Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator is a Simulation title with a measured data set for the Intel Core i5-14600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. The combination is ranked 1716 out of 1769 tested combos. Measured averages range from 15.6 FPS at 3840x2160 High to 108.5 FPS at 1920x1080 Low. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 43rd percentile of all GPUs.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The i5-14600KF is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-R processor with a 3.50 GHz base clock and a 5.30 GHz boost clock. It has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, a 125 W TDP, and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and a 10 nm process. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 32889 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 4643 in single-core; Geekbench scores are 15636 multi-core and 2778 single-core. Its average benchmark score is 49367, and it ranks at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

The measured Pc Building Simulator data shows the CPU’s high single-thread score in the fastest rows: 1920x1080 Low reaches 108.5 FPS and 2560x1440 Low reaches 65.5 FPS. As the graphics load increases, those averages fall to 37.4 FPS at 3840x2160 Low and 15.6 FPS at 3840x2160 High. The trend is resolution-driven rather than CPU-score-driven. The nearest CPU rivals all sit within 1.4%: it is 0.4% ahead of the Core i5-14600K (49166), 0.6% ahead of the Ryzen 9 5950X (49062), 1.4% ahead of the Xeon Gold 5318H (48698), and 0.5% behind the EPYC 4345P (49595). This tight grouping means no small CPU swap would change the shape of these FPS results; the character of the combination is set elsewhere.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The GTX 1650 is a 12 nm Turing GPU with 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus. Memory bandwidth is 128.1 GB/s. It has 896 shading units, 56 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Base clock is 1485 MHz and boost is 1665 MHz; memory runs at 2001 MHz, or 8 Gbps effective. The card has a 75 W TDP and uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Its average benchmark score is 8713, which places it at the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. Nearest rivals are separated by no more than 0.5%: it trails the RTX 3050 A Mobile (8746) by 0.4%, trails the Radeon 550X (8749) by 0.4%, trails the Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8761) by 0.5%, and leads the Quadro P2200 (8671) by 0.5%.

The FPS rows follow the GPU’s capacity closely. At 1920x1080, Low is 108.5, Medium 76.7, High 55.9, and Ultra 52.7. At 2560x1440, the row values are 65.5, 49.4, 31.7, and 31.9. At 3840x2160, they fall to 37.4, 23.2, 15.6, and 16.9. The 4 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus sit behind the low 3840x2160 results, especially High at 15.6 FPS and Ultra at 16.9 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Which resolution and preset gives the highest measured average FPS?

A: 1920x1080 Low averages 108.5 FPS. The next highest row is 1920x1080 Medium at 76.7 FPS.

Q: What is the slowest measured preset?

A: 3840x2160 High averages 15.6 FPS, the lowest row in the data. 3840x2160 Ultra averages 16.9 FPS.

Q: How does the GTX 1650 compare with the four closest GPUs?

A: Its average score is 8713. It is 0.4% behind the RTX 3050 A Mobile (8746), 0.4% behind the Radeon 550X (8749), 0.5% behind the Radeon Pro WX 5100 (8761), and 0.5% ahead of the Quadro P2200 (8671).

Q: Why is the combo rank so low when the CPU is in the 93rd percentile?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49367, but the GPU’s is 8713. The measured rows drop sharply as resolution and settings increase, and the GPU sits at the 43rd percentile. The combo’s rank of 1716 out of 1769 reflects that lower GPU position rather than the CPU’s high percentile.

Q: Which 2560x1440 setting performs best in this data set?

A: 2560x1440 Low averages 65.5 FPS. Medium is 49.4, High is 31.7, and Ultra is 31.9. Low is the only 2560x1440 row that exceeds the 1920x1080 High result of 55.9 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination’s in-game rank is 1716 out of 1769 tested combinations. This places it near the lower end of the database’s measured results. The CPU is a high-percentile component, but the GPU is not, and the measured FPS data is heavily influenced by the GPU side. The CPU’s nearest rivals differ by no more than 1.4%, and the GPU’s nearest rivals differ by no more than 0.5%, so the combo’s low rank is not the result of an unusually bad sample of either part. It is the product of pairing a 93rd-percentile CPU with a 43rd-percentile GPU in a title whose FPS scales strongly with resolution and preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data is as follows. Minimum and maximum FPS are null in this data set, so all listed values are averages.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

|---|---:|---:|

| 3840x2160 | High | 15.6 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 37.4 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 23.2 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 16.9 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 31.7 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 65.5 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 49.4 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 31.9 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 55.9 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 108.5 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 76.7 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 52.7 |

At 3840x2160, High is the slowest row at 15.6 and Low the fastest 3840x2160 row at 37.4. At 2560x1440, Low at 65.5 is the only row above 1920x1080 High at 55.9. At 1920x1080, all four rows are above 52.7, with Low at 108.5 and Medium at 76.7.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows indicate 1920x1080 Medium as the strongest balanced option. It delivers 76.7 FPS while remaining above every row outside 1920x1080 except 2560x1440 Low at 65.5. At 1920x1080, High at 55.9 and Ultra at 52.7 fall below that 2560x1440 Low figure, so neither offers a better measured outcome than Medium. 1920x1080 Low at 108.5 FPS is the fastest row overall, but Medium is the highest 1920x1080 preset that still beats the best 2560x1440 row.

At 2560x1440, Low at 65.5 is the only preset above 1920x1080 High at 55.9; Medium, High, and Ultra at 49.4, 31.7, and 31.9 are all lower. At 3840x2160, Low at 37.4 is the fastest row, but every 3840x2160 row is below 1920x1080 Ultra at 52.7 and below 2560x1440 Medium at 49.4. If the goal is the best combination of measured FPS and higher settings, the data points to 1920x1080 Medium as the balanced choice.