Ready Or Not

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a distinctive performance profile in Ready Or Not, one that is heavily dictated by the processor's age and the graphics solution's integrated nature. The data indicates a combination that is strictly entry-level in this title, with a combo rank of 2710 out of 2947 tested configurations. This places the pairing in the bottom 8% of all combos, a position that aligns with the individual component benchmarks: the CPU sits at the 75th percentile of all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 5th percentile. The benchmark results show a system that can achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with adjusted settings, but which struggles significantly as resolution increases.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen architecture, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, and its benchmark results reflect a chip that remains competitive for its age. With a PassMark multithread score of 13160 and a single-thread score of 2239, the CPU demonstrates a balanced capability for both multi-threaded workloads and the primary-thread performance that many games rely upon. The data shows its average benchmark score is 21484, placing it within a close margin of its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, which scores 21440 (a delta of 0.2%), and the Intel Core i9-11900H, which scores 21367 (a delta of 0.5%).

In Ready Or Not, a tactical shooter that simulates numerous AI-driven characters and environmental interactions, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to handle the game's simulation logic. The L3 cache of 16 MB (shared) provides a reasonable pool for game data, though the older DDR4 memory support and dual-channel bus, with a bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, might limit data transfer speeds in more demanding scenarios. However, the benchmark results indicate that at lower resolutions, the CPU is not the primary bottleneck. For instance, at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 113 FPS, suggesting the processor can feed the GPU adequately. The CPU's performance in physics and integer math tests — a PassMark physics score of 673 and an integer math score of 44518 — supports its ability to handle the game's core logic without becoming a severe limiting factor at 1080p.

The relationship between the CPU and the game's results becomes clearer when examining the frame rate scaling. As resolution increases, the frame rates drop dramatically, which points to the GPU becoming the limiting component. The CPU's role is to provide a stable foundation; it does not appear to hold back performance at 1440p or 4K, where the integrated graphics of the Arc B370 are clearly overwhelmed. The 12 nm process node and 65 W TDP indicate an older, less power-efficient design, but for this game, the architectural capability to handle 12 threads is more relevant than the process technology.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a playable frame rate?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the average FPS remains above 60 across all settings. At 1080p, Low settings yield 113 FPS, Medium yields 98 FPS, High yields 89 FPS, and even Ultra maintains 63 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops below 71 even on Low, and at 3840x2160, the maximum average is 37 FPS on Low.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: The combo rank is 2710 out of 2947 total tested combos in Ready Or Not. This places the pairing in the bottom 8% of all tested systems, indicating a very low overall performance level relative to the database's other configurations.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 2600 has an average benchmark score of 21484. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V, scores 21440, which is a delta of 0.2% (the 2600 is slightly faster). The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367 (0.5% slower), and the AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223 (1.2% slower). The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.7% faster than the 2600.

Q: Is the integrated GPU capable of running the game at Ultra settings?

A: Yes, but only at 1080p and with a marginal frame rate. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 63 FPS. At 1440p Ultra, the average drops to 40 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 21 FPS, which is not a smooth experience.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, which is 0.2% faster. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% faster), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% faster). The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% slower.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 62 FPS at 2560x1440 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. This is a playable experience, though it is close to the threshold where frame drops become noticeable.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data for this combo reveals a clear hierarchy of performance across settings and resolutions. For the best overall experience, the data suggests that 1080p with Medium settings is the sweet spot. At 1920x1080, Medium settings deliver an average of 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring smoother gameplay during intense firefights. The High preset at 1080p yields 89 FPS, which is still excellent, but the jump from Medium to High does not offer a proportional visual benefit for the 9 FPS cost in this scenario.

For users who prioritize visual fidelity, 1080p Ultra is technically playable at an average of 63 FPS, but the lack of a minimum FPS measurement suggests potential dips that could affect the experience in a tactical shooter where reaction time is critical. The data indicates that Low settings at 1080p are unnecessary, as the 113 FPS average exceeds what most displays can show, and the visual downgrade is significant.

At 1440p, the options are more constrained. Medium settings at 2560x1440 provide an average of 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS. This is the only 1440p preset that remains near the playable threshold. High settings at 1440p drop to 56 FPS, and Low settings, while averaging 71 FPS, likely sacrifice too much visual detail for the resolution. The 4K resolution is not recommended for this combo, as even Low settings only achieve 37 FPS, which is below the threshold for a smooth tactical shooter experience. Therefore, the data strongly supports 1080p Medium as the optimal balance of frame rate and visual quality for this hardware pairing.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo rank of 2710 out of 2947 tested combinations in Ready Or Not is a stark indicator of this system's position in the performance hierarchy. This rank places the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Arc B370 pairing in the 92nd percentile from the bottom, meaning that 91.8% of tested combos perform better in this game. This is unsurprising given the individual component data: the GPU's 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the primary drag on the system's overall performance.

The CPU's 75th percentile ranking shows it is a mid-range part relative to all processors, but the GPU's integrated nature (with a 25 W TDP and system-shared memory) is a severe limitation. The benchmark data suggests that the CPU is not the main issue, as its average benchmark score of 21484 is competitive with its nearest rivals. For context, the combo rank is not a linear combination of the component percentiles, but the GPU's low standing is clearly the dominant factor. The pairing's rank indicates that while the CPU can hold its own, the graphics solution cannot keep pace with even the lowest-tier discrete GPUs in the database, resulting in a system that is only suitable for 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The FPS scaling across resolutions in Ready Or Not provides a textbook example of GPU-bound performance. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 113 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the average FPS drops to 71, a decrease of 37.2%. At 4K Low, the average falls to 37 FPS, a 67.3% drop from 1080p. This scaling pattern is consistent with a GPU that is overwhelmed by pixel count.

Looking at Medium settings, the 1080p average is 98 FPS, which drops to 62 FPS at 1440p (a 36.7% decrease) and 32 FPS at 4K (a 67.3% decrease). The High settings follow a similar trajectory: 89 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p (37.1% decrease), and 29 FPS at 4K (67.4% decrease). The consistency of these percentage drops across all settings is a clear sign that the resolution is the primary variable affecting performance, not the CPU.

The data shows that the frame rate roughly halves when going from 1080p to 4K, which is expected for a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the processor's workload would not increase significantly with pixel count. The fact that FPS scales inversely with resolution indicates that the Intel Arc B370, with its system-shared memory and low pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s, is the definitive bottleneck. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to maintain frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth constraints become insurmountable at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a complete picture of its capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably across all presets. Low settings yield an average of 113 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 98 FPS, with a minimum of 83 FPS and a maximum of 113 FPS. High settings achieve an average of 89 FPS. Ultra settings, which are the most demanding, still manage an average of 63 FPS, making it the only resolution where Ultra is playable.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. Low settings average 71 FPS. Medium settings average 62 FPS, with a minimum of 53 FPS and a maximum of 71 FPS. High settings average 56 FPS. Ultra settings average 40 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings average 37 FPS. Medium settings average 32 FPS, with a minimum of 28 FPS and a maximum of 37 FPS. High settings average 29 FPS. Ultra settings average 21 FPS, which is effectively unplayable for a tactical shooter.

The data shows a linear progression from 1080p to 4K, with each resolution step costing roughly 30-40% of the frame rate. The lack of min/max FPS data for most presets limits the analysis of frame pacing, but the available data for Medium settings shows a consistent spread, with the minimum being roughly 15-20% lower than the average. This suggests that while the system is stable, there are occasional dips that could be noticeable in tense gameplay moments.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The GPU features 10 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. Its memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it relies on the system's DDR4 RAM, with bandwidth that is "System Dependent." This is a critical limitation for a game like Ready Or Not, which requires high memory bandwidth for texture streaming and scene complexity.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, 0.2% faster) and the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, 0.5% faster). The FP32 performance is rated at 6.144 TFLOPS, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. These specifications, while not impressive by discrete GPU standards, are typical for an integrated part. The 25 W TDP and "IGP" slot width indicate that this is not designed for high-end gaming.

In Ready Or Not, the GPU's role is the primary determinant of performance at higher resolutions. The system-shared memory, which is dependent on the CPU's dual-channel DDR4 bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, creates a bottleneck that becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. The data shows that the GPU can handle 1080p gaming with reasonable frame rates, but its fill rate and memory constraints cause the FPS to plummet at 1440p and 4K. The 20 ROPs are insufficient for high pixel throughput, and the 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate is a clear limiting factor. The GPU's low percentile ranking and the fact that its nearest rivals are all over a decade old underscore its position as an entry-level solution, one that is only suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in this title.