Pc Building Simulator

# Pc Building Simulator with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Pc Building Simulator, a Simulation title released in early 2019, presents an interesting benchmark scenario for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The measured FPS data reveals a component dynamic that shifts decisively as resolution increases. At 1080p, the system delivers extremely high frame rates that suggest a CPU-bound scenario, while at 4K, the GPU takes over as the primary limiter. This analysis examines the measured rows across three resolutions and four quality presets, interpreting what the scores indicate about the hardware balance in this specific title.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is substantial and reveals the expected shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces 385 FPS average. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 272 FPS, a decrease of 113 FPS or roughly 29%. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 142 FPS, representing a 63% reduction from the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that at lower resolutions, the CPU (AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with 6 cores and 12 threads) has enough headroom to push very high frame rates, but the GPU (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) becomes progressively more stressed as pixel count increases.

The High preset tells a similar story. At 1080p High, the system averages 215 FPS. At 1440p High, this drops to 136 FPS, a 37% reduction. At 4K High, the average is 71 FPS, which is 67% lower than the 1080p result. The Ultra preset follows the same trend: 205 FPS at 1080p, 130 FPS at 1440p, and 68 FPS at 4K. The consistency of these percentage drops across presets suggests that resolution is the dominant factor in performance scaling, rather than specific quality settings.

The data implies that at 1080p, the system is likely CPU-limited or at least balanced, given the extremely high frame rates exceeding 300 FPS on low settings. The Ryzen 5 7500F, with its boost clock of 5.00 GHz and Zen 4 architecture, appears sufficient to feed the RTX 4070 Ti at this resolution. However, at 4K, the GPU's workload increases dramatically, and the frame rates settle into the 68-142 FPS range depending on settings, clearly indicating GPU-bound behavior. The RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus width become the limiting factors here, though the frame rates remain playable even at 4K Ultra.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest measured average is 385 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This indicates the system can produce exceptionally high frame rates when graphical demands are minimal.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to 1080p Ultra?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 68, while at 1080p Ultra, it is 205. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same quality preset.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded at Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum FPS is 259. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum drops to 164, and at 3840x2160 Medium, it falls to 86. These values show that even the lowest recorded frames remain above 60 FPS at all tested resolutions.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?

A: The measured data shows no indication of VRAM-related issues. The RTX 4070 Ti with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory achieves playable frame rates at all tested settings and resolutions, including 4K Ultra at 68 FPS average.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance relate to the 1080p results?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F exhibits strong single-thread capabilities, as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 974 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3218. The high 1080p frame rates, particularly the 385 FPS at Low settings, suggest that per-core performance is adequate for this simulation title.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 463 out of 3723 tested combinations, placing it in the top 12.4% of all tested configs for Pc Building Simulator.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti plays a critical role in determining performance at higher resolutions. Its memory configuration includes 12 GB of GDDR6X type memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The core clocks are listed at 2310 MHz base and 2610 MHz boost, with a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). These specifications contribute to the GPU's overall capability, which is reflected in its benchmark scores: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 and Passmark G3D score of 31624.

The GPU's percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 84, indicating it performs better than 84% of all GPUs in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 44795 places it near rivals such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152, deltaPct -0.8), AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384, deltaPct -1.3), NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44075, deltaPct 1.6), and Intel Arc A730M (45592, deltaPct -1.7). These comparisons show the RTX 4070 Ti is competitively positioned against a range of desktop and mobile offerings.

In Pc Building Simulator specifically, the GPU's influence becomes most apparent at 4K resolution. The average FPS at 4K Ultra is 68, which is only 3 FPS higher than the 1440p Ultra result of 130 FPS when considering the proportional drop. The data shows that the gap between 1080p and 1440p is smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K in terms of percentage loss, reinforcing that the GPU's rendering capacity is the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The RTX 4070 Ti's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 626.4 GTexel/s texture rate are substantial, yet the simulation's rendering workload at 4K pushes the GPU to its limits.

Settings Recommendations

Examining the measured FPS rows, the Medium preset offers the most balanced experience across all resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the system achieves 305 FPS average with a minimum of 259 FPS and maximum of 351 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average is 193 FPS with a minimum of 164 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average is 101 FPS with a minimum of 86 FPS. These values indicate that Medium settings provide a consistently smooth experience, with the lowest recorded minimum FPS being 86 at 4K, which remains comfortably above common display refresh rates.

The High preset is also viable, particularly for users with 1440p displays. At 1440p High, the average FPS is 136, which is adequate for high-refresh-rate monitors up to 120 Hz or 144 Hz. At 1080p High, the 215 FPS average provides ample headroom for even the fastest gaming displays. However, at 4K High, the average drops to 71 FPS, which may be borderline for users seeking 60+ FPS consistency, though it technically exceeds that threshold.

The Ultra preset delivers the lowest performance but still maintains playability. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 68, and at 1440p Ultra, it is 130. For users prioritizing visual fidelity over frame rate, Ultra at 1440p is a strong choice given the 130 FPS average. At 1080p Ultra, the 205 FPS average is only slightly lower than the High preset's 215 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns from the additional quality settings. The Low preset, while producing the highest frame rates (385 FPS at 1080p, 272 FPS at 1440p, 142 FPS at 4K), sacrifices visual quality significantly and is not recommended for general play given the system's capability.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance. Low settings yield an average of 385 FPS, Medium produces 305 FPS with a minimum of 259 and maximum of 351, High achieves 215 FPS, and Ultra delivers 205 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 90 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 10 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset adds minimal graphical benefit relative to its performance cost at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Low settings produce 272 FPS average, Medium yields 193 FPS with a minimum of 164 and maximum of 222, High achieves 136 FPS, and Ultra delivers 130 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra narrows further to 6 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are nearly negligible in terms of performance impact at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low settings average 142 FPS, Medium averages 101 FPS with a minimum of 86 and maximum of 116, High averages 71 FPS, and Ultra averages 68 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 74 FPS, with the most significant drop occurring between Low and Medium (41 FPS). The High to Ultra transition costs only 3 FPS, which is the smallest difference across all settings and resolutions, indicating that the Ultra preset is nearly free at 4K in this game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F serves as the system's processor, featuring 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture (Raphael codename). Its base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and it has a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 32 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

The CPU's benchmark performance is substantial for its class. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 22799, and single-core score is 3218. Geekbench results show 12362 multicore and 2374 single-core. Passmark multithread score is 26825, with single-thread at 3841. The 3DMark scores range from 974 (single-thread) to 6379 (max threads), demonstrating strong scaling across thread counts.

The CPU's percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 77, and its average benchmark score is 24964. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, deltaPct -0.2), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, deltaPct 0.2), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, deltaPct 0.4). These comparisons show the Ryzen 5 7500F is tightly clustered with these processors, differing by less than 0.5% in average score.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU's role is most evident at 1080p resolution. The 385 FPS average at Low settings and 305 FPS at Medium suggest the CPU can drive frame rates well beyond what most displays can show. The Ryzen 5 7500F's boost clock of 5.00 GHz and efficient Zen 4 architecture likely contribute to this capability. However, at 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes as the GPU's rendering load dominates, evidenced by the frame rates converging across presets (68-142 FPS) regardless of CPU headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 463 out of 3723 tested combos in Pc Building Simulator. This places the configuration in the top 12.4% of all tested systems, indicating it delivers strong performance relative to the broader benchmark database. The rank reflects the system's ability to maintain high frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings, with no configuration dipping below 68 FPS average at 4K Ultra.

This ranking is notable given the CPU's mid-range positioning (percentile 77 among CPUs) and the GPU's high-end positioning (percentile 84 among GPUs). The synergy between the two components appears well-balanced for this simulation title, with the CPU providing sufficient throughput for lower resolutions and the GPU handling the heavier 4K workload. The rank of 463 suggests that many other combos (3260 total) perform worse, while a smaller set (462) outperform this configuration, likely featuring more powerful GPUs or CPUs.

The data indicates that this combo's performance is competitive with systems featuring the RTX 4070 Ti's rivals, as the GPU's nearest rivals include the RTX 5090 Mobile and RTX A6000, both of which show delta percentages within 1.7% of the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score. The CPU's nearest rivals also show minimal performance differences, suggesting that this combo represents a well-balanced mid-to-high-end configuration that should handle Pc Building Simulator comfortably at any resolution, with the caveat that 4K Ultra pushes the GPU to its limits at 68 FPS average.