Overpower
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 120 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 74 | 89 | 96 | 154 |
| 1440p QHD | 87 | 105 | 113 | 181 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 117 | 127 | 203 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers a strong performance profile in Overpower, with results indicating that the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gameplay at 1440p and capable of smooth 4K experiences. The measured data shows that the most balanced experience, balancing visual fidelity and frame pacing, is achieved at Medium settings across all tested resolutions. At 1080p Medium, the combo posts an average of 127 FPS, with a minimum of 108 FPS and a maximum of 146 FPS, demonstrating a stable frame delivery that avoids the dips seen at higher presets. Moving to 1440p Medium, the average remains comfortably high at 113 FPS, with a minimum of 96 FPS, ensuring that gameplay stays fluid even during demanding scenes. At 4K Medium, the average drops to 96 FPS, but the minimum of 82 FPS remains above the critical threshold for smooth action, making this the optimal choice for users prioritizing consistency over maximum graphical detail.
The High preset offers a marginal increase in visual quality but introduces a significant performance penalty relative to Medium. At 1080p, High yields an average of 117 FPS, which is 10 FPS lower than Medium, and at 1440p, the gap widens to 8 FPS, resulting in a 105 FPS average. The 4K High average of 89 FPS is still playable, but the lack of reported minimum FPS data suggests potential inconsistency. The Ultra preset, while visually impressive, pushes the system to its limits, with averages of 98 FPS at 1080p, 87 FPS at 1440p, and 74 FPS at 4K. These numbers indicate that Ultra is best reserved for users with high-refresh-rate monitors who are willing to accept occasional frame drops, as the lack of minimum FPS data for this preset makes its stability uncertain. The Low preset, by contrast, delivers the highest frame rates—203 FPS at 1080p, 181 FPS at 1440p, and 154 FPS at 4K—but sacrifices significant visual quality, making it suitable primarily for competitive play where frame rate is paramount.
Settings Recommendations
For the optimal balance between visual fidelity and performance, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation across all resolutions. The data shows that Medium provides the most consistent frame delivery, as it is the only preset with reported minimum FPS values at every resolution, indicating that the system maintains a stable frame pacing. At 1080p, the transition from High to Medium yields a 10 FPS average increase (from 117 to 127 FPS) while the minimum FPS jumps from an unreported value to 108 FPS, suggesting that Medium avoids the stutters that may occur at High. The 1440p results reinforce this, with Medium delivering a 113 FPS average and a 96 FPS minimum, compared to High's 105 FPS average with no minimum data. At 4K, Medium's 96 FPS average and 82 FPS minimum represent a 7 FPS improvement over High's average, and the minimum provides assurance that the frame rate will not dip below 82 FPS during intense action sequences.
For users with 144Hz or 165Hz monitors, the High preset at 1440p offers a viable alternative, as its 105 FPS average is still within range of the refresh rate, though the lack of minimum FPS data introduces an element of risk. The Ultra preset is not recommended for any resolution due to the significant performance drop, particularly at 4K where the average falls to 74 FPS, which may result in noticeable judder on high-refresh-rate displays. The Low preset, while delivering exceptional frame rates exceeding 150 FPS at all resolutions, is only advisable for esports-style play where visual quality is secondary to raw speed. In summary, Medium provides the best overall experience, balancing the visual enhancements of the game with the system's capabilities to ensure a smooth and responsive gameplay experience.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average FPS achieved by this combo in Overpower?*
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 203 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset. This represents the peak performance of the system when visual settings are minimized.
Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with the Ultra preset?
A: At 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset, the combo delivers an average FPS of 74. This is the lowest average across all tested settings and resolutions, indicating that the system is strained at the highest visual quality and resolution combination.
*Q: Is the RTX 3080's 10 GB VRAM sufficient for Overpower at high settings?*
A: The measured data shows that the combo achieves playable frame rates at High settings across all resolutions, with averages of 117 FPS at 1080p, 105 FPS at 1440p, and 89 FPS at 4K. This suggests that the 10 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for the game's demands at these settings, as no performance anomalies or crashes were indicated in the results.
Q: What is the difference in average FPS between the Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: The difference is 94 FPS. The Low preset achieves an average of 181 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves an average of 87 FPS at 2560x1440 resolution. This demonstrates a substantial performance trade-off for increased visual quality.
Q: Does the combo rank highly among all tested combinations in this game?
A: The combo ranks 780 out of 2980 tested combinations in Overpower, placing it in the top 26% of all tested systems. This indicates that it performs above average relative to the broader pool of hardware combinations.
Q: At which resolution does the combo experience the smallest FPS drop when moving from Medium to High?
A: The smallest FPS drop is observed at 1080p, where the average decreases by 10 FPS (from 127 to 117 FPS) when moving from Medium to High. At 1440p, the drop is 8 FPS, and at 4K, the drop is 7 FPS, showing that the resolution scaling of the performance penalty is relatively consistent.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 plays a pivotal role in Overpower's performance, with its 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 320-bit memory bus providing a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is sufficient to handle the game's textures and assets at all tested settings, as evidenced by the playable frame rates even at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS of 74 remains above the threshold for playability. The GPU's boost clock of 1710 MHz, alongside its 8704 shading units and 272 texture mapping units, contributes to the raw compute power required to render the game's action sequences. The measured data shows that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the FPS scales inversely with resolution across all settings, while the CPU's performance remains constant.
The RTX 3080's performance, as measured by its average benchmark score of 23172, places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs, indicating that it is a capable mid-to-high-range card. Its nearest rivals, including the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon RX 6600M, show very similar average scores, with delta percentages of -0.3% and -0.4% respectively, suggesting that the RTX 3080 is closely matched with these alternatives in general computing tasks. However, in Overpower, the GPU's specific capabilities, such as its 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, are likely leveraged to enhance visual effects, though the exact impact is not quantified in the FPS data. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides ample headroom for the game's graphics workload, as demonstrated by the high frame rates at lower resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In the context of all tested combinations in Overpower, this system with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and RTX 3080 achieves a rank of 780 out of 2980 total combos. This places the combo in the 74th percentile, meaning it outperforms approximately 74% of all tested systems, while falling short of the top 26%. The rank reflects a balanced pairing where the CPU's strong multi-threaded capabilities—evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216—complement the GPU's solid performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 64640 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rivals showing negligible differences: the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64823 (-0.3%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438 (+0.3%), and the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202 (+0.7%). This indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck in Overpower, as its performance is on par with or slightly better than its closest competitors.
The combo's rank of 780 suggests that while the system is powerful, there are many other combinations that deliver higher frame rates in this specific game. This could be attributed to the RTX 3080's position in the GPU hierarchy, as its 68th percentile ranking is lower than the CPU's 93rd percentile, indicating that the GPU is the more likely constraint on overall performance. The data shows that the combo's performance scales linearly with resolution changes, implying that the GPU is being fully utilized, and any additional CPU headroom is not being leveraged in this title. For users seeking higher rankings, a more powerful GPU would be necessary, but for the majority of players, this combo's performance is more than adequate, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved at 1440p and 1080p.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance scaling as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, which provides insight into the system's limiting component. At Low settings, the average FPS decreases from 203 at 1080p to 181 at 1440p, a drop of 22 FPS (10.8%), and further to 154 at 4K, a drop of 27 FPS (14.9%) from 1440p. At Medium settings, the averages decrease from 127 at 1080p to 113 at 1440p (an 11.0% drop) and then to 96 at 4K (a 15.0% drop). The High preset shows a similar trend, with averages of 117, 105, and 89 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively, representing drops of 10.3% and 15.2%. The Ultra preset exhibits the largest relative drops, with averages of 98, 87, and 74 FPS, corresponding to an 11.2% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 14.9% drop from 1440p to 4K.
This scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor, as the frame rate drops are relatively consistent across settings when moving to higher resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a more significant difference between Low and Ultra settings at the same resolution, as the CPU workload would increase with more complex scenes. However, the data shows that the FPS differences between presets at a given resolution are substantial—for example, at 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 105 FPS—which points to the GPU being the constraining component. The consistent percentage drops (around 10-15%) between resolution steps are typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the rendering workload increases proportionally with pixel count. The CPU, with its high single-thread score of 5960 in Cinebench R23, demonstrates ample headroom, as evidenced by the fact that the FPS at 1080p Low (203 FPS) is not limited by the CPU's processing capabilities.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The complete set of measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 203, followed by Medium at 127 FPS, High at 117 FPS, and Ultra at 98 FPS. The Medium preset is the only one at this resolution with reported minimum and maximum FPS values, showing a range of 108 to 146 FPS, which indicates a stable frame delivery. The Low and High presets lack min/max data, suggesting that the frame pacing may be less consistent, while Ultra's 98 FPS average is likely to be the most variable. At 2560x1440, the Low preset again leads with 181 FPS average, followed by Medium at 113 FPS, High at 105 FPS, and Ultra at 87 FPS. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 96 FPS and maximum of 130 FPS, demonstrating a tighter range than at 1080p, which is consistent with the increased GPU load.
At 3840x2160, the highest resolution tested, the Low preset achieves an average of 154 FPS, which is remarkably high for 4K, indicating that the game is well-optimized for lower settings. The Medium preset follows with 96 FPS average, with a minimum of 82 FPS and maximum of 110 FPS, providing the only complete data set at this resolution. The High preset averages 89 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 74 FPS. Across all resolutions, the Medium preset consistently offers the most balanced performance, with the only reported minimum FPS values ensuring that the user will not experience significant frame dips. The data also shows diminishing returns when moving from Low to Medium, with an average FPS increase of 76 FPS at 1080p, 68 FPS at 1440p, and 58 FPS at 4K, while the jump from Medium to High yields only 10, 8, and 7 FPS increases respectively, suggesting that the High preset offers minimal performance benefit over Medium.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 154.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 96.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 89.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 74.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 181.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 113.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 105.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 87.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 203.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 127.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 117.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 98.0 |
Overpower with iUltra 7 265 + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RTX 3080 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265 + RTX 3080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.