Fivem
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 195 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 72 | 92 | 115 | 146 |
| 1440p QHD | 129 | 166 | 208 | 263 |
| 1080p Full HD | 197 | 251 | 314 | 390 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, In-Depth Analysis
Fivem, a multiplayer modification platform built on the Grand Theft Auto V engine, presents a unique performance profile that often depends heavily on server-side scripts and player count. This analysis examines the measured performance of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, using only the provided benchmark data. The results show a system capable of high frame rates at mainstream resolutions, with a clear progression of performance as resolution decreases and settings are adjusted.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a significant and consistent impact from resolution scaling, indicating that the GPU becomes an increasingly dominant factor as resolution rises. At 4K (3840x2160) with High settings, the combo produces an average of 55 FPS. Dropping to 1440p (2560x1440) at the same High preset increases the average to 99 FPS, a substantial jump of 44 FPS. Further reducing resolution to 1080p (1920x1080) at High settings yields 151 FPS, which is 52 FPS above the 1440p result and 96 FPS above the 4K result.
This scaling pattern suggests that at 4K, the workload is heavily GPU-bound, as the RTX 4080's processing power is fully utilized to render the increased pixel count. The transition from 4K to 1440p represents a 56% reduction in pixels, which correlates with a near doubling of performance, underscoring the GPU's role as the primary limiter at higher resolutions. The gap between 1440p and 1080p, while still significant, is smaller in absolute FPS terms, hinting that other system components, particularly the CPU, begin to play a more substantial role as the resolution drops.
Looking at the Low settings across resolutions, the trend becomes even more pronounced. At 4K Low, the average is 87 FPS. At 1440p Low, it rises to 157 FPS, and at 1080p Low, it reaches 239 FPS. The 1080p Low result is particularly telling; a 239 FPS average is exceptionally high and suggests the system is no longer purely GPU-limited. At this point, the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic becomes increasingly important, especially in a multiplayer environment like Fivem where CPU overhead from scripts and networked entities is substantial. The data shows a clear shift: resolution scaling is the dominant factor at 4K and 1440p, but at 1080p, the CPU's contribution becomes more apparent, especially at lower settings.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader context of all tested system combinations for Fivem, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 holds a strong position. The combo rank is 941 out of 3005 tested configurations. This places it in the upper third of all systems, indicating that it delivers performance that is well above the median for this game. While not at the absolute top tier, a rank of 941 out of 3005 suggests a robust and capable setup for Fivem's demanding multiplayer environments.
The CPU's individual performance metrics provide context for this ranking. The Core Ultra 7 265HX has a percentile ranking of 93 compared to all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 93% of all processors in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 63173 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals. For instance, the Intel Core i7-13790F has an average score of 63080, a delta of just 0.1% higher. Similarly, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63331, which is 0.2% higher. This places the 265HX in a very competitive performance tier, where minor differences in synthetic benchmarks are unlikely to translate to noticeable real-world differences in Fivem.
The GPU also contributes to this strong ranking. The RTX 4080 has a percentile ranking of 86 among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 54247 is within 0.1% of the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209) and is only 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828). This data confirms that the RTX 4080 is a high-end graphics card, and its performance in Fivem, as evidenced by the measured FPS, is consistent with its standing. The combination of a top-decile CPU and a high-end GPU explains the solid overall rank in the game's database, though the rank also reflects that some combinations, likely with even more powerful parts, achieve higher frame rates.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 plays a central role in this system's Fivem performance, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output pipelines. It has 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which are technologies that, while not directly measured in this Fivem data, contribute to the card's overall feature set and DirectX 12 Ultimate support. The card's raw compute power is rated at 48.74 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, providing substantial headroom for the game's rendering tasks.
A key aspect of the GPU's capability is its memory subsystem. The RTX 4080 is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s. For Fivem, which often uses high-resolution texture packs and mods, the 16 GB capacity is a significant asset. The measured FPS data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the system manages an average of 43 FPS, indicating that the GPU's memory is sufficient to handle the most demanding settings without catastrophic failure. The memory clock operates at 1400 MHz, with an effective data rate of 22.4 Gbps, which supports the high bandwidth required for 4K textures.
The GPU's clock speeds are also noteworthy. The base clock is 2205 MHz, and the boost clock is 2505 MHz. These high frequencies allow the card to maintain strong performance across all resolutions. The FPS progression from 4K to 1080p demonstrates the GPU's scaling capability. At 4K High, the 55 FPS average shows the card is working hard. At 1080p Low, the 239 FPS average suggests the GPU is no longer the bottleneck, and the frame rate is likely capped by CPU performance or game engine limitations. The GPU's role is clear: it is the primary driver of performance at 4K and 1440p, while at 1080p, its immense power is underutilized, and the system's overall performance is governed by other factors.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160 (4K), the results are as follows: Low settings yield an average of 87 FPS, Medium settings produce 69 FPS with a minimum of 59 and a maximum of 79, High settings result in 55 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 43 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a predictable decline in performance as graphical fidelity increases, with a 44 FPS difference between the lowest and highest settings. The Medium preset's min/max data confirms this trend, showing consistency within the run.
Moving to 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance improves considerably. Low settings achieve an average of 157 FPS, Medium settings reach 124 FPS with a range of 106 to 143 FPS, High settings deliver 99 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 77 FPS. The jump from 4K to 1440p is substantial, with the Low preset gaining 70 FPS and the Ultra preset gaining 34 FPS. This indicates that the GPU has significant headroom at 1440p, and the frame rates are more than sufficient for a smooth multiplayer experience. The Medium preset's min/max data shows a 37 FPS variance, which is typical for a dynamic game like Fivem where player actions and script loads can cause fluctuations.
At 1920x1080 (1080p), the system's performance is exceptional. Low settings average 239 FPS, Medium settings average 189 FPS with a range of 160 to 217 FPS, High settings average 151 FPS, and Ultra settings average 117 FPS. The 1080p Low result is notable for its high average, suggesting the CPU is feeding the GPU effectively. The frame rates at 1080p are all well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors, making this resolution the sweet spot for competitive play. The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p > 1440p > 4K in terms of FPS, and within each resolution, Low > Medium > High > Ultra in terms of performance.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. This high boost clock is crucial for gaming performance, as Fivem's performance often depends on single-threaded speed for game logic and script processing. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 30 MB of L3 cache. This large cache can help reduce latency when accessing frequently used data.
In Fivem, the CPU's role is multi-faceted. The game is based on an older engine that can be sensitive to CPU performance, especially in multiplayer scenarios with many players and custom scripts. The 265HX's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel processing capability, which can help with background tasks and server communication. However, the single-core performance is often more critical for maintaining high frame rates. The CPU's benchmark scores reflect its strength: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40642 and a single-core score of 5737. These scores indicate a very capable processor for both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.
The measured FPS data shows the CPU's impact most clearly at 1080p. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 239 FPS, which is a significant leap from the 1440p Low result of 157 FPS. This 82 FPS increase shows that when the GPU is less burdened, the CPU can push the frame rate much higher. The difference between 1080p High (151 FPS) and 1080p Low (239 FPS) is 88 FPS, demonstrating that the CPU is capable of delivering high frame rates when the graphics settings are lowered to reduce GPU load. If the CPU were a limiting factor, we would expect to see a smaller gap between these settings. The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is well-balanced, with the CPU able to keep up with the GPU's output, though the engine's performance ceiling appears to be approached at the Low preset.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's resolution and performance goals. For 4K gaming, the data shows that High settings provide an average of 55 FPS, which is on the edge of smoothness for many players. Ultra settings drop to 43 FPS, which may be less desirable for a fast-paced multiplayer game. Therefore, for 4K, the Medium preset at 69 FPS offers a better balance, providing a more fluid experience while still delivering solid visual quality. The Low preset at 87 FPS is the smoothest option at 4K, but it sacrifices significant visual fidelity.
At 1440p, the situation is more comfortable. The High preset at 99 FPS provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, well above the 60 FPS threshold. For players with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Medium preset at 124 FPS is an excellent choice, offering a substantial frame rate boost with only a modest reduction in visual settings. The Ultra preset at 77 FPS is also playable and would be suitable for users who prioritize image quality above all else. The Low preset at 157 FPS is overkill for most monitors but would be ideal for competitive players seeking maximum refresh rates.
At 1080p, the system has more than enough power for any setting. The Ultra preset at 117 FPS is perfectly smooth and provides the best visual experience. The High preset at 151 FPS is also excellent and offers a slight performance edge. For competitive play or use with very high refresh rate monitors (240Hz+), the Low preset at 239 FPS is the best option, as it maximizes frame rate. The Medium preset at 189 FPS is a strong middle ground. Overall, the data suggests that for most users, the High preset at 1080p or 1440p provides the best experience, balancing high visual quality with frame rates that are well above the playable threshold for a multiplayer game.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution to play Fivem with this CPU and GPU combo?
A: Based on the measured data, 1440p at High settings offers an excellent balance, providing an average of 99 FPS. 1080p at High settings is also great at 151 FPS, while 4K at High settings is more demanding at 55 FPS.
Q: How much performance is lost when going from 1080p to 4K at High settings?
A: The average FPS drops from 151 at 1080p to 55 at 4K, a decrease of 96 FPS. This represents a 63.6% reduction in performance, showing the significant load that 4K rendering places on the GPU.
Q: Should I use the Ultra settings preset for the best experience?
A: At 1080p, Ultra settings are viable with a 117 FPS average. However, at 1440p, Ultra drops to 77 FPS, and at 4K, it falls to 43 FPS. For higher resolutions, the Medium or High presets provide a better balance of visual quality and smoothness.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at any resolution?
A: The data suggests the CPU becomes more relevant at 1080p Low, where the system hits 239 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the frame rate is much lower. The 20-core, 20-thread processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock is well-suited to avoid major bottlenecks.
Q: How does the RTX 4080's 16 GB of VRAM affect Fivem performance?
A: The 16 GB of GDDR6X memory provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and mods. The data shows playable performance at 4K Ultra (43 FPS) and 4K High (55 FPS), indicating that VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in these tests.
Q: What is the expected frame rate at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured average FPS is 189, with a minimum of 160 and a maximum of 217. This provides a very smooth experience, suitable for high-refresh-rate displays and multiplayer gameplay.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 72.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 92.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 146.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 129.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 166.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 208.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 263.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 197.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 251.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 314.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 390.0 |
Fivem with iUltra 7 265HX + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 4080 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265HX + RTX 4080
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.