Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B370 pairing delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Inside. At 1080p, the combo provides smooth framerates across all settings, with the Low preset hitting 141 FPS on average. However, pushing to 4K reveals the GPU's limitations, as the Ultra preset dips to an average of 30 FPS. The data indicates this is a capable 1080p machine for this title, with 1440p viable at Medium or Low settings, while 4K requires the Low preset for acceptable performance.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 is a desktop processor built on the Zen 3 architecture, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock runs at 3.70 GHz, with a boost clock up to 4.60 GHz. The CPU's L3 cache is 16 MB, and it supports dual-channel DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. This hardware is positioned for modern multitasking and gaming, with a 65 W TDP and an unlocked multiplier for potential overclocking.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 5700 shows strong multi-threaded capabilities. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 20655, while the single-core score is 2916. The Geekbench multicore result is 9959, and the single-core score is 1907. The 3DMark tests reveal a progression: 1762 for 2 threads, 3382 for 4 threads, 5585 for 8 threads, and 6628 for 16 threads, with a max threads score of 6617. This scaling indicates the processor efficiently utilizes its cores, which is beneficial for games that can leverage multiple threads.

For a puzzle platformer like Inside, the CPU requirements are typically modest. The game's genre suggests a focus on physics and logic rather than massive AI simulations or open-world streaming. Benchmark results show that even at 1080p with the Low preset, the combo achieves 141 FPS, which is likely not CPU-bound in most scenarios. However, the CPU's solid single-thread performance (2916 in Cinebench R23) ensures that the game's main logic thread runs efficiently, preventing bottlenecks that could limit the GPU.

The processor's percentile rank is 78, meaning it outperforms 78% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 25517. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 5700 is essentially neck-and-neck: it is 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. These deltas are negligible, indicating that the CPU's performance is firmly in a specific tier, and any of these chips would likely deliver similar frame rates in Inside.

The data suggests that the Ryzen 7 5700 is not the limiting factor in this combo for Inside. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it provides ample headroom for the game's demands. The 65 W TDP indicates efficient power usage, and the architecture's design allows for high clock speeds when needed. In practical terms, the CPU's job is to feed the GPU with draw calls and process game logic, and its benchmark scores suggest it does so without significant delays, even at high frame rates. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5585 is particularly relevant, as many games use up to 8 threads, and this score shows strong parallel performance.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output units. It also includes 10 ray tracing cores. The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's RAM, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

The Arc B370's raw compute capabilities are modest. It offers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12.29 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (with a 2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The GPU's TDP is just 25 W, emphasizing its efficiency-focused design. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, it scores 1184 points, which places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs.

This low percentile rank is telling. The Arc B370's nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (0.2% ahead), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 7650M (0.7% ahead), and AMD FirePro M2000 (1.4% behind). These are older, lower-performance parts, indicating that the Arc B370 is not designed for high-end gaming. Its performance is more in line with entry-level or integrated solutions from several years ago.

For Inside, which is a stylized puzzle platformer with a dark, minimalist aesthetic, the GPU's performance is the primary determinant of frame rates. The measured FPS data shows a clear correlation: at 1080p, the Low preset achieves 141 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 67 FPS. At 4K, the Low preset manages 64 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 30 FPS. These numbers indicate that the game's visual complexity, particularly at higher settings, quickly overwhelms the GPU's limited processing power.

The shared memory architecture means the GPU relies on system RAM, which can introduce latency and bandwidth limitations. However, for a game like Inside, which likely has modest texture and geometry requirements, this setup can still deliver playable results at lower resolutions. The data shows that the GPU's boost clock of 2400 MHz helps in lighter scenes, but the overall throughput is constrained by the low number of shading units and the shared memory bandwidth.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Inside?*

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with the Low preset delivers the highest average FPS at 141, making it the best resolution for maximum smoothness. For a balance of quality and performance, 1080p Medium is a strong option at 113 FPS average.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Inside?*

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves an average of 64 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset hits 51 FPS, but High (32 FPS) and Ultra (30 FPS) are below the 60 FPS threshold and may feel less smooth.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517. It is 0.1% behind the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. These differences are minimal.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and what does that mean?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it performs better than only 5% of the database. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 1184, which is very close to the ATI Radeon HD 5770's score of 1190 (0.5% difference).

Q: Does the game's frame rate scale well with settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 101 FPS average, Medium delivers 81 FPS, High delivers 51 FPS, and Ultra delivers 48 FPS. The scaling is consistent, with a notable drop from Medium to High.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has a launch MSRP of $179.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B370 combination ranks 2654 out of 2887 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the lower 8% of all tested systems, indicating that while it can run the game, most other combos in the database deliver higher performance. The rank is a direct reflection of the GPU's low percentile (5th), which significantly drags down the overall standing despite the CPU's respectable 78th percentile.

The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck here. The Ryzen 7 5700's benchmark scores place it in the middle of the pack, and its nearest rivals have nearly identical average scores. If this CPU were paired with a stronger GPU, the combo's rank would likely be much higher. However, the Arc B370's integrated nature and low compute power (6.144 TFLOPS) limit the system to lower resolutions and settings.

This ranking has practical implications. For a puzzle platformer like Inside, gameplay is more about atmosphere and puzzle-solving than twitch reflexes, so lower frame rates might be tolerable. However, the data shows that at 1080p Medium, the combo still achieves 113 FPS, which is smooth. The rank of 2654 reflects the system's inability to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions or settings, not a fundamental incompatibility with the game. For users with 1080p displays, this combo is a viable option, but for 1440p or 4K, it requires compromises.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of which settings offer the best experience at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 141 FPS average, which is exceptionally smooth. The Medium preset drops to 113 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset delivers 70 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 67 FPS. For 1080p, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, offering a significant visual upgrade over Low while maintaining a high frame rate. The High and Ultra presets are playable but provide diminishing returns for the FPS loss.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset hits 101 FPS, and the Medium preset achieves 81 FPS. These are both excellent for a 1440p display. The High preset drops to 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target but still playable for a slower-paced game. The Ultra preset is 48 FPS, which might feel less responsive. The recommendation for 1440p is the Medium preset, as it balances visual fidelity with a smooth 81 FPS average. The Low preset is also viable if maximum smoothness is preferred.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The Low preset manages 64 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset drops to 51 FPS, and the High and Ultra presets are 32 FPS and 30 FPS, respectively. For 4K, the Low preset is the only option that provides a consistently smooth experience. The Medium preset might be acceptable for some, but the frame rate is approaching the lower limit of playability. The High and Ultra presets should be avoided if frame rate consistency is a priority.

Across all resolutions, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, except at 4K where Low is recommended. The data shows that the jump from Medium to High results in a substantial FPS drop (e.g., from 113 to 70 at 1080p), suggesting that the game's higher settings introduce significant GPU load that the Arc B370 cannot handle efficiently.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following data is taken directly from the measured FPS rows for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and Intel Arc B370 combo in Inside.

1920x1080:

• Low: Average FPS is 141. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS is 113, with a minimum of 96 and a maximum of 130.
• High: Average FPS is 70. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 67. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.

At 1080p, the frame rate scaling is steepest between Low and Medium, with a 28 FPS drop. The difference between High and Ultra is minimal at just 3 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset adds little visual overhead beyond High. The Medium preset's minimum of 96 FPS ensures that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays well above 60 FPS.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average FPS is 101. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS is 81, with a minimum of 69 and a maximum of 93.
• High: Average FPS is 51. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 48. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.

At 1440p, the Low preset is the only one that maintains an average above 100 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 69 FPS is still playable, but the High and Ultra presets dip into the 40-50 FPS range. The resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p results in a 28% FPS drop for the Low preset (from 141 to 101), highlighting the GPU's limited bandwidth and processing power.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average FPS is 64. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.
• Medium: Average FPS is 51, with a minimum of 43 and a maximum of 59.
• High: Average FPS is 32. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.
• Ultra: Average FPS is 30. No minimum or maximum values were recorded.

At 4K, the frame rate plummets. The Low preset is the only one that achieves a 60+ FPS average. The Medium preset's minimum of 43 FPS indicates noticeable frame drops. The High and Ultra presets are essentially unplayable at 30-32 FPS average, which would likely result in a stuttery experience. The data shows that 4K is only viable with the Low preset, and even then, users should expect occasional dips below 60 FPS.

The measured FPS data confirms that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming in Inside. At 1440p, users must choose between Low and Medium settings for smooth gameplay. At 4K, only the Low preset is recommended. The GPU's low performance percentile (5th) is the primary constraint, as the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores (e.g., 20655 in Cinebench R23) are not the limiting factor in any of the tested configurations.