Overpower
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 39 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 28 | 31 | 49 |
| 1440p QHD | 28 | 34 | 36 | 58 |
| 1080p Full HD | 31 | 38 | 41 | 65 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B370, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B370 presents a starkly contrasting combination in the "Overpower" benchmark database. The CPU is a modern 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 desktop processor that ranks in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is an integrated graphics solution based on Intel's Xe3-LPG architecture that sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing creates a significant bottleneck that is immediately visible in the measured frame rates across all tested resolutions and settings.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data for this combo in "Overpower" reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 65 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Low settings drops the average to 58 FPS, a reduction of 7 FPS. At 4K (3840x2160) with Low settings, the average falls further to 49 FPS, which is 16 FPS below the 1080p result and 9 FPS below the 1440p result.
The scaling pattern across High settings shows a similar trajectory but with lower absolute numbers. The 1080p High preset yields 38 FPS, 1440p High yields 34 FPS, and 4K High yields 28 FPS. This represents a 10 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings, a 26.3% reduction relative to the 1080p baseline. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is 16 FPS, a 24.6% reduction. The Medium preset shows the most consistent relative scaling, with 41 FPS at 1080p, 36 FPS at 1440p, and 31 FPS at 4K, representing a 10 FPS total drop.
The fact that frame rates drop by roughly a quarter from 1080p to 4K, even at the lowest settings, indicates that the limiting component is the GPU rather than the CPU. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the resolution scaling would show a much flatter curve, since the CPU's workload is largely independent of resolution. The data suggests that the Arc B370's rendering capabilities are being taxed progressively harder as pixel count increases, while the Ryzen 5 7500F has ample headroom to feed frames at all tested resolutions. The drop from 1080p Low (65 FPS) to 4K Low (49 FPS) is substantial and points to the integrated GPU's fill rate and shading capacity as the primary constraint in "Overpower."
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated GPU with 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output pipelines. Its boost clock is rated at 2400 MHz, and it operates on a 3 nm process node from Intel. The GPU's memory configuration is listed as "System Shared," meaning it relies on the host system's DDR5 memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bandwidth is described as "System Dependent," which adds variability to performance based on the system's memory configuration.
The GPU's benchmark results in the database include a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184. This places the Arc B370 in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, deltaPct -0.2), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, deltaPct -0.5), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1192, deltaPct -0.7). These rivals are all older discrete solutions, yet they are statistically tied with this modern integrated part, highlighting the Arc B370's modest absolute performance level.
In "Overpower," the GPU's role is clearly the dominant factor in the measured FPS. The highest average FPS recorded across all tests is 65 at 1080p Low. At Ultra settings, the combo manages only 31 FPS at 1080p, 28 FPS at 1440p, and 24 FPS at 4K. The GPU's 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate are evidently insufficient to maintain high frame rates at higher quality presets. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which likely exacerbates performance issues in scenes with high texture complexity, although the database does not provide explicit VRAM usage metrics.
The relationship between the GPU's clock speed and the measured results is indirect but observable. The boost clock of 2400 MHz is respectable for an integrated part, yet the architectural limitations of the Xe3-LPG design, combined with the shared memory subsystem, cap performance. The fact that 4K Ultra yields 24 FPS while 1080p Low yields 65 FPS shows a 41 FPS range, indicating that the GPU's performance scales poorly with both resolution and settings, reinforcing its position as the system's performance ceiling in this game.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows provide a clear basis for recommending settings based on the desired experience. For players targeting 60 FPS, the only configuration that achieves this is 1080p with Low settings, which produces an average of 65 FPS. No other setting and resolution combination in the data reaches 60 FPS. At 1440p, the Low preset delivers 58 FPS, which is close to but not at the 60 FPS mark. At 4K, even Low settings only produce 49 FPS.
For a balanced experience prioritizing playability, the Medium preset offers the most consistent minimum frame rates across resolutions. The data shows 1080p Medium averaging 41 FPS with a minimum of 34 FPS, 1440p Medium averaging 36 FPS with a minimum of 31 FPS, and 4K Medium averaging 31 FPS with a minimum of 26 FPS. The Medium preset provides a 5 FPS improvement over High at every resolution, and it provides a 10 FPS improvement at 1080p and 1440p over Ultra settings.
The High preset appears to be a poor middle ground, yielding only 38 FPS at 1080p, 34 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K. These numbers are only marginally better than Ultra, which produces 31 FPS at 1080p, 28 FPS at 1440p, and 24 FPS at 4K. The data suggests that High settings offer little benefit over Medium in terms of visual quality per frame rate cost, but the database does not include visual quality metrics. For the best experience per the measured rows, 1080p Low is the only option for smooth 60+ FPS gameplay, while 1080p Medium provides a playable 41 FPS average. At higher resolutions, players must accept sub-60 FPS averages, with Medium being the recommended preset for maintaining minimum frame rates above 30 FPS at 1440p.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in "Overpower"?
A: The highest average FPS recorded is 65, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: Does this combo maintain 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: No. At 2560x1440 with Low settings, the average FPS drops to 58. No other settings at 1440p reach 60 FPS, with Medium averaging 36 FPS, High averaging 34 FPS, and Ultra averaging 28 FPS.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 65 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 31 FPS. This represents a 34 FPS difference, with Ultra delivering less than half the frame rate of Low.
Q: How does the Arc B370's benchmark score compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, a deltaPct of -0.2, meaning the Arc B370 is effectively tied with these older parts.
Q: At 4K resolution, which settings produce the highest minimum FPS?
A: The Medium preset at 3840x2160 has a measured minimum FPS of 26. The Low and Ultra presets do not have recorded minimum FPS values in the data, but their averages are 49 and 24 FPS respectively.
Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations in "Overpower"?
A: The combo ranks 2742 out of 2980 total combos tested in the game, placing it in the lower percentile of all tested systems.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes.
The CPU's benchmark results are strong for its class. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22799 in multi-core and 3218 in single-core. Its 3DMark scores show scaling from 974 in single-thread to 6379 in max-threads. The Geekbench scores are 12362 multi-core and 2374 single-core. These results place the CPU in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964.
The nearest rivals to the 7500F in the database include the Intel Core i7-11850H (avgScore 24935, deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avgScore 25005, deltaPct -0.2), the Intel Core i7-13620H (avgScore 24911, deltaPct 0.2), and the Intel Core 5 210H (avgScore 24872, deltaPct 0.4). The deltaPct values indicate that the 7500F is essentially tied with these processors, with differences of less than half a percent.
In the context of "Overpower," the CPU's role is to feed frames to the GPU. The measured FPS at low resolutions and settings, such as 65 FPS at 1080p Low, suggests that the CPU is capable of delivering frames at that rate. The fact that the FPS drops as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K indicates the CPU is not the primary bottleneck, as the CPU's workload does not scale significantly with resolution. The 5.00 GHz boost clock and 12 threads provide ample single-thread and multi-thread performance for this game. The CPU's strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 suggests it can handle any background tasks or game logic without issue. The data does not show CPU-specific frame times or utilization, so it is not possible to quantify the CPU's headroom precisely, but the resolution scaling pattern points to the GPU as the limiting factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data for this combo in "Overpower" covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra).
At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 65 FPS, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. The Medium preset averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 47 FPS. The High preset averages 38 FPS, with no minimum or maximum values. The Ultra preset averages 31 FPS, also without minimum or maximum values. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 34 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 58 FPS. The Medium preset averages 36 FPS, with a minimum of 31 FPS and a maximum of 42 FPS. The High preset averages 34 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 28 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 30 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 49 FPS. The Medium preset averages 31 FPS, with a minimum of 26 FPS and a maximum of 35 FPS. The High preset averages 28 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 24 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 25 FPS.
The Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values across all resolutions, providing a more complete picture of frame time consistency. The minimum FPS values at Medium are 34 FPS at 1080p, 31 FPS at 1440p, and 26 FPS at 4K. The maximum values are 47 FPS at 1080p, 42 FPS at 1440p, and 35 FPS at 4K. The gap between minimum and maximum FPS is 13 FPS at 1080p, 11 FPS at 1440p, and 9 FPS at 4K, suggesting better frame pacing at higher resolutions where the GPU is more consistently saturated.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2742 out of 2980 tested combos in "Overpower," placing it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. This rank is primarily driven by the GPU's low performance percentile of 5, while the CPU's percentile of 77 is comparatively strong. The combo's rank of 2742 reflects the severe bottleneck created by pairing a high-end desktop CPU with an integrated mobile-class GPU.
The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are all older discrete graphics cards, such as the ATI Radeon HD 5770 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, which are statistically tied with the Arc B370 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores. This indicates that the Arc B370's raw rendering performance is comparable to hardware from more than a decade ago, despite its modern architecture and 3 nm process node. In "Overpower," this translates to the low measured FPS across all settings and resolutions.
The CPU's nearest rivals show a different story. The 7500F is statistically tied with the Intel Core i7-13620H and Intel Core 5 210H, which are mobile processors, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F, which is a desktop part. The deltaPct values are all within 0.4%, indicating that these CPUs offer essentially identical benchmark performance. The 7500F's strong showing in CPU benchmarks does not compensate for the GPU's weakness in this game, as evidenced by the combo's low rank. The data suggests that for "Overpower," the GPU is the determining factor for the combo's position in the rankings, and the CPU's capabilities are largely untapped at the frame rates achieved.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
Intel Arc B370
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500F + Intel Arc B370 in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 49.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 31.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 28.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 58.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 36.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 34.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 65.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 38.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 31.0 |
Overpower with Ryzen 5 7500F + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with Arc B370 + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500F + Arc B370
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.