scaling curve from Low to Ultra at this resolution.
Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to the 1080p Low performance?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 35. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 192. This represents a drop of 157 FPS, or roughly 82% lower performance when moving from the least demanding to the most demanding measured configuration.
Q: Which component has the most headroom according to the benchmark data?
A: The CPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, has a 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU, Intel Arc B570, has a 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The CPU's higher relative standing suggests it is less likely to be the limiting factor in this game compared to the GPU.
Q: What is the frame time variance like at Medium settings?
A: The Medium preset is the only configuration with reported minimum and maximum FPS values. At 1080p, the frame rate ranges from 142 to 192 FPS. At 1440p, it ranges from 90 to 121 FPS. At 4K, it ranges from 47 to 63 FPS. The spread between minimum and maximum is wider at lower resolutions, indicating more variability in frame delivery.
Q: Does the GPU support modern rendering APIs needed for this tactical shooter?
A: Yes, the Intel Arc B570 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. This allows the GPU to utilize modern graphics features that a game like Ready Or Not may employ for its visual effects and rendering pipeline.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Arc B570 combination sits at position 2361 out of 2947 tested system pairings for Ready Or Not. This places the combo in the lower quartile of the database, suggesting that while the game is playable, the system does not compete with higher-end configurations that dominate the upper ranks. The percentile data reinforces this: the GPU ranks at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks at the 79th percentile among all CPUs. The system's overall game-specific ranking is dragged down by the GPU, which is the weaker link in this pairing.
The combo's rank implies that for a tactical shooter like Ready Or Not, which can be demanding on both CPU and GPU depending on the scene, this system will handle standard gameplay but may struggle in intense firefights or complex environments with many AI characters. The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its 8 cores and 16 threads, helps maintain game logic, but the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit memory bus are modest for high-resolution textures. When compared to other tested combos, the 2361st position means that a significant majority of systems in the database deliver higher average frame rates, making this pairing a mid-to-low-tier option for this specific title.
The gap between the CPU's and GPU's percentile ranks is notable. The CPU at 79th percentile versus GPU at 65th percentile indicates a bottleneck scenario where the GPU is more likely to be the performance limiter. This is typical for a system where the processor has more relative capability than the graphics card. For players aiming for high refresh rate monitors, this combo's ranking suggests that 1080p Medium or High settings are the realistic ceiling, while 4K gaming will require significant compromises in visual quality. The data positions this as a balanced but budget-conscious pairing that prioritizes CPU capability over GPU headroom.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals how the system's performance scales across three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 192 at 1080p to 121 at 1440p, then to 63 at 4K. This represents a 37% decrease from 1080p to 1440p, and a 67% decrease from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is not linear; the jump from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep, indicating that the GPU is becoming increasingly stressed as pixel count rises.
At High settings, the average FPS is 152 at 1080p, 96 at 1440p, and 50 at 4K. The percentage drops are 37% from 1080p to 1440p, and 67% from 1080p to 4K, which mirrors the Low settings pattern. This suggests that the resolution scaling is consistent regardless of the quality preset, pointing to a GPU-bound scenario where the pixel throughput is the primary constraint. The 4K High result of 50 FPS is just at the edge of playability, while 4K Ultra drops to 35 FPS, which is below the threshold for a smooth experience.
The data indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, not the CPU. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 921 in 3dmark_single_thread and multicore score of 6858 in 3dmark_16_threads suggest it can keep up with the game's logic demands. However, the GPU's FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s are modest figures that become strained at higher resolutions. The frame rate drops from 1080p to 4K are classic signs of GPU-bound performance, where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become the deciding factors. The 380.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p but insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 192 FPS, which is well above the refresh rate of most monitors. Medium settings yield 167 FPS on average, with a reported range of 142 to 192 FPS. High settings produce 152 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 107 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p gaming is smooth across all presets, with even Ultra settings remaining playable. The 107 FPS at Ultra is sufficient for competitive play, though not for high-refresh-rate displays above 100 Hz.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down noticeably. Low settings average 121 FPS, which is still excellent for most gaming scenarios. Medium settings average 105 FPS, with a range of 90 to 121 FPS. High settings produce 96 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 67 FPS. The 67 FPS at 1440p Ultra is playable but may feel less fluid in fast-paced situations. The jump from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 37% of the frame rate across all presets, indicating a consistent GPU workload increase.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings average 63 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. Medium settings average 55 FPS, with a range of 47 to 63 FPS. High settings produce 50 FPS average, and Ultra drops to 35 FPS. These numbers suggest that 4K gaming requires significant compromises. The Low preset at 4K is the only viable option for a playable experience, while Medium and High are marginal, and Ultra is not recommended. The minimum FPS of 47 at 4K Medium indicates potential stuttering in demanding scenes.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is the primary performance driver in this combo for Ready Or Not. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a moderate amount for a modern GPU. The 2304 shading units and 80 ROPs handle pixel processing, while the 144 texture mapping units process texture lookups. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both locked at 2500 MHz, which is a relatively high frequency for this class of card, but the FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS indicates a mid-range compute capability.
The GPU's memory configuration is directly relevant to the game's performance at different resolutions. At 1080p, the 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for all texture sizes, allowing the GPU to operate without memory pressure. At 1440p, the VRAM usage increases, but the card still manages to deliver playable frame rates. At 4K, the memory bandwidth becomes a bottleneck, as the 380.0 GB/s is insufficient to feed the GPU at the higher pixel count. This explains the steep performance drop from 1440p to 4K, where the frame rate nearly halves.
The GPU's benchmark scores provide context for its gaming performance. Its PassMark G3D score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2649 indicate a mid-range GPU that sits between budget and mainstream offerings. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 and OpenCL score of 83514 suggest solid compute performance, which is useful for games that utilize async compute. However, the GPU's 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it below many competitors, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A750 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which have similar average scores. The GPU's 18 ray tracing cores are present but may not be fully utilized in Ready Or Not, which is primarily a rasterization-based game.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset provides an average of 167 FPS with a range of 142 to 192 FPS, which is the best balance between visual quality and performance. The High preset at 152 FPS average is also excellent, offering improved visuals with only a 15 FPS penalty. Ultra at 107 FPS is playable but may not be worth the visual upgrade for competitive players who prioritize frame rate.
At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 96 FPS average, which is a good target for most monitors. The Medium preset at 105 FPS is slightly faster, but the visual difference is noticeable. The Ultra preset at 67 FPS is still playable for slower-paced tactical gameplay, but the frame rate may dip in intense firefights. For players with 144 Hz monitors, the Medium preset is the recommended choice to maintain high frame rates.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 63 FPS is the only configuration that provides a consistently playable experience. The Medium preset at 55 FPS with a minimum of 47 FPS may be acceptable for some players, but the risk of stuttering is higher. The High and Ultra presets at 50 FPS and 35 FPS respectively are not recommended for serious gameplay. Given that Ready Or Not is a tactical shooter where reaction time matters, the 4K Low preset is the best compromise for visual clarity and performance. The data suggests that 1080p or 1440p are the sweet spots for this combo, with 4K reserved for players who prioritize resolution over frame rate.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X plays a supporting role in this combo's performance for Ready Or Not. With 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, the CPU provides strong multi-threaded processing power. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz offer solid single-thread performance, which is crucial for game logic and AI calculations. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency, and the dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for feeding the GPU.
The CPU's benchmark results indicate it is more than capable of handling the game's demands. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 and single-core score of 1499 show strong performance for a desktop processor. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 6858 and max-thread score of 6850 demonstrate consistent multi-threading capability. The PassMark multithread score of 26612 and single-thread score of 3385 further confirm its balanced performance profile. The CPU's 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the majority of processors in the database.
In the context of Ready Or Not, the CPU's role is to maintain game state, process AI decisions, and handle physics calculations. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is well-suited for these tasks, and the data suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck in this system. The frame rate drops from 1080p to 4K are consistent with GPU-bound performance, meaning the CPU has headroom to spare. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600K, has an identical average score of 27578, indicating that the Ryzen 7 5700X is competitive with mainstream Intel offerings. The CPU's 65W TDP also means it runs cool and efficient, but the data shows that its performance is not the limiting factor in this game.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + Intel Arc B570 in Ready Or Not
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 63.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 55.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 121.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 105.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 96.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 67.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 192.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 167.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 152.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 107.0 |
Ready Or Not with Ryzen 7 5700X + Other GPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Ready Or Not with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700X + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.