Overpower
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 66 | 76 | 117 |
| 1440p QHD | 64 | 80 | 86 | 139 |
| 1080p Full HD | 74 | 89 | 100 | 156 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Overpower with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination produces a consistent, playable experience in Overpower, though the data reveals distinct performance tiers depending on how the game is configured. Across all measured resolutions, the pair demonstrates a clear hierarchy: Low settings deliver the highest frame rates, Medium and High provide a balanced middle ground, and Ultra imposes the heaviest load. The benchmark results show that the most effective way to maximize performance is to select the Low preset, which yields frame rates that are substantially higher than the next tier. At 1920x1080, Low produces 156 FPS on average, while Medium drops to 99.7 FPS, a reduction of over 56 FPS. This pattern holds at higher resolutions, where Low at 2560x1440 reaches 139 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it still manages 117.1 FPS. These figures suggest that the Low preset is the best choice for players prioritizing smoothness and high refresh rates, as the jump from Low to Medium represents a significant performance cost.
However, for those who want a more visually rich experience without sacrificing playability, the Medium preset is the strongest recommendation. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 99.7 FPS, which remains well above the 60 FPS threshold, and it scales acceptably to 85.7 FPS at 2560x1440 and 75.7 FPS at 3840x2160. The High preset offers a slight visual upgrade over Medium, but the performance gap is modest: at 1080p, High produces 89 FPS, only 10.7 FPS lower than Medium, and at 1440p, the difference narrows to 6.2 FPS. The Ultra preset, by contrast, is demanding, with frame rates falling to 73.8 FPS at 1080p, 64.2 FPS at 1440p, and 59.8 FPS at 4K. Given these numbers, Ultra is only advisable for users with a 60 Hz display at 1440p, as it stays just above the 60 FPS mark, but it becomes marginal at 4K. The data strongly indicates that Medium is the optimal balance, offering a meaningful improvement in visual fidelity over Low while remaining comfortably ahead of High and Ultra in frame rate.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the primary driver of frame rate scaling in Overpower, as the benchmark results show that changes in resolution and settings have a direct and predictable impact on performance. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for the texture and geometry loads of this action game. The card’s clock speeds are notably high, with a base clock of 2321 MHz, a game clock of 2424 MHz, and a boost clock of 2581 MHz. These elevated clocks contribute to its measured performance, as the GPU is able to maintain high utilization across all tested presets. In terms of raw compute, the RX 6700 XT offers 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which places it in the 77th percentile among all GPUs, according to the benchmark database.
The GPU’s position relative to its nearest rivals is informative. The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (score of 33493) and 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (score of 33294). Conversely, it trails the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (score of 34050) by 1% and the AMD Radeon RX 480 (score of 34059) by 1%. This data suggests that the RX 6700 XT is a mid-to-high-tier performer, but it is not without competition. In Overpower, the GPU’s strength is evident when moving from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 156 FPS at 1080p to 117.1 FPS at 4K, a decline of 38.9 FPS. This reduction is primarily due to the increased pixel count, which places a heavier load on the GPU’s shading units and memory subsystem. The 12 GB VRAM capacity proves adequate, as there is no indication of memory-related bottlenecks in the measured data, even at the highest resolution.
The GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at Ultra settings, where the frame rate at 4K falls to 59.8 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold. This indicates that the RX 6700 XT is nearing its limits when rendering the most demanding settings at 4K. However, the fact that it maintains over 60 FPS at 1440p Ultra (64.2 FPS) suggests that the card is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at that resolution. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the frame rate scales consistently with resolution changes, rather than being capped by the CPU. This is a clear sign that the RX 6700 XT’s compute and memory bandwidth are the primary determinants of performance in this title.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 provides a solid foundation for the RX 6700 XT in Overpower, though its role is secondary to the GPU in most scenarios. The CPU features 6 cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a 16 MB L3 cache. This setup is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, but the benchmark results show that the CPU’s influence diminishes as resolution increases. The Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 20875, which places it in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the Intel Core i5-12500 scores 20897 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE scores 20900 (0.1% higher), and the Intel Core i5-12600T scores 20917 (0.2% higher). The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 5 5500.
In Overpower, the CPU’s impact is most visible at 1080p, where frame rates are highest. At Low settings, the CPU is able to push the GPU to 156 FPS, but this is still below the GPU’s maximum potential, suggesting that the CPU is not the sole bottleneck. The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by a score of 836 in 3dmark single-thread and 2319 in cinebench R23 single-core, is adequate for the game’s logic and physics, but it does not scale as well as the GPU’s frame rate. The multi-threaded capabilities, with a cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16429, ensure that background tasks and game threads are handled without stuttering. However, the data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the frame rate drops consistently with resolution increases, which is a hallmark of GPU-bound scenarios.
The CPU’s role is further clarified when comparing its benchmark scores to its rivals. The Ryzen 5 5500 is essentially on par with the Intel Core i5-12500, with a delta of only -0.1%, and it is 0.2% slower than the Intel Core i5-12600T. This means that in Overpower, the CPU is unlikely to be the deciding factor in performance differences between these processors, as the GPU will dominate the frame rate at settings above Low. The 65W TDP and PCIe Gen 3 interface are worth noting, as they do not appear to hinder performance in this game, given the measured results. Overall, the CPU provides enough headroom for the GPU to operate at its full potential, particularly at 1440p and 4K, where the frame rates are clearly GPU-limited.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for this CPU/GPU combination?
A: The Medium preset is the best choice, as it delivers 99.7 FPS at 1920x1080, 85.7 FPS at 2560x1440, and 75.7 FPS at 3840x2160, all of which are comfortably above 60 FPS. Low settings offer the highest frame rates, but Medium provides a better visual experience with only a moderate performance penalty.
Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (33493) and 1.3% higher than the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (33294). It is 1% lower than the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (34050) and 1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 480 (34059).
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 5500 a bottleneck at any resolution?
A: The CPU is not the primary bottleneck at 1440p or 4K, as frame rates scale with resolution, indicating GPU limitation. At 1080p Low, the CPU is able to deliver 156 FPS, which is high enough to avoid significant stalling, though it may limit the GPU’s absolute maximum.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 4K with Ultra settings?
A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combination produces an average of 59.8 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests that Ultra at 4K is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings?
A: At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 156 FPS at 1080p to 117.1 FPS at 4K, a reduction of 24.9%. At Medium, the drop is from 99.7 FPS to 75.7 FPS (24.1%), and at Ultra, it is from 73.8 FPS to 59.8 FPS (19.0%).
Q: Does the 12 GB VRAM on the RX 6700 XT cause any issues in this game?
A: No, the benchmark data shows no evidence of VRAM-related performance drops, even at 4K with Ultra settings. The 12 GB capacity is sufficient for the game’s demands at all tested configurations.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a consistent pattern of resolution scaling, with the frame rate decreasing as pixel count increases. At 1920x1080, the average frame rate across all settings is 104.6 FPS, while at 2560x1440, it drops to 92.1 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it falls to 79.7 FPS. This represents a 12.0% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 23.8% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is most pronounced at Low settings, where the frame rate drops from 156 FPS at 1080p to 117.1 FPS at 4K, a 24.9% decrease. At Ultra settings, the drop is smaller in percentage terms, from 73.8 FPS to 59.8 FPS, a 19.0% reduction. This pattern suggests that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the workload increases with pixel count, putting more pressure on the RX 6700 XT’s shading units.
The data also shows that the CPU’s role diminishes as resolution increases. At 1080p, the CPU must work harder to feed the GPU, which is why the frame rate at Low settings is the highest. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, and the CPU’s influence on frame rate decreases. This is evident in the fact that the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings narrows at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 82.2 FPS, while at 4K, the difference is 57.3 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is stretched at 4K, and the CPU has less headroom to affect performance. For players using a 1440p monitor, the RX 6700 XT is well-matched, as it can deliver over 60 FPS on all settings, including Ultra. At 4K, the GPU is only suitable for lower settings, as Ultra falls below the 60 FPS mark.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following data is derived directly from the measured FPS table, providing a detailed look at performance across all resolutions and settings.
At 1920x1080, the benchmark results show a wide range of frame rates depending on the preset. The Low setting produces the highest average at 156 FPS, followed by Medium at 99.7 FPS, High at 89 FPS, and Ultra at 73.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 56.3 FPS, which is the largest jump between any two consecutive settings at this resolution. The difference between Medium and High is 10.7 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 15.2 FPS. These numbers indicate that the Low preset is significantly less demanding, while the higher presets impose a more uniform load on the GPU.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates are lower across the board, but the ranking remains the same. Low delivers 139 FPS, Medium produces 85.7 FPS, High achieves 79.5 FPS, and Ultra reaches 64.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 53.3 FPS, which is slightly smaller than at 1080p. The difference between Medium and High is 6.2 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 15.3 FPS. This resolution is still well within the GPU’s capabilities, as even Ultra stays above 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits. Low settings produce 117.1 FPS, Medium delivers 75.7 FPS, High manages 66 FPS, and Ultra drops to 59.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 41.4 FPS, which is the smallest of any resolution, indicating that the GPU is becoming the bottleneck. The difference between Medium and High is 9.7 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 6.2 FPS. Notably, Ultra is the only configuration that falls below 60 FPS, making it marginal for 4K gaming. The data shows that the RX 6700 XT is best utilized at 1440p, where it can maintain high frame rates on all presets, while 4K is only viable with lower settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Overpower
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 117.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 75.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 66.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 59.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 139.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 85.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 79.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 64.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 156.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 99.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 89.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 73.8 |
Overpower with Ryzen 5 5500 + Other GPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Overpower with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500 + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.