Pc Building Simulator

Benchmark results for Pc Building Simulator use the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile as a tested combination. The dataset contains measured FPS rows at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 across Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings. This combo is ranked 745th out of 3723 tested combinations, and the data is marked as measured. The range of results runs from 370 fps at 1080p Low to 61 fps at 4K Ultra.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows cover four presets at three resolutions. At 1080p, the averages are 370 fps for Low, 274 fps for Medium, 193 fps for High, and 184 fps for Ultra. At 1440p, the same preset order produces 244, 173, 122, and 116 fps. At 4K, the values are 127, 90, 64, and 61 fps.

High is the recommended preset from this measured set. It is the highest preset that stays close to Ultra in every resolution while still sitting at a playable level across all three. High and Ultra are separated by these measured averages: 193 vs 184 at 1080p, 122 vs 116 at 1440p, and 64 vs 61 at 4K. That is a narrow separation, and the dataset does not include a visual quality metric, so High delivers nearly the same FPS class as Ultra without requiring the Ultra setting.

Low and Medium produce higher frame rates, but they sit further down the settings ladder. Low at 1080p reaches 370 fps, which is the highest average in the entire measured set. Medium at 1080p reaches 274 fps, with a minimum of 233 fps and a maximum of 315 fps. Medium is the only preset in the dataset with min/max values: at 1440p, Medium ranges from 147 to 199 fps; at 4K, from 77 to 104 fps. The absence of min/max rows for Low, High, and Ultra means frame-by-frame variability cannot be compared directly. For a balanced experience across resolutions, High is the strongest choice among the measured presets.

FAQ

Q: What is the fastest measured result in the dataset?

A: The fastest result is 370 fps at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The same resolution produces 274 fps on Medium, 193 fps on High, and 184 fps on Ultra.

Q: How does this combo rank in Pc Building Simulator?

A: The combo ranks 745th out of 3723 tested combinations. The CPU sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU sits at the 84th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Which components appear closest in aggregate benchmark score?

A: The CPU's nearest listed rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 with an average score of 35719 and a deltaPct of -0.1, the Intel Core 7 250H at 35728 and -0.2, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 at 35802 and -0.4, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35909 and -0.7. The GPU's nearest listed rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384 and -0.5, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti at 44795 and 0.8, the Intel Arc A730M at 45592 and -1, and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45972 and -1.8.

Q: Does the dataset include minimum and maximum FPS?

A: Only for Medium. At 1080p Medium, the range is 233 to 315 fps. At 1440p Medium, it is 147 to 199 fps. At 4K Medium, it is 77 to 104 fps. All other preset rows list only average FPS.

Q: What are the GPU's memory specifications?

A: The RTX 5090 Mobile uses 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, listed as 28 Gbps effective. The GPU's base and boost clocks are 990 MHz and 1515 MHz.

Q: What are the CPU's core and clock specifications?

A: The Core Ultra 9 185H has 16 cores, 22 threads, a base clock of 3.90 GHz, a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Its TDP is 45 W.

GPU Role

The RTX 5090 Mobile is the rendering component in this combination. It is built on a 5 nm TSMC process using the GB203 chip and Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The GPU has 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. Its FP32 and FP16 throughput are both listed at 31.80 TFLOPS. The memory package is 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 990 MHz, the boost clock is 1515 MHz, and the memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective throughput.

In Pc Building Simulator, the GPU's effect is visible in the resolution scaling of the FPS rows. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 370 at 1080p to 127 at 4K. At Medium, it falls from 274 to 90. At High, from 193 to 64. At Ultra, from 184 to 61. These are large measured differences across the three resolutions, and they show the renderer taking on more work as the pixel count grows. The 24 GB frame buffer and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are the memory specifications associated with those results, although the dataset does not include VRAM usage measurements, so the exact capacity headroom cannot be isolated.

The GPU's aggregate benchmark score is 45152, placing it at the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest listed rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT at 45384, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti at 44795, the Intel Arc A730M at 45592, and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation at 45972. The deltaPct values for those rivals are -0.5, 0.8, -1, and -1.8. This suggests the RTX 5090 Mobile scores in the same aggregate range as the four GPUs listed around it, even though its in-game FPS profile is determined by this specific title's measured rows.

How This Combo Ranks

The game-specific rank for this combo is 745 out of 3723 tested combinations in Pc Building Simulator. That rank is based on measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H paired with the RTX 5090 Mobile. The CPU's aggregate score is 35670, ranking at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's aggregate score is 45152, ranking at the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Both components sit at similar percentile levels, and the measured FPS table reflects that pairing: high but not extreme values across the tested presets.

A rank of 745 out of 3723 places the combination in the upper portion of the tested field, without putting it at the very top. The measured FPS rows are the primary evidence: 370 fps at 1080p Low, 274 fps at 1080p Medium, 193 fps at 1080p High, and 184 fps at 1080p Ultra. At 1440p, the same preset order produces 244, 173, 122, and 116 fps. At 4K, it produces 127, 90, 64, and 61 fps. These results are internally consistent, and the combination's rank reflects that measured performance rather than synthetic scores alone.

Resolution Scaling

Average FPS decreases as resolution rises in every measured preset. Low settings scale from 370 at 1080p to 244 at 1440p and 127 at 4K. Medium scales from 274 to 173 to 90. High scales from 193 to 122 to 64. Ultra scales from 184 to 116 to 61. The pattern is monotonic: each higher resolution produces a lower average FPS.

The 1080p results are high enough to indicate that the processor is not preventing very high frame rates at the lower end of the resolution range. The 370 fps Low result is the ceiling of the dataset, and it appears when the GPU has the least rendering work to do. The CPU's benchmark profile supports this: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 17984.5, single-core scores 1810.5, and PassMark multithread scores 29376. At 4K, the same CPU and GPU pair stays at 61 fps on Ultra and 127 fps on Low. That shift with resolution points to the rendering subsystem taking on the larger share of the added load. The Medium rows add the only min/max data: 233 to 315 fps at 1080p, 147 to 199 fps at 1440p, and 77 to 104 fps at 4K. Those ranges confirm that the same preset behaves differently across resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|

| 3840x2160 | High | 64 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 127 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 90 | 77 | 104 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 61 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 122 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 244 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 173 | 147 | 199 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 116 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 193 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 370 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 274 | 233 | 315 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 184 | — | — |

The table shows a consistent ordering within each resolution: Low produces the highest average FPS, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. At 1080p, the spread runs from 370 on Low down to 184 on Ultra. At 1440p, it runs from 244 down to 116. At 4K, it runs from 127 down to 61. Medium is the only preset with measured minimum and maximum values, and those values appear at all three resolutions: 233 to 315 at 1080p, 147 to 199 at 1440p, and 77 to 104 at 4K. All other rows contain only the average FPS. These are the complete measured FPS data available for this CPU and GPU combination in Pc Building Simulator.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is a mobile Meteor Lake processor built on a 7 nm process. It has 16 cores and 22 threads, a base clock of 3.90 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The cache layout is 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Its TDP is 45 W. The memory interface is dual-channel, supporting DDR5 depending on the motherboard, with 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The socket is Intel BGA 2049, and the PCIe interface is listed as Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU.

The CPU's aggregate benchmark score is 35670, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals form a close group: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at 35719, the Intel Core 7 250H at 35728, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 at 35802, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35909. Their deltaPct values are -0.1, -0.2, -0.4, and -0.7. In individual benchmarks, the CPU scores 17984.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1810.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 11657 in Geekbench multi-core, and 1794 in Geekbench single-core. PassMark multithread scores 29376, PassMark single-thread scores 3697, PassMark integer math scores 98302, and PassMark floating-point math scores 73270.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role appears most clearly in the high frame rates at 1080p. The Low preset reaches 370 fps, and even the Ultra preset at 1080p reaches 184 fps. Those results require a processor that can feed frames quickly when the GPU is not heavily loaded. The CPU's 16 cores and 22 threads provide broad multi-thread capacity, while the 3.90 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock supply high peak frequency. The dataset does not include per-core utilization, so the CPU's exact share of each measured frame cannot be separated from the GPU's contribution. The measured evidence, however, shows a processor capable of supporting the full FPS table in this combination.