Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 86 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 46 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 76 | 87 | 113 |
| 1080p Full HD | 89 | 115 | 139 | 178 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X and AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT combination delivers a solid 1080p experience in Minimum, but the benchmark data reveals a steep performance cliff as resolution increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 178.2 FPS, which drops to 114.7 FPS at High settings. Moving to 1440p, those figures fall to 112.9 FPS and 76 FPS respectively. At 4K, the strain is severe: High settings produce just 38 FPS, and Ultra dips to 28.6 FPS. The scaling pattern—a 78.7% performance drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low—indicates the GPU becomes the dominant limiting factor beyond 1080p, with the CPU’s headroom largely untapped at higher resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The data shows a classic GPU-bound scaling curve. From 1080p Low (178.2 FPS) to 1440p Low (112.9 FPS), the frame rate drops by 36.6%. Pushing to 4K Low (61.8 FPS) represents another 45.3% reduction from 1440p. This consistent decline across settings points squarely at the Radeon RX 6650 XT as the bottleneck—the Ryzen 9 5900X’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample processing power that simply isn’t the constraint here.
At Ultra settings, the pattern intensifies. The 1080p Ultra result of 88.7 FPS falls to 55.3 FPS at 1440p (a 37.7% drop) and then to 28.6 FPS at 4K (a 48.3% drop from 1440p). The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens with resolution: at 1080p, the delta is 89.5 FPS (50.2% reduction), while at 4K it narrows to 33.2 FPS (53.7% reduction). This suggests that at 4K, even the lowest settings cannot escape the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute limits.
The game’s 2014 release date means it lacks modern upscaling features, so the raw rendering load is unavoidable. The RX 6650 XT’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus (280.3 GB/s bandwidth) are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results hover near playability thresholds only at Low settings. For competitive play, 1080p Medium (138.9 FPS) or High (114.7 FPS) are the sweet spots; for immersive 4K, the data suggests accepting 30-45 FPS on Medium or High.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: 1080p is clearly optimal. The combo delivers 178.2 FPS at Low settings and 114.7 FPS at High settings, both well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1440p, High settings still manage 76 FPS, but 4K High drops to 38 FPS, making 1080p the only resolution where all settings remain fluid.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 9 5900X’s average benchmark score is 39,453. It sits 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 4245P (39,383) and 0.9% above the Intel Core i7-13700F (39,095). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.7% and the Intel Core i7-13700 by 1%. The CPU’s percentile ranking is 90, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of tested processors.
Q: Is the GPU’s synthetic benchmark performance competitive?
A: The RX 6650 XT’s average benchmark score is 29,024, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, scores 29,011 (0% delta), while the AMD Radeon RX 470 scores 28,996 (0.1% delta). The Intel Arc A370M is 0.5% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH is 0.6% ahead, so the GPU is tightly clustered with its peers.
Q: What settings should I use for 1440p gameplay?
A: For 1440p, Medium settings yield 87.4 FPS, which is smooth for most scenarios. High settings drop to 76 FPS, still acceptable. Ultra is marginal at 55.3 FPS, and Low provides 112.9 FPS. The data suggests Medium or High are the best trade-offs for visual quality versus frame rate.
Q: How does the 4K Ultra result compare to 1080p Ultra?
A: The 4K Ultra average of 28.6 FPS is 67.8% lower than the 1080p Ultra result of 88.7 FPS. This 60.1 FPS gap illustrates the GPU’s inability to sustain high-fidelity rendering at 4K, making 4K Ultra impractical for this combination.
Q: Does the CPU’s cache configuration matter for this game?
A: The Ryzen 9 5900X features 64 MB of L3 cache, which is substantial, but Minimum’s 2014 engine is unlikely to fully utilize it. The benchmark results show GPU-bound scaling, so the CPU’s cache and 12-core/24-thread layout are not the primary performance drivers in this title.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is the decisive component in this pairing. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, operating at 17.5 Gbps effective, produces 280.3 GB/s of bandwidth—sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but strained at 4K. The GPU’s base clock of 2055 MHz and boost clock of 2635 MHz, with a game clock of 2410 MHz, provide the raw compute headroom seen in the 1080p results. The 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs handle Minimum’s geometry, but the 128-bit memory bus limits high-resolution texture streaming.
The GPU’s synthetic benchmarks corroborate its mid-range positioning. Its PassMark G3D score of 17,166 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,859 place it in the 72nd percentile. The FP32 throughput of 10.79 TFLOPS is adequate for a 2014 title, yet the 4K results show it cannot maintain 60 FPS even at Low settings (61.8 FPS is close but not consistent). The pixel rate of 168.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 337.3 GTexel/s explain the 1080p performance but falter under 4K’s 8.3 million pixel workload.
The GPU’s nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks—the RX 6800M (0% delta) and RX 470 (0.1% delta)—suggest that this card’s performance tier is well understood. The 176 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface do not appear to create bottlenecks in Minimum, as the frame rate scaling is smooth until the resolution increase overwhelms the memory subsystem. For this game, the GPU is the limiter at every resolution above 1080p, and its 8 GB VRAM is not the constraint—bandwidth and compute are.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo excels across all settings. Low settings produce 178.2 FPS, Medium 138.9 FPS, High 114.7 FPS, and Ultra 88.7 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra (89.5 FPS) shows the GPU has headroom, but even Ultra remains comfortably above 60 FPS. This is the resolution where the Ryzen 9 5900X’s 3.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost clocks can keep up with the GPU’s output, avoiding CPU stalls.
At 2560x1440, the results remain playable but tighter. Low settings yield 112.9 FPS, Medium 87.4 FPS, High 76 FPS, and Ultra 55.3 FPS. The Ultra result falls below 60 FPS, indicating that 1440p Ultra is only for those willing to accept occasional dips. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 57.6 FPS, showing diminishing returns as the GPU works harder.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes dramatically. Low settings average 61.8 FPS, just above the 60 FPS line, but Medium drops to 45.7 FPS, High to 38 FPS, and Ultra to 28.6 FPS. The Low-to-Ultra spread shrinks to 33.2 FPS, suggesting that at 4K, the GPU’s limits flatten the performance curve—raising settings has less impact because the resolution itself is the primary burden. The 4K Low result (61.8 FPS) is the only 4K setting that approaches smoothness, and it does so only by sacrificing visual fidelity.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations for Minimum, this pairing ranks 1,103 out of 1,733 combos, placing it in the 36th percentile of all tested systems. This mid-pack ranking reflects the GPU’s 72nd percentile standing and the CPU’s 90th percentile, but the game’s GPU-bound nature means the CPU’s strength cannot boost the overall result. The rank indicates that while many weaker GPUs exist, a substantial number of combinations deliver higher frame rates, likely due to more powerful graphics cards.
The CPU’s synthetic rivals—the AMD EPYC 4245P (0.2% ahead) and Intel Core i7-13700F (0.9% behind)—show that the Ryzen 9 5900X is not a bottleneck in this game. Conversely, the GPU’s rivals, including the RX 6800M (0% delta) and RX 470 (0.1% delta), are statistically tied in synthetic scores, yet the measured FPS in Minimum would vary based on their real-world drivers and memory configurations. The combo’s rank of 1,103/1,733 suggests that for this specific title, the RX 6650 XT’s performance is the limiting factor, and users seeking higher rankings would need to upgrade the GPU rather than the CPU. The data points to a balanced 1080p/1440p configuration that falls short of 4K ambitions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 61.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 112.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 87.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 76.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 178.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 138.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 114.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 88.7 |
Minimum with Ryzen 9 5900X + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 6650 XT + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + RX 6650 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.