Overpower

Overpower

AVERAGE FPS
92
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 92 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 66 75 117
1440p QHD 68 79 84 139
1080p Full HD 76 91 99 155

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 117
3840x2160 Medium 75
3840x2160 High 66
3840x2160 Ultra 60
2560x1440 Low 139
2560x1440 Medium 84
2560x1440 High 79
2560x1440 Ultra 68
1920x1080 Low 155
1920x1080 Medium 99
1920x1080 High 91
1920x1080 Ultra 76

Overpower with Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers its most compelling performance at 1440p, where the balance between CPU and GPU load produces a smooth and responsive experience. At 1080p, the combination is heavily GPU-bound at higher settings, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor, causing the frame rate to scale predictably with resolution. The data shows this is a well-matched pairing for high-refresh-rate 1440p gaming, though it will require settings adjustments to maintain high frame rates at 4K.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent pattern: as resolution increases, the average frame rate drops proportionally, indicating that the Radeon RX 6700 XT is the primary bottleneck in this configuration. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings reduces the average frame rate from 91.4 FPS to 78.5 FPS, a drop of 12.9 FPS (14.1%). Scaling further to 3840x2160 at High settings yields 65.5 FPS, which is 25.9 FPS (28.3%) lower than the 1080p result. This scaling behavior is typical for a GPU-bound scenario, where the CPU has ample headroom to feed the graphics card.

The trend is even more pronounced at Low settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 155.3 FPS, which drops to 139.1 FPS at 1440p and 117 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K here is 24.7%, which is smaller than the 28.3% drop seen at High settings. This suggests that at Low settings, the CPU begins to play a more significant role, as the reduced graphical load allows the processor to become a more active participant in determining the final frame rate. However, the fact that frame rates still decline substantially with resolution indicates that the GPU remains the dominant constraint.

At Ultra settings, the frame rates are the lowest across all resolutions, with 75.5 FPS at 1080p, 67.5 FPS at 1440p, and 60.1 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 4K here is a 20.4% drop, which is less severe than at High settings. This implies that at the highest graphical fidelity, the GPU is so heavily loaded that the relative impact of resolution is somewhat muted, as the card is already working near its maximum capacity. Overall, the data indicates that for 4K gaming, users will need to accept lower settings to achieve playable frame rates, while 1440p offers the best compromise between visual quality and performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU combination in Overpower?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 provides the most balanced experience. At High settings, the system achieves 78.5 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while 1080p only offers a 12.9 FPS advantage at the same settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 60.1 FPS. This is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes, and it is 15.4 FPS slower than the 4K High preset, which achieves 65.5 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 155.3 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 75.5 FPS. The CPU, with 6 cores and 12 threads, is not the constraint, as the frame rate varies more with graphical settings than with resolution.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 1440p Low, the average frame rate is 139.1 FPS, while at Ultra it is 67.5 FPS. This represents a 71.6 FPS difference, indicating that the GPU's workload is the main driver of performance changes.

Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 954th out of 1744 tested combinations in Overpower. This places it in the middle of the pack, indicating that while it is not a top-tier configuration, it is by no means weak.

Q: Does the 12 GB of VRAM on the GPU provide enough headroom for high resolutions?

A: The data shows playable frame rates at 4K, with 65.5 FPS at High settings. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient for this game, as the performance drop from 1440p to 4K is consistent with GPU compute limitations rather than memory capacity issues.

How This Combo Ranks

In the grand scheme of tested configurations for Overpower, this pairing of the Intel Core i5-12400F and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT sits at rank 954 out of 1744 combos. This places it in the 54.7th percentile, meaning it outperforms the majority of systems tested, but it is far from the top. The mid-pack ranking is consistent with the hardware's specifications; the CPU is a 6-core, 12-thread part with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and the GPU features 12 GB of VRAM and a boost clock of 2581 MHz.

The ranking suggests that while this combo is capable of delivering solid frame rates in Overpower, there are many other combinations that offer higher performance. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, has an average benchmark score that is 0.7% higher, indicating that the RX 6700 XT is only slightly behind its more powerful sibling. Similarly, the CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8700K, is only 0.1% faster on average, showing that the i5-12400F is effectively on par with that older flagship. This data implies that the combo's mid-pack ranking is due to the GPU being a mid-range part, rather than a deficiency in the CPU.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings for this system depend on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 91.4 FPS, which is an excellent balance of visual quality and performance. Pushing to Ultra drops the frame rate to 75.5 FPS, which is still playable but reduces the margin for error in fast-paced action scenes. The Low preset at 1080p achieves 155.3 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play but sacrifices visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear recommendation, yielding 78.5 FPS. This is noticeably smoother than the 67.5 FPS achieved at Ultra settings, and the visual difference between High and Ultra is often minimal. The Medium preset offers 84.1 FPS, which is a slight improvement over High, but the lower graphical quality is not worth the 5.6 FPS gain.

For 3840x2160, the High preset is the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience, with 65.5 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 60.1 FPS, which is borderline for playability, and the Medium preset at 75.2 FPS is a better choice if visual quality can be sacrificed. The Low preset at 4K achieves 117 FPS, but the graphical downgrade is severe. The data suggests that High settings at 1440p is the sweet spot for this combination.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 155.3 FPS for Low, 98.9 FPS for Medium, 91.4 FPS for High, and 75.5 FPS for Ultra. The step from Low to Medium is a significant 56.4 FPS drop, while the step from Medium to High is a modest 7.5 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra costs 15.9 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates are 139.1 FPS for Low, 84.1 FPS for Medium, 78.5 FPS for High, and 67.5 FPS for Ultra. The drop from Low to Medium is 55 FPS, which is the largest single-settings gap at this resolution. The difference between Medium and High is 5.6 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 11 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates are 117 FPS for Low, 75.2 FPS for Medium, 65.5 FPS for High, and 60.1 FPS for Ultra. The Low to Medium drop is 41.8 FPS, while the Medium to High drop is 9.7 FPS. The High to Ultra drop is 5.4 FPS, which is the smallest settings gap across all resolutions, indicating that at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that the Ultra preset's additional demands have a limited impact.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It features 18 MB of shared L3 cache and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. In Overpower, this CPU provides more than enough processing power to avoid becoming a bottleneck, as evidenced by the frame rate scaling with resolution and settings.

The CPU's benchmark scores support this analysis. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16518 points in multi-core and 2332 points in single-core, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-8700K, has an average score that is 0.1% higher, showing that the i5-12400F is a highly competitive part. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 155.3 FPS, which is a frame rate that would require a capable CPU to maintain. The fact that the frame rate increases when moving from 4K to 1080p indicates that the CPU has headroom, as the GPU is the component that benefits most from the reduced resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the defining component in this combination, and its specifications directly explain the measured performance. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock is 2581 MHz, and it has 2560 shading units. These specs place it in the 77th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 33721 is only 0.7% lower than its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800.

The GPU's role as the primary performance limiter is clear from the data. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 60.1 FPS, which is the lowest measured result. The 12 GB of VRAM is sufficient for this game, as the performance degradation from 1440p to 4K is consistent with the increased pixel count rather than memory exhaustion. The GPU's 230 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it is a power-hungry part, but the performance it delivers in Overpower justifies its specifications. The data shows that the RX 6700 XT is the component that determines the overall frame rate, and its capabilities are well-matched to the i5-12400F's processing power.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Overpower

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 117.0
3840x2160 Medium 75.2
3840x2160 High 65.5
3840x2160 Ultra 60.1
2560x1440 Low 139.1
2560x1440 Medium 84.1
2560x1440 High 78.5
2560x1440 Ultra 67.5
1920x1080 Low 155.3
1920x1080 Medium 98.9
1920x1080 High 91.4
1920x1080 Ultra 75.5

Overpower with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Overpower with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Overpower performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400F + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.