Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 76 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 34 | 48 | 56 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 65 | 80 | 101 |
| 1080p Full HD | 70 | 96 | 123 | 154 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
# Palworld — Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600
The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Palworld. Across twelve measured configurations, the combo shows a clear pattern: 1080p performance is strong, 1440p remains viable, and 4K requires aggressive settings compromises. The data indicates this pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint at higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS reveals how sharply Palworld's demands scale with pixel count. At 1080p High settings, the combo produces 95.5 FPS average. Moving to 1440p High drops that to 65.1 FPS — a 31.8% reduction. At 4K High, the average falls to 34.4 FPS, which is 64% below the 1080p figure. This steep decline suggests the Radeon RX 7600's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus become limiting factors as resolution increases.
The Low preset tells a similar story in absolute terms but with different implications. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 153.7 FPS, which is excellent for fast-paced survival gameplay. At 1440p Low, it drops to 101.3 FPS, still comfortably above 60 FPS. At 4K Low, the average falls to 55.6 FPS — playable but marginal. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p Low is a 34.1% reduction, while 4K Low is 63.8% below 1080p Low. This consistent ~64% penalty at 4K across presets indicates the GPU's memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s) and raw throughput are the bottlenecks, not the CPU.
The Medium preset shows intermediate behavior: 122.8 FPS at 1080p, 80.4 FPS at 1440p, and 47.8 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 70.3 FPS at 1080p, 51.0 FPS at 1440p, and 29.0 FPS at 4K. Notably, the gap between Medium and Ultra widens at higher resolutions, suggesting that Ultra settings impose memory pressure that disproportionately affects 4K performance. The data shows the GPU is the limiting component at 4K across all presets, while at 1080p, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads (with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz) appear sufficient to feed the GPU adequately.
Settings Recommendations
The measured rows provide clear guidance for optimal settings at each resolution. At 1080p, High settings offer an excellent balance: 95.5 FPS average, which is 36% higher than the 70.3 FPS at Ultra. The jump from Medium (122.8 FPS) to High (95.5 FPS) costs 22.2% performance but likely delivers noticeably better visuals. For competitive or high-refresh-rate play, Low at 153.7 FPS is the standout choice, but High remains the recommended default for most users.
At 1440p, High settings deliver 65.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Medium runs at 80.4 FPS, offering a more comfortable margin. Ultra drops to 51.0 FPS, which may introduce noticeable stutter in a game where base building and exploration demand consistent frame times. The recommendation here is Medium for a guaranteed smooth experience, with High as an option for those who prioritize visual fidelity over a small frame-rate buffer.
At 4K, the choices are more constrained. High settings yield 34.4 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS floor for playability in some titles but above it in others — the data shows this is borderline. Medium runs at 47.8 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for a game with fast action elements. Low at 55.6 FPS provides the best 4K experience, though it sacrifices most visual enhancements. Ultra at 29.0 FPS is not recommended, as the average falls below 30 FPS. The data suggests 4K users should stick to Low or Medium, accepting the visual trade-offs for playable frame rates.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the dominant factor in Palworld's performance, particularly at higher resolutions. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the card has a measured bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU's boost clock reaches 2655 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz and a base clock of 1720 MHz. These clocks, combined with 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs, produce a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s. The FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS places this card in the mid-range segment, which the benchmark percentiles confirm — it ranks at the 63rd percentile against all GPUs.
The benchmark scores provide context for its gaming behavior. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7600 scores 2310. Its PassMark G3D score is 16634, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 82501 and 90825 respectively. These numbers align with the measured FPS pattern: strong at 1080p, adequate at 1440p, and struggling at 4K. The GPU's nearest rival in average benchmark score is the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, which scores 20146 — a 0.6% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (1.3% higher), and the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 (1.5% higher). These close margins indicate the RX 7600 sits in a competitive performance band, though the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint in future titles.
The data shows that Palworld's 4K performance is limited by the GPU's memory subsystem. The 128-bit bus and 8 GB capacity appear insufficient for Ultra settings at 3840x2160, where the average FPS drops to 29.0. Even at Medium, 4K only reaches 47.8 FPS. This pattern suggests the game's texture and geometry demands at 4K exceed what the card's bandwidth can deliver, making the GPU the clear bottleneck in this configuration.
FAQ
Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average is 95.5 FPS. This is the recommended balance point for most users, offering smooth gameplay without the 36% performance penalty of Ultra settings (70.3 FPS).
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: Yes, but with significant compromises. Low settings produce 55.6 FPS, Medium reaches 47.8 FPS, and High drops to 34.4 FPS. Ultra averages 29.0 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS threshold for comfortable play.
Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rival in benchmarks?
A: The RX 7600's average benchmark score is 20258. Its closest rival, the RX 7600 XT, scores 20146 — a 0.6% difference. The RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534 (1.3% higher), and the Intel Arc B570 scores 20556 (1.5% higher).
Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance?
A: The Intel Core i5-12400F scores 16518 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 9138 in Geekbench multi-core. Its PassMark multi-thread score is 19433, placing it at the 77th percentile against all CPUs.
Q: What resolution is this combo best suited for?
A: The data indicates 1080p is the sweet spot, with 153.7 FPS at Low, 122.8 FPS at Medium, and 95.5 FPS at High. At 1440p, Medium (80.4 FPS) and High (65.1 FPS) remain playable, but 4K requires Low or Medium settings.
Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Palworld?
A: Based on measured results, yes for 1080p and 1440p, but 4K Ultra (29.0 FPS) and High (34.4 FPS) indicate the memory capacity and bandwidth are limiting factors at that resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
Among the 1718 tested combinations in the database, this Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 pairing ranks 1147th in Palworld. This places it in the lower third of all tested combos, which reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than a CPU limitation. The rank suggests that while this combo is capable for 1080p gaming, many other tested configurations offer higher frame rates in this title.
The ranking becomes more meaningful when contextualized with the component-level percentiles. The CPU ranks at the 77th percentile against all tested processors, while the GPU sits at the 63rd percentile. The gap between these percentiles indicates the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing for Palworld specifically. A stronger GPU would likely move this combo significantly higher in the rankings, as the CPU's 6-core/12-thread configuration appears to have headroom — its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16518 and single-core score of 2332 show solid performance that doesn't appear to bottleneck at 1080p High (95.5 FPS).
The combo rank of 1147 out of 1718 means approximately 33% of tested configurations perform worse in Palworld. This is a modest position, but the measured FPS at 1080p and 1440p shows practical playability. The rank is dragged down by the 4K results, where the GPU's memory constraints become apparent. For users targeting 1080p, this combo outperforms its overall rank suggests, but the aggregate ranking weighs all resolutions equally.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F plays a supporting role in Palworld, with the data indicating it does not become the primary bottleneck until frame rates exceed 150 FPS. The CPU features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. Its 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 cache per core provide adequate data locality for game workloads. The processor is built on a 10 nm process with a 65 W TDP, making it an efficient choice for gaming systems.
Benchmark scores show the CPU's capability profile. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 and max-thread score of 5912 indicate strong multi-threading for a 6-core part. The single-thread score of 909 in 3DMark and 2332 in Cinebench R23 single-core demonstrate competent per-core performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 19433 and single-thread score of 3481 place it at the 77th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-8700K (delta 0.1%), Intel Core i5-1335U (delta 0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS (delta -0.7%), and AMD EPYC 7773X (delta 1.3%) — all within a 2% band, showing this CPU is competitively positioned.
In Palworld specifically, the CPU's role is evident from the scaling behavior. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 153.7 FPS, which is close to the practical ceiling for this CPU-GPU combination. The fact that 4K Low (55.6 FPS) is only 63.8% lower than 1080p Low (153.7 FPS) — rather than a more modest drop — confirms the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU can feed the GPU up to approximately 150 FPS, beyond which the frame rate would likely plateau. The measured results show no scenario where the CPU holds back performance below 60 FPS, meaning users at 1440p and 4K are strictly GPU-limited. The i5-12400F's 12 threads and 4.40 GHz boost clock are sufficient for Palworld's survival-game mechanics, which typically involve many entities and physics calculations but not extreme thread counts.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 55.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 34.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 101.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 65.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 153.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 122.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 70.3 |
Palworld with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.