Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not

AVERAGE FPS
66
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 66 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 33 36 41
1440p QHD 44 62 69 79
1080p Full HD 69 99 109 125

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 41
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 High 33
3840x2160 Ultra 23
2560x1440 Low 79
2560x1440 Medium 69
2560x1440 High 62
2560x1440 Ultra 44
1920x1080 Low 125
1920x1080 Medium 109
1920x1080 High 99
1920x1080 Ultra 69

Ready Or Not with AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + Intel Arc B390, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B390 presents a fascinating, if constrained, performance profile in Ready Or Not. The measured data shows this combination is firmly positioned in the lower percentile of tested systems, yet it reveals a clear path to a playable experience. The most effective approach is to prioritize the Medium preset, which consistently offers the best balance between visual fidelity and frame rate across all tested resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 109 FPS, with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 125 FPS. This is a significant jump from the High preset's 99 FPS average and provides a smoother experience than the 69 FPS average seen on Ultra. The data suggests that the Ultra preset is a performance trap for this hardware, demanding more than the integrated graphics can efficiently deliver. Moving up to 2560x1440, the Medium preset again proves to be the sweet spot, producing a solid 69 FPS average with a minimum of 58 FPS, which is comfortably in the playable range for a tactical shooter. While High at this resolution hits 62 FPS, the Medium preset’s higher minimum frame rate suggests more consistent frame pacing, which is crucial for a game where precision and reaction time are paramount.

At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more challenging. The Medium preset yields a 36 FPS average with a minimum of 30 FPS, which is on the edge of playability. The Low preset at 4K manages a 41 FPS average, but the visual compromise is significant. For the best experience, the data strongly indicates that 1920x1080 with Medium settings is the optimal configuration, offering high frame rates that fully utilize the system's capabilities. This setup provides a responsive and visually coherent experience, whereas higher resolutions or settings force the hardware into a state where frame rate consistency is sacrificed.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best settings preset for this CPU and GPU combination in Ready Or Not?*

A: The benchmark data indicates that the Medium settings preset is the optimal choice. At 1920x1080, it achieves an average of 109 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS, outperforming High by 10 FPS and Ultra by 40 FPS. This preset provides the best balance of visual quality and performance, ensuring a consistently smooth experience.

*Q: Can this system handle 1440p gaming in Ready Or Not?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers a 69 FPS average with a minimum of 58 FPS, which is generally playable. However, the High preset drops to 62 FPS, and Ultra falls to 44 FPS, indicating that the system is at its limits at this resolution. For the most consistent performance, 1080p is the recommended target.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution?

A: Performance at 3840x2160 is quite limited. The Medium preset produces an average of 36 FPS, while High drops to 33 FPS and Ultra to just 23 FPS. Even the Low preset only reaches a 41 FPS average. This suggests that 4K gaming is only viable with significant visual compromises and reduced frame rates.

Q: Is the Ultra preset usable with this hardware?

A: The data suggests it is not recommended for a good experience. At 1080p, the Ultra preset yields a 69 FPS average, which is 40 FPS lower than Medium. At 1440p, it drops to 44 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 23 FPS. The performance cost of Ultra settings is too high for the visual benefit on this system.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 2611 out of 2947 tested combos for Ready Or Not, placing it in the lower 11th percentile of all systems. This indicates that while it can run the game, it is not a high-performance setup and will require careful settings management to achieve a smooth frame rate.

Q: What does the minimum FPS tell us about the experience?

A: The minimum FPS data points are crucial for understanding consistency. For instance, at 1080p Medium, the minimum is 92 FPS, which is close to the average of 109 FPS, indicating a stable experience. At 1440p Medium, the minimum is 58 FPS, showing more fluctuation. This suggests that while average frame rates can look acceptable, the system may experience noticeable dips during intense scenes, especially at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark results position the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B390 combination at rank 2611 out of 2947 tested combos for Ready Or Not. This places it in the 88.6th percentile from the bottom, meaning it outperforms roughly 11.4% of all tested systems. This is a low ranking that reflects the significant performance constraints of the Intel Arc B390 integrated GPU, which is the primary bottleneck in this pairing.

This ranking is consistent with the GPU's overall standing, as it sits in the 9th percentile of all tested GPUs. The CPU, however, is much more capable, ranking in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. The data clearly shows a large disparity between the CPU's potential and the GPU's delivery. The integrated graphics solution is essentially limiting the entire system to a performance tier that is far below what the Ryzen 5 5600G could support with a more powerful discrete graphics card. The fact that the combo is ranked so low indicates that in a game like Ready Or Not, which can be demanding on both CPU and GPU, the system's overall capability is severely hampered by its weakest link. The performance ceiling is defined by the Arc B390, not the Ryzen 5 5600G.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system's capabilities across different resolutions and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its best performance. The Low preset achieves an average of 125 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 109 FPS, with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 125 FPS. The High preset produces an average of 99 FPS. The Ultra preset significantly drops performance to an average of 69 FPS. This shows a clear scaling pattern where the cost of Ultra settings is substantial.

At 2560x1440, performance begins to decline. The Low preset averages 79 FPS. The Medium preset averages 69 FPS, with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 79 FPS. The High preset averages 62 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to an average of 44 FPS. The gap between Medium and High narrows here, but the drop to Ultra remains severe.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. The Low preset averages 41 FPS. The Medium preset averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 30 FPS and a maximum of 41 FPS. The High preset averages 33 FPS. The Ultra preset is nearly unplayable, with an average of just 23 FPS. The data shows that 4K resolution is only marginally playable on the lowest settings, and the frame rate drops below the 30 FPS threshold on Medium.

Resolution Scaling

The performance scaling from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is steep and reveals a system that is heavily GPU-limited. Comparing the Medium preset, the average FPS drops from 109 at 1080p to 69 at 1440p, a reduction of 40 FPS, and then further to 36 at 4K, a reduction of 73 FPS from the 1080p baseline. This represents a 67% decrease in performance from 1080p to 4K.

This dramatic drop when moving to higher resolutions is a classic indicator that the GPU is the limiting component. The workload on the GPU increases exponentially with the number of pixels, and the Intel Arc B390, with its system-shared memory and limited compute power, is unable to keep up with the demand. The CPU, in contrast, is not as heavily burdened by resolution changes. The data implies that the Ryzen 5 5600G is likely capable of feeding frames at a much higher rate than the GPU can render at higher resolutions. The system is being held back by the GPU's pixel throughput limits, which are a direct consequence of its integrated and shared architecture. This is not a case of a balanced system; it’s a case of a powerful CPU being throttled by a weak GPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10551 and a single-core score of 1409, indicate a capable processor for gaming. Its percentile ranking of 74 places it above average among all CPUs.

In the context of Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter that can be sensitive to CPU performance for game logic and AI, this processor provides a solid foundation. Its multi-threading capabilities, evidenced by a Passmark multithread score of 19717, are more than sufficient to handle the game's demands. However, the measured FPS data suggests that the CPU is not the primary constraint in this system. The fact that frame rates drop so significantly with resolution increases points directly to the GPU as the bottleneck. The CPU is likely able to process the game's simulation and prepare frames well ahead of the GPU, which then struggles to render them at higher resolutions. This is a situation where the CPU's headroom is being left untapped because the GPU cannot keep up. The Ryzen 5 5600G is performing its role effectively, but its potential is wasted in this configuration.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is an integrated GPU based on the Xe3-LPG architecture. Its performance is characterized by a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482, which places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include very old, low-end discrete GPUs like the GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, which underscores its limited capabilities. It has a boost clock of 2500 MHz and a TDP of 80 W, but its memory is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's main memory, which is a major performance bottleneck.

The data leaves no doubt that the GPU is the definitive limiting factor in this combo. The severe frame rate drops at higher resolutions are a direct consequence of the Arc B390's inability to handle the increased pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth demands. With only 1536 shading units and a memory bus that is "System Dependent," it cannot provide the throughput needed for a smooth experience at 1440p or 4K. The 12 RT cores are present, but the raw rasterization performance is too low. The benchmark results show that even at 1080p, the Ultra preset is too demanding, which is typical for an iGPU. This is a clear case where the GPU's low percentile ranking (9th) and the system's low combo ranking (2611th) are directly correlated. The Intel Arc B390's performance is the single greatest factor holding back the entire system in Ready Or Not.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B390

VRAM System Shared System Shared
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2500 MHz MHz
TDP 80 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + Intel Arc B390 in Ready Or Not

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 41.0
3840x2160 Medium 36.0
3840x2160 High 33.0
3840x2160 Ultra 23.0
2560x1440 Low 79.0
2560x1440 Medium 69.0
2560x1440 High 62.0
2560x1440 Ultra 44.0
1920x1080 Low 125.0
1920x1080 Medium 109.0
1920x1080 High 99.0
1920x1080 Ultra 69.0

Ready Or Not with Ryzen 5 5600G + Other GPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Ready Or Not with Arc B390 + Other CPUs

See how Ready Or Not performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600G + Arc B390

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.