Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end mobile combination that delivers strong frame rates in Fivem, though the game's demands scale significantly with resolution. The data shows a system that comfortably handles 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K Ultra remains a challenge for maintaining high refresh rates. This analysis breaks down the component specifications and measured performance to provide a clear picture of what this combo offers.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of this CPU and GPU combination in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 1217 out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the top third of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has an average benchmark score of 40518, which is virtually identical to the Intel Core 7 253PE (40557), showing a negligible 0.1% difference.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile compared to all other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile sits in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, indicating it outperforms roughly 80% of the graphics cards in the database.

Q: What are the highest and lowest average FPS recorded for this combo in Fivem?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 239 at 1920x1080 with Low settings, while the lowest average is 43 at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the RTX 4080 Mobile, and what bandwidth does it provide?

A: The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the CPU, and how many cores does it have?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H has 16 cores and can boost up to 5.00 GHz from a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the primary driver of Fivem's visual output. Built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, this GPU packs 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for the game's open-world textures and multiplayer environments. The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial, with an FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s, making it a capable part for high-resolution rendering.

The clock speeds of the RTX 4080 Mobile are set at a base of 1290 MHz with a boost up to 1665 MHz. The memory operates at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. These figures, combined with the 58 ray tracing cores and 232 tensor cores, give the GPU the raw power needed to handle Fivem's varied scenes, from dense city streets to open rural areas. In the benchmark hierarchy, the GPU scores 24926 in Passmark G3D and 11191 in Passmark GPU Compute, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs.

The measured FPS data for this combo shows a clear scaling pattern tied to GPU load. At 1920x1080, the GPU is not the bottleneck, as evidenced by the 239 average FPS at Low settings. However, at 3840x2160, the GPU's workload increases dramatically, with the average FPS dropping to 55 at High settings and 43 at Ultra. This indicates that the RTX 4080 Mobile's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game's textures, but the raw compute power is the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals shows it is closely matched with the RTX 5080 Mobile, which has a 0.6% higher average score, and the RTX 4070, which is 1.3% lower.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 25 W. This mobile processor features a 18 MB shared L3 cache, along with 192 KB of L1 cache and 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core. Memory support includes LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s. The CPU's benchmark results are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28221 and a single-core score of 3984, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is critical for handling the game's simulation and multiplayer logic, particularly in populated areas. The 16 cores and 16 threads provide ample parallel processing capability, which is reflected in the Passmark multithread score of 32956 and the Passmark physics score of 2857. The high boost clock of 5.00 GHz is beneficial for single-threaded tasks, as shown by the Passmark single-thread score of 4005. This balance between multi-core and single-core performance ensures that the CPU can keep up with the GPU in most scenarios, preventing it from becoming a bottleneck.

The measured FPS data indicates that the CPU is well-matched to the GPU for this game. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 239 average FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently at high frame rates. However, the CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals shows it is nearly tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, which has a 0.2% higher average score, and the Intel Xeon 6507P, also 0.2% higher. This means the CPU is not a differentiator in this system; it provides solid, consistent performance that does not hold back the RTX 4080 Mobile.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank in Fivem is 1217 out of 3707 tested combinations, which places it in the 67th percentile of all systems. This rank reflects a balance between the CPU's 87th percentile standing and the GPU's 81st percentile standing. The data suggests that while both components are individually strong, the combination does not achieve the top-tier performance seen in the highest-ranked combos, likely due to Fivem's optimization and the specific demands of the game.

Comparing to other combos, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H's nearest CPU rivals include the Intel Core 7 253PE, which has a 0.1% higher average score, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, which is 0.2% higher. On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 Mobile's nearest rival is the RTX 5080 Mobile, with a 0.6% higher average score, and the RTX 4070, which is 1.3% lower. These small deltas indicate that the combo is in a tightly contested performance band, where minor clock or driver differences can shift the ranking.

The measured FPS data shows that the combo's rank is justified by its performance across different settings. At 2560x1440 with High settings, the combo achieves 99 average FPS, which is a solid result for a demanding resolution. The 1080p results are particularly strong, with 151 average FPS at High and 239 at Low, demonstrating that the combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution. However, at 4K, the combo's performance drops to a range where 60 FPS is only achievable at Medium settings (69 average FPS), with Ultra dipping to 43 average FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. The data is measured, not estimated, ensuring accuracy.

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance. Low settings yield an average of 239 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate displays. Medium settings produce an average of 189 FPS, with a minimum of 160 and a maximum of 217, indicating consistent frame times. High settings drop to 151 average FPS, still well above the 144 Hz threshold. Ultra settings bring the average down to 117 FPS, which remains smooth but shows the impact of maxing out graphical features.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. Low settings achieve an average of 157 FPS, maintaining high responsiveness. Medium settings deliver 124 average FPS, with a minimum of 106 and a maximum of 143, showing a slight variance but staying above 100 FPS. High settings average 99 FPS, which is suitable for most gaming scenarios. Ultra settings drop to 77 average FPS, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed harder. Low settings yield an average of 87 FPS, which is respectable for 4K. Medium settings average 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 79, indicating that frame rates can dip near 60 FPS. High settings average 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. Ultra settings average 43 FPS, making this preset unsuitable for smooth gameplay at 4K.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the combo excels at 1080p and performs well at 1440p, but struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K, especially with higher settings. The Medium settings at 1440p provide a balanced experience with 124 average FPS, while the Low settings at 1080p offer the highest frame rates for competitive play.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate.

For 1920x1080, the High preset is the best recommendation for most users. It delivers an average of 151 FPS, which is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate of many gaming monitors, and it provides a good balance of visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset, at 117 average FPS, is also viable for those who prioritize visual fidelity, but the drop from High to Ultra is significant enough that High is the better choice for maintaining high refresh rates. For competitive play, the Low preset at 239 average FPS is optimal, but it sacrifices visual quality.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is recommended as it achieves 99 average FPS, which is smooth and playable. The Medium preset at 124 average FPS is the best choice for those with a 120 Hz or 144 Hz monitor, as it stays above the refresh rate with a minimum of 106 FPS. The Ultra preset at 77 average FPS is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but the High preset offers a better frame rate without a major visual compromise.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the only viable option for a consistent experience, with an average of 69 FPS and a minimum of 59 FPS. This ensures that frame rates stay near 60 FPS, which is the standard for 4K gaming. The Low preset at 87 average FPS is also playable and offers a smoother experience, but the visual downgrade is noticeable. The High preset at 55 average FPS and the Ultra preset at 43 average FPS are not recommended for 4K, as they fall below the 60 FPS target and will result in noticeable stuttering.

In summary, the best experience is achieved by selecting the High preset at 1920x1080 for high-refresh-rate gaming, the Medium or High preset at 2560x1440 for a balanced experience, and the Medium preset at 3840x2160 for 4K gaming.