Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
124
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 124 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 71 83 116
1440p QHD 85 109 124 178
1080p Full HD 113 149 174 240

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 116
3840x2160 Medium 83
3840x2160 High 71
3840x2160 Ultra 51
2560x1440 Low 178
2560x1440 Medium 124
2560x1440 High 109
2560x1440 Ultra 85
1920x1080 Low 240
1920x1080 Medium 174
1920x1080 High 149
1920x1080 Ultra 113

Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Lockdown Protocol on the Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT shows a pairing that is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions but reveals the CPU's strength at 1080p. The measured data indicates a clear scaling pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution decreases, which is typical for a system where the graphics card becomes the limiting factor at 4K but the processor has enough headroom to push very high frame rates at 1080p.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, confirming that the RX 6800 XT is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At Low settings, average FPS falls from 240.4 at 1080p to 177.8 at 1440p (a 26% reduction) and then to 115.6 at 4K (another 35% drop). This pattern repeats at Medium settings, where the sequence goes 174.2 → 124.2 → 83.3, and at High settings, from 148.9 → 108.9 → 70.5. At Ultra, the numbers are 112.6 → 85.4 → 50.5.

The rate of decline accelerates at 4K. For example, going from 1440p to 4K at High settings costs 38.4 FPS, while going from 1080p to 1440p only costs 40.0 FPS—similar absolute drops, but the 4K figure represents a much larger percentage loss from an already lower base. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is nearing its limit, and the CPU's contribution diminishes. At 1080p, the high frame rates (especially 240.4 at Low) suggest the i7-12700KF is capable of feeding the GPU effectively, but as pixel count rises, the RX 6800 XT's raw throughput becomes the deciding factor.

The scaling between settings also tells a story. At 1080p, Ultra is 46% slower than Medium (112.6 vs 174.2), but at 4K, Ultra is only 39% slower than Medium (50.5 vs 83.3). This tighter spread at 4K indicates that the GPU is so saturated that even reducing settings yields smaller relative gains—the limiting factor is pixel fill rate, not shader complexity.

FAQ

Q: How does the i7-12700KF perform relative to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The processor's average benchmark score of 35355 places it virtually tied with the Intel Core i5-14400 (35336, 0.1% ahead) and the Intel Core i9-12900HX (35289, 0.2% ahead). It is marginally behind the Intel Core i7-13800H (35416, -0.2% delta). This suggests the CPU's compute headroom is competitive with newer mobile and desktop parts.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo if aiming for 144Hz gaming?

A: At 1440p, the combo hits 124.2 FPS on Medium and 108.9 FPS on High, which are close to but below 144Hz. At 1080p, High settings deliver 148.9 FPS, and Medium reaches 174.2 FPS, both comfortably above 144Hz. For a locked 144Hz experience, 1080p with High or Medium is the safer choice.

Q: Is the RX 6800 XT's 16GB VRAM a limiting factor in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The data does not indicate VRAM limitations. The measured FPS scales consistently with resolution and settings, which suggests the 16 GB GDDR6 memory (512.0 GB/s bandwidth) is sufficient for the tested configurations. No stutter or min FPS anomalies were recorded.

Q: How does the GPU rank against its nearest competitors?

A: The RX 6800 XT's average benchmark score of 49982 puts it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (49737) and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 50HX (49071). It trails the NVIDIA RTX A1000 (50826, -1.7%) and sits 2.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (48704).

Q: What Ultra settings performance can be expected at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 50.5, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced FPS action. Dropping to High raises this to 70.5 FPS, a 40% improvement, making High the better choice for 4K gameplay.

Q: Does the CPU's 12-core/20-thread configuration help in this game?

A: While the game's threading model is not specified, the i7-12700KF's high single-thread score (4091 in Cinebench R23) and multi-thread capability (28979 in R23) likely contribute to the high 1080p frame rates. The 240.4 FPS at Low settings suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, High settings at 1440p are the sweet spot. The measured 108.9 FPS provides smooth gameplay for most monitors, and the jump from Medium (124.2 FPS) to High (108.9 FPS) costs only 15.3 FPS but likely brings substantial visual improvements. At 4K, High settings are also recommended, delivering 70.5 FPS—a 40% improvement over Ultra's 50.5 FPS with arguably minimal visual degradation in a fast-paced shooter.

If maximizing frame rate is the priority, Medium settings at 1080p (174.2 FPS) or Low at 1440p (177.8 FPS) both exceed 144Hz. Low settings at 1080p hit 240.4 FPS, which is useful for very high refresh rate displays, but the visual compromises may not be worth it for most players. Ultra settings are generally not recommended—at 1080p they drop to 112.6 FPS, at 1440p to 85.4 FPS, and at 4K to 50.5 FPS—each representing a significant loss from High without a proportional visual gain.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers: Low 240.4 FPS, Medium 174.2 FPS, High 148.9 FPS, and Ultra 112.6 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 127.8 FPS, showing that the CPU can sustain very high frame rates when the GPU is not heavily taxed.

At 2560x1440, the numbers are: Low 177.8 FPS, Medium 124.2 FPS, High 108.9 FPS, and Ultra 85.4 FPS. The spread narrows to 92.4 FPS, indicating the GPU is starting to become more relevant.

At 3840x2160, the results are: Low 115.6 FPS, Medium 83.3 FPS, High 70.5 FPS, and Ultra 50.5 FPS. The spread is 65.1 FPS, the smallest of the three resolutions, confirming that the RX 6800 XT is the clear limiting factor at 4K. Every setting at 4K is lower than the corresponding 1080p Ultra result (112.6 FPS), which highlights how demanding 4K is on this GPU.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ranks 569th out of 1637 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the upper third of all combinations tested, which is a solid result given that the GPU is from the previous generation (released 2020-10-27) and the CPU is from late 2021. The rank suggests that this pairing offers above-average performance for the game, though there is significant headroom above it.

The ranking implies that most higher-ranked combos likely feature newer GPUs with more raw throughput. However, the i7-12700KF's strong single-thread performance (1043 in 3DMark single-thread, 4091 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it is not holding back the system in this FPS title, which typically favors high clock speeds. The GPU's percentile rank of 87 (vs all GPUs) and the CPU's 89th percentile (vs all CPUs) indicate both components are above average, but the combo's 569th rank suggests other pairings with similar CPU but faster GPUs would score higher.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-12700KF is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. In Lockdown Protocol, this CPU demonstrates its capability by not bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p, where it achieves 240.4 FPS on Low settings. This is likely due to strong single-thread performance (1043 in 3DMark single-thread, 2526 in Geekbench single-core) and high boost clocks.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores (28979 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 9983 in 3DMark max threads) are competitive with rivals like the i5-14400 (0.1% delta) and i9-12900HX (0.2% delta), but these are not directly relevant to gaming performance. The key metric is the single-thread performance, which at 4091 in Cinebench R23 single-core confirms the processor can handle high FPS workloads. The data shows that at 1080p, the FPS drops by 28% from Low to Medium (240.4 to 174.2), which is a GPU-side effect, not a CPU limitation. The CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls, and the fact that FPS scales normally with settings at 1080p indicates the i7-12700KF is doing its job effectively.

At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes further. The FPS at Low (115.6) is only 25% higher than at Ultra (50.5), showing that the GPU's pixel throughput is the dominant constraint. The i7-12700KF's 12 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for this game, and even its 125W TDP and L3 cache (25 MB shared) are not limiting factors in the measured results.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-12700KF

Cores / Threads 12 / 20
Base Clock 3600 MHz
Boost Clock 5000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2250 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700KF + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 115.6
3840x2160 Medium 83.3
3840x2160 High 70.5
3840x2160 Ultra 50.5
2560x1440 Low 177.8
2560x1440 Medium 124.2
2560x1440 High 108.9
2560x1440 Ultra 85.4
1920x1080 Low 240.4
1920x1080 Medium 174.2
1920x1080 High 148.9
1920x1080 Ultra 112.6

Lockdown Protocol with ii7-12700KF + Other GPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Lockdown Protocol with RX 6800 XT + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-12700KF + RX 6800 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.