Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 100 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 46 | 60 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 84 | 109 | 134 |
| 1080p Full HD | 97 | 127 | 165 | 204 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld, a survival title released in early 2024, presents a demanding workload that scales significantly with both resolution and graphical preset. This analysis examines the performance of the Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 across the game's settings and resolutions. The data indicates a configuration that is highly capable at 1080p and 1440p, with performance characteristics that shift from CPU-bound to GPU-bound as resolution increases. The measured frame rates provide a clear picture of where this combo excels and where its limitations become apparent.
Resolution Scaling
The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reveals a pronounced performance drop that is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios at higher resolutions. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 127 FPS at 1080p to 84 FPS at 1440p, a decrease of 43 FPS, and further down to 46 FPS at 4K. This represents a substantial 64% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K, indicating that the RTX 3070's rendering capabilities are the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases.
The scaling pattern across all settings confirms this trend. At Low settings, performance drops from 204 FPS at 1080p to 134 FPS at 1440p and 75 FPS at 4K. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K at Low settings is 63%, nearly identical to the High setting drop. This consistency suggests that the GPU is the bottleneck across the board, with the CPU having sufficient headroom to feed the graphics card even at lower resolutions where frame rates are exceptionally high.
When examining Medium settings, which include frame time variance data, the pattern holds. The average frame rate at 1080p is 165 FPS, dropping to 109 FPS at 1440p and 60 FPS at 4K. The min FPS at 4K Medium is 51 FPS, which is 85% of the average, indicating some frame time inconsistency at higher resolutions. This suggests that while the GPU is the main constraint, memory bandwidth or other GPU-side factors may cause occasional stutters as the resolution increases.
The Ultra settings show the most dramatic scaling, with 97 FPS at 1080p, 64 FPS at 1440p, and just 35 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 4K drop of 64% aligns with the other presets, confirming that the RTX 3070's performance envelope is consistently taxed by Palworld's rendering demands. The data clearly indicates that this game is heavily GPU-bound at all tested resolutions, with the CPU playing a supporting role that becomes less relevant as resolution increases.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, built on the Ampere architecture with an 8 nm process, is the dominant performance driver in this configuration. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a critical resource for Palworld's open-world environments. The GPU's base clock of 1500 MHz and boost clock of 1725 MHz deliver the raw compute power needed to maintain playable frame rates, with 5888 shading units and 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.
The GPU's benchmark scores place it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17208. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 17083, putting the RTX 3070 just 0.7% ahead. This narrow margin indicates that the RTX 3070 sits at a performance tier where small architectural differences matter, and Palworld's specific workload may favor one design over another.
At 4K resolution, the 8 GB VRAM capacity becomes a potential limiting factor. The measured frame rates at 4K High (46 FPS) and 4K Ultra (35 FPS) suggest that the GPU is not only compute-bound but may also be approaching memory capacity limits with higher texture quality settings. The jump from 4K Medium (60 FPS) to 4K High (46 FPS) represents a 23% performance hit, which is substantial and likely reflects both increased shading complexity and higher memory pressure.
The GPU's 184 texture mapping units and 96 render output units provide a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s. These specifications directly influence how quickly Palworld's terrain and creature textures can be processed. The data shows that at 1440p, the GPU maintains very playable frame rates across all settings, with the 84 FPS average at High and 64 FPS at Ultra indicating that this resolution is the sweet spot for visual fidelity versus performance.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F provides the processing foundation for this combination, with 6 cores and 12 threads operating at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This Alder Lake-S architecture processor has an 18 MB shared L3 cache and supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The CPU's 65 W TDP suggests efficient power delivery, though the game's performance data indicates that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in Palworld.
The CPU's benchmark results show a 3DMark max threads score of 5912 and a single thread score of 909, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 19039 is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, which scores 19047, a delta of 0%. This near-parity in synthetic benchmarks suggests that the i5-12400F is well-matched to its peers in general computing tasks.
In Palworld, the CPU's role becomes evident at lower resolutions where frame rates are exceptionally high. At 1080p Low, the 204 FPS average suggests that the CPU can keep up with the GPU's output, but the 1080p Ultra result of 97 FPS indicates that the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads may be limiting when combined with higher physics and simulation loads. However, the consistent scaling across resolutions points to the GPU as the primary constraint, with the CPU maintaining sufficient headroom.
The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 versus its 2-thread score of 1699 shows good scaling with thread count, which benefits Palworld's multi-threaded simulation systems. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 further confirms the CPU's capability, though the single-core score of 1680 highlights that individual thread performance is adequate but not exceptional. This balance suggests that the i5-12400F handles Palworld's CPU demands without becoming a substantial limiting factor.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing ranks 1591 out of 3711 total combos for Palworld. This places it in the 57th percentile of all tested configurations, indicating a solidly mid-to-upper-tier performance standing. The rank reflects the combination's ability to deliver playable frame rates across most settings and resolutions, though it is not among the top performers.
The combo's ranking is influenced by the GPU's 61st percentile standing and the CPU's 73rd percentile standing. The GPU's position is more limiting, as the RTX 3070's 8 GB VRAM and 20.31 TFLOPS represent a specific performance ceiling that the CPU cannot overcome. The comparison to the RX 7600 XT, which is just 0.7% behind in GPU benchmarks, suggests that alternative GPU choices could yield similar or slightly different results in this game.
The rank of 1591 out of 3711 means that approximately 57% of tested combos perform better than this configuration in Palworld. This is not surprising given the GPU's mid-range positioning, but the combo's performance at 1080p and 1440p is strong enough to justify its ranking. The data shows that the combination is well-balanced for its tier, with neither component dramatically outperforming the other in a way that would skew the overall performance.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers its highest frame rates across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 204 FPS, Medium yields 165 FPS with a min of 141 and max of 190, High reaches 127 FPS, and Ultra drops to 97 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1080p is well within the GPU's comfort zone, with even Ultra settings maintaining near-100 FPS averages for smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows a clear step down. Low settings average 134 FPS, Medium averages 109 FPS with a min of 93 and max of 125, High averages 84 FPS, and Ultra averages 64 FPS. The Medium settings frame range at 1440p shows a spread of 32 FPS between min and max, suggesting some frame time variance during intense scenes, but the overall averages remain playable.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle with higher settings. Low averages 75 FPS, Medium averages 60 FPS with a min of 51 and max of 69, High averages 46 FPS, and Ultra averages just 35 FPS. The 4K Medium settings show a min FPS of 51, which is only 85% of the average, indicating noticeable frame drops during heavy loads. The 4K Ultra result of 35 FPS is borderline playable and suggests that this resolution is only suitable for lower settings.
The scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows a consistent pattern: Ultra settings reduce performance by approximately 52% at 1080p (204 to 97 FPS), 52% at 1440p (134 to 64 FPS), and 53% at 4K (75 to 35 FPS). This consistency indicates that the GPU's relative performance across settings is stable, with the same proportional cost for higher visual fidelity at every resolution.
Settings Recommendations
For players targeting 1080p, the High preset at 127 FPS offers an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, with Ultra at 97 FPS being viable for those prioritizing image quality. The Medium preset at 165 FPS is ideal for high-refresh-rate displays, while Low at 204 FPS is excessive unless chasing maximum frame rates.
At 1440p, the Medium preset at 109 FPS is the recommended starting point, providing smooth gameplay with good visual fidelity. The High preset at 84 FPS is also playable and offers better image quality, while Ultra at 64 FPS is acceptable for those who prefer visuals over frame rate. The Low preset at 134 FPS is suitable for competitive play or when frame rate consistency is paramount.
At 4K, the Low preset at 75 FPS is the only setting that provides consistently smooth gameplay. The Medium preset at 60 FPS is playable but shows frame time variance with a min of 51 FPS, which may cause noticeable stutters. High at 46 FPS and Ultra at 35 FPS are below the ideal range for a smooth experience and should be avoided for serious gameplay.
The data indicates that the best overall experience is achieved at 1440p Medium, which balances visual quality with a 109 FPS average and a 93 FPS minimum. This setting provides a significant improvement over 1080p High in terms of image clarity while maintaining frame rates that exceed typical 60 FPS targets. For players with 4K displays, the Low preset is the only recommended option, as higher settings sacrifice too much performance.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Palworld?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the optimal resolution, with Medium settings delivering 109 FPS average and 93 FPS minimum, providing a strong balance between visual quality and smooth gameplay.
Q: Can this configuration handle 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: 4K is only viable at Low settings, which averages 75 FPS. Medium settings average 60 FPS but show frame drops to 51 FPS, while High and Ultra are below 50 FPS and not recommended.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 3070 has an average benchmark score of 17208, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT's score of 17083, indicating near-identical performance in general GPU workloads.
Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core i5-12400F ranks in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19039, placing it slightly below the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS which scores 19047.
Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the configuration averages 97 FPS, which is lower than the 127 FPS at High settings but still smooth for most gameplay scenarios.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The benchmark data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as performance scales consistently with resolution and settings, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom at lower resolutions where frame rates exceed 200 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 75.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 60.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 46.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 134.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 109.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 84.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 204.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 165.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 127.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 97.0 |
Palworld with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RTX 3070 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 3070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.