Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 94 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 33 | 43 | 56 | 70 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 78 | 102 | 126 |
| 1080p Full HD | 90 | 119 | 155 | 191 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700, In-Depth Analysis
# Palworld: Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700
This combo pairs a 6-core Intel Alder Lake processor with a 16 GB RDNA 3.0 graphics card, producing a setup that sits near the middle of the tested field for Palworld. The data shows this pairing ranks 1311 out of 2944 tested combos, placing it in the 55th percentile of all configurations measured for this game. That is a solidly mid-pack result, not a top-tier performer but far from a weak one, and the measured frame rates across resolutions confirm a system that can handle Palworld comfortably at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires careful settings management.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1311 out of 2944 tested configurations puts it squarely in the upper-middle range of the database. This is not a flagship pairing, but it outperforms roughly 55% of all tested combos in Palworld specifically. The position makes sense given the hardware: the CPU sits at the 73rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU is at the 58th percentile among all graphics cards. Neither component is class-leading, but their combined performance in this game lands them in a respectable position.
Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals clarifies its standing. The Intel Core i5-12400F scores nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, with a delta of 0% in average benchmark score. It also trades blows with the Intel Core 3 201E (-0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-1335U (+0.3%). These are all mid-range processors, and the i5-12400F holds its own among them, with differences of less than 1% in either direction. The AMD EPYC 7773X, a server chip, also lands within 0.3% of the i5's average score, though that comparison is more academic than practical for gaming.
The GPU's nearest rivals tell a similar story of mid-pack positioning. The Radeon RX 7700 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X, 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060, 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500, and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. These are tight margins, suggesting the RX 7700 sits in a crowded performance band where small architectural differences matter more than raw specifications. In Palworld, this translates to playable but not exceptional performance at higher resolutions.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 brings 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with memory bandwidth rated at 624.1 GB/s. That memory configuration is generous for a card in this class and helps explain why the combo handles high-resolution textures without obvious stuttering. The card's base clock is 1900 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. These clocks are respectable for RDNA 3.0 architecture, and the card's 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units provide a solid foundation for rasterization work.
In Palworld specifically, the GPU's 16 GB framebuffer matters more than the raw clock speeds. The game's open-world survival mechanics involve rendering large, detailed environments with many objects, and the data shows the card handles this well. At 1080p the GPU is rarely the bottleneck, but at 4K the card's limitations become apparent, as frame rates drop significantly from lower resolutions. The card's 25.18 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 40 ray tracing cores are secondary considerations in this game, which does not lean heavily on ray-traced effects.
The GPU's passmark G3D score of 20974 and passmark GPU compute score of 10963 reflect its mid-range positioning. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2865 is modest, and the DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 passmark scores range from 92 to 261, indicating consistent but not outstanding performance across API generations. The GPU's percentile ranking of 58 means it outperforms 58% of all tested graphics cards, which aligns with the combo's overall mid-pack placement in Palworld.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the memory bus is dual-channel. Its 65 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for a mid-range gaming system, and its PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes ensures the GPU has a fast connection path.
For Palworld, the CPU's multi-threaded performance is more relevant than its single-thread capabilities. The game's simulation work, including creature AI and world state updates, benefits from the 12 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12380 and Geekbench multicore score of 9472 show solid throughput, while the 3DMark 16-thread score of 5895 and max-thread score of 5912 indicate the chip scales well with additional load. The passmark multithread score of 19433 reinforces this picture.
Single-thread performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1680 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 909. These numbers are not exceptional, but they are sufficient for Palworld's gameplay loop, which does not appear to be heavily single-thread bound based on the measured results. The CPU's percentile ranking of 73 among all processors suggests it outperforms nearly three-quarters of tested CPUs, making it a capable partner for the RX 7700 in this game.
The CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.3% of its average benchmark score of 19039, meaning the i5-12400F is essentially interchangeable with several other mid-range chips in general compute tasks. However, in Palworld specifically, the combo's rank suggests the CPU is not holding the GPU back in most scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this combo in Palworld show a clear hierarchy across resolutions and settings. Starting at 1920x1080, the performance is strong across the board. At Low settings, the combo averages 191 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth and well above any refresh rate most monitors can display. Medium settings drop the average to 155 FPS, with minimum and maximum readings of 131 and 178 FPS respectively, indicating stable frame pacing. High settings produce an average of 119 FPS, still very playable. Ultra settings bring the average down to 90 FPS, which remains smooth for most gaming scenarios.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains solid but shows the expected scaling. Low settings average 126 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium settings average 102 FPS, with a minimum of 87 and maximum of 117 FPS, showing the frame rate holds up well under load. High settings average 78 FPS, which is playable but begins to show the GPU working harder. Ultra settings drop to 59 FPS, which is borderline for a 60 Hz display but still acceptable for many gamers.
At 3840x2160, the combo's limits become clear. Low settings average 70 FPS, which is surprising strong for 4K and suggests the game is not terribly demanding at lower presets. Medium settings average 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 and maximum of 65 FPS, indicating some frame dips below 60 that could be noticeable. High settings average 43 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. Ultra settings average 33 FPS, which is stuttery and not recommended for a smooth experience.
The data shows a consistent pattern: each settings tier costs roughly 15-20% performance in this game, and each resolution step costs a similar amount. The jump from 1080p to 1440p reduces average frame rates by about 30-35% across settings, while the jump from 1440p to 4K reduces frame rates by another 35-40%. This scaling suggests the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed it at 1080p.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run Palworld at 60 FPS on a 1440p monitor?
A: Yes, for most settings. The data shows Medium settings average 102 FPS and High settings average 78 FPS at 2560x1440. Ultra settings drop to 59 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold, so High is the recommended ceiling for a locked 60 FPS experience.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware for Palworld?
A: Only at lower settings. At 3840x2160, Low settings average 70 FPS and Medium settings average 56 FPS. High settings drop to 43 FPS and Ultra to 33 FPS, so 4K at Medium is the practical limit for acceptable performance.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in compute performance?
A: The Intel Core i5-12400F averages a benchmark score of 19039, which is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19047 (0% delta). It is 0.1% behind the Intel Core 3 201E and 0.3% ahead of both the Intel Core i5-1335U and AMD EPYC 7773X.
Q: How does the GPU stack up against similarly performing cards?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X, 1% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060, 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500, and 1.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Palworld?
A: The data indicates 2560x1440 at High settings provides the best balance, averaging 78 FPS. This resolution offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining frame rates well above 60 FPS, unlike 4K where even Medium settings dip to 56 FPS.
Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM on the GPU make a difference in Palworld?
A: The data suggests it contributes to stable performance at higher settings. The card's 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth rendering even at 4K Medium, where the minimum FPS of 48 remains playable, indicating no severe VRAM-related stuttering.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured frame rates, the best experience for this combo depends heavily on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings at 90 FPS provide the highest visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay, and even the most demanding users can comfortably use High or Ultra without concern. The gap between High (119 FPS) and Ultra (90 FPS) is modest, so choosing Ultra is a reasonable trade-off for better visuals.
At 2560x1440, High settings at 78 FPS deliver the best overall experience. Medium settings at 102 FPS offer more headroom for competitive play, but the visual improvement from Medium to High is noticeable in an open-world game like Palworld. Ultra at 59 FPS is borderline, and the slight dip below 60 FPS may be jarring on a high refresh rate display, so High is the recommended ceiling for this resolution.
At 3840x2160, Medium settings at 56 FPS with a minimum of 48 FPS represent the best compromise. Low settings at 70 FPS are smoother but sacrifice significant visual detail, while High at 43 FPS is too inconsistent for comfortable play. For 4K users, the choice comes down to accepting Medium settings for a playable experience or dropping to Low for smoother motion. The measured data does not support Ultra at 4K as a viable option, with only 33 FPS average.
For users prioritizing frame rate stability over absolute visual quality, Low or Medium settings at 1440p provide the most consistent experience, with minimum frame rates of 87 FPS or higher. For those who want the best visuals the combo can manage, High at 1440p is the sweet spot, offering 78 FPS average without the frame dips seen at 4K Medium. The data suggests this combo is best suited to 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for users willing to accept Medium or Low settings.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F
AMD Radeon RX 7700
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 7700 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 70.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 43.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 33.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 126.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 102.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 59.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 191.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 90.0 |
Palworld with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with RX 7700 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-12400F + RX 7700
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.