Inside
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 152 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 86 | 89 | 142 | 157 |
| 1440p QHD | 139 | 140 | 171 | 186 |
| 1080p Full HD | 156 | 160 | 191 | 206 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pairing delivers a remarkably high level of performance in Inside, a game from 2016 that is far more demanding than its minimalist art style suggests. The measured results show a combination that is heavily GPU-limited at lower resolutions, with the CPU only becoming a potential factor as settings and resolution push frame rates to extreme levels. The data indicates that this is an extremely capable setup for this title, capable of delivering a flawless experience on virtually every display configuration.
FAQ
*Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU and GPU combination for Inside?*
A: The combo ranks 1016th out of 1671 tested combinations in the database.
*Q: Can this system handle 4K resolution in Inside?*
A: Yes, it can. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate is 88.5 FPS on High settings and 86 FPS on Ultra, both of which are well above the standard 60 FPS target.
Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this combo can achieve?
A: The highest measured average frame rate is 205.5 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti's performance compare to its closest rivals in the database?
A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 30849, which is 0.8% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6700's score of 31112, but 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME's score of 30755.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 2600's performance compare to its nearest competitors?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 19616. It is 0.6% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (19508), 0.7% faster than the Intel Core i7-10700F (19485), and 0.4% slower than the Intel Core i5-1345U (19691).
Q: What is the difference in performance between the "High" and "Ultra" settings at 1440p?
A: The difference is minimal. The average frame rate at 2560x1440 on High settings is 140.2 FPS, while on Ultra settings it is 138.7 FPS, a performance drop of only about 1%.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1016 out of 1671 places it in the lower-middle portion of all tested combinations for Inside. However, this rank is misleading when considering the actual gameplay experience. A rank in this range does not indicate poor performance; rather, it reflects the fact that Inside is not a demanding title for modern high-end hardware. The benchmark database includes many combinations with far less powerful CPUs and GPUs that are still perfectly capable of running the game at high frame rates, which compresses the performance field.
The data shows that this specific pairing is not at the top of the leaderboard because the game's engine is relatively simple. The bottleneck is not the hardware, but the game's frame generation cap or the sheer ease of rendering its scenes. The measured results demonstrate that the Ryzen 5 2600 and RTX 3070 Ti are more than sufficient to saturate any standard display's refresh rate, making the absolute ranking less relevant than the raw frame rates achieved. The combination is effectively in a performance tier where the game's demands are fully and easily met, leaving headroom that is simply unused.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti plays the dominant role in this pairing's performance for Inside. The GPU is built on the Ampere architecture and features a GA104 chip with 6144 shading units. Its performance is supported by 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial memory bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The card's boost clock is rated at 1770 MHz, and its memory operates at a 19 Gbps effective speed.
These specifications are far beyond what Inside requires. The game's visuals, while atmospheric, do not utilize heavy textures or complex geometry that would stress the 8 GB VRAM pool or require massive memory bandwidth. The GPU's raw compute power, rated at 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, ensures that the game's rendering pipeline is never the limiting factor. Benchmark results show the GPU holds a percentile rank of 74 among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 30849 is competitive with its nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6700. In the context of Inside, the RTX 3070 Ti is so powerful that its role is to deliver extremely high frame rates with significant overhead, rather than to struggle at any settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are exceptionally high. The Low preset achieves 205.5 FPS, Medium reaches 190.8 FPS, High comes in at 160.4 FPS, and Ultra yields 156.1 FPS. Even at the most demanding 1080p setting, the game runs at nearly triple the speed of a standard 60 Hz monitor.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains outstanding. The Low preset delivers 185.8 FPS, while Medium, High, and Ultra produce 171.2 FPS, 140.2 FPS, and 138.7 FPS, respectively. The step up in resolution does reduce frame rates, but the results remain far above the threshold for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the system continues to impress. The Low preset manages an average of 157.4 FPS, and the Medium preset is not far behind at 142.2 FPS. The High and Ultra presets yield 88.5 FPS and 86 FPS, which are still excellent for 4K gaming.
Resolution Scaling
The data reveals a clear pattern of how resolution affects performance. The most significant drop occurs between 1440p and 4K, particularly on the High and Ultra presets. For instance, on High settings, the frame rate falls from 140.2 FPS at 2560x1440 to 88.5 FPS at 3840x2160, a decrease of nearly 37%. This is a classic sign of the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck as the pixel count increases.
Conversely, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is less severe. At High settings, the frame rate goes from 160.4 FPS at 1920x1080 to 140.2 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of about 13%. This smaller penalty suggests that at 1080p, the CPU or game engine is starting to limit the maximum frame rate. The fact that the 1080p Low preset (205.5 FPS) is only about 10% faster than the 1440p Low preset (185.8 FPS) reinforces this. The system is so fast that even at 1440p, the CPU is beginning to hold back the GPU, preventing the frame rate from scaling linearly with the reduction in resolution.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600, a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 2000 series, plays a supporting role that becomes more noticeable as resolution drops. With a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, its computational power is substantial. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 11186, and its single-core score is 1579, indicating solid performance for a CPU of its generation.
In Inside, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics calculations. The game is not known for being heavily CPU-bound, but the data suggests it can be at high frame rates. The performance difference between 1080p and 1440p on the Low preset is only 19.7 FPS (205.5 vs 185.8), which is far less than the difference between 1440p and 4K. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 2600 is reaching its limit around the 200 FPS mark. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19616 places it just 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F, and its PassMark multi-thread score is 13160. For a game like Inside, the Ryzen 5 2600 provides more than enough processing power to maintain high frame rates, but it is the component that prevents the system from pushing past the 200 FPS threshold at lower resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
Given the measured performance, the optimal settings depend on the user's display and preference for frame rate over visual fidelity. For users with a 1080p or 1440p display with a high refresh rate (144 Hz or higher), the High or Ultra presets are the best choice. At 1080p, High yields 160.4 FPS and Ultra yields 156.1 FPS, both of which are sufficient to take full advantage of a 144 Hz monitor. At 1440p, High (140.2 FPS) and Ultra (138.7 FPS) are nearly identical in performance, so the higher visual quality of Ultra is essentially free.
For 4K displays, the High preset is the recommended starting point. It provides an average of 88.5 FPS, which is a very smooth experience for a single-player puzzle game. The Ultra preset offers only a marginal improvement in visuals while reducing the frame rate to 86 FPS. The Low and Medium presets are difficult to recommend for this title on this hardware. The Low preset sacrifices significant visual quality for a frame rate increase that is largely unnecessary, and the Medium preset at 4K (142.2 FPS) is a middle ground that offers no clear advantage over High given the small performance gap. The data suggests that users should prioritize the High preset for the best balance of image quality and performance, as the step up to Ultra provides diminishing returns.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 157.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 142.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 88.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 86.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 185.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 171.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 140.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 138.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 205.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 190.8 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 160.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 156.1 |
Inside with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.