Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile delivers a strong, high-refresh-rate experience in Fivem, though the data shows that the Ultra preset is too demanding for smooth play at higher resolutions. Measured results indicate that the combo ranks 799th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it comfortably in the top quarter of all systems. The CPU’s 16 cores and 5.00 GHz boost clock, combined with the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM, provide a balanced foundation for this multiplayer title.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Fivem at 4K with high settings?

A: Yes, but just barely. The measured average at 3840x2160 with High settings is 63 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive multiplayer. For a smoother 4K experience, dropping to Medium yields an average of 79 FPS, while Low pushes it to 100 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to hit 144 FPS?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average FPS is 114, which misses the 144 FPS mark. However, at 1920x1080 with High settings, the average jumps to 173 FPS, and with Medium settings, it reaches 216 FPS. Data suggests that 1080p is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40518, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core 7 253PE (40557, -0.1% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40431, +0.2% delta). This means the CPU performance is effectively tied with those processors, offering no significant advantage or disadvantage.

Q: Is the RTX 5090 Mobile significantly faster than the RTX 4070 Ti?

A: According to the GPU benchmark data, the RTX 5090 Mobile’s average score is 45152, while the RTX 4070 Ti scores 44795. This represents a delta of 0.8%, meaning the 5090 Mobile is only slightly faster in synthetic tests, not a generational leap in this specific comparison.

Q: What is the maximum FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest max FPS recorded in the dataset is 248 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Medium settings. The lowest max FPS is 91 FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, indicating significant scaling based on resolution.

Q: Should I use the Ultra preset for this game?

A: The data suggests no. At 1920x1080, Ultra yields an average of 134 FPS, which is still high, but at 2560x1440 it drops to 88 FPSags, and at 3840x2160 it falls to 49 FPS. Unless you prioritize visual fidelity over smoothness, High or Medium presets offer a better balance of performance and quality.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy for settings. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, and the results indicate it is only viable at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080, Ultra averages 134 FPS, which is playable, but the jump to High at the same resolution provides a substantial 39 FPS improvement (173 FPS) with likely minimal visual difference in a fast-paced multiplayer game. At 2560x1440, the gap widens; Ultra averages 88 FPS, while High averages 114 FPS. For the best experience, High settings at 1440p offer a solid balance, but for those with 1080p 144Hz monitors, High is the clear winner.

For 4K users, the data is more restrictive. The Ultra preset averages only 49 FPS at 3840x2160, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. High settings at 4K average 63 FPS, which is playable but not competitive. The best 4K experience per the data is Medium, which averages 79 FPS with a minimum of 67 FPS. This suggests that Medium is the highest preset that maintains a reasonably stable frame rate at 4K. If you prioritize frame rate over everything, Low at 4K yields 100 FPS, but the visual hit is likely significant Mend. The optimal strategy is to cap settings at High for 1080p and 1440p, and use Medium for 4K.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is the primary driver of frame rates in Fivem, and its 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large memory pool is particularly beneficial for a multiplayer game like Fivem, which often features custom assets and mods that can consume significant VRAM. The data shows that the GPU’s performance scales predictably with resolution; at Low settings, the average FPS drops from 274 at 1080p to 100 at 4K, a 63% reduction. This indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck at lower resolutions, while the CPU becomes more relevant as resolution increases.

The GPU’s boost clock of 1515 MHz and base clock of 990 MHz are modest for a flagship mobile part, but its 10496 shading units and 112 ROPs deliver substantial raw compute power. In the benchmark suite, the GPU scored 30034 in Passmark G3D and 5871 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, has a delta of -0.5%, meaning the RTX 5090 Mobile is just slightly slower in average score. However, in real-world gaming, the 5090 Mobile’s 24 GB VRAM and Blackwell 2.0 architecture provide advantages in titles like Fivem that are not fully captured by synthetic benchmarks.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and the RTX 5090 Mobile achieves a rank of 799 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places the system in the top 21.5% of all configurations, which is a strong showing for a mobile platform. The rank reflects the balance between the CPU and GPU; the CPU’s performance is average compared to its nearest rivals, but the GPU’s high memory capacity and compute power boost the overall experience. The data shows that this combo is not a top-tier performer like those with desktop-class components, but it is well above the median for laptops.

When compared to other combos in the database, the 799th rank indicates that there are 798 configurations that achieve higher FPS in Fivem. This is likely due to combinations with more powerful desktop CPUs or GPUs, but for a mobile system, this rank is respectable. The CPU’s percentile of 87 vs all CPUs and the GPU’s percentile of 84 vs all GPUs are both high, but the combo rank is lower than either individual percentile. This suggests that the pairing is slightly imbalanced, possibly due to the CPU’s 16 threads not fully feeding the GPU at lower resolutions, or vice versa at higher resolutions. Nonetheless, the measured FPS data shows the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock of 2.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz provide a wide range of performance, and the 18 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data-heavy workloads. In Fivem, which is known for being CPU-intensive in multiplayer scenarios, this processor’s single-thread performance is crucial. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3984 and Passmark single-thread score of 4005 indicate strong per-core performance, which is essential for maintaining high FPS when many players are on screen.

The CPU’s multi-core performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221 and a Passmark multithread score of 32956. However, the data shows that the CPU’s average benchmark score of 40518 is virtually identical to its nearest rivals, with deltas of -0.1% to +0.2%. This means that in terms of raw processing power, the Core Ultra X7 368H offers no edge over the Intel Core 7 253PE or AMD Ryzen 9 7940H. The 16 threads are sufficient for Fivem, but they are not overkill, and the CPU may become a limiting factor at 1080p where the GPU is not fully utilized. The 25 W TDP is low for a mobile processor, indicating efficient power use, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures it can deliver peak performance when needed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the performance is constrained by the GPU. With Low settings, the average FPS is 100, which is a solid result for 4K. Medium settings reduce the average to 79 FPS, with a minimum of 67 FPS and a maximum of 91 FPS, indicating some frame time variance. High settings drop the average to 63 FPS, which is near the edge of playability. Ultra settings are the worst, with an average of only 49 FPS, making them effectively unusable for a smooth experience at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the combo hits a sweet spot for high refresh rates. Low settings yield an average of 180 FPS, providing a very smooth experience. Medium settings average 142 FPS, with a minimum of 121 FPS and a maximum of 163 FPS, which is excellent for 144Hz monitors. High settings average 114 FPS, still playable but not ideal for competitive play. Ultra settings drop to an average of 88 FPS, which is acceptable but not great. The data suggests that Medium is the best choice for 1440p, as it provides a high average FPS with a minimum above 120 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the combo truly shines. Low settings achieve an average of 274 FPS, which is extremely high. Medium settings average 216 FPS, with a minimum of 184 FPS and a maximum of 248 FPS, making it ideal for 240Hz monitors. High settings average 173 FPS, which is still very smooth. Even Ultra settings manage an average of 134 FPS, which is above the 120 FPS threshold for most high-refresh displays. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor, as the GPU has enough headroom to render frames far faster than the CPU can feed it. The minimum FPS of 184 FPS at Medium settings indicates that even in demanding scenes, the combo maintains a high frame rate, providing a consistently smooth experience.