Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
190
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 190 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Estimated performance. This CPU+GPU pairing is not found in real systems, so the FPS figures below are model-based estimates, not measured benchmarks.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 118 143 153 242
1440p QHD 139 168 180 280
1080p Full HD 157 187 201 311

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Ultra 118
3840x2160 High 143
3840x2160 Medium 153
3840x2160 Low 242
2560x1440 Ultra 139
2560x1440 High 168
2560x1440 Medium 180
2560x1440 Low 280
1920x1080 Ultra 157
1920x1080 High 187
1920x1080 Medium 201
1920x1080 Low 311

Overpower with Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, In-Depth Analysis

# Overpower: Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

This combination of Intel's Core Ultra X7 368H mobile processor and NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5070 targets high-refresh 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming in the action title Overpower. The benchmark data shows a system that consistently delivers playable frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings, though the scaling behavior between CPU and GPU workloads reveals where each component's contributions begin and end.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Overpower?*

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 2560x1440 with High settings delivers 78 FPS average, which balances visual fidelity with smooth gameplay. At 1920x1080, the system reaches 87 FPS on High, but the jump to 1440p only costs 9 FPS while providing substantially more detail.

*Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Overpower?*

A: The combination ranks 1610 out of 2980 tested combos, placing it in the 54th percentile. This suggests it sits slightly above the median performer, which aligns with its ability to maintain 60+ FPS at 4K on Medium settings but falling short of top-tier configurations.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Overpower?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 3840x2160, the combo achieves 66 FPS on High, 71 FPS on Medium, and 55 FPS on Ultra. The Low preset hits 114 FPS at 4K, indicating the GPU has headroom when graphical load is reduced.

Q: Which component limits performance at 1080p?

A: The data indicates a CPU-bound scenario at lower resolutions. The 1920x1080 Low preset produces 151 FPS, while the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4005 and multi-thread score of 32956 suggest it can sustain high frame rates, but the gap between Low and Medium at 1080p (151 to 94 FPS) shows the GPU becoming more influential as settings rise.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores in the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40518. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PE, scores 40557, a delta of just -0.1%, indicating near-identical overall performance.

Q: How does the RTX 5070's compute performance compare to its gaming performance?

A: The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 29137, placing it in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. Its compute score of 15787 in PassMark GPU Compute is notably lower, suggesting the card prioritizes rasterization and gaming workloads over general-purpose compute tasks.

How This Combo Ranks

The 1610 rank out of 2980 combos places this pairing firmly in the middle of the tested field for Overpower. This positioning is curious given the individual component strengths: the CPU sits in the 87th percentile and the GPU in the 82nd percentile. The gap between component percentiles and combo rank suggests that Overpower may not scale linearly with hardware capability, or that the mobile CPU's thermal constraints (25 W TDP) create a bottleneck that prevents the system from achieving top-tier status.

The delta between this combo's rank and what component-level scores might predict reveals a system that punches at its weight class but doesn't exceed it. In a field of 2980 combinations, being at 1610 means roughly 1370 configurations performed better in this specific title. This is not a condemnation—the measured FPS data shows solid 60+ FPS at 4K Medium and 78 FPS at 1440p High—but it indicates that Overpower may favor configurations with different CPU-GPU balance points.

Interestingly, the CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with a delta of 0.2% and the Intel Xeon 6507P at 0.2%, showing the Ultra X7 368H sits in a tightly contested performance band. The GPU's closest competitor, the AMD Radeon Pro 580, is just 0.1% ahead. This combination of mid-pack component performance translates directly to a mid-pack system ranking, suggesting Overpower rewards balanced configurations rather than extremes in either CPU or GPU capability.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H brings 16 cores and 16 threads to this pairing, running at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosting to 5.00 GHz. This Panther Lake architecture chip, built on Intel's 3 nm process, delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221 and a single-core score of 3984. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the data throughput needed for modern game engines.

In Overpower, the CPU's influence is most visible at lower resolutions and settings. The 1920x1080 Low preset achieves 151 FPS, which is the highest measured frame rate across all tests. This 151 FPS figure represents a ceiling that the GPU cannot exceed at higher settings—at 1080p Medium, FPS drops to 94, and at High it falls to 87. The 57 FPS gap between Low and Medium at 1080p suggests that as the GPU workload increases, the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes less critical, but at Low settings, the CPU's 5.00 GHz boost clock and 16 threads keep the pipeline full.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 32956 and physics score of 2857 indicate strong computational throughput, which likely helps with Overpower's action-game physics and AI calculations. The data compression score of 312927 and encryption score of 25228 show the CPU handles data-intensive tasks efficiently, though these are less directly relevant to gaming performance. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking versus all processors confirms it is a capable gaming processor, but its 25 W TDP suggests power constraints that may limit sustained boost clocks during extended gaming sessions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers a wide range of performance depending on settings. Low preset hits 151 FPS average, Medium drops to 94 FPS (with a min of 80 and max of 108), High achieves 87 FPS, and Ultra settles at 73 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 78 FPS total drop, with the steepest decline between Low and Medium (57 FPS), indicating that Medium introduces significant GPU workload that the RTX 5070 handles but with diminishing returns as settings increase.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates compress into a tighter band. Low produces 135 FPS, Medium averages 84 FPS (min 71, max 97), High delivers 78 FPS, and Ultra hits 65 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra here is 70 FPS, slightly less than at 1080p. The Medium to High transition at 1440p costs only 6 FPS, suggesting that High settings at this resolution provide a meaningful visual upgrade for minimal performance loss.

At 3840x2160, the system shows its limitations. Low achieves 114 FPS, Medium averages 71 FPS (min 61, max 82), High drops to 66 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 55 FPS. The 4K Low result is notable—it's higher than 1440p Ultra (65 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (73 FPS), indicating that at Low settings, the GPU has sufficient headroom to drive high frame rates even at 4K resolution. However, the Ultra preset at 4K falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay.

The min/max data for Medium settings across all resolutions shows consistent frame pacing: 1080p ranges from 80 to 108, 1440p from 71 to 97, and 4K from 61 to 82. These ranges suggest the system maintains stable performance without severe frame drops, which is critical for an action game where sudden dips can affect gameplay.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a GB205 chip, provides 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs process graphics data at a base clock of 2325 MHz and boost clock of 2512 MHz. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores handle ray tracing and AI workloads, while the 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides substantial raw compute power.

In Overpower, the GPU's role becomes increasingly dominant as resolution and settings rise. At 1080p, the GPU is not the primary limiting factor—the 151 FPS Low result and 94 FPS Medium result show the CPU can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's workload scaling is evident in the 57 FPS drop from Low to Medium. At 1440p, the GPU's influence grows: Low hits 135 FPS, but Medium drops to 84 FPS, showing the card's rendering capabilities are more heavily taxed. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, with Ultra producing just 55 FPS.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29137 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 confirm strong DirectX 12 performance, which Overpower likely utilizes. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 178923 indicates robust Vulkan API support, potentially beneficial if the game offers multiple rendering paths. The 12 GB VRAM capacity proves sufficient for the tested settings—even at 4K Ultra, no VRAM-related stuttering appears in the min FPS data.

The GPU's 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the upper tier, though its nearest rivals include workstation cards like the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (0.1% ahead) and Radeon Pro WX 7100 (0.8% ahead). This suggests the RTX 5070's gaming performance is competitive but not class-leading, which aligns with its measured FPS results in Overpower.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience depends on the target resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset (87 FPS) offers the best balance—it's 14 FPS below Medium's 94 FPS but provides superior visual quality, while Ultra's 73 FPS represents a 14 FPS drop from High for marginal visual gains. For players prioritizing maximum smoothness, Low at 151 FPS is an option, but the visual compromise is substantial.

At 2560x1440, High settings (78 FPS) are the clear recommendation. The 6 FPS difference between Medium (84 FPS) and High (78 FPS) is minimal, while Ultra (65 FPS) introduces a 13 FPS penalty that may not justify the visual upgrade. This resolution offers the best overall experience, as 78 FPS is comfortably above 60 FPS and 1440p provides significantly more detail than 1080p.

For 3840x2160, Medium (71 FPS) is the recommended preset. High (66 FPS) is also viable and offers better visuals, but the 5 FPS difference between Medium and High is not substantial. Ultra (55 FPS) falls below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided for action gameplay. Low (114 FPS) is an option for competitive play where frame rate trumps visuals, but the graphical downgrade at 4K is significant.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset shows the most consistent frame pacing with the only available min/max data, suggesting it may offer the most stable experience. The data indicates that High settings provide the best quality-to-performance ratio at 1080p and 1440p, while Medium is the safest choice at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, performance scales from 151 FPS at 1080p to 135 FPS at 1440p (a 10.6% drop) to 114 FPS at 4K (a 24.5% drop from 1080p). This relatively shallow scaling curve suggests that at Low settings, the CPU plays a significant role in limiting frame rates—the GPU has enough headroom to handle the resolution increase without proportional FPS loss.

At Medium settings, the scaling steepens: 94 FPS at 1080p drops to 84 FPS at 1440p (10.6% drop) and 71 FPS at 4K (24.5% drop from 1080p). The percentage drops mirror Low settings, indicating the GPU is becoming more influential but the CPU still contributes to the bottleneck.

High settings tell a different story: 87 FPS at 1080p, 78 FPS at 1440p (10.3% drop), and 66 FPS at 4K (24.1% drop from 1080p). The nearly identical percentage drops across Low, Medium, and High settings suggest a consistent scaling pattern, which is unusual—typically, higher settings show steeper drops as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. This consistency implies that Overpower may have a CPU-side frame rate cap or that the game engine scales rendering load proportionally with resolution.

Ultra settings exhibit the steepest scaling: 73 FPS at 1080p to 65 FPS at 1440p (11% drop) to 55 FPS at 4K (24.7% drop from 1080p). The 4K Ultra result of 55 FPS represents the only sub-60 FPS measurement, confirming that at maximum settings, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor.

The 4K to 1080p FPS ratio hovers around 75-76% across all settings, indicating a consistent resolution scaling behavior. This suggests the RTX 5070's 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12 GB VRAM are sufficient to handle the increased pixel count without introducing memory-related bottlenecks, but the GPU's raw compute power (30.87 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The CPU's contribution diminishes as resolution increases, with its 5.00 GHz boost clock and 16 threads providing adequate frame generation at lower resolutions but being unable to compensate for the GPU's rendering workload at 4K Ultra.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra X7 368H

Cores / Threads 16 / 16
Base Clock 2000 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 25W
Socket Intel BGA 2540
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

VRAM 12 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2512 MHz MHz
TDP 250 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra X7 368H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Ultra 118.0
3840x2160 High 143.0
3840x2160 Medium 153.0
3840x2160 Low 242.0
2560x1440 Ultra 139.0
2560x1440 High 168.0
2560x1440 Medium 180.0
2560x1440 Low 280.0
1920x1080 Ultra 157.0
1920x1080 High 187.0
1920x1080 Medium 201.0
1920x1080 Low 311.0

Overpower with iUltra X7 368H + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RTX 5070 + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra X7 368H + RTX 5070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.