Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 219 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 80 | 84 | 117 | 164 |
| 1440p QHD | 151 | 158 | 222 | 316 |
| 1080p Full HD | 237 | 251 | 354 | 493 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, In-Depth Analysis
Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents a unique workload that scales dramatically across resolutions and settings. The data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 shows a configuration that is exceptionally powerful at standard resolutions, yet exhibits a steep performance curve as graphical demands increase. The measured frames per second (FPS) range from a staggering 493.3 FPS at 1080p Low to a still-very-playable 80.1 FPS at 4K Ultra, indicating a system with substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions, while remaining capable of delivering smooth 4K experiences. This analysis examines the measured data, contextualizes the performance against the hardware's specifications, and provides recommendations for the optimal settings for this specific combination.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 493.3 FPS, which was achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
Q: How does the Ultra preset at 4K compare to the High preset at 4K?
A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset yields an average of 80.1 FPS, while the High preset yields an average of 84 FPS. This represents a minor performance difference, with Ultra being approximately 4.6% slower in this specific comparison.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Medium settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves an average of 316.1 FPS, while the Medium preset achieves 221.9 FPS. The transition from Low to Medium results in a significant 94.2 FPS drop, which is a 29.8% reduction in average frame rate.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rival?
A: According to the benchmark data, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 79102. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, has an average score of 79240, placing the 265K just 0.2% behind.
Q: Is the RTX 5080's average benchmark score higher or lower than the Intel Arc A580?
A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 59188. The Intel Arc A580 is listed as a nearest rival with an average score of 57756, meaning the RTX 5080 is 2.5% ahead of the Arc A580 in this metric.
Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded across all tested configurations?
A: The lowest average frame rate recorded is 80.1 FPS, which occurs at the highest tested settings combination: 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides a clear picture of how this hardware combination scales with graphical presets, allowing for targeted recommendations based on display capabilities. For users with a 1920x1080 display, the Ultra preset is the definitive choice, delivering an average of 236.9 FPS. This frame rate is far beyond the refresh rate of typical monitors and provides a fluid, responsive experience without any need to compromise on visual fidelity. Dropping to High, Medium, or Low would only increase an already excessively high frame rate, providing no tangible benefit to the user.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset still delivers a very high average of 151 FPS. This is an excellent result, making it the recommended setting for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors (e.g., 144Hz or 165Hz). The High preset offers a 7 FPS increase to 158 FPS, but the marginal gain does not justify the reduction in visual quality. The data shows that the Ultra preset provides the best balance of high fidelity and high performance at this resolution.
The 3840x2160 resolution presents the most interesting decision. Here, the Ultra preset averages 80.1 FPS, which is a solidly playable frame rate for most titles. However, the High preset achieves 84 FPS, and the Medium preset jumps to 117 FPS. For a simulation game where menu navigation and UI interactions are frequent, the higher frame rates of High or Medium could provide a smoother and more responsive feel. Given that the visual difference between High and Ultra is often subtle in a game focused on system building, the High preset is the recommended choice for 4K, as it offers a performance increase of nearly 5% over Ultra while maintaining a high level of graphical detail. The Medium preset is a strong alternative for those prioritizing frame rate above all else, offering a 46% performance uplift over Ultra.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Arrow Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its benchmark results show a strong multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50009 and a single-core score of 7060. This performance profile places it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79102. The data shows it performs nearly identically to the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF (0.2% lower) and the Intel Core i9-14900KF (0.2% lower), indicating it is a top-tier competitor in its class.
In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is critical, as the game's logic, physics, and system simulation are heavily reliant on processor performance. The extremely high frame rates at 1080p (up to 493.3 FPS on Low) suggest that the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution, allowing the GPU to render frames at its maximum potential. The 20 cores and 20 threads may be leveraged by the game's background simulation of various components, and the high boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensures rapid single-threaded response for UI interactions and menu navigation. The processor's robust multi-threaded throughput, evidenced by its PassMark multi-thread score of 58838, ensures that complex system builds with multiple interacting components are simulated without causing significant frame drops, even when the GPU is not under heavy load at lower resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is placed at rank 24 out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the combo in the top 1.4% of all configurations tested, signifying an elite level of overall performance. This high ranking is a direct result of the synergy between the top-tier CPU and GPU. While the CPU's average benchmark score is 97th percentile, and the GPU's is 89th percentile, their combined performance in this specific game is ranked higher than many other pairings, indicating that this particular combination is exceptionally well-suited to the game's engine and workload.
The ranking suggests that this combo outperforms the vast majority of other systems, including those with potentially higher individual component scores. This result can be attributed to the balanced nature of the pairing, where the CPU's strong single and multi-core performance ensures it can keep up with the GPU's high frame output, especially at lower resolutions. The data implies that users with this combo will experience near-best-in-class performance, with only 23 other combinations out of 1769 providing a better experience in this simulation title.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, is the primary driver of visual output and its role becomes more pronounced as resolution and graphical demands increase. With 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, it offers a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. Its performance is substantial, with a PassMark G3D score of 36565 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637. The GPU's percentile ranking against all GPUs is 89, and its average benchmark score of 59188 puts it 1.6% ahead of the Intel Arc A570M, its closest rival in the data.
The measured FPS data clearly illustrates the GPU's scaling with resolution. At 1080p, even the Ultra preset achieves 236.9 FPS, showing the GPU is not the limiting factor at this resolution. The workload shifts dramatically at 4K, where the Ultra preset drops to 80.1 FPS. This reduction of 66% from the 1080p Ultra score highlights the immense processing power required to render at 3840x2160. The RTX 5080's 16 GB of VRAM is likely sufficient for the textures and models used in Pc Building Simulator at 4K, but the raw compute power of the GPU, with its 10752 shading units and 84 RT cores, is what determines the final frame rate. The data shows that while the GPU can handle high frame rates at 1440p and below, the 4K Ultra preset presents a significant challenge, requiring a reduction in settings to maintain higher frame rates. The boost clock of 2617 MHz and the high pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s are instrumental in meeting the demands of rendering complex scenes at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 164.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 117.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 84.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 80.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 316.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 221.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 158.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 151.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 493.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 353.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 251.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 236.9 |
Pc Building Simulator with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 5080 + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RTX 5080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.