Overpower

# How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon 760M ranks 3702 out of 3713 tested combinations in Overpower. This places the combo in the bottom 0.3% of all tested configurations, indicating that this hardware pairing delivers among the lowest frame rates observed in the benchmark database for this title. The rank is not a reflection of any single component's weakness, but rather the combined result of a mobile processor with integrated graphics attempting to run a demanding action game. The data shows that only 11 other tested combos perform worse, making this one of the least capable configurations for Overpower in the entire database.

The delta between this combo and the top performers is substantial, though the measured FPS numbers provide the clearest picture of its standing. With the CPU sitting at the 83rd percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 35th percentile among all graphics cards, the pairing creates a significant bottleneck that the game's engine cannot overcome. The combo rank reflects the integrated GPU's role as the primary limiting factor, as the CPU's strong benchmark scores do not translate into playable frame rates when paired with the Radeon 760M.

# CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H features 16 cores and 22 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. This Meteor Lake architecture processor, built on Intel's 7 nm process, carries a 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 cache per core. The CPU's benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028 and a single-core score of 1743. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 24873 and single-thread score of 3468 further demonstrate the processor's capability in general computing tasks.

In Overpower, however, the CPU's role is constrained by the integrated graphics solution. The processor's 28 W TDP and mobile segment design mean it operates within power limits that affect sustained performance, but the benchmark data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this game. The nearest rivals in CPU benchmarks include the Intel Core i5-14600T with an average score of 32707 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 (0.2% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (0.4% slower). These small deltas indicate the 155H is competitive with similar mobile and desktop processors in raw compute, yet the game's frame rates remain low across all settings and resolutions.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 memory provides the system with adequate data throughput, but the Radeon 760M's reliance on shared system memory means the CPU and GPU compete for the same bandwidth. This contention is likely a contributing factor to the low FPS figures observed, as the game's action sequences require simultaneous CPU and GPU memory access.

# GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz, delivering 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance. The 760M uses system shared memory, with bandwidth that is system dependent, meaning the GPU's performance is tied directly to the CPU's memory subsystem.

The GPU's benchmark scores place it at the 35th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 6019. Its nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks include the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001 (0.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000 (0.3% slower), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5996 (0.4% slower), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049 (0.5% faster). These small deltas suggest the 760M performs similarly to older discrete GPUs, but its integrated nature means it shares power and thermal resources with the CPU.

In Overpower, the GPU's role is decisive. The measured FPS figures show that even at the lowest settings and resolution, the GPU struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 and Passmark G3D score of 5310 indicate the GPU's raw graphics capability, but the game's demands exceed what this integrated solution can provide. The GPU's 15 W TDP is a fraction of what discrete graphics solutions consume, and this power limitation directly impacts the frame rates observed across all tested configurations.

# Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's priority between visual quality and frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 44 FPS, which is the highest frame rate achieved at any resolution or settings combination. This represents the only configuration where the combo approaches playability, though the lack of min and max FPS data for this setting means stability cannot be fully assessed.

The Medium preset at 1920x1080 produces an average of 28 FPS, with a minimum of 23 FPS and maximum of 32 FPS. This represents a 36% reduction in average frame rate compared to Low, but offers improved visual fidelity. The High preset at 1920x1080 yields 26 FPS average, while Ultra drops to 21 FPS. None of these higher settings provide consistently smooth gameplay, but the data suggests that Low at 1080p is the only viable option for responsive action gameplay.

For users willing to accept lower resolution, the 2560x1440 Low preset delivers 39 FPS average, which is 5 FPS lower than the 1080p Low figure. The 4K Low preset achieves 33 FPS average. However, the trade-off in resolution does not yield significantly better frame rates than the 1080p Low setting, and the visual clarity loss at higher resolutions with Low settings may not be worth the minor FPS difference. The data indicates that 1080p Low is the recommended configuration for this combo in Overpower.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its best results across all settings. The Low preset achieves an average of 44 FPS, with no min or max data recorded. Medium averages 28 FPS, with a range of 23 to 32 FPS. High averages 26 FPS, while Ultra averages 21 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decline, with each step up in quality costing approximately 5-6 FPS on average.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop noticeably. Low averages 39 FPS, a decrease of 5 FPS from the 1080p Low figure. Medium averages 25 FPS, with a range of 21 to 28 FPS. High averages 23 FPS, and Ultra averages 19 FPS. The relative performance gap between settings remains consistent, but the absolute numbers are lower across the board, indicating that resolution has a significant impact on the GPU's ability to render the game.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low averages 33 FPS, which is the highest 4K result but still below the 1080p Low figure by 11 FPS. Medium averages 21 FPS, with a range of 18 to 24 FPS. High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra drops to 16 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that the integrated GPU cannot handle the pixel throughput required at this resolution, even at the lowest quality settings.

# FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this combo?

A: The 1920x1080 Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 44, making it the only configuration that approaches playable frame rates for action gameplay.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the best result is 33 FPS average on Low settings, with Medium at 21 FPS, High at 19 FPS, and Ultra at 16 FPS.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p Low and 4K Low?

A: The 1080p Low setting averages 44 FPS, while 4K Low averages 33 FPS, representing an 11 FPS drop.

Q: Does the Medium preset provide a consistent frame rate?

A: At 1080p, Medium averages 28 FPS with a range of 23 to 32 FPS. At 1440p, it averages 25 FPS with a range of 21 to 28 FPS. At 4K, it averages 21 FPS with a range of 18 to 24 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-14600T at 32707 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (0.1% delta).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M sits at the 35th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 6019.

# Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by approximately 11% across all settings. From 1440p to 4K, the drop is more pronounced at approximately 18-20%. The scaling from 1080p Low at 44 FPS to 1440p Low at 39 FPS represents a 5 FPS loss, while the drop from 1440p Low to 4K Low at 33 FPS represents a 6 FPS loss.

This resolution scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is the limiting component in this combo. The frame rate drops are roughly proportional to the increase in pixel count, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would remain more consistent across resolutions, as the CPU workload would not change significantly with pixel count. The data shows that the Radeon 760M's compute and memory bandwidth constraints become more severe as the pixel throughput demands increase.

The 4K results, where even Low settings produce only 33 FPS average, confirm that the integrated GPU cannot handle the rendering load at higher resolutions. The 1440p results, while better than 4K, still fall below the 60 FPS threshold that action games typically require for smooth gameplay. The 1080p Low result of 44 FPS is the only configuration that approaches acceptable performance, but it remains below the 60 FPS mark. The resolution scaling analysis strongly suggests that users of this combo should target 1080p with the lowest quality settings to maximize frame rates in Overpower, as higher resolutions provide diminishing returns in visual quality while exacting a significant performance penalty.