Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the Intel Arc B370 delivers a limited performance envelope in Fivem, with the benchmark data indicating that playable frame rates are largely confined to the 1080p resolution tier. The measured rows show a clear hierarchy: at 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 80 FPS, which stands as the only result above the 60 FPS threshold. Medium at the same resolution averages 63 FPS, providing a viable alternative with improved visuals. High drops to 50 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. While the data shows that Low is the only preset to comfortably exceed 60 FPS, Medium remains functionally playable for most users. At 1440p, the situation tightens considerably; Low averages 53 FPS, Medium 41 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. The 4K results are consistently below playable standards, with Low averaging 29 FPS and High dropping to 18 FPS. Therefore, the data suggests that the best experience in terms of balancing frame rate and visual fidelity is the Medium preset at 1920x1080, which delivers an average of 63 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS, keeping the frame time stable enough for multiplayer scenarios. For users prioritizing smoothness above all else, the Low preset at 1080p is the only configuration that approaches the 80 FPS mark.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution built on the Xe3-LPG architecture with a 3 nm process node. Its clock speeds are modest, with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. Critically, the memory configuration is listed as "System Shared," meaning the VRAM size, type, and bus width are all dependent on the host system's main memory rather than dedicated video memory. This shared memory architecture is a fundamental constraint for Fivem performance. The GPU's compute capabilities are limited, with a FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s. The texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The GPU also has 10 ray tracing cores, but the overall percentile ranking against all GPUs is 5, placing it in the bottom tier of performance. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 1184 from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186, deltaPct -0.2), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190, deltaPct -0.5), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (1192, deltaPct -0.7). This comparison underscores that the Arc B370's raw graphics performance is comparable to legacy discrete GPUs from over a decade ago. In Fivem, this translates to a severe bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data shows a stark drop from 1080p to 4K, which is consistent with a GPU that has insufficient fill rate and memory bandwidth to handle the pixel throughput demanded by higher resolutions. The shared memory system also means that bandwidth is "System Dependent," which can introduce variability in performance based on the CPU's memory configuration, but the measured data here reflects a single configuration.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a GPU-bound scenario, particularly at lower settings where the CPU has less influence. Examining the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 80 at 1920x1080 to 53 at 2560x1440, a decrease of 27 FPS, and then to 29 at 3840x2160, a further decrease of 24 FPS. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is approximately 33.75%, and from 1440p to 4K is approximately 45.28%. For the Medium preset, the averages are 63, 41, and 23 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively. This represents a 34.92% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 43.90% drop from 1440p to 4K. The High preset shows 50, 33, and 18 FPS, with drops of 34% and 45.45%. The scaling pattern is consistent: moving from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly one-third of the frame rate, and moving to 4K costs another 40-45% of the remaining frame rate. This steep decline indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, as increasing the resolution directly increases the pixel load on the Arc B370. The CPU, which has a high average benchmark score of 24964, is not the primary constraint at higher resolutions. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would remain relatively flat across resolutions. Instead, the data shows a near-linear relationship between pixel count and frame rate, which is the classic signature of a GPU-limited workload. The 4K results are uniformly below 30 FPS, even at Low settings, confirming that this resolution is not viable for this combination. The 1440p results are marginal, with only the Low preset exceeding 50 FPS, while 1080p remains the only resolution where the GPU can keep up with the game's demands at playable levels.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate is 80 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186, which is 0.2% higher. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher). The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, which is 1.4% lower.

Q: Is the 4K resolution playable with any settings preset?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 29 FPS, Medium averages 23 FPS, High averages 18 FPS, and Ultra averages 14 FPS. All of these are below the 30 FPS threshold generally considered minimally playable.

Q: What is the range of frame rates for the Medium preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 41, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance in synthetic tests?

A: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 3218 in single-core and 22799 in multi-core. In Geekbench, it scores 2374 in single-core and 12362 in multi-core. The multi-core scores are significantly higher, indicating strong scaling across its 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 80 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 39 FPS, resulting in a 41 FPS difference between the two extremes.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and the Intel Arc B370 ranks 2762 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 8.09% of all configurations, indicating that it is a low-performing pairing for this specific game. The rank is a holistic measure that takes into account all measured FPS results across resolutions and settings. The primary reason for this low rank is the GPU's severe performance limitations, as evidenced by its 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs. While the CPU is a relatively strong performer, ranking in the 77th percentile among all CPUs, it cannot compensate for the GPU's inability to render the game at higher frame rates. The combo's rank is heavily weighted by the GPU's performance, since Fivem at higher resolutions becomes entirely GPU-bound. The data shows that even at 1080p, the highest average FPS is only 80, which is modest by modern standards, but the GPU's weakness becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. The 4K results, with averages between 14 and 29 FPS, drag the overall ranking down significantly. In comparison, a combo with a more capable GPU would achieve much higher frame rates at 1440p and 4K, thereby achieving a better rank. The CPU's high average benchmark score of 24964, which is within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005) and 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935), does not translate into a high combo rank because the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. This rank serves as a warning that this configuration is only suitable for low-resolution, low-settings gaming in Fivem.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 65 watts. The CPU features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, along with 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 KB of L1 cache per core. Memory support is limited to DDR5, with a dual-channel bus and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The processor's synthetic benchmark scores are robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22799 and a single-core score of 3218. In Geekbench, it scores 12362 in multi-core and 2374 in single-core. Its average benchmark score is 24964, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935, deltaPct 0.1), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005, deltaPct -0.2), and the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, deltaPct 0.2). In the context of Fivem, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and network processing, which are typically single-threaded or lightly threaded tasks. The CPU's strong single-core performance, evidenced by its 3dmark single-thread score of 974 and Passmark single-thread score of 3841, is sufficient for these tasks. The data from the measured FPS does not show evidence of CPU bottlenecking, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution changes. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rates would be similar across all resolutions. Instead, the steep drop from 1080p to 4K indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint. The CPU's fast boost clock of 5.00 GHz and 6 cores provide enough processing power to feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions. Therefore, the CPU is not the performance limiter in this pairing; it is the GPU that holds back the system.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 80 FPS, with no min or max recorded. The Medium preset averages 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 72 FPS. The High preset averages 50 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 39 FPS. This resolution is the only one where the Low preset exceeds 60 FPS, and the Medium preset also remains above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 53 FPS. The Medium preset averages 41 FPS, with a minimum of 35 FPS and a maximum of 48 FPS. The High preset averages 33 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 26 FPS. None of the 1440p results reach 60 FPS, indicating a significant performance drop from 1080p. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 29 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 23 FPS, with a minimum of 20 FPS and a maximum of 26 FPS. The High preset averages 18 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 14 FPS. The 4K results are all below 30 FPS, making the game unplayable at this resolution. The data shows a consistent pattern: for each settings preset, the average FPS decreases by roughly 30-35% when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and then by another 40-45% when moving from 1440p to 4K. For example, the Low preset goes from 80 to 53 to 29 FPS. This scaling is indicative of a GPU that is overwhelmed by pixel count. The Medium preset is the only one that provides min/max data for all three resolutions, showing a range of 54-72 FPS at 1080p, 35-48 FPS at 1440p, and 20-26 FPS at 4K. These ranges are relatively narrow, suggesting that frame times are stable but at low levels. The overall picture is that this combo is only suitable for 1080p gaming with reduced settings. The Ultra preset at 1080p (39 FPS) is playable but not smooth, while the High preset at 1440p (33 FPS) is borderline. The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU's high benchmark scores do not translate into high frame rates at higher resolutions.