Outriders

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the Intel Arc B390 occupies a very specific, low-end position in the Outriders performance hierarchy. The data places this combination at rank 2582 out of 2913 tested combos, which puts it in the bottom percentile of systems capable of running the game. This is a configuration where the graphics solution is the dominant constraint, a fact made clear by the GPU’s overall benchmark percentile of 9, meaning it performs better than only 9% of all tested graphics cards. The CPU, by contrast, is a strong mid-range performer with a percentile of 74, so the pairing is heavily imbalanced. Benchmark results indicate that while the processor has ample headroom, the integrated graphics of the Arc B390 limit the experience to playable framerates only at lower resolutions and settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 2582 out of 2913 in Outriders places it in the lower 11% of all tested system configurations. This is a decisive indicator that the system is not built for high-fidelity gaming at demanding settings. The ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU’s performance ceiling. The Intel Arc B390 scores 1482 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, a result that places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in this benchmark are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, which scores 1463 (1.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce 800M at 1460 (1.5% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM at 1446 (2.5% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 at 1443 (2.7% slower). These are entry-level or legacy parts, which contextualizes the Arc B390’s standing.

The CPU, on the other hand, is a much stronger component. The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (20454, 0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, 0.2% faster), and the AMD EPYC 9454P (20422, 0.2% faster). The delta between the CPU and GPU performance is stark. The data shows that in Outriders, the system’s rank is dragged down entirely by the graphics component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the rank would likely be much higher, given its strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores. Instead, the measured FPS at 1080p with Ultra settings drops to 45 FPS, which is a clear sign that the iGPU is overwhelmed.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Outriders with this combo for a smooth experience?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 with Low settings yields an average of 115 FPS, which is the only configuration that provides a high-refresh-rate experience. The next best option is 2560x1440 with Low settings, averaging 72 FPS, which is also playable.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Outriders?

A: The data shows that at 3840x2160, even with Low settings, the average FPS is only 38. At High settings, it drops to 21 FPS, and at Ultra, it falls to 15 FPS. These results indicate that 4K is not viable for a smooth gaming experience with this hardware.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600 has an average benchmark score of 20468. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, scores 20454, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425 (0.2% lower), and the AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20422 (0.2% lower). The 5600 is marginally ahead of all of them.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor in Outriders?

A: The GPU is unequivocally the limiting factor. The Intel Arc B390 has a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1482, which is in the 9th percentile. In contrast, the CPU is in the 74th percentile. The FPS scaling with resolution—dropping from 115 FPS at 1080p Low to 38 FPS at 4K Low—shows the GPU cannot keep up with increased pixel counts.

Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 115 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 45 FPS. This represents a 70 FPS drop, or a 60.9% reduction in average framerate when moving from the lowest to the highest quality settings.

Q: What are the exact scores of the GPU’s nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B390’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX with a score of 1463, which is 1.3% slower. Other rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460, 1.5% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446, 2.5% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443, 2.7% slower).

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. In Outriders, a game that relies on both physics and AI calculations, the CPU’s role is to maintain a stable frame delivery to the GPU. The processor’s benchmark results are robust. It scores 18309 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2584 in single-core, which are solid numbers for a mid-range desktop part. Its Geekbench scores are 9158 multi-core and 1936 single-core.

The CPU’s high percentile rank of 74 suggests it is more than capable of feeding the Arc B390. The measured FPS data supports this. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 115 FPS, which is a high framerate that the CPU can easily handle. However, the framerate drops to 45 FPS at 1080p Ultra. This drop is not a CPU issue because the resolution and settings increase the GPU load, not the CPU load. The CPU’s performance remains constant, but the GPU’s rendering time increases. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support provide sufficient bandwidth for the CPU’s tasks. The system’s performance in Outriders is therefore not hindered by the processor, which is operating well within its capabilities. The data indicates that the CPU is a component with headroom, waiting on the GPU to complete its work.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system’s capabilities. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average FPS is 115. This is the highest framerate recorded across all configurations. Moving up to Medium settings at the same resolution drops the average to 83 FPS, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 96 FPS. The High preset averages 63 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 45 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the framerates decrease significantly. The Low preset averages 72 FPS. The Medium preset averages 53 FPS, with a minimum of 45 FPS and a maximum of 61 FPS. The High preset averages 40 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 29 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles. The Low preset averages 38 FPS. The Medium preset averages 28 FPS, with a minimum of 23 FPS and a maximum of 32 FPS. The High preset averages 21 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 15 FPS.

The data shows a clear trend. The system is only capable of achieving a consistent 60+ FPS experience at 1080p with Low settings. For a locked 60 FPS experience at higher quality, users would need to compromise heavily. The Medium preset at 1080p offers 83 FPS, which is playable, but the High preset at 63 FPS is borderline for a 60 Hz display. At 1440p, only the Low preset (72 FPS) surpasses the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at any resolution is not recommended, as it produces framerates in the 15 to 45 FPS range.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and reveals the bottleneck. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 115 at 1080p to 72 at 1440p to 38 at 4K. This represents a 37.4% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 66.9% drop from 1080p to 4K. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 63 at 1080p to 40 at 1440p to 21 at 4K, which is a 36.5% drop to 1440p and a 66.7% drop to 4K.

This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-limited system. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the framerate would remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the CPU’s workload does not change with pixel count. Instead, the framerate drops sharply as the resolution increases, indicating that the Intel Arc B390’s rendering throughput is the limiting factor. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, and a boost clock of 2500 MHz, but its FP32 performance of 7.680 TFLOPS is insufficient for high-resolution gaming. The memory bandwidth is also a constraint, as the GPU uses "System Shared" memory, which is dependent on the system’s DDR4 memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This shared memory configuration is a significant drawback at higher resolutions where larger textures and buffers are required. The data suggests that the system is best suited for 1080p gaming, where the GPU’s limitations are less pronounced.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal experience for this combo is at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which yields an average of 115 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a framerate high enough for a smooth, responsive experience on a high-refresh-rate monitor. The Medium preset at 1080p, averaging 83 FPS, is also a viable option for users who prioritize visual quality over raw speed, as it stays well above the 60 FPS threshold.

For users with a 1440p monitor, the Low preset at 2560x1440, averaging 72 FPS, is the recommended choice. This provides a playable experience, though it requires accepting the lowest quality settings. The Medium preset at 1440p, averaging 53 FPS, is playable but may feel less smooth in fast-paced combat scenarios.

The High and Ultra presets are not recommended at any resolution. At 1080p High, the average FPS is 63, which is acceptable for a 60 Hz display, but the Ultra preset drops to 45 FPS, which can cause noticeable stutter in a looter shooter where quick reactions are necessary. At higher resolutions, these presets produce framerates in the 15 to 40 FPS range, which is not suitable for a smooth gameplay experience. The data strongly suggests that users should prioritize framerate over visual fidelity with this hardware. The best experience is achieved by sticking to the Low or Medium presets at 1080p, or Low at 1440p. This configuration is not designed for maxing out graphical settings.