Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination delivers a performance profile that is heavily dictated by the GPU, even in a title as light as Inside. The data shows a clear hierarchy where frame rates scale dramatically with resolution and settings, but the underlying component bottleneck shifts depending on the configuration. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to explain how each component contributes to the overall experience.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates on the AMD Socket AM4 platform with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz. This processor features a 32 MB shared L3 cache, which is a significant asset for gaming workloads that rely on data locality. The CPU’s 7 nm process node and 65 W TDP are notable for efficiency, but the more relevant factor for this game’s results is its raw compute capability.

In the PassMark benchmark suite, the 5600F scores 19,236 in multithreaded tests and 2,872 in single-thread tests. The single-thread score is particularly important for a puzzle platformer like Inside, which often relies on a limited number of primary threads for game logic and physics. While the game is not heavily threaded, the 12 threads ensure that background tasks or any auxiliary processing do not cause frame pacing issues. The CPU’s percentile rank of 85 versus all CPUs indicates it is in the upper echelon of processors, but its nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 (0.2% faster), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 (0.4% faster). This suggests that the 5600F provides a performance level that is essentially interchangeable with its immediate competitors in general processing tasks.

For Inside, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The data reveals that at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 257 FPS, which is far above any display refresh rate. This indicates that the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions; it has ample headroom to process game state and issue draw calls. The strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 2,872 PassMark score, helps ensure that the game’s logic does not bottleneck the frame output. The L3 cache size also plays a role in keeping frequently accessed game assets close to the cores, reducing latency. Overall, the 5600F provides a solid foundation that allows the RTX 2070 SUPER to be the primary performance driver, especially as resolution and settings are increased.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing. It is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1605 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz. These specifications are crucial for understanding the frame rates observed in the measured data.

The GPU’s performance is reflected in its benchmark scores, with a PassMark G3D score of 18,169 and an average benchmark score of 20,282. Its percentile rank of 65 versus all GPUs places it in the mid-to-upper range. The nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (1.2% faster), and the Intel Arc B570 scores 20,556 (1.3% faster). These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 2070 SUPER is competitive with these cards in raw graphics compute, though it trails them slightly.

In the context of Inside, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is more than sufficient, as the game’s art style is minimalist and does not require large texture pools. The memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s ensures that the GPU can quickly access the frame buffer and any necessary assets, which is reflected in the high frame rates. The 2,560 shading units and 64 ROPs are the primary drivers of pixel output, and the data shows that the GPU scales performance predictably with resolution. For instance, at 1440p High settings, the average FPS is 111, while at 1080p High it is 155. This 44 FPS increase demonstrates the GPU’s ability to handle the lower pixel count with less strain. The RTX 2070 SUPER is the clear bottleneck in this system, as evidenced by the significant frame rate drops when moving to 4K. The GPU’s compute capabilities, while not top-tier by modern standards, are well-matched to the demands of this game, allowing for smooth gameplay at most settings except the most demanding 4K Ultra configuration.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how the system scales across resolutions. The data shows a consistent pattern: as resolution increases, frame rates drop, but the magnitude of the drop varies significantly by settings preset. This variance is key to identifying the limiting component.

At Low settings, the scaling is dramatic. The system achieves 257 FPS at 1080p, 223 FPS at 1440p, and 140 FPS at 4K. This represents a 13% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 46% drop from 1080p to 4K. The fact that the frame rate remains above 140 FPS at 4K on Low settings indicates that the GPU is still capable of handling the lower graphical load, but the performance loss is substantial. This suggests that even with minimal graphical features, the pixel fill rate requirement at 4K is taxing the GPU.

At Medium settings, the scaling is similar but with lower absolute numbers. The system achieves 237 FPS at 1080p, 178 FPS at 1440p, and 112 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 25%, and from 1080p to 4K is 53%. The min FPS values at Medium settings are telling: at 1080p, the min is 201 FPS; at 1440p, it is 151 FPS; and at 4K, it is 95 FPS. This progressive decline in minimum frame rates shows that the GPU is struggling to maintain consistent frame pacing as the pixel count increases.

At High settings, the scaling continues. The system achieves 155 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 70 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 28%, and from 1080p to 4K is 55%. The 4K High result of 70 FPS is still playable, but it is significantly lower than the 1080p result. At Ultra settings, the pattern is similar: 147 FPS at 1080p, 106 FPS at 1440p, and 67 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K is 54%.

The data strongly indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component. The CPU’s performance is relatively consistent across resolutions, as it does not have to work harder to process more pixels. The GPU, however, must render more pixels at higher resolutions, leading to the observed frame rate drops. The fact that the frame rate does not halve when moving from 1080p to 4K (which would be expected if the GPU were purely pixel-bound) suggests that the game’s rendering is not entirely fill-rate limited, but the trend is clear. The RTX 2070 SUPER’s 8 GB VRAM and 448 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game’s assets, but the raw pixel processing power is not enough to maintain 4K frame rates comparable to lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is ranked 1,701 out of 2,887 tested combos in Inside. This places the combo in the 59th percentile of all tested system configurations. This ranking is based on the average FPS across all tested resolutions and settings, providing a holistic view of the system’s performance.

A rank of 1,701 out of 2,887 indicates that this combo is slightly above the median but not in the top tier. The data shows that the system is capable of high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, but its performance at 4K drags down its overall ranking. The combo’s position is likely influenced by the GPU’s age and the CPU’s mid-range positioning. The RTX 2070 SUPER, while competitive with its nearest rivals, is not a high-end card by current standards, and the 5600F, despite its strong single-thread performance, does not have the core count of higher-end processors.

The ranking suggests that for a game like Inside, which is not graphically demanding, the combo performs admirably, but it does not reach the heights of systems with more powerful GPUs. The 2887 tested combos likely include configurations with newer RTX 30-series and 40-series cards, as well as high-end CPUs, which would push this combo down in the rankings. However, the rank of 1,701 is respectable for a mid-range pairing, indicating that it can deliver a smooth experience in this title at most settings. The data underscores that the combo is balanced, with neither component being a severe bottleneck, but the GPU’s limitations at 4K are the primary factor preventing a higher rank.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data is presented in a structured format across three resolutions and four settings presets. This breakdown provides the exact average frame rates, with some entries also including minimum and maximum FPS values.

1920x1080 (1080p):

• Low: Average FPS of 257. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo, indicating that the system is heavily GPU-limited at this resolution and settings, but the GPU is more than capable.
• Medium: Average FPS of 237, with a minimum of 201 and a maximum of 272. The min FPS is still very high, showing good frame consistency.
• High: Average FPS of 155. This is a significant drop from Medium, indicating that the High preset introduces graphical features that are more demanding on the GPU.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 147. The difference between High and Ultra is small (8 FPS), suggesting that the Ultra preset adds minimal extra load compared to High.

2560x1440 (1440p):

• Low: Average FPS of 223. This is a 13% drop from the 1080p Low result, showing the expected scaling with resolution.
• Medium: Average FPS of 178, with a minimum of 151 and a maximum of 205. The min FPS is still above 150, ensuring smooth gameplay.
• High: Average FPS of 111. This is a 28% drop from the 1080p High result, indicating that the GPU is being pushed harder.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 106. The difference between High and Ultra is only 5 FPS, again showing that the Ultra preset has a minimal impact over High.

3840x2160 (4K):

• Low: Average FPS of 140. This is a 46% drop from the 1080p Low result, showing the significant impact of 4K resolution.
• Medium: Average FPS of 112, with a minimum of 95 and a maximum of 129. The min FPS of 95 is still playable but is approaching the lower bounds of smooth gameplay.
• High: Average FPS of 70. This is a 55% drop from the 1080p High result, indicating that the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K.
• Ultra: Average FPS of 67. This is the lowest recorded frame rate and is just above the 60 FPS threshold, but it may not be consistently smooth.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: the GPU is the limiting factor, and the 4K resolution is where the RTX 2070 SUPER begins to struggle. At 1080p and 1440p, the frame rates are high enough for a smooth experience, but at 4K, only the Low preset provides a high margin above 60 FPS.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user’s resolution and performance preferences. The data shows that the Medium preset offers the best balance between visual fidelity and frame rate consistency.

At 1080p, the Medium preset delivers an average FPS of 237, with a minimum of 201 FPS. This is a very high frame rate that exceeds most high-refresh-rate displays. The High preset drops to 155 FPS, which is still excellent, but the jump from Medium to High results in a 35% performance loss. The Ultra preset at 147 FPS is only slightly lower than High, so the visual gains from Ultra may not be worth the performance hit compared to High. However, for most users, the Medium preset at 1080p provides a buttery-smooth experience with no risk of frame drops.

At 1440p, the Medium preset again stands out. It achieves an average FPS of 178, with a minimum of 151 FPS. This is a very solid performance for a 1440p display. The High preset at 111 FPS is also playable, but the 38% drop from Medium is noticeable. The Low preset at 223 FPS is overkill for most displays, but it is an option for those seeking the highest possible frame rates. The Ultra preset at 106 FPS is similar to High and is the least attractive option due to the minimal visual improvement over High.

At 4K, the recommendations change. The Low preset at 140 FPS is the only one that provides a wide margin above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 112 FPS is also good, but the minimum FPS of 95 indicates that there may be occasional dips. The High and Ultra presets, at 70 and 67 FPS respectively, are close to the 60 FPS threshold and may not provide a consistent experience. For 4K, the Medium preset is the best recommendation, as it offers a good balance of visual quality and performance, with an average FPS well above 60. The Low preset is the safest choice for those who prioritize frame rate stability above all else.

Overall, the Medium preset is the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions. It provides a significant performance advantage over High and Ultra while still offering a visually appealing experience. The data shows that the jump from Medium to High incurs a large performance penalty, making Medium the most efficient choice.

FAQ

*Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combo can achieve in Inside?*

A: The maximum average FPS recorded is 257, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average FPS of 67. This is the lowest recorded performance and is just above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: Which settings preset provides the best frame rate consistency?

A: The Medium preset offers the best consistency, as it is the only preset with recorded minimum FPS values across all resolutions. At 1080p, the min is 201 FPS; at 1440p, it is 151 FPS; and at 4K, it is 95 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. This is evident from the significant frame rate drops as resolution increases, while the CPU’s performance remains sufficient to feed the GPU.

Q: What is the percentile rank of the CPU and GPU individually?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has a percentile rank of 85 versus all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has a percentile rank of 65 versus all GPUs.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested combinations?

A: The combo is ranked 1,701 out of 2,887 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the upper half of all tested systems.