Minimum

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 6600 form a capable pairing for Minimum, a Third-Person Shooter from 2014. The benchmark data shows a combination that can handle high refresh rates at 1080p but begins to strain at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, how the CPU and GPU split their duties, and what settings deliver the best experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture (Vermeer) using a 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 105 W TDP. This is a desktop-class chip on the AMD Socket AM4 platform, supporting dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. Its large 64 MB L3 cache and PCIe Gen 4 support make it a strong foundation for gaming, though its role in Minimum is largely about feeding frames to the GPU rather than being the primary bottleneck.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reflect its strong multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities. In Cinebench R23, it scores 16262 points multi-core and 1527 points single-core. Geekbench results show 14118 multi-core and 2083 single-core. These numbers place it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in general compute tasks. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (0.3% faster), Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (0.4% faster), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (0.4% faster), while the Intel Core i7-14650HX is 0.5% slower. This tells us the 5900X sits in a tightly contested performance band, but its high core count ensures it won't hold back a mid-range GPU like the RX 6600 in most scenarios.

For Minimum, which is not a CPU-intensive title, the 5900X's 12 cores and 24 threads are more than sufficient. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz provides strong single-thread performance that helps with game logic and physics. The data suggests that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in this pairing; instead, the frame rates are largely dictated by the GPU's rendering capabilities, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU's high percentile ranking and robust synthetic scores indicate it has ample headroom to maintain stable frame pacing, even when the GPU is under heavy load.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo, and at what settings?

A: The highest average FPS is 156, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At the same resolution, Medium settings yield 119 FPS, High yields 100 FPS, and Ultra yields 76 FPS.

Q: How does performance scale from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 100 at 1920x1080 to 65 at 2560x1440, and further to 35 at 3840x2160. This represents a 65% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K, indicating the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5900X likely to bottleneck the RX 6600 in this game?

A: No, the data suggests it does not. The CPU has a high average benchmark score of 41376 and ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 156 FPS, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU quickly enough; the frame drops at higher resolutions are consistent with GPU limitations, not CPU processing limits.

Q: What is the difference in performance between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 100 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 49 FPS. This is a 51 FPS difference, showing that Ultra settings roughly halve the frame rate compared to Low at this resolution.

Q: What are the minimum FPS values recorded for Medium settings?

A: For Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 101 at 1920x1080, 65 at 2560x1440, and 35 at 3840x2160. These minimums are close to the averages, suggesting relatively stable frame pacing without major stutters.

*Q: How does this combo rank against all other tested combinations in Minimum?*

A: This combo ranks 2885 out of 3712 tested combinations. This places it in the lower half of all tested combos (roughly the 22nd percentile), but this is expected given the GPU's mid-range positioning relative to top-tier cards.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination holds a rank of 2885 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This ranking places it in the lower 22% of all possible pairings, which might sound unimpressive at first, but it must be interpreted with context. The database includes many high-end and enthusiast-grade components; a mid-range GPU like the RX 6600 will naturally rank lower than pairings with top-tier cards like the RTX 4090 or RX 7900 XTX.

The GPU itself sits in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19036. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0% difference), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (-0.1% slower), NVIDIA Tesla K20m (-0.3% slower), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (0.4% faster). This indicates that the RX 6600 is a solid mid-range performer, roughly on par with a mobile RTX 4050 in raw compute. The CPU, in contrast, ranks much higher at the 87th percentile, but the combo's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's more modest capabilities.

In practical terms, this rank means that while the 5900X is a high-end CPU, its pairing with the RX 6600 in Minimum results in frame rates that are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but not competitive with top-tier systems. The ranking is a reflection of the GPU's limitation as the primary driver of frame rates in this title. It's a sensible pairing for a balanced mid-range build, but it won't top any leaderboards.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this combo performs across resolutions and settings. The table below breaks down the exact average frame rates, with minimum and maximum values where available.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 3840x2160 | Low | 54 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41 | 35 | 48 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 35 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 100 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 77 | 65 | 88 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 65 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 49 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 156 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 119 | 101 | 137 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 100 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 76 | — | — |

At 1080p, the combo excels. Low settings hit 156 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Medium settings still deliver a smooth 119 FPS, and even High settings reach 100 FPS. Ultra drops to 76 FPS, which is still playable but starts to show the GPU's limits. At 1440p, the frame rates remain respectable: Low hits 100 FPS, Medium 77 FPS, High 65 FPS, and Ultra falls to 49 FPS. This resolution is a sweet spot for the RX 6600, offering a good balance between visual fidelity and smoothness.

At 4K, the performance takes a significant hit. Low settings manage 54 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay, but Medium drops to 41 FPS, High to 35 FPS, and Ultra to just 26 FPS. These numbers are below the 60 FPS target and indicate that 4K is not a viable resolution for this combo except at very low settings. The minimum FPS values for Medium settings at 1440p and 1080p are 65 and 101, respectively, showing relatively consistent frame times.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a clear story about where the bottleneck lies. Moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 at High settings, the average FPS drops from 100 to 35, a 65% reduction. This is a dramatic fall that is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect frame rates to remain more stable across resolutions, as the CPU workload would not increase nearly as much as the GPU's rendering load.

At Low settings, the drop is less severe but still significant: from 156 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 4K, a 65% decrease. The fact that even Low settings struggle at 4K confirms that the RX 6600's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus (with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth) are not sufficient to handle the pixel throughput required at 2160p. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.928 TFLOPS and 1792 shading units are simply overwhelmed by the sheer number of pixels.

The scaling pattern also suggests that the Ryzen 9 5900X is not the limiting component. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 156 FPS, which is a high frame rate that requires strong single-thread performance. The CPU's boost clock of 4.80 GHz and high single-core Cinebench score of 1527 provide this capability. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see frame rates plateau at a lower level regardless of resolution. Instead, the FPS scales inversely with resolution, a classic sign of GPU limitation. This means that for users wanting to play at 4K, a GPU upgrade would be far more impactful than a CPU change.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p, the combo is remarkably versatile. Low settings deliver 156 FPS, which is perfect for 144Hz or 165Hz monitors. However, Medium settings at 119 FPS still provide a high refresh rate experience with better visual quality, and High settings at 100 FPS remain smooth for 100Hz displays. Ultra at 76 FPS is the best visual option for 60Hz monitors, offering a significant visual upgrade while staying above the 60 FPS threshold. For competitive play, Low or Medium is recommended; for single-player immersion, Ultra is acceptable.

At 1440p, the choices become more constrained. Low settings achieve 100 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. Medium settings at 77 FPS are still smooth and offer a good balance. High settings at 65 FPS are playable but begin to feel less fluid for fast-paced action. Ultra at 49 FPS is below the 60 FPS target and is only recommended for slower-paced exploration or if visual fidelity is the absolute priority over frame rate. The sweet spot for most players at 1440p is Medium, as it provides a 77 FPS average with a minimum of 65 FPS, ensuring consistent performance.

At 4K, the situation is challenging. Even Low settings only achieve 54 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but still playable for a third-person shooter. Medium settings drop to 41 FPS, which is borderline for a smooth experience, and High and Ultra are not recommended due to sub-40 FPS averages. For 4K, the best experience is to stick with Low settings and accept the 54 FPS average, or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a much better experience. The data clearly shows that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for those who prioritize resolution over frame rate.