Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a simulation title that stresses system assembly and management, and the benchmark data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER shows a combination that is heavily influenced by the graphics card at higher settings, while the CPU’s 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for the game’s logic and background simulation tasks. The processor’s base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz, combined with a 30 MB shared L3 cache, ensure that the game’s menu-driven interactions and component compatibility checks run without stutter, but the real performance ceiling is dictated by the GPU’s rendering output.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz are high enough to handle single-threaded tasks like the game’s UI rendering and part selection logic, while the 30 MB shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores. The processor also supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is sufficient for the game’s asset loading and system simulation.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is more about maintaining consistent frame pacing than pushing extreme frame rates, as the game’s core loop involves managing inventory, assembling components, and booting virtual systems. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low settings, the combo produces 468.3 FPS, which is far beyond any display’s refresh rate and indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower graphical loads. However, the processor’s 20 threads are likely utilized for simulating multiple virtual machines and running diagnostic tools within the game, which can create transient spikes in workload even if the average frame rate remains high.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reinforce its capability: it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50009 and a single-core score of 7060. In PassMark, it scores 58838 for multithreaded performance and 4904 for single-thread performance. Its percentile ranking of 97th among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Core i9-14900KF, which have average scores of 79240 and 79245, respectively, putting the 265K at a negligible 0.2% deficit. This means that in a game like Pc Building Simulator, which is not heavily multi-threaded per frame, the CPU’s high single-core throughput and large cache will keep the simulation logic responsive, but the overall FPS will be governed by the graphics card’s ability to render the 3D workshop environment.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K fast enough for Pc Building Simulator’s simulation aspects?

A: Yes. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50009 and PassMark multithread score of 58838 indicate strong parallel processing, which helps when the game simulates multiple virtual PC builds simultaneously. Its 20 cores and 20 threads provide enough parallelism for the game’s background tasks, and the high single-core score of 7060 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the main game loop remains responsive.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to its closest GPU rivals in terms of raw performance?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 53610, which puts it 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (score 53489) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (score 53414). It is 2.1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7700S (score 52505) and 2.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (score 52086), making it the strongest of these four in this metric.

Q: What is the combo’s overall ranking among all tested CPU-GPU pairs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 72nd out of 1769 tested combinations, placing it in the top 5% of all systems for this game.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts, and how do they affect gaming?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads. In Pc Building Simulator, this is more than sufficient for the game’s logic, and the benchmark data shows that even at 1080p Low, the frame rate reaches 468.3 FPS, indicating that the CPU is not a limiting factor at any tested setting.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 SUPER have enough memory bandwidth for 4K gaming?

A: Yes. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. At 4K Ultra settings, it still manages 70.6 FPS, and at 4K High it reaches 79.5 FPS, showing that the memory subsystem is not a bottleneck.

Q: How does the CPU’s launch MSRP compare to its performance tier?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has a launch MSRP of $394, which places it in the upper-midrange segment. Its benchmark scores, including an average benchmark score of 79102, put it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it delivers top-tier performance for its price class.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination holds the 72nd position out of 1769 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This ranking places it in the upper echelon of systems, with only 71 other CPU-GPU pairs outperforming it in this specific game. Given that the game is a simulation title with moderate graphical demands, the ranking suggests that the combo is well-balanced, but not the absolute fastest available.

To put this in context, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 79102 puts it in the 97th percentile, while the GPU’s average score of 53610 puts it in the 88th percentile. The gap between these percentiles indicates that the GPU is slightly less exceptional than the CPU, which could explain why the combo ranks 72nd rather than higher. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-14900K, have an average score of 79824 (0.9% higher), but in Pc Building Simulator, the difference may be negligible because the game does not heavily tax the CPU.

The GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT, has an average score 0.2% lower, which means the RTX 4080 SUPER has a slight edge. However, the combo’s rank of 72 out of 1769 still means it outperforms 95.9% of all tested systems, making it a very strong choice for this game. The data shows that the limiting factor for this combo is likely the GPU at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s performance is well above what the game requires.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo scales across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the lowest tested resolution, the combo delivers exceptional frame rates: 468.3 FPS at Low settings, 333.2 FPS at Medium, 231.3 FPS at High, and 221 FPS at Ultra. These numbers are all well above the refresh rate of any mainstream monitor, meaning the system is entirely GPU-bound at 1080p, with the CPU having no impact on performance.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop but remain high: 293.6 FPS at Low, 208.3 FPS at Medium, 150.1 FPS at High, and 137.6 FPS at Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is substantial, with the Low setting falling by 174.7 FPS (37.3%), and the Ultra setting falling by 83.4 FPS (37.7%). This indicates that the GPU is now doing more work per frame, but the CPU is still not a bottleneck.

At 3840x2160, the performance is more demanding: 153.9 FPS at Low, 111.2 FPS at Medium, 79.5 FPS at High, and 70.6 FPS at Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is below 75 FPS, which may be a concern for 4K display owners who want to enable V-Sync at 60 Hz, but it is still playable. The 4K Low result of 153.9 FPS shows that the GPU has enough headroom to push high frame rates even at this resolution if settings are reduced.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear pattern: the frame rate drops by roughly 60-70% across all settings, which is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 468.3 at 1080p to 293.6 at 1440p (a 37.3% decrease) and then to 153.9 at 4K (a 47.6% decrease from 1440p). At Ultra settings, the drop is from 221 at 1080p to 137.6 at 1440p (a 37.7% decrease) and then to 70.6 at 4K (a 48.7% decrease from 1440p).

These percentage drops are very similar across settings, which is a hallmark of GPU-limited performance. The CPU’s workload does not change significantly with resolution, so if the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see diminishing FPS drops as resolution increases. Instead, the consistent percentage drops indicate that the RTX 4080 SUPER is the limiting component at all resolutions above 1080p. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high (221 FPS at Ultra) that the CPU may start to play a larger role, but even then, the game’s simulation logic does not appear to cause stutters or frame drops.

The data shows that the 4K Ultra result of 70.6 FPS is the only setting where the combo falls below 75 FPS, meaning that users with 4K 60 Hz displays can run the game at Ultra with V-Sync enabled, but those with 4K 120 Hz or 144 Hz panels may need to drop to High settings (79.5 FPS) to maintain a higher refresh rate.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For 1080p users, the Ultra preset delivers 221 FPS, which is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor. The step from High (231.3 FPS) to Ultra (221 FPS) costs only 10.3 FPS, so the visual fidelity gain is worth it. For 1440p, the Ultra preset provides 137.6 FPS, which is excellent for 144 Hz monitors, while the High preset at 150.1 FPS is also viable for those who prefer higher frame rates over minor visual improvements. The Medium preset at 208.3 FPS is overkill for most 1440p displays.

For 4K users, the choice is more nuanced. The Ultra preset at 70.6 FPS is playable but falls short of 75 FPS, making it a borderline choice for 144 Hz panels. The High preset at 79.5 FPS is a better option for those wanting to stay above 75 FPS, and the Medium preset at 111.2 FPS provides a significant frame rate boost for minimal visual loss. The Low preset at 153.9 FPS is only recommended for competitive play or for users who prioritize frame rate above all else, as the visual quality drop is substantial.

The best overall experience for a 4K 60 Hz display is the Ultra preset, since it stays above 60 FPS and offers the highest visual fidelity. For 4K 120 Hz displays, the High preset at 79.5 FPS is the sweet spot, as it maintains a smooth experience while keeping the game looking good. The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1440p Ultra gaming, where it delivers 137.6 FPS, providing a perfect balance of visual quality and performance.