Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combination ranks 1693rd out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the 56th percentile of all systems tested, meaning it outperforms a slim majority of configurations but sits firmly in the middle of the pack. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically boosts the system above its class, yet the combo delivers playable performance across most settings and resolutions. Benchmark results indicate this is a competent mid-tier setup for Fivem, though it does not threaten the top echelons of the database.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1693 out of 3005 tested combos places it just past the halfway point of the distribution. This is a respectable position for a system built around a six-core processor and an eight-gigabyte graphics card, but it is not a ranking that suggests high-end dominance. The data shows that many combos with more recent hardware or higher-tier components sit above it, while a substantial number of older or less balanced systems fall below. In the context of Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification framework rather than a traditional single-player title, this rank indicates the system can handle the game's demands without being optimized for maximum frame rates. The percentile position implies that users should expect smooth gameplay at moderate settings, but pushing for ultra-high refresh rates at maximum quality will strain the hardware. The ranking is consistent with the component specifications: the CPU sits in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU rests in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, creating a slight imbalance where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in synthetic benchmarks.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a six-core, twelve-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, built on TSMC's 7 nm process node with 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die. The CPU features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 32 MB L3 cache. This configuration is well-suited for Fivem's multiplayer environments, which typically involve numerous NPCs, vehicles, and player interactions that can stress single-thread performance. In Passmark testing, the CPU achieves a single-thread score of 2872 and a multithread score of 19236, with a physics score of 1043. The single-thread performance is particularly relevant for Fivem, as the game's engine often relies on a few heavily loaded threads for simulation and network processing. The CPU's percentile ranking of 85 among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 with an average score of 36938, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D at 37018, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 at 37093. The Ryzen 5 5600F's average benchmark score of 36945 places it within a fraction of a percent of these competitors, with deltas ranging from 0 to -0.5 percent. This tight grouping suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 5600F will perform nearly identically to these alternatives. For Fivem, the CPU's 12 threads provide ample capacity for background tasks, while the 32 MB L3 cache helps reduce latency when accessing frequently used game data. The 65 W TDP and DDR4 memory support with dual-channel bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s round out a capable foundation, though the CPU's integrated graphics are listed as N/A, meaning the discrete GPU handles all rendering duties.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process by TSMC. It packs 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1605 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz or 14 Gbps effective. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for Fivem's texture-heavy environments but may become a limiting factor at higher resolutions. The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, 40 ray tracing cores, and 320 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 113.3 GPixel/s, texture rate is 283.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 9.062 TFLOPS. In Passmark testing, the GPU scores 18169 in the G3D benchmark and 7557 in GPU compute, with a percentile ranking of 65 among all GPUs. This places it below the top tier of graphics cards, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M with an average score of 20480, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534, the Intel Arc B570 at 20556, and the Intel Arc A750 at 20582. The RTX 2070 SUPER's average benchmark score of 20282 is 1 to 1.5 percent lower than these competitors, indicating it trails slightly in raw compute performance. For Fivem, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K with high settings, memory capacity and bandwidth may constrain performance. The 215 W TDP and PCIe 3.0 x16 interface are standard for this generation, and the dual-slot cooling solution with a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector requires a 550 W power supply. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 175 FPS on Low settings, 138 FPS on Medium, 111 FPS on High, and 86 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 118 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS, indicating consistent frame delivery. At 2560x1440, averages drop to 116 FPS on Low, 91 FPS on Medium, 73 FPS on High, and 57 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at this resolution has a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 105 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system manages 64 FPS on Low, 51 FPS on Medium, 40 FPS on High, and 31 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset at 4K shows a minimum of 43 FPS and a maximum of 58 FPS. These numbers illustrate a predictable scaling pattern: each resolution step up from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly 30 to 35 percent, while stepping from 1440p to 4K reduces them by another 40 to 45 percent. The Low preset consistently provides the highest frame rates at every resolution, with 175 FPS at 1080p, 116 FPS at 1440p, and 64 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset delivers the lowest performance, with 86 FPS at 1080p, 57 FPS at 1440p, and 31 FPS at 4K. The gap between Low and Ultra widens as resolution increases: at 1080p, Ultra is 89 FPS lower than Low, while at 4K, the difference is 33 FPS. This suggests that the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck at higher settings, while the CPU's role diminishes as resolution increases.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the limiting component in this system. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 175 FPS at 1080p to 116 FPS at 1440p, a 34 percent reduction, and then to 64 FPS at 4K, a further 45 percent reduction from 1440p. This steep decline indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed as pixel count increases, even at the lowest settings. At Medium settings, the progression is from 138 FPS at 1080p to 91 FPS at 1440p (34 percent drop) and then to 51 FPS at 4K (44 percent drop from 1440p). The High settings show a similar pattern: 111 FPS at 1080p, 73 FPS at 1440p (34 percent drop), and 40 FPS at 4K (45 percent drop from 1440p). The Ultra settings demonstrate the most dramatic scaling: 86 FPS at 1080p, 57 FPS at 1440p (34 percent drop), and 31 FPS at 4K (46 percent drop from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across all settings strongly suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at resolutions above 1080p. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance allows the GPU to operate near its full potential, but as resolution increases, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become constraints. The 4K results, particularly the 31 FPS average on Ultra, indicate that this resolution is not viable for competitive or smooth gameplay. The scaling pattern also shows that the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain those rates as pixel count grows.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and performance priorities. At 1920x1080, the High preset provides 111 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay and only 27 FPS lower than Medium's 138 FPS. The Ultra preset at 86 FPS remains playable but offers diminishing returns over High, and the 25 FPS gap between High and Ultra suggests that the visual improvements may not justify the performance cost. For users with 1440p monitors, the Medium preset delivers 91 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and frame rate. The High preset at 73 FPS is still playable, but the 18 FPS difference between High and Medium makes Medium the better choice for maintaining higher frame rates. The Ultra preset at 57 FPS dips below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for competitive play. At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 64 FPS is the only setting that maintains a playable frame rate, while Medium at 51 FPS and High at 40 FPS are borderline, and Ultra at 31 FPS is too slow for smooth gameplay. Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently offers the highest frame rates, but it sacrifices significant visual fidelity. The Medium preset is the most balanced option overall, providing 138 FPS at 1080p, 91 FPS at 1440p, and 51 FPS at 4K. For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, Low is the clear choice, but for those seeking a compromise, Medium offers the best experience per the measured rows. The data indicates that the system is best suited for 1080p gaming with High or Ultra settings, or 1440p gaming with Medium or High settings, while 4K should be reserved for Low settings or users willing to accept lower frame rates.