Overpower

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Arc B570 pairing in Overpower occupies a specific niche, ranking 2373rd out of 2980 tested combinations. This places the combo in the lower-mid tier of the database, indicating that while the system is capable of playable framerates, it does not dominate the leaderboard. The data suggests a balanced pairing where neither component becomes a complete bottleneck, but both contribute to the overall performance ceiling observed in the measured results. The following analysis breaks down the specific roles of each processor and graphics card, how they interact across resolutions, and what settings offer the best experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 provides six physical cores and twelve threads, a configuration that remains relevant for modern gaming workloads. Its base clock operates at 3.40 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 3.90 GHz. This processing core is built on the Zen architecture and manufactured on a 12 nm process node by GlobalFoundries. The CPU package includes 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache, which helps feed the cores with game data. The processor supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, and connects to the system via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

In the context of Overpower, the CPU's performance is quantifiable through several benchmark scores. The Cinebench R15 multicore score stands at 1248, while the single-core score is 157.3. Geekbench results show a multicore score of 5648 and a single-core score of 1154. These figures indicate a processor that handles multi-threaded workloads reasonably well but is not at the top of the single-thread performance charts. The Passmark multithread score of 13160 and single-thread score of 2239 further reinforce this profile. The CPU's percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 75, meaning it outperforms a majority of processors in the database.

The relationship between these CPU metrics and the game's frame rates is nuanced. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU has a more significant role in determining the maximum frame rate. The measured FPS at 1080p Low is 110 average, which is the highest across all tested settings and resolutions. This suggests that at this setting, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to reach a high frame rate. However, as the resolution increases, the GPU becomes the primary limiter. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 40, indicating the GPU is overwhelmed. The CPU's 12 threads might provide enough headroom to avoid being the sole bottleneck in most scenarios, especially when compared to the GPU's load at higher resolutions.

The nearest rivals to this CPU in the database provide context for its expected performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V has an average score of 21440, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 2600's average of 21484. The Intel Core i9-11900H is 0.5% behind, and the AMD EPYC 9454 is 1.2% behind. This tight clustering suggests that the Ryzen 5 2600's compute capabilities are very close to a range of other processors, meaning that in CPU-bound scenarios, the frame rate differences between these chips would be minimal. The data shows that the CPU is a competent performer for a 2023 action game, but it lacks the sheer single-thread horsepower of newer architectures that could push frame rates higher in lightly threaded game logic.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B570 is the graphics workhorse in this pairing, built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The GPU is equipped with 18 ray tracing cores. The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory clock operates at 2375 MHz, which translates to 19 Gbps effective. The base and boost clocks for the GPU core are both set at 2500 MHz. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, with a FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS.

The GPU's benchmark scores provide insight into its gaming capability. The Passmark G3D score is 14195, which places it in a competitive position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2649, indicating modern API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 83514 and 96844, respectively. The GPU's percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 65, which is lower than the CPU's 75th percentile. This suggests that the Arc B570 is a relative weak point in this combo, and the performance ceiling of the system is more likely to be limited by the graphics card than the processor.

The GPU's memory capacity of 10 GB is a critical factor for Overpower. At 4K resolution with High settings, the average FPS is 49. When settings are increased to Ultra, the frame rate drops to 40. This pattern suggests that the game is heavily dependent on GPU compute and memory throughput at higher resolutions. The bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the demand on the memory bus increases, which could explain the significant frame rate drops. The GPU's performance is close to rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% higher average score) and the Intel Arc A750 (0.1% lower). This indicates that the B570 is a solid mid-range performer, but it cannot compete with high-end cards that have more memory and bandwidth.

The ray tracing capabilities of the Arc B570, provided by its 18 RT cores, are present but not heavily utilized in the measured data, as the benchmark rows do not specify ray tracing settings. The FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS is the raw compute throughput available for shader work. The data implies that for Overpower, the GPU's rasterization performance is the primary driver of frame rates, and its 10 GB VRAM is adequate for the tested settings, though the 160-bit bus might be a limiting factor at 4K.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. Starting at 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 110 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the average drops to 98 FPS, a reduction of 12 FPS or approximately 10.9%. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 84 FPS. This represents a total drop of 26 FPS from 1080p to 4K at Low settings. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at Low is about 23.6%, indicating that the system is still relatively capable at lower graphical loads.

The scaling becomes more pronounced at higher settings. At Medium settings, the average FPS goes from 69 at 1080p, to 62 at 1440p, and down to 52 at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium is 17 FPS, or 24.6%. At High settings, the averages are 64 FPS at 1080p, 57 at 1440p, and 49 at 4K. The drop is 15 FPS, or 23.4%. At Ultra settings, the averages are 53 FPS at 1080p, 47 at 1440p, and 40 at 4K. The drop is 13 FPS, or 24.5%.

The pattern shows that the percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is relatively consistent across all settings, hovering around 24%. This consistency suggests a balanced scaling behavior where both CPU and GPU are contributing to the performance degradation. If the GPU were the sole bottleneck, we would expect a more aggressive drop at higher resolutions and settings, as the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become saturated. Conversely, if the CPU were the limiter, the frame rate would stay flat or even increase at higher resolutions, as the GPU would have more time to render each frame. The data shows neither of these extremes. The relatively uniform percentage drop indicates that the system is co-limited, but the GPU is likely the primary factor at 4K, given the absolute FPS numbers fall below 60 at High and Ultra settings.

The fact that 4K Low still achieves 84 FPS is telling. It suggests that the CPU can push a high frame rate when the GPU load is light. However, the inability to maintain 60 FPS at 4K High (49 FPS) and 4K Ultra (40 FPS) points to the GPU being the component that struggles with the additional pixel count and graphical fidelity. For a game like Overpower, which demands high graphics throughput, this data implies that the user must prioritize either resolution or settings, as the system cannot handle both at maximum.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The comboRankInGame field provides a specific position of 2373 out of 2980 tested combinations. This places the Ryzen 5 2600 + Arc B570 in the 20th percentile of all tested combos, meaning it outperforms roughly 20% of the systems tested. This is a low ranking, but it must be interpreted within the context of the entire database, which likely includes high-end systems with top-tier CPUs and GPUs. The ranking suggests that this combo is not designed for maximum performance in Overpower, but rather for a playable experience at moderate settings.

The data indicates that the combo's performance is below the median, but the measured FPS shows that it can still achieve playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. For instance, at 1440p High, the average FPS is 57, which is close to the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. At 1080p High, the average is 64. The ranking is likely dragged down by the GPU's 65th percentile score and the CPU's 75th percentile score, which are both mid-tier. The combo's rank is a result of the combined performance, and the data shows that it is a budget-conscious pairing that delivers acceptable results in less demanding scenarios.

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU individually provide a benchmark for this combo's standing. If the CPU were paired with a stronger GPU, the rank might be higher. Conversely, if the GPU were paired with a weaker CPU, the rank could be lower. The data shows that the combo is balanced, but not exceptional. The 2980 total combos tested means there are 607 combinations that perform worse, which provides some comfort for users with this setup. The performance is adequate for 1080p gaming, and the system can handle 1440p at lower settings, but it will not compete with high-end builds that dominate the top of the rankings.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the data shows that the Low preset achieves an average of 110 FPS, which is ideal for competitive or high-refresh-rate play. However, most users will prefer the visual quality of higher presets. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 69 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while the High preset drops to 64 FPS, still acceptable. The Ultra preset at 1080p produces 53 FPS, which is below 60 FPS and might feel less smooth. Therefore, for 1080p, the Medium or High preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, with High being the sweet spot for a stable experience.

At 1440p, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates on higher presets. The Low preset achieves 98 FPS, which is excellent, but the Medium preset drops to 62 FPS, and the High preset to 57 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 47 FPS. For a playable experience at 1440p, the Medium preset is recommended, as it stays above 60 FPS. The High preset at 57 FPS is borderline and might be acceptable for some users, but it risks dipping below 60 FPS during intense scenes. The data suggests that 1440p is the practical limit for this combo if the user wants to play on Medium settings.

For 4K gaming, the data shows that the system is not well-suited for high settings. The Low preset achieves 84 FPS, which is playable, but the Medium preset drops to 52 FPS, and the High preset to 49 FPS. The Ultra preset is at 40 FPS, which is not ideal for a smooth experience. The recommendation for 4K is to use the Low preset to maintain a high frame rate, or accept lower performance at Medium for better visuals. The 10 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the GPU's compute power is the limiting factor. Overall, the best experience per the measured rows is to target 1080p High or 1440p Medium, as these settings provide the best combination of frame rate and visual quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the system delivers the following average frame rates: Low settings produce 110 FPS, Medium settings produce 69 FPS, High settings produce 64 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 53 FPS. The Medium setting has a minimum FPS of 59 and a maximum of 79, indicating some variance, but it remains above 60 FPS on average. The High setting at 1080p does not have reported min/max values, but the average of 64 FPS suggests a stable experience.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down. The Low preset achieves an average of 98 FPS. The Medium preset yields 62 FPS, with a minimum of 52 and a maximum of 71. This shows that the frame rate can dip below 60 FPS under load, which is a concern for smooth gameplay. The High preset at 1440p produces an average of 57 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target, and the Ultra preset drops to 47 FPS. The 1440p results indicate that the system is borderline for higher settings, and users might need to adjust settings to maintain a consistent frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the system's limitations are more evident. The Low preset achieves 84 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K, indicating the GPU can handle simple graphics. The Medium preset produces 52 FPS, with a minimum of 44 and a maximum of 60. The High preset yields 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 40 FPS. The 4K data shows that the system is only suitable for Low or Medium settings if the user wants playable frame rates. The drop from Low to Medium at 4K is significant, from 84 FPS to 52 FPS, which is a 38% reduction. This highlights the GPU's struggle with increased graphical complexity at high resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 1080p with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS for the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B570 at 1920x1080 with High settings is 64 FPS.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 40, which is below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution and settings level.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck in this system?

A: The data shows the GPU has a lower percentile ranking (65th) compared to the CPU (75th), and the frame rate drops significantly at higher resolutions and settings, suggesting the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at 4K.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming?

A: Based on the measured rows, the Medium preset at 2560x1440 yields an average of 62 FPS, which is the only preset above 60 FPS, making it the recommended option for a smooth experience at that resolution.

Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and 0.1% lower than the Intel Arc A750.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems in Overpower?

A: The combo ranks 2373rd out of 2980 tested combinations, placing it in the lower 20% of all systems tested for this game.