Inside

# Inside — AMD Ryzen 5 3600 + Intel Arc B570

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the Intel Arc B570 delivers a distinctly playable experience in Inside, a puzzle platformer from 2016 that remains remarkably undemanding by modern standards. Benchmark data shows this combination achieves a combo rank of 2356 out of 2887 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the database, yet the measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings tell a story of consistent 60+ FPS performance in most configurations. The data indicates a system that is heavily GPU-limited at lower resolutions, with the CPU's six cores and twelve threads proving more than sufficient for this title's modest processing demands.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combination achieves at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo reaches an average of 234 FPS, which is the highest measured result across all tested configurations.

Q: Does this system maintain 60 FPS at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 52 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. However, at 4K High settings, the average is 54 FPS, and at 4K Medium it improves to 87 FPS.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 3600 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-1260P (17007) and the AMD EPYC 7742 (16998), and 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i5-11400 (17067) and the AMD EPYC 7573X (17070).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc B570 sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, scores 20534, a 0.1% difference.

Q: Which settings preset at 1440p offers the best balance between frame rate and visual quality?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium settings deliver an average of 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS, making it the highest-quality preset that still comfortably exceeds 120 FPS on average.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce an average of 234 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 114 FPS — a difference of 120 FPS, or roughly 51% lower performance at Ultra compared to Low.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 2 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, drawing 65 W TDP. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor uses AMD Socket AM4 and supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

In the context of Inside, the CPU's role is relatively modest. The game is a 2D puzzle platformer with limited physics simulation and AI complexity, meaning the Ryzen 5 3600's processing power is rarely taxed. Benchmark results show the CPU achieves a percentile rank of 71 among all tested processors, with an average benchmark score of 17035. Its multithreaded performance is measured at 4605 in 3DMark with 16 threads, and 4603 with maximum threads, indicating strong scaling across its 12 threads. Single-thread performance, measured at 696 in 3DMark single-thread, is more relevant for this game's primary game logic thread.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average score include the Intel Core i5-11400 at 17067 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i7-1260P at 17007 (0.2% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7573X at 17070 (0.2% higher). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming scenarios, and Inside's modest requirements mean the Ryzen 5 3600's 6 cores and 12 threads are more than adequate. The data shows that at 1080p, where the GPU is less burdened, the system reaches 234 FPS at Low settings, indicating the CPU can feed frames far beyond typical display refresh rates. The processor's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15045 and single-core score of 2124 further confirm its capability for this workload.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured frame rate data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired performance headroom. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver playable frame rates, but the data suggests Medium settings provide the best experience. Medium at 1080p yields an average of 192 FPS with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS, offering smooth performance well above 144 Hz displays. High settings reduce the average to 120 FPS, while Ultra drops to 114 FPS — both still playable but with diminishing returns for the additional visual fidelity.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings again emerge as the sweet spot, achieving an average of 138 FPS with a minimum of 117 FPS. This maintains high refresh rate compatibility while providing better visual quality than Low, which averages 172 FPS but sacrifices detail. High at 1440p averages 86 FPS, and Ultra drops to 82 FPS, both falling below the 120 FPS threshold that many gamers prefer.

For 3840x2160, the recommendation shifts. Medium settings produce an average of 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, making it the only preset at 4K that consistently stays above 60 FPS. Low averages 108 FPS but with reduced visual fidelity, while High averages 54 FPS and Ultra averages 52 FPS, both below the 60 FPS playability standard. The data strongly suggests that 4K users should select Medium settings to balance visual quality with frame rate stability, as the minimum frame rate of 74 FPS provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold.

The measured data shows that the gap between Low and Medium is smaller than between Medium and High at all resolutions, suggesting Medium is where the combination of CPU and GPU resources is most efficiently utilized. For users with high refresh rate monitors at 1080p or 1440p, Medium provides the best combination of smoothness and visual quality. For 4K users, Medium is the highest preset that maintains consistent playability.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and Intel Arc B570 ranks 2356 out of 2887 tested combinations in Inside, placing it in the 81.6th percentile of all tested systems — meaning roughly 18% of tested combinations perform better. This ranking reflects the GPU's 65th percentile position among all graphics cards and the CPU's 71st percentile among processors, suggesting the combo performs slightly below what its individual component percentiles might imply for this specific game.

The ranking indicates that while this system is capable of running Inside at high frame rates in most configurations, many other tested combinations achieve higher performance, particularly at 4K Ultra settings where the average drops to 52 FPS. The combo's position in the database likely reflects the GPU's mid-range performance tier rather than any CPU limitation, as the Ryzen 5 3600's benchmark scores are competitive with its nearest rivals — the Intel Core i5-11400 and Intel Core i7-1260P — all within 0.2% of each other.

Compared to other systems in the database, this combination's performance is adequate for the game's requirements but not exceptional. Inside is not a demanding title, and the data shows that even the lowest-performing presets (4K Ultra at 52 FPS) remain playable for many users. The ranking of 2356 out of 2887 places this combo in the lower half of tested systems, aligning with the GPU's 65th percentile and the CPU's 71st percentile — both mid-range positions that translate to solid but not top-tier performance in this game.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. It operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The card has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's compute capabilities include 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 performance.

In Inside, the GPU's role is significant at higher resolutions and settings. The game's 2D visuals are not particularly demanding, but the data shows clear scaling with GPU load. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 234 FPS, indicating the GPU is not the bottleneck at this configuration. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 52 FPS, showing the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU's benchmark scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and a Passmark G3D score of 14195, placing it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals in average score are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (0.1% lower), the Intel Arc A750 at 20582 (0.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (0.5% higher). These small differences suggest the B570 performs similarly to these cards in synthetic benchmarks, though gaming performance can vary by title. The GPU's 10 GB of VRAM is ample for Inside, which is not a memory-intensive game, and the 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is more than sufficient for the game's texture and geometry data.

The GPU's performance in Inside shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, all settings presets exceed 114 FPS, while at 4K, only Low and Medium settings exceed 60 FPS. This indicates the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, particularly when visual effects and post-processing are increased.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates are: Low 234 FPS, Medium 192 FPS (minimum 163, maximum 221), High 120 FPS, and Ultra 114 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a consistent decrease, with the largest drop occurring between Medium and High — a reduction of 72 FPS. The minimum frame rate at Medium, 163 FPS, still exceeds the average frame rate at High, indicating significant headroom even during demanding scenes.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are: Low 172 FPS, Medium 138 FPS (minimum 117, maximum 159), High 86 FPS, and Ultra 82 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 52 FPS, a smaller absolute decrease than at 1080p but proportionally similar. The minimum frame rate at Medium, 117 FPS, remains above 60 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay throughout.

At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are: Low 108 FPS, Medium 87 FPS (minimum 74, maximum 100), High 54 FPS, and Ultra 52 FPS. This resolution shows the most dramatic scaling, with Low achieving more than double the frame rate of Ultra. The minimum frame rate at Medium, 74 FPS, is the only 4K configuration that maintains a consistent 60+ FPS experience, while High and Ultra both fall below 60 FPS on average.

The data reveals that the gap between High and Ultra is minimal at all resolutions — only 6 FPS at 1080p, 4 FPS at 1440p, and 2 FPS at 4K — suggesting that the visual difference between these presets is not worth the performance cost. Conversely, the gap between Low and Medium is substantial at every resolution, indicating Medium offers significant visual improvements with relatively modest performance penalties.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the system's bottleneck characteristics. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 234 FPS at 1080p to 172 FPS at 1440p (a 26.5% reduction) and then to 108 FPS at 4K (a 53.8% reduction from 1080p). This scaling pattern suggests the GPU becomes increasingly limiting as resolution increases, with the 4K resolution demanding significantly more pixel throughput.

At Medium settings, the frame rates are 192 FPS at 1080p, 138 FPS at 1440p (a 28.1% reduction), and 87 FPS at 4K (a 54.7% reduction from 1080p). The consistent percentage drops across Low and Medium settings indicate the GPU is the primary bottleneck at these configurations, with the CPU maintaining sufficient headroom to feed frames.

At High settings, the frame rates are 120 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p (a 28.3% reduction), and 54 FPS at 4K (a 55% reduction from 1080p). Ultra settings follow a similar pattern: 114 FPS at 1080p, 82 FPS at 1440p (a 28.1% reduction), and 52 FPS at 4K (a 54.4% reduction). The uniformity of these percentage drops across all settings presets strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, with the CPU's performance being sufficient throughout.

The scaling behavior shows that the system is CPU-limited at 1080p Low settings, where 234 FPS approaches the practical limits of the CPU's single-thread performance. However, as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, with the frame rate dropping proportionally to the increase in pixel count. This is typical of a balanced system where neither component is severely mismatched for the game's requirements, but the GPU's mid-range performance (65th percentile) caps the highest achievable frame rates at higher resolutions.