Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
181
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 181 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 66 85 106 135
1440p QHD 119 153 191 242
1080p Full HD 180 232 290 368

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 135
3840x2160 Medium 106
3840x2160 High 85
3840x2160 Ultra 66
2560x1440 Low 242
2560x1440 Medium 191
2560x1440 High 153
2560x1440 Ultra 119
1920x1080 Low 368
1920x1080 Medium 290
1920x1080 High 232
1920x1080 Ultra 180

Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, In-Depth Analysis

Fivem is a demanding multiplayer title that behaves differently from typical single-player benchmarks, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination delivers a broad range of performance depending on how you configure it. The measured data shows that this pairing is capable of extremely high frame rates, but the gap between the Low and Ultra presets is substantial, which tells you a lot about where the bottlenecks lie in this specific game engine. This analysis breaks down the measured results to help you decide how to balance visual fidelity against raw FPS.

Settings Recommendations

For this specific combo in Fivem, the data points to the High preset as the best overall experience for most users, but the choice is heavily dependent on your display's refresh rate and resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 232 FPS, which is a massive jump over the 180 FPS you get from Ultra, while still providing a significant visual upgrade over Medium’s 290 FPS. The performance cost of moving from High to Ultra is a 52 FPS drop, which is a 22% reduction in average frame rate for what is often a marginal visual gain in a multiplayer environment.

At 2560x1440, the High preset’s 153 FPS average is still excellent and pairs well with high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The Ultra preset here drops to 119 FPS, which is playable but begins to sacrifice the smoothness that this hardware is capable of delivering. If you have a 144Hz or 165Hz monitor at this resolution, High is the clear choice, as it keeps you above the refresh rate ceiling, whereas Ultra will frequently dip below it. The Medium preset at 191 FPS is only worth considering if you are chasing the absolute maximum frame rate, but the visual compromise is usually not worth the 38 FPS gain over High.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The High preset’s 85 FPS average is the sweet spot, as it remains above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay while offering the best visual quality that can still hold up at this resolution. The Ultra preset at 66 FPS is borderline, and the Medium preset at 106 FPS shows that you are trading a significant amount of visual fidelity for that extra headroom. For 4K gaming, the data suggests that High is the most balanced choice, providing a 19 FPS improvement over Ultra while avoiding the visual downgrade to Medium. The Low preset at 135 FPS is only for competitive play where frame rate trumps everything else, as it will look noticeably worse on a 4K display.

How This Combo Ranks

The measured data places this Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination at rank 84 out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem. This puts it in the top 2.8% of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing for a game that is notoriously sensitive to CPU performance in multiplayer scenarios. The data shows that this combo outperforms the vast majority of systems, but it is not at the absolute top, indicating that there are a few other pairings that edge it out in this specific title.

This ranking is particularly notable given the hardware involved. The RTX 4090 is an end-of-life product with a launch MSRP of $1,599 USD, but it remains one of the most powerful consumer GPUs ever made. The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, with its 24 cores and 24 threads, is also a high-end desktop part. The fact that this combo only reaches the 84th spot out of 3005 suggests that Fivem’s performance ceiling is not solely dictated by raw GPU power, but also by how well the CPU can feed the GPU in a multiplayer environment. The data shows that this combo is clearly in the upper echelon, but there is a small group of systems that manage to extract even more performance from this game.

The percentile rankings of the individual components support this. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile versus all CPUs, and the GPU at the 88th percentile versus all GPUs, which is a very high baseline. Yet, the combo rank is not as high as either of those percentiles, which implies that the game itself introduces a bottleneck that prevents this pairing from reaching its full potential. This is a common characteristic of CPU-bound multiplayer titles where the game world and other players' actions create a workload that is hard for any single CPU to handle, regardless of how powerful it is.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a good match for the RTX 4090 in Fivem?

A: Yes, the data shows this is a strong pairing, ranking 84th out of 3005 tested combos. The combo performs well across all resolutions, but the gap between the Low and Ultra presets indicates that the game is often limited by factors other than raw GPU throughput.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: At 1920x1080, the High preset achieves 232 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh monitors. At 2560x1440, High still delivers a very playable 153 FPS. At 3840x2160, High drops to 85 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS but requires more careful settings management.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between the Low and Ultra presets?

A: The difference is substantial. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 368 FPS, while Ultra averages 180 FPS, a 188 FPS difference. At 1440p, the spread is from 242 FPS on Low to 119 FPS on Ultra. At 4K, Low averages 135 FPS, while Ultra averages 66 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU overclocking ability matter for this game?

A: The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, and its boost clock is 5.50 GHz. While the data does not include overclocking results, the high boost clock and 24 threads suggest the CPU is well-suited for the multi-threaded workload of a multiplayer server, but the game's performance may still be limited by other factors.

Q: What kind of frame rates can I expect with the Medium preset?

A: The Medium preset provides a middle ground. At 1080p, it averages 290 FPS with a minimum of 247 FPS. At 1440p, it averages 191 FPS with a minimum of 163 FPS. At 4K, it averages 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 overkill for this game?

A: The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU is not the primary limiting factor, as even the Low preset at 4K only reaches 135 FPS. The RTX 4090 is very powerful, but the game's engine appears to cap performance in certain scenarios, making the CPU and game optimization more critical than the GPU in many cases.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo in Fivem shows a clear scaling pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the results are as follows: Low averages 368 FPS, Medium averages 290 FPS with a minimum of 247 FPS and a maximum of 334 FPS, High averages 232 FPS, and Ultra averages 180 FPS. This shows a steady decline as visual fidelity increases, with the largest single drop being 58 FPS when moving from Low to Medium.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down proportionally but remain high. Low averages 242 FPS, Medium averages 191 FPS with a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 220 FPS, High averages 153 FPS, and Ultra averages 119 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is 34 FPS here, which is a significant difference for competitive play. The Medium preset's minimum of 163 FPS is still well above the 144Hz refresh rate threshold, making it a viable option for high-refresh 1440p monitors.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops become more pronounced, highlighting the GPU's workload. Low averages 135 FPS, Medium averages 106 FPS with a minimum of 90 FPS and a maximum of 122 FPS, High averages 85 FPS, and Ultra averages 66 FPS. At this resolution, the drop from High to Ultra is 19 FPS, which is a 22% reduction. The Medium preset's minimum of 90 FPS is still playable, but the High preset at 85 FPS offers a better balance of visual quality and performance for a 4K display.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a lot about the limiting component in this system. Moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS across all settings drops by roughly 35-40%. For example, High goes from 232 FPS at 1080p to 153 FPS at 1440p, a 34% reduction. This is a significant drop, but it is still within the expected range for a GPU-bound workload at higher resolutions.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is more dramatic. High goes from 153 FPS to 85 FPS, a 44% reduction. This steeper drop indicates that at 4K, the RTX 4090 is starting to hit its limits, and the game is becoming more GPU-bound. The fact that the Low preset only achieves 135 FPS at 4K, compared to 368 FPS at 1080p, is telling. If the CPU were the primary bottleneck, you would expect the Low preset to scale better with resolution, since lower graphics settings reduce the GPU load. Instead, the Low preset's 4K frame rate is only 37% of its 1080p value, suggesting that even at Low settings, the GPU is struggling to keep up with the pixel count.

This pattern indicates that the limiting component shifts with resolution. At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is likely the primary bottleneck, as the frame rates are so high that the CPU cannot feed the GPU fast enough. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, as the sheer number of pixels overwhelms even the RTX 4090. This is a classic sign of a well-balanced system at lower resolutions that becomes GPU-bound at higher ones. The 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU and the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth of the GPU also play a role, but the data suggests that the GPU's rendering load is the dominant factor at 4K.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It is built on a 3 nm process and has a 36 MB shared L3 cache. In Fivem, a multiplayer title where the CPU must handle the game world, other players, and network data, the core count and clock speed are critical. The data shows that this CPU is performing well, but the game's performance is not solely dependent on it.

The CPU's benchmarks are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44253 and a single-core score of 2439. This indicates excellent multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The PassMark multithread score of 68574 further supports this. However, in Fivem, the CPU's role is more nuanced. The game is known to be sensitive to single-core performance in certain scenarios, but the high boost clock of 5.50 GHz helps in this regard. The 24 threads also ensure that the CPU can handle the multiple background tasks that come with a multiplayer environment.

The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor. The fact that the Low preset at 1080p only reaches 368 FPS, while the GPU is capable of much higher frame rates, points to a CPU bottleneck. The CPU's 125W TDP and 17,800 million transistors indicate a powerful chip, but Fivem's engine may not be fully optimized to leverage all 24 cores. The presence of 24 threads with no hyper-threading means each core handles one thread, which can be beneficial for games that scale well with physical cores, but it also means that the game must be well-threaded to use all of them effectively. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms that it is a top-tier part, but the combo rank of 84 out of 3005 suggests that there is still room for improvement in how this specific game utilizes the hardware.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

Cores / Threads 24 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 450 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 135.0
3840x2160 Medium 106.0
3840x2160 High 85.0
3840x2160 Ultra 66.0
2560x1440 Low 242.0
2560x1440 Medium 191.0
2560x1440 High 153.0
2560x1440 Ultra 119.0
1920x1080 Low 368.0
1920x1080 Medium 290.0
1920x1080 High 232.0
1920x1080 Ultra 180.0

Fivem with iUltra 7 270K Plus + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with RTX 4090 + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 7 270K Plus + RTX 4090

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.