Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a robust Fivem experience, but the data reveals a system that transitions from being CPU-limited at lower resolutions to heavily GPU-bound at 4K. The measured frame rates across the resolution and settings matrix show a clear hierarchy, with performance scaling that highlights the strengths and bottlenecks of this specific combination.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic, and the pattern in the data suggests that the limiting component shifts depending on the resolution. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches 193.4 FPS, but this falls to 124.1 FPS at 2560x1440 and further to 71.2 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 36% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 43% reduction from 1440p to 4K. Such a steep decline indicates that the RX 6700 XT is becoming the primary constraint as pixel count increases.

The Ultra preset tells a similar story but with lower absolute numbers. At 1080p Ultra, the system produces 94.6 FPS, dropping to 61 FPS at 1440p and 34.7 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings is a 43% reduction, mirroring the Low preset’s scaling pattern. This consistency across settings strongly implies that the GPU’s rendering throughput, rather than any CPU-side limitation, dictates the frame rate at higher resolutions.

However, the gap between Low and Ultra at the same resolution reveals where the CPU begins to matter. At 1080p, the difference between Low (193.4 FPS) and Ultra (94.6 FPS) is a massive 98.8 FPS, showing that the GPU has headroom to spare when settings are lowered. The fact that the system can exceed 190 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the Ryzen 5 5500 is capable of feeding the GPU adequately at that point. The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is more balanced, with the CPU able to keep up with the GPU’s output.

GPU Role

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is the dominant factor in this combo’s performance, particularly at higher resolutions. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for Fivem’s asset streaming in a multiplayer environment. The GPU’s boost clock of 2581 MHz and game clock of 2424 MHz are relatively high, and the benchmark results show that this card sits at the 77th percentile among all GPUs. This places it in a competitive position, as its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6800, which has an average benchmark score only 0.7% higher.

The GPU’s role is most evident in the 4K results, where even Low settings yield only 71.2 FPS. This is a clear sign that the card is working near its limits at this resolution. The measured data shows a linear progression from Low to Ultra at 4K: 71.2, 52.4, 44.4, and 34.7 FPS. Each step up in settings costs roughly 10-15 FPS, which is a typical pattern for a GPU-bound scenario. The 12 GB VRAM is unlikely to be the limiting factor here, as Fivem is not known for extreme VRAM consumption, but the raw compute power of the Navi 22 chip is what sets the ceiling.

At 1080p, the GPU’s capabilities are more than sufficient. The 193.4 FPS at Low settings shows that the card can push well beyond the 144 Hz refresh rate common on modern monitors. The fact that the RX 6700 XT’s nearest rival, the RTX A5000, scores 1.3% lower in average benchmarks suggests that this card is well-positioned in its class. The data implies that for 1080p gaming, the GPU is rarely the bottleneck, and the system’s performance will be more dependent on the CPU.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 5 5500 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz. Its 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide a solid foundation for gaming. In the benchmark database, this CPU scores at the 79th percentile among all processors, with its closest rival being the Intel Core i5-12500, which has an average score just 0.1% higher. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 5500 is a very capable mid-range part.

The CPU’s influence on Fivem performance is most apparent at 1080p, where frame rates are high enough to expose any CPU limitations. The shift from Low to Ultra at 1080p only drops the frame rate from 193.4 to 94.6 FPS, a 51% reduction. While this is partly due to increased GPU load, the fact that the system cannot maintain 200+ FPS at Low settings suggests that the CPU is beginning to cap performance. The single-thread performance is crucial for Fivem, as the game is known to be sensitive to CPU speed in multiplayer scenarios. The 3dmark single-thread score of 836 and the passmark single-thread score of 3058 indicate decent but not exceptional per-core performance.

At 1440p, the CPU’s role diminishes as the GPU becomes more stressed. The difference between Low (124.1 FPS) and Ultra (61 FPS) is 63.1 FPS, which is a smaller percentage drop than at 1080p. This suggests that the CPU is no longer the primary constraint, and the GPU’s rendering demands are taking over. The data implies that for players targeting high refresh rates at 1080p, the CPU might be the limiting factor, but at higher resolutions, the GPU is clearly the dominant component.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combos, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 5500 and RX 6700 XT ranks 971st out of 1792 combinations. This places it in the 54th percentile, meaning it outperforms just over half of all tested systems. While this might seem middling, it is important to consider that the database includes many top-end configurations with much more expensive CPUs and GPUs. The rank is a reflection of the overall balance of this combo, which is solid but not exceptional.

The CPU’s 79th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 77th percentile ranking are both respectable, but the combo’s 54th percentile rank suggests that the pairing does not synergize as well as the individual parts might suggest. This could be due to the CPU being a slight bottleneck at lower resolutions, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. The nearest rival CPUs, such as the Intel Core i5-12500, are close in performance, but the combo rank indicates that other pairings with similar components may yield better results. The data shows that this is a capable system, but not one that pushes the boundaries of what either component can achieve.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS on High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the system achieves 76.4 FPS. At 3840x2160 with High settings, it drops to 44.4 FPS. Therefore, 1440p is the highest resolution that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS on High.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its closest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-12500 has an average benchmark score of 20897, which is only 0.1% higher than the Ryzen 5 5500’s score of 20875. The scores are effectively identical.

Q: Is the RX 6700 XT capable of running Fivem at 4K?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 4K Low, it achieves 71.2 FPS, but at Ultra, it drops to 34.7 FPS. For a playable experience, Medium settings at 52.4 FPS would be the maximum.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce 193.4 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 94.6 FPS. This is a difference of 98.8 FPS, showing the significant impact of graphical settings.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6800?

A: The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721, while the RX 6800 has a score of 33493. The RX 6700 XT is actually 0.7% ahead of the RX 6800 in this metric.

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system achieves an average of 99.7 FPS, which is a smooth experience for most monitors.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a complete picture of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system ranges from 193.4 FPS at Low settings to 94.6 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset delivers 152.8 FPS, and High delivers 122.4 FPS. These numbers show that 1080p is a very comfortable environment for this combo, with all settings exceeding 90 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings yield 124.1 FPS, Medium drops to 99.7 FPS, High to 76.4 FPS, and Ultra to 61 FPS. The step from High to Ultra is a 15.4 FPS drop, which is the largest single-step reduction at this resolution. This suggests that Ultra settings impose a heavy load on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates. Low settings produce 71.2 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. Medium drops to 52.4 FPS, High to 44.4 FPS, and Ultra to a marginal 34.7 FPS. The data shows that 4K is only viable at Low or Medium settings for a consistent experience.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p users with a 144 Hz monitor, the High preset at 122.4 FPS offers a good balance between visual quality and performance. Pushing to Ultra drops the frame rate to 94.6 FPS, which is still smooth but sacrifices some headroom. For maximum performance, the Low preset at 193.4 FPS is the best choice for competitive play.

At 1440p, the Medium preset at 99.7 FPS provides a smooth and visually appealing experience, ideal for 100 Hz monitors. The High preset at 76.4 FPS is also viable for 60-75 Hz displays, but Ultra at 61 FPS is borderline for high-refresh-rate gaming. The data suggests that 1440p Medium is the sweet spot for this resolution.

For 4K, the options are limited. The Low preset at 71.2 FPS is the only setting that consistently exceeds 60 FPS, making it the recommended choice for a playable experience. The Medium preset at 52.4 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but High and Ultra are not recommended due to the significant frame rate drops. The overall data indicates that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for lower graphical fidelity.