Fivem

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer modification for Grand Theft Auto V, and this combination of an Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus processor with an AMD Radeon RX 570 graphics card produces a highly constrained experience. The benchmark data shows this pairing ranks at 2867 out of 3005 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 5% of all systems evaluated for this game. The results indicate a system where the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, struggling to maintain playable frame rates at higher resolutions despite the CPU's considerable headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination's rank of 2867 out of 3005 combos is a poor showing, placing it in the bottom 4.6% of all tested systems for Fivem. This ranking reflects the severe imbalance between the components, where a top-tier CPU is paired with an entry-level legacy GPU. The data suggests that this system will not provide a smooth experience in Fivem, particularly at higher resolutions where the GPU's limitations are most pronounced.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU is a top performer, with a percentile rank of 96 compared to all other CPUs. However, the GPU's percentile rank is 74 among all GPUs, which does not sound terrible on its own, but the pairing's actual in-game performance tells a different story. The measured frame rates are consistently low, with the best average of 77 FPS only achieved at 1080p with Low settings. This is a clear indication that while the CPU has the potential to drive high frame rates, the GPU cannot keep up.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 84003 places it just 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and 1.1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4584PX. This shows the 290K Plus is a top-tier processor, but that performance is entirely wasted in this configuration. The GPU's average benchmark score of 28766 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, being 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800M and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M295X. This confirms the GPU is a mid-range performer from a bygone era, and its capabilities are simply insufficient for modern, unoptimized multiplayer environments like Fivem.

The overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's inability to translate the CPU's processing power into frame rates. The data shows a massive disparity in performance potential, and the in-game results are exactly what one would expect from such a bottlenecked system. For a game like Fivem, which is known for being CPU-intensive, this is a counter-intuitive result, but the data is clear: the RX 570 is the limiting factor in every measured scenario.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 is a 4 GB GDDR5 card with a 256-bit memory bus and a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1168 MHz with a boost clock of 1244 MHz. This is an older architecture (GCN 4.0) on a 14 nm process, and the card is considered end-of-life. The GPU's performance in Fivem is severely limited, as evidenced by the measured frame rates.

At 1080p, the GPU manages an average of 77 FPS on Low settings, 60 FPS on Medium, and 48 FPS on High. The minimum FPS on Medium is 51, which shows some stability, but the average is still not ideal for a competitive multiplayer game. The situation deteriorates significantly at 1440p, where the average drops to 50 FPS on Low and 32 FPS on High. At 4K, the GPU is overwhelmed, producing averages of 28 FPS on Low and 18 FPS on High.

The data shows that the GPU's performance scales poorly with resolution. This is typical for a card with limited memory bandwidth and raw compute power. The 5.095 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 159.2 GTexel/s texture rate are simply not enough to handle the draw calls and asset streaming that Fivem requires at higher resolutions. The card's 32 ROPs and 128 TMUs are also insufficient for modern game engines. The result is a system that can only approach playable frame rates at 1080p with Low settings, which undermines the visual experience.

The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, is only 0.4% faster in synthetic benchmarks, but the RX 570's legacy architecture and memory limitations make it far less capable in real-world gaming. The 4 GB of VRAM is also a significant constraint, as Fivem's multiplayer environments can easily exceed this capacity, leading to texture pop-in and stuttering. The benchmark data confirms that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, and any attempt to improve visual fidelity or resolution results in a dramatic FPS penalty.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus is a flagship processor with 24 cores and 24 threads. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. This is a desktop-class chip built on a 3 nm process with 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Its performance is near the top of the charts, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51731 and a single-core score of 7303.

Given this processor's capabilities, the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combination. The benchmark data shows that the CPU's performance is far beyond what the GPU can utilize. For example, the PassMark multi-thread score is 60860, and the data compression score is 698346, indicating immense processing power. In Fivem, which can be CPU-heavy due to the large number of connected players and scripts, this processor would theoretically excel.

However, the measured FPS values tell a different story. The fact that the system only achieves 77 FPS at 1080p Low indicates that the GPU is preventing the CPU from ever reaching its full potential. The CPU's high single-thread performance, as evidenced by the 4823 PassMark single-thread score, would normally be excellent for a game like Fivem, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's lack of fill rate and pixel throughput. The CPU sits idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering each frame.

The contrast between the CPU's capabilities and the in-game results is stark. The CPU has a percentile rank of 96 among all CPUs, while the GPU has a percentile rank of 74 among all GPUs. This mismatch is the core problem. The data suggests that the system is effectively wasting the CPU's potential, and the user would see no benefit from this processor over a much cheaper option when paired with the RX 570. The CPU's power is simply not the issue; the GPU's inability to render frames fast enough is the sole cause of the low performance.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination good for playing Fivem at 1080p?

A: The data shows it is playable only at the lowest settings. The average FPS at 1080p Low is 77, but this drops to 60 on Medium and 48 on High. At Ultra, the average falls to 38, which is not a smooth experience.

Q: What is the best resolution for this system in Fivem?

A: Based on the measured data, 1080p is the only resolution where the frame rates approach acceptable levels. At 1440p, the average FPS on High is 32, and at 4K, it drops to 18, which is essentially unplayable.

Q: Which component is the bottleneck in this setup?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 570 is clearly the bottleneck. The CPU's performance is in the top 4% of all CPUs, but the GPU is a legacy part that cannot keep up. The frame rates remain low even with a top-tier CPU, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The combination ranks 2867 out of 3005 tested combos. This places it in the bottom 5% of all systems tested for Fivem, highlighting its poor performance.

Q: What is the highest average FPS this system can achieve?

A: The highest average FPS in the data is 77, achieved at 1080p with Low settings. This is the only scenario where the system breaks the 60 FPS mark.

Q: Is the CPU's performance relevant to this game's results?

A: No. The CPU's benchmark scores are excellent, but they have no bearing on the game's performance. The GPU's limitations cap the frame rates, making the CPU's power irrelevant for this specific combination.

Resolution Scaling

The impact of resolution on this combo is severe and clearly demonstrates the GPU bottleneck. Moving from 1080p to 1440p on High settings results in a drop from 48 FPS to 32 FPS, a 33% decrease. The scaling is even more dramatic when moving to 4K, where the High setting average falls to 18 FPS, a 62% drop from 1080p. This steep decline is a classic sign of a GPU that is running out of pixel processing power and memory bandwidth.

The data shows a similar pattern across all settings. At Low settings, the system goes from 77 FPS at 1080p to 50 FPS at 1440p and 28 FPS at 4K. The frame rate drops are nearly linear with the increase in pixel count, which is characteristic of a fill-rate limited card. The RX 570's 39.81 GPixel/s pixel rate is simply insufficient for 1440p and 4K resolutions in a demanding game like Fivem.

This resolution scaling behavior confirms that the CPU is not the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would be more consistent across resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not increase as much with resolution. The fact that the FPS drops so significantly when moving to higher resolutions proves that the GPU is the sole constraint. The system is only viable at 1080p, and even then, users must compromise on settings to achieve a playable frame rate. The data suggests that 4K is not a realistic target for this combination, and 1440p is only possible at the cost of visual fidelity.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear picture of what settings are viable for this system. The only scenario that yields an average FPS above 60 is 1080p with Low settings, hitting 77 FPS. This is the only option that provides a smooth, competitive experience in Fivem. However, this requires sacrificing nearly all visual quality.

For a balance between visual quality and performance, 1080p with Medium settings is the best choice. It produces an average of 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS. This provides a stable experience while improving the game's appearance over the Low preset. The other options are less appealing: High at 1080p yields 48 FPS, which is borderline, and Ultra drops to 38 FPS, which is not recommended for a responsive multiplayer experience.

At 1440p, the data shows that only Low settings are viable, with an average of 50 FPS. This still offers a decent frame rate, but the visual quality is poor. The Medium and High presets at 1440p are too demanding, producing 40 FPS and 32 FPS respectively. At 4K, no settings are recommended, as even the Low preset only averages 28 FPS, which is far below the threshold for a playable multiplayer game.

In summary, the optimal configuration for this system is 1080p with either Low or Medium settings. Low settings provide the highest frame rate, while Medium offers a better visual experience at a still-playable 60 FPS average. Users should avoid 1440p and 4K resolutions, and they should not expect to use High or Ultra presets at any resolution without experiencing significant performance issues. The data indicates that this system is designed for 1080p gaming with moderate settings, and anything beyond that will result in a subpar experience.