Ready Or Not

Ready Or Not is a demanding tactical shooter that punishes both CPU and GPU heavily, and the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G with the Intel Arc B370 produces a very specific performance profile. The data shows a system that can deliver smooth frame rates at 1080p, but which struggles significantly as resolution increases, revealing a clear hardware bottleneck. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain exactly what this combo can do, where its limits are, and how to best configure the game for a playable experience.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking pattern in the measured data is how sharply performance degrades as resolution climbs from 1080p to 4K. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo averages 89 FPS, which is a solidly playable frame rate for a tactical shooter. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same High preset, the average drops to 56 FPS, a substantial 37% reduction in performance. The jump to 3840x2160 is even more punishing, with the average FPS falling to 29, which is less than one-third of the 1080p performance. This steep decline indicates that the Intel Arc B370, with its 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 20 ROPs, is quickly overwhelmed by the pixel count, making it the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly telling. At High settings, the drop from 56 FPS to 29 FPS represents a 48% performance loss, which is nearly proportional to the increase in pixel count (from 3.7 million to 8.3 million pixels). This near-linear scaling is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario. The Arc B370's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning it shares system memory, and this shared bandwidth is likely a major contributor to the severe frame rate collapse at 4K, where the demand for texture data and framebuffer access skyrockets. The data suggests that at 4K, the GPU is simply running out of resources to feed the display pipeline.

Interestingly, the scaling between 1080p and 1440p is less drastic but still significant. The 33 FPS difference at High settings (89 to 56) shows that even a modest resolution increase from Full HD to Quad HD puts considerable strain on the graphics processor. This indicates that while the combo is capable of high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, it is not suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming. The bottleneck shifts from the CPU at 1080p, where the Ryzen 5 4600G's 6 cores and 12 threads can keep up with the GPU's output, to a complete GPU bottleneck at 1440p and beyond, where the Arc B370's limited pixel throughput and ROP count become insurmountable obstacles.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Ready Or Not at 4K resolution?

A: Technically yes, but the experience will be poor. The measured data shows an average of 29 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, and only 21 FPS at Ultra. These frame rates are below the threshold for a smooth, responsive tactical shooter, making 4K gaming impractical for this combo.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The data clearly indicates 1920x1080 is the sweet spot. At this resolution, the combo achieves an average of 89 FPS on High settings and 113 FPS on Low. This is the only resolution where the system consistently delivers frame rates high enough for a fluid experience.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is substantial. The average frame rate at 1920x1080 on Low is 113 FPS, while on Ultra it drops to 63 FPS. This represents a 50 FPS swing, or a 44% performance penalty for maxing out the visual quality settings.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G holding back the Intel Arc B370 at 1080p?

A: At 1080p, the data suggests a balanced load. The CPU's 3.70 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock, along with its 12 threads, are sufficient to feed the GPU, as evidenced by the high frame rates. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs also indicates it is a capable mid-range processor that won't be a major hindrance at this resolution.

Q: What kind of frame rates can I expect at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. This is a playable range, but it is on the lower end for a fast-paced tactical shooter where quick reactions matter.

Q: How does the Arc B370's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Arc B370's average benchmark score is 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a delta of -0.2%, meaning they are statistically tied in performance. This positions the Arc B370 as a very low-end graphics solution, comparable to hardware from over a decade ago.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G, based on the Zen 2 architecture built on a 7 nm process, has 6 cores and 12 threads. Its base clock is 3.70 GHz, which can boost up to 4.20 GHz. This specification set makes it a competent processor for gaming, particularly when paired with a lower-end GPU. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13593 and a single-core score of 1919, indicate it has enough processing power to handle game logic and AI in a title like Ready Or Not, which is known for being CPU-intensive in its simulation of AI squadmates and suspects.

In the context of this pairing, the CPU's role is critical at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the Arc B370 is not the limiting factor, and the Ryzen 5 4600G's performance allows the system to reach an average of 113 FPS on Low settings. This shows that the CPU can drive high frame rates when the graphical load is light. However, the data also shows that the CPU's performance ceiling is not the primary concern here. The 3dmark single-thread score of 726 and the passmark single-thread score of 2653 suggest that while single-thread performance is adequate, it is not exceptional. This could become a bottleneck in scenarios with many AI characters, but the measured FPS data does not show this being an issue at 1080p.

The CPU's 8 MB of shared L3 cache is another factor in its gaming performance. While this is a modest amount by modern standards, it is sufficient for the 4600G's role in this system. The benchmark results show a 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors on the market. This places it above rivals like the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and the Intel Core 7 150U, which have average scores of 17482 and 17395 respectively, with the 4600G posting an average score of 17507. This indicates that the CPU is a solid foundation, but the pairing is ultimately let down by the GPU's inability to scale with resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo performs admirably. With Low settings, the average FPS is 113, providing a very smooth experience. Medium settings bring the average down to 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS, still well within playable territory. High settings yield an average of 89 FPS, which is excellent for a tactical shooter. Only at Ultra settings does performance dip to an average of 63 FPS, which is still playable but shows a significant hit to visual fidelity for the performance cost.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops are more pronounced. Low settings yield an average of 71 FPS, which is acceptable. Medium settings average 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS, which is borderline for a game requiring precision. High settings drop to an average of 56 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 40 FPS. The data shows that 1440p is the upper limit for this combo, and only with reduced settings can it maintain playable frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly out of its depth. Low settings average only 37 FPS, which is choppy. Medium settings average 32 FPS, with a minimum of 28 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS. High settings average just 29 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to a slideshow-like 21 FPS. These numbers confirm that 4K is not a viable option for this hardware combination. The measured data indicates that the Intel Arc B370 is simply not powerful enough to handle the pixel throughput required at 4K, resulting in a consistently sub-30 FPS experience at most settings levels.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined performance of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and Intel Arc B370 places it in the 2710th position out of 2947 tested combos for Ready Or Not. This rank, which is in the bottom 8% of all combinations, reflects the severe bottleneck created by the Arc B370. While the CPU is a reasonably capable performer, the GPU's 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs drags the entire system down. The data shows that this is a fundamentally unbalanced pairing for this particular game.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all older, low-end parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, and AMD Radeon HD 7650M all score within 1% of the Arc B370's average benchmark score of 1184. This puts the Arc B370 in the same performance tier as graphics cards from the early 2010s, which explains why the combo ranks so low. The combo's rank of 2710 suggests that most other CPU and GPU pairings tested will provide a better experience in Ready Or Not, likely achieving higher frame rates at lower resolutions or maintaining playable performance at higher resolutions.

The data shows a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU rankings. The Ryzen 5 4600G's 71st percentile ranking is a solid mid-range result, but the Arc B370's 5th percentile ranking is a bottom-tier result. This extreme disparity is the defining characteristic of this combo. The CPU is not the primary issue; it is the GPU that holds the system back, preventing it from achieving competitive frame rates in a demanding title like Ready Or Not. The combo's overall rank of 2710 out of 2947 is a clear indicator that this is a low-performance configuration for this game.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal way to play Ready Or Not with this combo is at 1920x1080 resolution. This is the only resolution where the system can consistently deliver frame rates above 60 FPS. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset is recommended. It yields an average of 89 FPS, providing a smooth and responsive experience while still offering a good level of graphical detail. The Medium preset is also a strong choice, with an average of 98 FPS and a minimum of 83 FPS, ensuring that even in intense firefights, the frame rate will not dip below a playable level.

If maximizing frame rate is the priority, the Low preset at 1080p delivers an average of 113 FPS. This is the best choice for competitive play or for users with high refresh rate monitors, as it ensures the highest possible frame pacing. However, the visual downgrade from Low to High is noticeable, and the 24 FPS difference may not be worth the loss in graphical fidelity for most players. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with an average of 63 FPS, is not recommended, as it incurs a significant performance penalty for marginal visual improvements over High.

For users who must play at 2560x1440, the data suggests using the Low preset, which averages 71 FPS. The Medium preset at this resolution is borderline, with an average of 62 FPS and a minimum of 53 FPS, which may lead to occasional stutters in busy scenes. It is advisable to avoid High and Ultra settings at 1440p, as they drop to 56 FPS and 40 FPS respectively, making the game feel sluggish. Playing at 3840x2160 is not recommended, as even the Low preset only achieves an average of 37 FPS, which is not a satisfactory experience for a tactical shooter. The data clearly shows that 1080p with Medium or High settings is the only way to get a consistent, high-quality experience with this hardware.