Pc Building Simulator
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 187 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 69 | 69 | 102 | 143 |
| 1440p QHD | 132 | 135 | 189 | 275 |
| 1080p Full HD | 208 | 216 | 307 | 394 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title focused on assembling and troubleshooting PCs, presents a unique performance profile with the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The measured frame rates show that this combination is exceptionally powerful for the game, delivering high refresh rate performance even at demanding resolutions. The data indicates that the GPU is the scaling bottleneck at higher settings, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that frame rates remain high even when graphical loads are reduced.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is significant, but the absolute numbers remain playable across the board. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 394.3 FPS at 1920x1080 to 143.4 FPS at 3840x2160, a reduction of roughly 64%. This steep decline is the expected result of increased pixel count, where the RTX 4070 Ti's rendering workload grows substantially. However, even at 4K Low, the frame rate is far above the 60 FPS threshold, showing that the GPU still has considerable headroom.
The scaling pattern shifts with higher quality presets. At High settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 216.3 FPS down to 69.1 FPS. This is a smaller percentage reduction (about 68%) than what is seen at Low settings, which suggests that as the graphical load increases, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor earlier in the resolution scaling. The difference between 1440p and 4K at High settings is particularly telling: 135.4 FPS versus 69.1 FPS. That near-halving of performance indicates that 4K is where the card's pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint.
The data also shows that the gap between Ultra and Low settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Ultra (208.1 FPS) and Low (394.3 FPS) is 186 FPS. At 4K, that same gap is only 74.6 FPS (68.8 vs 143.4). This is a classic sign of a system that is CPU-bound at lower resolutions; the Ryzen 5 7600 is able to feed frames quickly at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain that pace at 4K. The benchmark results indicate that 1440p is the sweet spot for balancing visual fidelity and high refresh rates, as it maintains an average above 131 FPS across all tested settings.
Settings Recommendations
For users targeting a standard 60 Hz display, the Ultra preset at 4K is viable, as it produces an average of 68.8 FPS. This allows for the maximum visual quality without dropping below the refresh rate threshold. However, the data suggests that High settings at 4K (69.1 FPS) are nearly identical in performance to Ultra (68.8 FPS), making Ultra the better choice for those who want the best image quality without a meaningful performance penalty.
For high refresh rate gaming at 1440p, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It delivers an average of 135.4 FPS, which is well-suited for 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitors. The Medium preset at 1440p offers a significant boost to 189.3 FPS, but the visual difference between Medium and High in a simulation game like this is often less critical than the frame rate jump. The Low preset at 1440p reaches 275.1 FPS, which is excessive for most displays and sacrifices too much visual detail.
At 1080p, the situation is reversed. The CPU is likely the bottleneck, as the GPU is capable of much higher frame rates. The Ultra preset at 1080p still yields an average of 208.1 FPS, so there is no reason to lower settings for performance reasons. The Low preset at 1080p (394.3 FPS) is only useful for competitive play on a 360 Hz monitor, but the gains over Ultra are not worth the graphical compromises. The measured rows show that the RTX 4070 Ti is overkill for 1080p in this title, making Ultra the only sensible choice for that resolution.
FAQ
Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti overkill for 1080p gaming in Pc Building Simulator?
A: Yes, the data shows that at 1080p with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 208.1 FPS. Even at Low settings, the average is 394.3 FPS, indicating that the GPU has far more headroom than a standard 1080p monitor can display.
Q: What is the best resolution for a 144 Hz monitor with this setup?
A: The 2560x1440 resolution with High settings is the best match, as it produces an average of 135.4 FPS. This is above the 144 Hz refresh rate threshold, though the Medium preset (189.3 FPS) can provide a larger buffer if you prefer higher frame rates.
Q: How does the Ultra preset compare to High at 4K?
A: The Ultra preset averages 68.8 FPS, while High averages 69.1 FPS. The performance difference is negligible, so using Ultra is recommended for the best visual quality at 4K.
Q: Does the CPU limit performance at any resolution?
A: The data suggests that at 1080p Low, the frame rate of 394.3 FPS is likely limited by the CPU's single-thread performance, as the GPU is capable of much more. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this GPU and CPU combo?
A: Yes, 4K gaming is viable. The High and Ultra presets both average close to 69 FPS, which is smooth for a simulation game. The Medium preset at 4K (101.6 FPS) provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS for those who want more headroom.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: The Low preset averages 275.1 FPS, while Ultra averages 131.6 FPS. This is a 143.5 FPS difference, which shows a substantial performance cost for the highest quality settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 4070 Ti produces excellent frame rates across all presets. The Low preset averages 394.3 FPS, which is the highest measured in the entire data set. Medium settings drop to 307.2 FPS, High to 216.3 FPS, and Ultra to 208.1 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is only 8.2 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset offers a nearly free improvement in visual quality over High.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but show a clearer tiering. Low averages 275.1 FPS, Medium 189.3 FPS, High 135.4 FPS, and Ultra 131.6 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 53.9 FPS, which is a significant cost for the increased detail. The difference between High and Ultra narrows to just 3.8 FPS, again making Ultra the better value in terms of performance per visual gain.
At 3840x2160, the GPU workload becomes much more demanding. Low averages 143.4 FPS, which is still excellent for 4K. Medium drops to 101.6 FPS, High to 69.1 FPS, and Ultra to 68.8 FPS. The 4K results show a clear inflection point: High and Ultra are nearly identical, while Medium provides a substantial 32.5 FPS advantage over High. This indicates that the Ultra preset at 4K is not significantly more demanding than High, but Medium is a more efficient choice for those prioritizing frame rate.
The overall pattern across all resolutions is that High and Ultra presets are tightly grouped, while Medium and Low offer progressively larger performance gains. For a game like Pc Building Simulator, where the visual detail may not be as critical as in fast-paced shooters, the Medium preset at 4K (101.6 FPS) is a strong recommendation for a smooth experience.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process node. It features 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The core runs at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The card's pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s.
The benchmark results show that the GPU is the primary scaling factor in Pc Building Simulator. The frame rate differences between resolutions are directly tied to the GPU's ability to process pixels and textures. At 4K, the card is pushed to its limits, with the Ultra preset producing an average of 68.8 FPS. This aligns with the GPU's 85th percentile ranking among all GPUs, placing it above the average but not at the top tier.
The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM is not a limiting factor in this game, as the simulation does not require large texture pools. The measured data shows no signs of memory-related stuttering or frame drops. The card's FP32 performance of 40.09 TFLOPS is more than sufficient for the game's rendering demands, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The nearest rivals to the RTX 4070 Ti include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (0.6% faster) and the Intel Arc A730M (1.5% faster), which confirms that this desktop card is competitive with high-end mobile parts in synthetic benchmarks, though the game-specific results show it excels at high refresh rates.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The processor is built on a 5 nm process and has a TDP of 65 W.
The CPU's role in Pc Building Simulator becomes apparent when analyzing the scaling from 1440p to 1080p. At 1440p Low, the average frame rate is 275.1 FPS, while at 1080p Low, it jumps to 394.3 FPS. This 119 FPS increase is substantial, but not as large as the jump from 4K to 1440p. The data indicates that the CPU's single-thread performance is still capable of pushing over 390 FPS, which confirms its 5.10 GHz boost clock and strong IPC from Zen 4.
The CPU's 3DMark scores reflect this strength. The single-thread score of 999 and the 2-thread score of 1938 show that the processor excels at lightly-threaded tasks, which is common for game logic in simulation titles. The multi-threaded scores, such as the 3DMark 16-thread score of 6499 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22992, indicate that it can handle more complex tasks as well. The CPU ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26617, placing it in a tight grouping with rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (0.2% faster) and the Intel Core i9-11900K (0.3% faster).
In the context of this game, the CPU is not a bottleneck at standard resolutions. The measured frame rates at 1440p Ultra (131.6 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (208.1 FPS) show that the Ryzen 5 7600 can feed the RTX 4070 Ti efficiently. The single-thread performance is the key factor, as the game's simulation logic appears to rely on it. The CPU's 12 threads are more than adequate for this title, and the data shows no evidence of CPU-related performance limitations until the very high frame rates seen at 1080p Low.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in Pc Building Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 143.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 101.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 69.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 68.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 275.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 189.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 135.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 131.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 394.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 307.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 216.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 208.1 |
Pc Building Simulator with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Pc Building Simulator with RTX 4070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Pc Building Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RTX 4070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.