Evolve
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 117 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 63 | 76 | 99 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 106 | 135 | 172 |
| 1080p Full HD | 108 | 159 | 181 | 194 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Evolve with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination ranks 582nd out of 1,695 tested combos for Evolve, placing it in the 65th percentile of all pairings. This is a strong position that reflects the GPU's dominance in the pairing, but the ranking also signals that the aging six-core CPU is holding the system back from the top tier. The combo sits comfortably in the upper-middle range of the database, with the RTX 3080 Ti's raw power clearly doing the heavy lifting while the Ryzen 5 2600 provides adequate, if not exceptional, support for this 2015 title.
FAQ
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 2600 compare to its nearest rivals in overall CPU benchmark scores?
A: The Ryzen 5 2600 has an average benchmark score of 19,616, placing it 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U (19,691) and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19,740). Conversely, it is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (19,508) and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F (19,485).
Q: What is the RTX 3080 Ti's standing relative to other GPUs in the database?
A: The RTX 3080 Ti scores in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41,224. Its nearest rival is the RTX 3090, which scores 41,441, a margin of 0.5%. The data shows the 3080 Ti is 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and 1.1% behind the RTX 5070.
Q: What is the best performance this combo achieves at 1080p?
A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 194.2 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At 1080p with Ultra settings, the average drops to 108.1 FPS, which is still well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the frame rates are primarily GPU-bound. The average FPS ranges from 40.7 at Ultra to 98.9 at Low. The steep drop between Low and Ultra settings (58.2 FPS) indicates the GPU is the bottleneck at this resolution, as the CPU's workload does not scale significantly with pixel count.
Q: How does the CPU's architecture influence its performance in this game?
A: The Ryzen 5 2600 uses the Zen+ architecture, built on a 12 nm process. It has 6 cores and 12 threads with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz. The data shows this is sufficient for high frame rates in Evolve, but the CPU's single-thread performance, reflected in its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,579, prevents it from pushing frame rates as high as a more modern processor might.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Medium and High settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS is 134.6 on Medium settings and 106 on High settings. This represents a 28.6 FPS difference, showing that the Medium preset offers a considerable performance advantage while still maintaining a smooth experience.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of scaling across resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo delivers 108.1 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the average drops to 71.9 FPS, a reduction of 36.2 FPS. At 4K (3840x2160) Ultra, the average falls further to 40.7 FPS. This progression shows that the RTX 3080 Ti is being increasingly taxed as pixel count rises, with the CPU's role becoming less significant at higher resolutions.
The scaling pattern changes when examining lower settings. At Low settings, the FPS goes from 194.2 at 1080p to 172.2 at 1440p, a drop of only 22 FPS. However, the jump to 4K Low brings the average down to 98.9 FPS, a substantial 73.3 FPS decrease from the 1440p figure. This suggests that at 1080p and 1440p with Low settings, the CPU is starting to limit performance, as the GPU has enough headroom to render frames quickly but is waiting on the processor. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, as the pixel workload increases dramatically.
The data indicates that for this pairing, 1440p is the sweet spot where the GPU is still heavily utilized but the CPU can keep up with frame delivery. At 1080p, particularly with lower settings, the Ryzen 5 2600's limitations become apparent, as the frame rate gains from lowering settings are smaller than expected. The 3080 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for all tested resolutions, meaning the performance differences are driven by compute and pixel throughput rather than memory capacity.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest frame rates. Low settings yield an average of 194.2 FPS, while Medium settings produce 180.8 FPS. High settings average 158.7 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 108.1 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 22.1 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra is a severe 50.6 FPS reduction, indicating that the Ultra preset applies a significant rendering load that the CPU cannot fully feed.
At 2560x1440, the averages are 172.2 FPS on Low, 134.6 FPS on Medium, 106 FPS on High, and 71.9 FPS on Ultra. The difference between Low and Medium is 37.6 FPS, while Medium to High is a 28.6 FPS drop. The Ultra setting again causes the largest relative decrease, with a 34.1 FPS gap from High. This resolution shows the GPU beginning to assert its dominance, as the CPU can maintain high frame rates at lower settings but struggles to keep up with the demands of the Ultra preset.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates are substantially lower across all settings. Low settings average 98.9 FPS, Medium averages 76.4 FPS, High averages 63.3 FPS, and Ultra averages 40.7 FPS. The scaling from Low to Medium is a 22.5 FPS drop, Medium to High is a 13.1 FPS drop, and High to Ultra is a 22.6 FPS drop. This resolution is clearly GPU-bound, as the RTX 3080 Ti is working at its limits, and the CPU is no longer the primary constraint. The 4K results show that even this powerful GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates at Ultra settings, but it does deliver a smooth 63.3 FPS at High.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the High preset at 2560x1440 is the recommended choice. The data shows an average of 106 FPS at this setting, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This combination provides a significant visual upgrade over Medium settings (134.6 FPS) while still maintaining a frame rate that exceeds most display refresh rates. The 28.6 FPS cost of moving from Medium to High is a reasonable trade-off for the improved image quality.
At 1920x1080, the High preset is also recommended, delivering 158.7 FPS. The Ultra setting at this resolution drops to 108.1 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 50.6 FPS reduction for what is likely a marginal visual improvement. For competitive play, the Medium preset at 1080p offers 180.8 FPS, providing a substantial frame rate advantage over High while maintaining decent visuals.
For users with a 4K display, the High preset is the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience, yielding 63.3 FPS. The Ultra setting falls to 40.7 FPS, which is below the threshold for fluid gameplay. Low settings at 4K produce 98.9 FPS, but the visual sacrifices are likely too severe for most players. The data suggests that 4K Ultra is not a realistic option for this combo, but 4K High provides a solid experience.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the Zen+ architecture, built on a 12 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, with 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 11,186, and its single-core score is 1,579. These numbers indicate a capable mid-range processor that, while not top-tier by modern standards, is more than adequate for a game released in 2015.
The CPU's performance percentile is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all tested processors. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i5-1345U and AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, which have nearly identical average scores. However, the Ryzen 5 2600's single-thread performance is a limiting factor in Evolve, particularly at lower resolutions where the CPU has a greater influence on frame rates.
The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 194.2 FPS, but this is only 13.4 FPS higher than at Medium settings (180.8 FPS). This relatively small gain suggests that the CPU is nearing its limit, as the GPU is capable of rendering frames faster than the processor can issue draw calls. At 1440p Low, the average is 172.2 FPS, which is 22 FPS lower than at 1080p Low, indicating that the GPU is still not fully saturated at this resolution and the CPU remains a factor. It is only at 4K that the CPU's role diminishes, as the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The Ryzen 5 2600's 12 threads and 3.90 GHz boost clock are sufficient for Evolve, but its age is evident in the scaling behavior at lower resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Evolve
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 98.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 76.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 63.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 172.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 134.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 106.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 71.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 194.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 180.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 158.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 108.1 |
Evolve with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Evolve with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Evolve performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.